川粉邏輯錯亂綜合症（老白）
川粉因為頭腦錯亂，基本不能正常生活了。自從八九年前他們的天之驕子懂王出世，他們就興奮不已，聞糞識香，邏輯開始扭曲，生活和工作都進入顛瘋狀態，語言邏輯讓人啼笑皆非，但又非常自信。我這裏舉幾個例子。
第一，他們個人組織的文學群投資群基本成了謠言集散中心，互相打雞血，主業荒蕪凋零。 文學隻歌頌主子，投資隻投資領袖概念股，比如就我親耳聽到的，他們認為全球第一大的公司應該是特斯拉，而特斯拉的市值與第一的是三倍之別，他們認為全球唯一搞人工智能的是特斯拉，其它都是騙子，沒有人工智能。
第二，他們中的一些對某朝似乎非常痛恨，但對與某朝做生意的馬斯克卻絕對擁護。在這二者中的一個持什麽觀點是個人自由思想觀念，咱不好說什麽，但是兩個同時持有就是邏輯錯亂了。此外也要對這個矛盾加以化解，我的前相識香港才子川粉某傑在這方麵比較突出，昨天他寫了一篇文章，他說馬一龍老媽出身南非種族隔離白人階層，修養上等，儀態高雅，但性格簡單，因此隻要伺候好她，就好拿下川普和馬氏。於是讓馬老太太和鄧文迪以及伊萬卡三人結成莫逆，三個女人紅顏禍水，拉懂王和馬氏下水，實為兩個英雄所難拒，都怪女人。
第三與第二有所關聯，也是與某朝的關係。我有川粉朋友，人本善良，如果生在古代，似乎也能劫富濟貧。每天發某朝不公之貼，為弱者鳴不平。但是對於美利堅對窮人的幫助則憤憤不平，對懂王和馬斯克取消對弱者的資助大聲叫好，極為讚賞。這兩個方麵，如果是兩個人單獨的觀點，那都很自洽，個人觀點無可厚非，問題是一個人同時持有這兩種觀點，實屬厲害，不得不讓我高看一眼，覺得他們深得我量子禪之精神，攜兩種矛盾觀點尚能行事，確是高人，如著名作家菲茨傑拉德所鳴。
第四種思維相當跳躍，曾有一師弟本來號稱是川黑，絕不川粉，對J6事件不能讚同。但後來某天，忽然成為本校最大川粉之一，而且說恨不能飛回J6，為懂王兩肋插刀，縱使入獄也心甘，隻等到懂王凱旋歸來，特赦成為英雄。話說本人當年因為某事也曾成為川粉幾日，但跳躍沒有這麽巨大，了解懂王絕非本人之輩，對啟蒙認知有天壤之別，所以雖然對此師弟的變化稍有理解，但對病情如此嚴重還是有些吃驚，但病既不在我身，那我就樂觀他病入膏肓。
Trump Supporter Derangement Syndrome (Lao Bai)
Trump supporters have become so mentally deranged that they can barely function in everyday life. Ever since their “chosen one” emerged eight or nine years ago, they’ve been in a state of constant excitement, perceiving filth as fragrance, twisting logic beyond recognition, and living and working in a frenzied state. Their speech and reasoning are often absurd, yet they exude absolute confidence. Let me provide a few examples.
First, the literary and investment WeChat groups they organize have essentially become rumor mills where they hype each other up while neglecting their main pursuits. Literature exists solely to praise their leader, and investment revolves entirely around stocks associated with their idol. For example, I personally heard some of them claim that Tesla should be the world’s largest company, even though its market value is only a third of the actual largest company. They also believe that Tesla is the only company in the world developing artificial intelligence, dismissing all others as frauds without AI capabilities.
Second, some of them seem to harbor intense hatred for a certain foreign regime, yet they unconditionally support Elon Musk, who does extensive business with that very regime. Holding either of these views individually is a matter of personal belief, but holding both simultaneously is pure logical inconsistency. Some even go to great lengths to resolve this contradiction. A former acquaintance of mine, a Hong Kong intellectual and die-hard Trump supporter, recently wrote an article arguing that Musk’s mother, who comes from South Africa’s apartheid-era white elite, is refined and elegant but simple-minded. He proposed that by currying favor with her, one could easily influence both Trump and Musk. His perceived strategy? Musk’s mother was in a trap to befriend Wendi Deng and Ivanka Trump, forming an unbreakable trio. He reasoned that these three women, as femme fatales, would inevitably drag both Trump and Musk into the web of the regime behind, making them powerless to resist. In his view, it is not the men’s fault—it’s always the women to blame.
Third, and somewhat related to the second point, is still their stance on a certain foreign government. I have Trump-supporting friends who, at heart, are kind people. If they had lived in ancient times, they might have been noble bandits robbing the rich to aid the poor. They frequently share posts criticizing injustices in one particular regime and advocating for the underprivileged. However, when it comes to America, they fiercely oppose government assistance for the poor. They cheer loudly when Trump or Musk cuts aid programs and praise these actions as commendable. If these were the separate views of two different individuals, each perspective would be internally consistent and beyond criticism. The remarkable thing, however, is that the same person holds both contradictory views simultaneously. I can’t help but admire their ability to embody what F. Scott Fitzgerald described as the essence of a first-rate intellect—holding two opposing ideas at the same time while still functioning.
Fourth, their thought process is highly erratic. I once had a junior schoolmate who staunchly opposed Trump, swearing never to be a supporter and even condemning the events of January 6th. Yet one day, out of the blue, he became one of the most fervent Trump supporters at our school, claiming that he wished he could have flown back for January 6th, willing to fight and even go to prison for Trump, just to await his triumphant return and receive a presidential pardon as a hero. I, too, once briefly became a Trump supporter for a few days due to certain circumstances, but my shift wasn’t nearly as drastic. I understand that people’s perceptions evolve, but the sheer magnitude of my schoolmate’s transformation left me stunned. That said, since I’m not the one afflicted, I can only watch with amusement as his condition deteriorates beyond hope.
