個人資料
正文

It's Time For a New Model of Human Evolution

(2023-02-12 08:11:06) 下一個

It's Time For a New Model of Human Evolution

https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/its-time-for-a-new-model-of-human-evolution 

New evidence suggests we need to rethink our current models of how humans evolved.

By Gemma Tarlach Apr 1, 2018 8:00 PM

human-history-new

A partial jawbone from an anatomically modern human, found in Israel, is more than 170,000 years old. Israel Hershkovitz/Tel Aviv University

 

How well do we know ourselves? The fossil record of hominins, our ancestors and closest kin, is limited, and the exploration of our collective deep history through genetic analysis is still a relatively new field. Neither excavations nor lab work has been able to reconstruct, definitively, the earliest chapter of the Homo sapiensstory.

For decades, two competing models of human evolution have dominated the field. One claims that H. sapiensevolved in a single place, Africa, and left that continent only fairly recently; the other suggests that our species evolved in multiple regions across both Africa and Eurasia.

While debate between proponents of the two models rages on, there’s one big problem: Researchers keep finding fossil and genomic evidence that don’t fit either model.

A paleoanthropological review published in Science in December acknowledged that the evidence had reached a tipping point. It’s time, the authors said, for a new model of how our species evolved and spread across the world. But how does this new model compare with its predecessors?

Recent Africa Origin Model

recent-africa-origin 1

Dan Bishop/Discover

Beginning in the mid-20th century, fossils unearthed in Africa showed a progression, over millions of years, from a primitive bipedal primate to anatomically modern humans. Based on those fossils, researchers developed the Recent Africa Origin (RAO) model for human evolution and migration. According to the RAO model, although some groups of our predecessor Homo erectus left Africa roughly 2 million years ago, those early explorers eventually died out and did not contribute significantly to modern human ancestry. Instead, H. sapiens evolved exclusively in Africa and left the continent only about 60,000 years ago to spread across Eurasia. The RAO model has dominated Western thinking about human evolution for decades.

Multiregionalism Model

multiregionalism-model 2

Dan Bishop/Discover

The RAO model does not account for some hominin fossils found outside of Africa, especially in China, that are 100,000 years or older but appear to belong to anatomically modern humans. Based on these fossils and some artifacts, a challenge to RAO emerged: multiregionalism. According to this model, after H. erectus populations left Africa roughly 2 million years ago, these intrepid hominins settled in pockets across Eurasia, where they continued to evolve into regional populations of H. sapiens.  Multiregionalism agrees with one aspect of RAO: When the relative latecomer sapiens left Africa 60,000 years ago and met up with other hominin populations in Eurasia, some interbreeding occurred. According to multiregionalists, however, the ancestry of human populations outside of Africa, particularly in Asia, is rooted in the earlier regional H. erectus populations.

New Model

new-model 3

Dan Bishop/Discover

According to the new model proposed in the December review in Science, H. sapiens evolved in Africa but left the continent much earlier, about 120,000 years ago, and in multiple waves of migration. In January, the work of a separate team, also published in Science, pushed the start date for modern humans migrating out of Africa even farther back: Anatomically modern human fossils found in Israel were dated to more than 170,000 years old.  While some of the early pioneers perished, others survived, reaching as far as Australia and East Asia. There, and along the way, migrating H. sapiens met and sometimes interbred with other hominins, including Neanderthals in Europe and Denisovans in Asia, as well as, potentially, other populations not yet known to science. The new and more complex model doesn’t just reflect the latest research — it also emphasizes the interconnectedness of our entire species and our closest kin.

migration-map

Dan Bishop/Discover and Ekler/Shutterstock

我們對自己了解多少? 我們的祖先和最親近的人科動物的化石記錄是有限的,通過基因分析探索我們集體的深層曆史仍然是一個相對較新的領域。 無論是挖掘工作還是實驗室工作都無法明確地重建智人故事的最早篇章。

幾十年來,兩種相互競爭的人類進化模型一直主導著該領域。 有人聲稱智人在一個地方進化,即非洲,並且最近才離開該大陸; 另一個表明我們的物種在非洲和歐亞大陸的多個地區進化。

雖然這兩種模型的支持者之間的爭論仍在繼續,但存在一個大問題:研究人員不斷發現不適合任何一種模型的化石和基因組證據。

去年 12 月發表在《科學》雜誌上的古人類學評論承認,證據已經達到臨界點。 作者說,現在是時候建立一個新模型來說明我們的物種如何在世界範圍內進化和傳播。 但是這個新模型與其前輩相比如何呢?

最近的非洲血統模特 Dan Bishop/Discover

從 20 世紀中葉開始,在非洲出土的化石顯示了經過數百萬年的進化,從原始的雙足靈長類動物到解剖學上的現代人類。 基於這些化石,研究人員開發了人類進化和遷移的近代非洲起源 (RAO) 模型。 根據 RAO 模型,雖然我們的前身直立人的一些群體在大約 200 萬年前離開了非洲,但這些早期探險者最終滅絕了,並且對現代人類祖先沒有做出重大貢獻。 相反,智人隻在非洲進化,僅在大約 60,000 年前離開非洲大陸,傳播到歐亞大陸。 幾十年來,RAO 模型一直主導著西方對人類進化的思考。

多區域主義模型 Dan Bishop/Discover

RAO 模型沒有考慮在非洲以外發現的一些人科動物化石,尤其是在中國,這些化石已有 10 萬年或更早,但在解剖學上似乎屬於現代人類。 基於這些化石和一些人工製品,對 RAO 的挑戰出現了:多區域主義。 根據這個模型,大約 200 萬年前直立人種群離開非洲後,這些勇敢的古人類在歐亞大陸各地定居,並在那裏繼續演變成區域性智人種群。 多區域論同意 RAO 的一個方麵:當相對較晚的智人在 6 萬年前離開非洲並與歐亞大陸的其他人類種群相遇時,發生了一些雜交。 然而,根據多區域主義者的說法,非洲以外的人群,尤其是亞洲人群的祖先,植根於早期的區域性直立人種群。

新模特 Dan Bishop/Discover

根據 12 月發表在《科學》雜誌上的評論提出的新模型,智人在非洲進化,但離開非洲大陸的時間要早得多,大約在 12 萬年前,並經曆了多次遷徙浪潮。 今年 1 月,同樣發表在《科學》雜誌上的另一個團隊的工作將現代人類遷出非洲的開始日期推得更早:在以色列發現的解剖學上的現代人類化石可追溯到 17 萬多年前。 雖然一些早期的先驅者死了,但其他人幸存下來,最遠到達澳大利亞和東亞。 在那裏,一路上,遷徙的智人遇到了其他人科動物,有時還與其他人科動物雜交,包括歐洲的尼安德特人和亞洲的傑尼索瓦人,以及可能還不為科學所知的其他種群。 新的和更複雜的模型不僅反映了最新的研究——它還強調了我們整個物種和我們最親近的親屬之間的相互聯係。

遷移地圖

 
[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (0)
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.