I an actually thinking to sue Visa's witnesses perjury,

just don't know should I report to District Attorney for crime, or I sue them myself for civil. I think once they are proved perjury, my case can be logically reopen, right? But one thing I am not sure: my former manager is living in CA. Where should I sue him? in Virginia, or in California?

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：I an actually thinking to sue Visa's witnesses perjury, -lhxlch- ♂ (41 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 18:02:48

• 回複：I an actually thinking to sue Visa's witnesses perjury, -單身老貓- ♂ (455 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 18:56:59

• 第一，中國人通常不願意卷入這種糾紛，第二，我在被開除之前已經讓他寫下了 -CoolVoice- ♂ (259 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 19:15:11

• 回複：第一，中國人通常不願意卷入這種糾紛，第二，我在被開除之前已經讓他寫下了 -單身老貓- ♂ (1340 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 22:23:38

• 法官取消了庭訊。所以我沒有機會傳喚對方出庭。 -CoolVoice- ♂ (576 bytes) () 03/29/2011 postreply 05:19:07

• 如果政府起訴他們，我可否出庭作證？如果他們被定罪，我的案子能否Reopen? -CoolVoice- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 19:16:53

• 你當然要出庭作證，如果他們被定罪，我的案子必定會Reopen -chengdan88- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/31/2011 postreply 14:15:02

• 我保留的emails和其它公司文件可以重現原來的工作進度，差不多可以精確到‘天’。 -CoolVoice- ♂ (2288 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 20:04:51

• 即使不能證明他們蓄意撒謊，但如果證明了他們撒謊，我的案子是否可以 Reopen? -CoolVoice- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 20:09:21

• 回複：即使不能證明他們蓄意撒謊，但如果證明了他們撒謊，我的案子是否可以 Reopen? -寶石- ♀ (73 bytes) () 03/29/2011 postreply 18:37:57

• 保留所有對方做偽證的證據，向FBI等等控告 -chengdan88- ♀ (1086 bytes) () 03/31/2011 postreply 13:57:18

• . -mbjr- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/13/2011 postreply 23:11:18