無格局的希拉裏仍然不悟 ?
|| 推薦到群組
無格局的希拉裏仍然不悟 ?
Reading WaPo newspaper and TIME magazine, I's shocked with surprise that Hillary Clinton, coming out of her own shell, was so trivial as person, real herself, too much of to be a leader! No wonder she lost the election. From her book just coming out - she still couldn't get it! So sad!
What's her lacking? a lot, but here are some
1) no vision, exciting enough to mobilize the voters.
2) no mission, see above.
3) no specific plans to balance out a future
4) too much sexism - if you're Margaret Thatcher type, you don't need to play that card.
5) Stay comfort in the shadow of Obama era, too much, too long without creativity for better America.
Why did she lose the election? It didn't mean the other one was any better, but only meaning that she's much worse than the winning one as mentioned above.
Conclusion: you're your own making and you can't escape your own limitation.
**
Allow me to mansplain ‘manspreading’ to you, because Hillary Clinton didn’t
The inside track on Washington politics.
Be the first to know about new stories from PowerPost. Sign up to follow, and
we’ll e-mail you free updates as they’re published.
AnalysisInterpretation of the news based on evidence, including data, as well as anticipating how
events might unfold based on past events
If you are not as hip as Hillary Clinton, then you may have been slightly confused by her claim on
CBS's “Late Show” on Tuesday night that Russian President Vladimir Putin had a habit of
“manspreading” when she would meet with him during her tenure as secretary of state.
Manwhating? Clinton didn't provide a definition, and her demonstration wasn't quite accurate
(probably because she was trying to be somewhat tasteful).
So, please allow me to mansplain manspreading to you. (If you don't know what mansplaining is,
then you are not even as hip as Merriam-Webster.)
Manspreading does not involve splaying one's arms, as Clinton did when talking to Stephen Colbert; a manspreading man splays his legs, while seated, to occupy as much space as possible and
draw attention to his, uh, manhood.
Here's the top definition of manspreading in the indispensable Urban Dictionary, submitted by a
user who goes by “mugoloo”:
A term used by Third-Wave Feminists to describe men who spread their legs — particularly on subway trains — to make room for their genitalia. However, when women set large purses and shopping bags next to them and take up another seat, it goes unnoticed and is generally dismissed because men are disgusting pigs and penises are bad!
That's a little bit hurtful, mugoloo.
For the record, Clinton showed she does know that manspreading is a lower-body gesture when she elaborated on her experience with Putin, in “What Happened,” the
election reflection book she released last week:
President Obama once compared Vladimir Putin to a “bored kid at the back of the classroom.” “He's got that kind of slouch,” Obama said. When I sat with Putin in meetings, he looked more like one of those guys on the subway who imperiously spreads their legs wide, encroaching on everyone else's space, as if to say, “I take what I want” and “I have so little respect for you that I'm going to act as if I'm at home lounging in my bathrobe.” They call it “manspreading.” That was Putin.
When you think about it, manspreading helps explain two radically divergent views of the way
Clinton has handled her election defeat. She writes in “What Happened” that sexism contributed
to her loss, but critics at right-leaning publications such as the National Review, the Washington Examiner and the New York Post reject her premise and say that she is just making excuses and looking for discrimination where
none exists.
Similarly, some men say the term manspreading is an invention of feminists with persecution complexes, and claim that the act is not an attempt to strike a dominant posture but rather an innocent
effort to stay comfortable.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Heritage landmarks of my horizons (我的視野的傳統地標 ) - - -
** Epilogue **
轉載授權說明 - Postscript(epilogue) - 閱讀我寫博文的視野角度 -
鏈接地址：http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-847277-1071424.html
四位一體, 四願讀寫博文 Postscript(epilogue) for governing all my blog posts
獨立的時空, 自由的思寫。勞作 (Labor)、藝術 (art)、遊戲 (game)、學問 (knowledge), 四位一體; 四願讀寫博文: 正義(Justice)、良知 (conscience)、自由 (freedom)、獨立 (independence)- leading to integrity, compassion, and mutual respect 。照鏡驗心,久而久之習慣自然, 我手寫我心,寫出心安而淡然、端然、坦然。
I can't ask or practice wisdom as I believe it's not by gain of your own effort but given by God like kindness, grace and mercy.
勞作（勞工），藝術，遊戲，學問（知識）-
我不能要求或實踐獲得智慧，因為我相信這智慧不是因為你自己的努力而得到的，而是像上帝的慈愛，恩典和憐憫所給予的。
http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-847277-1076979.html
上一篇：上中下等的丈夫: Balance of life with work?
下一篇：宜疏不宜堵: 新的治癌思路?
