Nobody is perfect. You can't require CoolVice to be perfect in o

His manager deliberately built negative cases againest him. This is the major issue that EVERY Chinese has to concern about. I don't think it is a good reputation for Chinese that a manager can do whatever he wants for Chinese worker. This is the real root cause where CoolVoice's misfortune came from.

The legal battle costs company a lot and sends a clear message to the management if they don't want the company to spend $100k in the court they should do something more reasonable. This is the real positive consequency that I can see.

If we let CoolVoice down, we laughed at CoolVoice and said how stupid CoolVoice you are, we are hopeless. And next time, any manager can just give a Chinese worker below-everage evaluation without worrying about anything. Isn't bad? Maybe you don't care!

所有跟帖： 

• We let him down, we laughed at him? -CyberCat- ♂ (192 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 14:02:01

• You can always disagree his choice -LakeSideCA- ♂ (492 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 14:24:08

• Unfortunately I only look at it from -CyberCat- ♂ (288 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 14:30:37

• I think CoolVoice is already a winner -LakeSideCA- ♂ (643 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 14:46:25

• It's people's choice to commit suicide as well. -CyberCat- ♂ (207 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 14:53:23

• I support CoolVoice goes to court. This is my only point. -LakeSideCA- ♂ (687 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 15:15:55

• I an actually thinking to sue Visa's witnesses perjury, -CoolVoice- ♂ (299 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 15:26:18

• 回複：I an actually thinking to sue Visa's witnesses perjury, -lhxlch- ♂ (41 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 18:02:48

• 回複：I an actually thinking to sue Visa's witnesses perjury, -單身老貓- ♂ (455 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 18:56:59

• 第一，中國人通常不願意卷入這種糾紛，第二，我在被開除之前已經讓他寫下了 -CoolVoice- ♂ (259 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 19:15:11

• 回複：第一，中國人通常不願意卷入這種糾紛，第二，我在被開除之前已經讓他寫下了 -單身老貓- ♂ (1340 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 22:23:38

• 法官取消了庭訊。所以我沒有機會傳喚對方出庭。 -CoolVoice- ♂ (576 bytes) () 03/29/2011 postreply 05:19:07

• 如果政府起訴他們，我可否出庭作證？如果他們被定罪，我的案子能否Reopen? -CoolVoice- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 19:16:53

• 你當然要出庭作證，如果他們被定罪，我的案子必定會Reopen -chengdan88- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/31/2011 postreply 14:15:02

• 我保留的emails和其它公司文件可以重現原來的工作進度，差不多可以精確到‘天’。 -CoolVoice- ♂ (2288 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 20:04:51

• 即使不能證明他們蓄意撒謊，但如果證明了他們撒謊，我的案子是否可以 Reopen? -CoolVoice- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 20:09:21

• 回複：即使不能證明他們蓄意撒謊，但如果證明了他們撒謊，我的案子是否可以 Reopen? -寶石- ♀ (73 bytes) () 03/29/2011 postreply 18:37:57

• 保留所有對方做偽證的證據，向FBI等等控告 -chengdan88- ♀ (1086 bytes) () 03/31/2011 postreply 13:57:18

• . -mbjr- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/13/2011 postreply 23:11:18

• Thanks a lot to LakeSideCA! -CoolVoice- ♂ (637 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 15:05:17