個人資料
正文

大屠殺曆史學家對德國極右翼分子的警告

(2023-10-07 10:46:39) 下一個

“永遠不要低估他們”:一位大屠殺曆史學家對德國極右翼分子的警告

德國極右翼如何利用舊劇本卷土重來。

作者:Li Zhouli@vox.com 2023 年 9 月 6 日,美國東部時間上午 7:00

2023 年 9 月 4 日,德國選擇黨聯邦主席兼德國選擇黨議會小組領導人蒂諾·克魯帕拉 (Tino Chrupalla) 在德國聯邦議院舉行的該黨議會小組會議開始時發表新聞聲明。

Li Zhou 是 Vox 的政治記者,負責報道國會和選舉。 此前,她曾擔任《Politico》的科技政策記者和《大西洋月刊》的編輯研究員。

柏林——在德國,和許多歐洲國家一樣,對極右翼的支持正在激增。

受對經濟和能源政策不滿的鼓舞,德國另類選擇黨 (AfD) 在 2024 年東德和今年秋季晚些時候的巴伐利亞地區選舉之前的民意調查中的支持率不斷上升。 反移民、否認氣候變化的政黨 AfD 今年 6 月贏得了德國東部城鎮 Sonneberg 的首次區議會選舉,並在國家立法機構中擁有 78 個席位(略高於 10%)。

該黨獲得的支持率值得注意:全國民意調查平均顯示該黨獲得 21% 的支持率,高於德國總理奧拉夫·肖爾茨 (Olaf Scholz) 領導的社會民主黨 (SPD) 18% 的支持率。 在最近對德國特定州的民意調查中,選擇黨已成為某些地區最受歡迎的政黨之一,例如在圖林根州獲得了高達 34% 的支持率。

鑒於該國納粹主義的曆史,德國選擇黨的進展引起了曆史學家和政治領導人的警惕。 德國選擇黨表示對新納粹主義不感興趣,並公開試圖與新納粹組織保持距離。 然而,它與右翼極端分子的聯係很深,而且與納粹一樣,民族主義和將少數群體(包括穆斯林移民)當作替罪羊是其意識形態的關鍵。

到目前為止,德國主要政黨——中左翼的社民黨、中右翼的基督教民主聯盟(基民盟)和環保主義者綠黨——都拒絕在聯邦層麵與選擇黨合作。 但有人擔心,主流政黨可能會開始使德國選擇黨正常化,以建立執政聯盟並鞏固權力。

“有一點是:永遠不要低估 [AfD]。 從來沒有,”大屠殺曆史學家、柏林猶太博物館前館長克裏斯托夫·克羅伊茨米勒 (Christoph Kreutzmüller) 說道。

Vox 與克羅伊茨穆勒 (Kreutzmüller) 坐下來討論了我們應該從德國過去吸取的教訓,以及右翼現在看到這種複興的原因。

為了清晰起見,本次采訪經過編輯和精簡。

李舟
您能否首先談談推動納粹崛起的一些政治和經濟因素?

克裏斯托夫·克羅伊茨穆勒
我認為最重要的是大部分民眾對共和國的普遍警惕和不滿,共和國被視為輸掉了戰爭。

[並且]在 20 年代中期,“嘿,我們正在取得進展,我們正在前進”的感覺相當廣泛。 但隨後,當然,經濟災難來了。 這個小黨長期以來一直被太多人容忍,現在卻成為了一個嚴重的威脅。

這是我們想要思考的事情,因為 1923 年,這個激進的小黨試圖發動政變。 你知道,他們並沒有禁止這個政黨,因為這違反了法治,違反了憲法,他們隻是被解散了很短的時間。 政變領袖阿道夫·希特勒獲得了非常榮譽的監獄待遇,他在獄中寫出了他的假新聞書,該書成為國際暢銷書。

1923 年,他們錯過了說“句號”的機會。 當……納粹通過鬥毆和暴力上台時,他們錯過了說“句號”的機會。 [有]一係列執行法治的機會。 當然,接下來就是大蕭條。 在恐懼、焦慮和數百萬人失業的時期,很多人都在尋找堅強的人物。

[此外],反猶太主義是核心政治信息之一。 第一次世界大戰後,相當大一部分人似乎需要像替罪羊這樣的東西。 當時在歐洲,在一個以基督教為基礎的社會中,猶太人很容易成為替罪羊。

李洲
是否有其他政黨幫助納粹領導層正常化的感覺?

克裏斯托夫·克羅伊茨米勒
在圖林根州,自 1931 年起,聯合黨中有一名納粹部長。當時德國有不少州建立了納粹形式的政府或讓納粹掌權。 當然,這使其正常化。

這就是現在(關於德國選擇黨)爭論的問題。 你能與這些人組成聯盟並讓他們被接受為正常合作夥伴嗎? 現在有一個巨大的理解,或者曾經有一個巨大的理解:不,你可能不會,因為他們不按照規則比賽。 而規則就是我們憲法和法治的內容。

這是真正令人擔憂的。 現在的基民盟領導人並不像他的前任那樣堅定。

李洲
您認為現在德國選擇黨和當前極右勢力的崛起與納粹有什麽相似之處?

克裏斯托夫·克羅伊茨米勒
在焦慮的時候,人們往往會變得更加極端,因為他們害怕失去[他們擁有的]。

我們現在都知道,[在氣候和其他問題上]即將發生重大變化,我們害怕這些重大變化。 你現在得到的另一件事……是法西斯主義在整個歐洲複興。 當然,他們互相支持。

[還有]再次尋找替罪羊,人們忘記了……德國需要新人的湧入,因為我們是一個垂死的社會,我們太老了。 如果沒有人進來,這將是一場更嚴重的衰退。 十年後,我們就不再擁有勞動力了。 所以我們現在確實需要它們。 我們確實需要每個現在就想來的人。 每個經濟學家都會告訴你這一點。

[這是]一種非常非常古老的模式。 反猶太主義植根於這個基督教社會。 現在它是針對外國人的,當然,這與很多人所共有的反穆斯林態度有關。

李洲
在某種程度上,考慮到德國最近的曆史和正視它的嚐試,看到極右翼分子在德國重新崛起,讓人感到有些驚訝。 我很好奇你是否感到驚訝。

克裏斯托夫·克羅伊茨米勒
不,我的意思是,有不止一個因素。 一是曆史早已過去。 人們已經忘記了歐洲的真實情況。 目擊者——目擊者——正在死去,所以影響也在消失。 這不僅僅是受迫害者的目擊者,而是人們……可以說:“看,我的村莊被轟炸了,這太可怕了。” 這種對破壞和謀殺的敏銳認識正在逐漸消失。

另一件事是,你當然可以看到德國選擇黨在東方更強大,原因之一是在西德,人們的談論,就像自下而上的談論納粹肇事者,關於納粹意識形態,關於 對猶太人的迫害。 這種自下而上的過程確實在社會中根深蒂固,而且……這確實很有幫助。 而這個過程在東德(德意誌民主共和國,被蘇聯占領)並沒有發生,[至少直到]很久以後,然後……在社會中就不那麽紮根了。

李洲
您認為德國選擇黨提出的哪些論點引起了選民的共鳴?

克裏斯托夫·克羅伊茨米勒
德國選擇黨的主要論點之一是他們不是一個真正的政黨。 他們是不同的:“我們不像大公司那樣做。” [他們這樣說]選民忘記了,在[存在]10年後,他們已經是一個成熟的政黨了。

另一個是非常強烈的民族主義論點,即我們德國人必須重新找到自己,這引起了很好的共鳴,尤其是在東方,因為盡管可能很奇怪,但它仍然存在於那裏的角落裏,它有一些東西 這與沒有真正談論納粹德國的肇事者有關。

在統一過程中,東方人民往往認為他們的聲音被忽視了,沒有被聽到,而他們的聲音應該被聽到。 這是另一點,我覺得這是可以理解的,因為他們在早年確實沒有被聽到,並且失去了很多生命。 我看到。 但當然,這並不是支持納粹或新納粹的理由。

當然,[他們支持]解散歐盟,因為人們不了解歐盟是什麽,也不了解歐盟最大的捐助者之一是德國。

但主要論點是民族主義,而我們不同。

李洲
德國是否可以在政治上或社會上采取更多措施來阻止德國選擇黨的發展?

克裏斯托夫·克羅伊茨米勒
憲法保護辦公室(旨在保護德國政府免受反民主極端主義的侵害)實際上已展開調查。 越來越清楚的是,[選擇黨]在很大程度上或部分違反了憲法,因此可以被禁止。 你知道,這個案子還沒有偵破。 (編者注:德國法律有正式程序禁止被發現對國家構成威脅的政黨,以防止反民主極端分子利用政黨控製國家。)

但這是德國目前廣泛爭論的一個問題。 也許來得有點晚了。 我想如果你考慮一下我們的機會。 作為一個社會,我們錯過了一句句號:“你們沒有按照規則行事,所以你們不再和我們一起玩了。 你是法西斯分子,你違反了我們的憲法,以及我們關於如何共同生活的信念,你將被禁止。”

盡管爭論越來越多,但這些機會正在逐漸消失。 真正禁止這個政黨變得越來越困難,因為他們獲得了如此多的支持。 我的意思是,你如何禁止一個已經獲得並將獲得 30% 選票的政黨呢?

李洲
您認為對於關注德國選擇黨崛起的人們來說,德國曆史中哪些重要的教訓值得牢記?

克裏斯托夫·克羅伊茨米勒

一件事是:永遠不要低估他們。 絕不。 並切實執行法治。 我的意思是,看在上帝的份上,這就是我們所擁有的。 這是我們作為一個社會所擁有的唯一的東西。

我們有憲法,我認為這是法治的一部分。 應用它。 這適用於德意誌聯邦共和國和美利堅合眾國。

"Never underestimate them”: A Holocaust historian's warning about Germany's far right

How Germany's far right is making a comeback using an old playbook.

By Li Zhouli@vox.com  
 
Tino Chrupalla, AfD federal chairman and AfD parliamentary group leader, gives a press statement at the start of his party’s parliamentary group meeting in the Bundestag, September 4, 2023.
 
Li Zhou is a politics reporter at Vox, where she covers Congress and elections. Previously, she was a tech policy reporter at Politico and an editorial fellow at the Atlantic.
 

BERLIN — In Germany, as in a number of European countries, support for the far right is surging.

Buoyed by discontent over the economy and energy policy, Alternative for Deutschland (AfD) has been gaining in the polls ahead of regional elections in East Germany in 2024 and in Bavaria later this fall. An anti-migration, climate change-denying party, AfD won its first district council election in Sonneberg — a town in eastern Germany — this past June and holds 78 seats (a little more than 10 percent) in the national legislature.

The backing it has picked up is notable: National polling averages currently show the party with 21 percent support, higher than that of the 18 percent held by Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s Social Democratic Party (SPD). And in recent polls of specific German states, AfD has become one of the most popular political parties in some regions, getting up to 34 percent support in Thuringia, for example.

AfD’s gains have raised alarms among historians and political leaders, given the country’s history with Nazism. The AfD says it is not interested in neo-Nazism and has publicly tried to distance itself from neo-Nazi organizations. Its ties to right-wing extremists are deep, however, and, as with the Nazis, nationalism and the scapegoating of minorities — including Muslim migrants — are key to its ideology.

Thus far, the major German political parties — the center-left SPD, the center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and the environmentalist Greens — have declined to work with AfD at the federal level. But there is concern that mainstream parties may begin to normalize the AfD in order to build governing coalitions and to consolidate power.

“One thing is: never underestimate [the AfD]. Never,” says Christoph Kreutzmüller, a Holocaust historian and former curator at the Jewish Museum in Berlin.

Vox sat down with Kreutzmüller, who now chairs the Aktives Museum, which is dedicated to confronting the history of Nazis in Berlin, to discuss the lessons we should take from Germany’s past and the reasons the right is seeing this resurgence now.

AD

This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Li Zhou

Could you start by talking about some of the political and economic factors that fueled the rise of the Nazis?

Christoph Kreutzmüller

I think the most important is a general wariness, dissatisfaction of a huge part of the population with ... the Republic, seen as the one who kind of lost the war.

[And] in the mid-1920s, the feeling, “Hey, we are getting somewhere, we are moving,” was quite broad. But then, of course, came the economic catastrophe. And this small party, which had been tolerated by too many for far too long, became a serious threat.

This is something we want to think about because, in 1923, this small radical party tried to putsch. And instead of, you know, prohibiting this party, which was against the rule of law, which was against the Constitution, they were only disbanded for a short time. Adolf Hitler, the head of the putsch, was given a very honorary prison treatment, in which he was able to write his fake news book, which became an international bestseller.

They missed the chance in 1923 to say “full stop.” They missed a chance in saying “full stop” when ... the Nazis rose to power with brawls and violence. [There were] a series of lost chances to enforce the rule of law. And, of course, then it’s the Depression. And in times of fear, anxiety, and millions unemployed, lots of people look for a strong figure.

[Additionally], anti-Semitism was one of the core political messages. After World War I, a quite big portion of the population seemingly needed something like a scapegoat. And Jews were then in Europe, in a Christian-based society, the easy scapegoat to pick.

Li Zhou

Was there a sense that other parties helped normalize Nazi leadership?

Christoph Kreutzmüller

In the state of Thuringia, there was a Nazi minister in a coalition party as of 1931. There were quite a few of those states Germany consisted of then that had established the Nazi form of government or had let Nazis come to power. So that normalized it, of course.

AD

And that’s the question that is debated [about the AfD] right now. Can you form a coalition with those people and make them accepted as normal partners? And there’s a huge understanding right now, or was a huge understanding: No, you may not, because they don’t play according to the rules. And the rules are the content of our Constitution and the rule of law.

There’s real concern. And the head of the CDU right now is not as adamant as his predecessors.

Li Zhou

What parallels do you see now with the rise of AfD and the current far right and that of the Nazis?

Christoph Kreutzmüller

In times of anxiety, people tend to become more extreme because they’re afraid to lose [what they have].

We all know now that there’s big changes coming [on climate and other issues] and we are afraid of these big changes. The other thing you got now ... is you [have] this fascist revival all over Europe. They are supporting each other, of course.

[There is also] scapegoating again, and it’s forgetting that ... Germany needs the influx of new people because we are a dying society, we are too old. And without people coming in, it will be an even huger recession. And in 10 years, we don’t have the workforce anymore. So we do need them now. We do need everyone who wants to come right now. And every economist will tell you that.

[It’s] a very, very old pattern. Antisemitism was rooted in this Christian society. Now it’s against foreigners, and of course, it’s connected to this anti-Muslim attitude that lots of people share.

Li Zhou

In a way, it felt somewhat surprising to see the resurgence of the far right in Germany given the country’s recent history and attempts to reckon with it. I’m curious if you have found it surprising.

Christoph Kreutzmüller

No, I mean, there’s more than one factor. One is that history is long gone now. People have forgot what it really [was] like in Europe. The witnesses are dying — the eyewitnesses — and so the impact is dying. It’s not just like the witnesses of the persecuted, it’s the people... who can say, “Look, my village has been bombed, and it was dreadful.” That is kind of receding, this acute knowledge of destruction and murder.

And the other thing is that you can certainly see that the AfD is stronger in the East, and one of the reasons for it is that in West Germany, the talk, like the bottom up talk about Nazi perpetrators, about Nazi ideology, about the persecution of the Jews. This bottom-up process is really grassrooted in society, and ... that really helped. And that process didn’t happen in the GDR (German Democratic Republic, occupied by the Soviet Union), [at least not until] much later, and then ... not so rooted in society.

Li Zhou

What are the arguments you’re seeing AfD make that are resonating with voters?

Christoph Kreutzmüller

One of the main arguments of the AfD is that they are not a real party. They are different: “We don’t do it like the big ones.” [They say that to] voters forgetting that after [existing for] 10 years, they are an established party.

 

The other is a very strong nationalistic argument, that us Germans have to find ourselves again, and that resonates quite well, especially in the East, because as strange as it may, it’s something that still lingers in the corners there, which has got something to do with not really talking about the perpetratorship in Nazi Germany.

In the course of the reunification, the people in the East tend to think that they have been neglected and not heard, and they should be heard. And that’s another bit of it, which I find quite understandable because they were really not heard in the early years and lost lots of their lives. I see that. But of course, it’s not a justification to supporting Nazis or neo-Nazis.

And, of course, [they support] disbanding the EU because people don’t understand what the EU is and that one of the greatest benefactors of the EU is Germany.

But the main argument is nationalism, and we are different.

Li Zhou

Was there more Germany, either politically or societally, could have done to stop the progression of AfD?

Christoph Kreutzmüller

The Office of the Protection of the Constitution [which is meant to protect the German government from anti-democratic extremism] actually opened an investigation. And it’s becoming clearer and clearer that [the AfD] is in huge parts, or in part, against the Constitution, and could [therefore] be prohibited. And you know, the case hasn’t been solved yet. (Editor’s note: German law has a formal process for banning political parties found to be a danger to the state, in order to prevent anti-democratic extremists from using parties to take control of the country.)

But this is a question that is widely debated right now in Germany. And maybe it comes a bit late. I think if you think about the chances we. as a society, missed in saying, full stop, “You are not playing according to the rules, so you don’t play with us anymore. You are fascist and you are against our Constitution, and our beliefs on how to live together, you are to be prohibited.”

Those chances are kind of fading, even though the arguments are growing. [It’s] ever more difficult to really prohibit this party because they’re gaining so much support. I mean, how do you then prohibit a party that has got, and will gain 30 percent of the votes?

Li Zhou

What lessons do you think are important for people watching the rise of the AfD to keep in mind from German history?

Christoph Kreutzmüller

One thing is: Never underestimate them. Never. And do enforce the rule of law. I mean, that’s what we’ve got, for God’s sake. That’s the only thing we’ve got as a society.

We’ve got the Constitution, which I see as part of the rule of law. Apply it. And that applies for the Federal Republic of Germany, as well as the United States of America.

[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (0)
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.