I support CoolVoice goes to court. This is my only point.

So you believe it is not CoolVoice's best interest to go to Court. Am I right?

I think there is no need to further argu about whether going to court is a crazy thing or not. If people feel really necessary and have a chance to win or settle, he should always go to court.

For a company making perjury at the court, it is really something CoolVoice may pursue with a new case. Potentially he can sue that company for obstruction of justice  ... If I am the CEO, I would settle with CoolVoice. So CoolVoice still has opportunity to win big in another case. Don't assume it is the end. The company's way of handling this case was kind of stupid and not flawless.

所有跟帖： 

• I an actually thinking to sue Visa's witnesses perjury, -CoolVoice- ♂ (299 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 15:26:18

• 回複：I an actually thinking to sue Visa's witnesses perjury, -lhxlch- ♂ (41 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 18:02:48

• 回複：I an actually thinking to sue Visa's witnesses perjury, -單身老貓- ♂ (455 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 18:56:59

• 第一，中國人通常不願意卷入這種糾紛，第二，我在被開除之前已經讓他寫下了 -CoolVoice- ♂ (259 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 19:15:11

• 回複：第一，中國人通常不願意卷入這種糾紛，第二，我在被開除之前已經讓他寫下了 -單身老貓- ♂ (1340 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 22:23:38

• 法官取消了庭訊。所以我沒有機會傳喚對方出庭。 -CoolVoice- ♂ (576 bytes) () 03/29/2011 postreply 05:19:07

• 如果政府起訴他們，我可否出庭作證？如果他們被定罪，我的案子能否Reopen? -CoolVoice- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 19:16:53

• 你當然要出庭作證，如果他們被定罪，我的案子必定會Reopen -chengdan88- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/31/2011 postreply 14:15:02

• 我保留的emails和其它公司文件可以重現原來的工作進度，差不多可以精確到‘天’。 -CoolVoice- ♂ (2288 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 20:04:51

• 即使不能證明他們蓄意撒謊，但如果證明了他們撒謊，我的案子是否可以 Reopen? -CoolVoice- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 20:09:21

• 回複：即使不能證明他們蓄意撒謊，但如果證明了他們撒謊，我的案子是否可以 Reopen? -寶石- ♀ (73 bytes) () 03/29/2011 postreply 18:37:57

• 保留所有對方做偽證的證據，向FBI等等控告 -chengdan88- ♀ (1086 bytes) () 03/31/2011 postreply 13:57:18

• . -mbjr- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/13/2011 postreply 23:11:18