維加諾大主教：俄烏危機，世界新秩序即將完成

維加諾大主教：俄烏危機，世界新秩序即將完成！

2022-04-16 22:03:43

https://blog.creaders.net/u/16885/202204/432634.html

俄羅斯總統普京提出，解決烏克蘭問題需達成以下3個條件：

1、承認俄羅斯對克裏米亞的主權；2、烏克蘭“去軍事化”和“去納粹化”；3、烏克蘭保持中立地位。

俄羅斯國防部發出一條重要消息，總統普京基本上答應澤連斯基的談判請求，普京向澤連斯基列出了6項停火條件，並全部寫入烏克蘭憲法！如果6項條件烏克蘭都接受，並按要求寫入烏克蘭憲法，那麽俄軍可以立即停火退兵！

俄羅斯國防部公布了總統普京向澤連斯基提出的6項停火要求：

第一，烏克蘭放棄加入北約，保持中立，俄羅斯願意成為烏克蘭安全的保障者。

第二，賦予俄語烏克蘭第二官方語言地位，取消所有針對俄語的限製。

第三，承認頓涅茨克和盧甘斯克的獨立。

第四，承認俄羅斯對克裏米亞的主權。

第五，烏克蘭去納粹化和禁止極端民族主義、納粹和新納粹黨派和社會組織的活動，廢除現有的美化納粹和新納粹的法律。

第六，烏克蘭的非軍事化：完全放棄進攻性武器。

維加諾大主教關於俄烏危機的聲明：“新世界秩序”即將完成！如果我們看看烏克蘭正在發生的事情，而不被主流媒體的嚴重造假所誤導，我們就會意識到對彼此權利的尊重完全被忽視了；的確，我們的印象是，拜登政府、北約和歐盟有意維持明顯不平衡的局麵，正是為了使和平解決烏克蘭危機的任何企圖都成為不可能，從而激起俄羅斯聯邦引發衝突。這就是問題的嚴重性。這是為俄羅斯和烏克蘭設置的陷阱，利用它們來讓全球主義精英實施其犯罪計劃。

2022年4月13日

維加諾大主教：

和平不讓人失去什麽，戰爭卻讓人失去一切。就讓人們回歸理解，繼續談判，以善意和尊重彼此權利的方式談判。讓他們意識到，真誠積極的談判不妨礙榮耀的成功。無論是對集體還是對個人而言，對激情的聲音施加沉默，給理性留有適當的空間，他們會感覺偉大——真正的偉大——他們會避免兄弟流血和家園毀滅。
因此，1939年8月24日，庇護十二世教皇向統治者和人民發表講話，因為戰爭迫在眉睫。這些不是空洞的和平主義言論，也不是對正進行的多方多重的對正義的侵犯予以同謀和沉默。那條無線電信息，有人至今記憶猶新，羅馬教皇的呼籲“尊重彼此的權利”作為富有成果的和平談判的先決條件。
這是為俄羅斯和烏克蘭設下的陷阱，利用它來讓全球主義精英實施其犯罪計劃。

媒體說辭：
如果我們看看烏克蘭正在發生的事情，而不被主流媒體的嚴重造假所誤導，我們就會意識到對彼此權利的尊重完全被忽視了；的確，我們的印象是，拜登政府、北約和歐盟有意維持明顯不平衡的局麵，正是為了使和平解決烏克蘭危機的任何企圖都成為不可能，從而激起俄羅斯聯邦引發衝突。這就是問題的嚴重性。這是為俄羅斯和烏克蘭設置的陷阱，利用它們來讓全球主義精英實施其犯罪計劃。

我們不再感到驚訝的是，在自稱是民主國家中受到如此讚揚的多元化和言論自由，每天都因對與官方不同觀點的審查和不容而被踐踏。在所謂的大流行期間，損害醫生、科學家和持不同意見的記者的操作已成為常態，他們僅僅因為敢於質疑實驗注射液的有效性而被抹黑和排斥。兩年後，有關副作用和對突發衛生事件的不幸管理的真相證明他們的正確，但真相被始終視而不見，因為它不符合某係統所要的和至今仍想要的。

我們應該問自己，為什麽在眼下的情形是，世界媒體會突然重新發現在 Covid期間廣泛拋棄的智識上的誠實和對道德準則的尊重。

如果世界媒體迄今為止在嚴謹科學相關事情上散布謊言隱藏現實，無恥地撒謊，我們應該問問自己，為什麽在目前的情況下，他們會突然重新發現在 Covid中期間廣泛拋棄的智識上的誠實和對道德準則的尊重。

但是，如果媒體支持和傳播這種巨大的欺詐，那麽就必須承認，國家和國際衛生機構、政府、地方法官、執法機構和天主教教團本身——每個人都在自己的領域內通過積極支持或不反對這種說法——對這場災難負有責任。這場災難已經影響了數十億人的健康、財產、個人權利的行使，甚至他們的生命。在這種情況下，很難想象那些支持故意且惡意放大一場大流行病而有罪的人，會在戰爭威脅安全和經濟時，突然有了尊嚴感，而對他們的公民和家園有了關心。。

當然，這些可能是那些想要保持中立並以超然態度看待周遭發生時間的人的謹慎反映。但如果我們加深對事實的了解並記錄下來，依靠權威和客觀的資料，會發現懷疑和困惑很快變成令人不安的定論。

即使隻將調查限於經濟層麵，我們也知道新聞機構、政治和公共機構本身依賴於屬於政治寡頭的少數金融集團。更要緊的事，這些寡頭集團不僅以金錢和權力聯手，而且用意識形態聯盟，這些聯盟指導針對國家和整個世界的政治行動和幹預。這個寡頭政治在聯合國、北約、世界經濟論壇、歐盟、以及像喬治 ·索羅斯的　“開放社會”　和　“比爾和梅琳達·蓋茨基金會”　等“慈善”　機構中，都展示其觸角。

所有這些實體都是私人的，隻對他們自己負責。同時，他們卻有權影響國家政府，這包括讓他們自己的代表參選或被任命到關鍵職位。他們自己也承認這一點。從意大利總理馬裏奧德拉吉開始，他們從國家元首和世界領導人那接受各種榮譽。他們讓這些領導人尊重和恐懼，因為他們才是世界命運的真正主人。因此，那些以“人民”名義掌權的人發現自己正踐踏人民的意誌，限製人民的權利，以便像朝臣一樣服從那些從沒有人選舉卻裁決這些國家政治和經濟議程的主人們。

接下來我們看看烏克蘭危機，這被展示為弗拉基米爾·普京對一個獨立民主國家的擴張主義的傲慢結果。他試圖在這個國家上聲稱荒謬的權利。據說“戰爭販子普京”正在屠殺手無寸鐵的民眾，這些民眾勇敢地站起來保衛祖國的土地、國家的神聖邊界和受到侵犯的公民自由。因此，歐盟和美國作為“民主的捍衛者”，被認為無法不以北約進行幹預，以恢複烏克蘭的自治，驅逐“入侵者”並保障和平。麵對“暴君的傲慢”，據說世界各國人民應該組成共同陣線，對俄羅斯聯邦實施製裁，向“民族英雄”、人民的“捍衛者”、“可憐的”澤連斯基總統派遣士兵，送上武器和經濟援助”。作為普京“暴力”的證據，媒體傳播了爆炸、軍事搜查和破壞的圖像，將責任歸咎於俄羅斯。還有更多：正是為了保證“持久和平”，歐盟和北約正張開雙臂歡迎烏克蘭成為成員國。並且為了防止“蘇維埃宣傳”，歐洲現在正在將今日俄羅斯和人造衛星拉黑，以確保信息“自由和獨立”。

這是官方的說辭，沒人都隨俗。在戰爭中，持不同政見者立即被當成開小差的，那些持不同政見是叛國罪，該受到或多或少的嚴重製裁，首先是公開譴責和排斥，在 Covid種 對付那些“未受感染”的人儼然經驗豐富。但是，如果您想知道真相，讓我們以不同的方式看待事物，並根據事實的本質而不是如何呈現給我們來判斷事實。正如希臘詞 ?λ?θεια 的詞源所表明的那樣，這是一個真實而恰當的揭示。或者，也許，帶著一種末世的凝視，一種啟示，一種揭示，一種 ?ποκ?λυψις。

 

北約擴張

首先，有必要記住事實，事實不會說謊，也不會敏感搖擺的改變。無論對那些試圖封殺它們的人來說多麽令人惱火，事實都告訴我們，自從柏林牆倒塌以來，美國的政治和軍事影響範圍已擴大到幾乎所有前蘇聯的衛星國聯盟。甚至最近，波蘭、捷克共和國和匈牙利並入北約（1999 年）；愛沙尼亞、拉脫維亞、立陶宛、斯洛文尼亞、斯洛伐克、保加利亞和羅馬尼亞（2004 年）；阿爾巴尼亞和克羅地亞（2009 年）；黑山（2017 年）；和北馬其頓（2020 年）。北大西洋公約組織正準備擴大到烏克蘭、格魯吉亞、波斯尼亞和黑塞哥維那以及塞爾維亞。實際上，俄羅斯聯邦正受到軍事威脅——來自武器和導彈基地——距離其邊界隻有幾公裏，而它沒有針對美國的類似的軍事基地。

考慮北約可能向烏克蘭擴張，卻沒有想到它會引起俄羅斯的合法抗議，這簡直令人費解，尤其是考慮到北約在 1991 年向克裏姆林宮承諾不再進一步擴張的事實。不僅如此：2021 年底，《明鏡周刊》公布了與美國簽訂的條約草案以及與北約就安全保障達成的協議。莫斯科要求其西方夥伴提供法律保證，以防止北約因烏克蘭的加入、北約在後蘇聯國家建立軍事基地而進一步向東擴張。提案還包含一項條款，即北約不在俄羅斯邊境附近部署進攻性武器，以及北約在東歐的部隊撤回其 1997 年的陣地。

正如我們所看到的，北約未能履行對俄羅斯的承諾，或者至少在地緣政治平衡非常微妙的時刻迫使局勢發展。我們應該自問，為什麽美國——或者確切地說，是在喬·拜登（Joe Biden）入主白宮的選舉舞弊後重新掌權的美國深層政府——想要與俄羅斯製造緊張關係，並讓其歐洲夥伴卷入衝突，從而帶來我們可以想見的所有後果。

正如聯合峰會作戰司令部前指揮官馬爾科·貝托裏尼將軍清楚地指出：“美國不僅贏得了冷戰，而且還想通過在某種意義上拿走屬於俄羅斯勢力範圍內的一切來羞辱俄羅斯。 [普京] 厭倦了波羅的海國家、波蘭、羅馬尼亞和保加利亞 [加入北約]。眼看烏克蘭 [加入北約] ，將帶走任何進入黑海的可能性，他做出了反應”。他補充說：“政權的穩定性出問題了，一個相當不可能的總理 [澤連斯基（Zelensky）] 出現了，他來自娛樂界。”這位將軍記得，在美國襲擊俄羅斯的情況下，“全球之鷹從西戈內拉（Sigonella） [意大利] 起飛，飛越烏克蘭上空；意大利在很大程度上是美國的軍事基地。風險就在那裏，它是真實存在的”。

 

俄羅斯天然氣供應封鎖帶來的利益

我們也應自問，在歐盟和俄羅斯之間微妙平衡不穩定的背後，是否還有經濟利益，這利益源於歐盟國家需要獲得美國液化氣，而不是俄羅斯天然氣（更生態）（為此，我們還需要許多國家被剝奪了再液化氣廠，我們也將不得不為此付出更大的代價）。

意大利石油和天然氣公司 ENI 決定暫停對俄羅斯天然氣工業股份公司的 Blue Stream 管道 的 （從俄羅斯到土耳其）Blue Stream 管道的投資，這也意味著剝奪了額外的供應源，因為它為（從土耳其到意大利）跨大西洋管道輸送天然氣。

因此，如果澤倫斯基在 2021 年 8 月宣布他將俄羅斯和德國之間的北溪 2 號管道視為“不僅對烏克蘭而且對整個歐洲而言都是危險的武器”，這聽起來並非巧合：它繞過烏克蘭，剝奪了基輔每年約 10 億歐元的過境關稅收入。烏克蘭總統說 “我們完全從安全的角度看待這個項目，並認為它是克裏姆林宮的危險地緣政治武器”，他表示同意拜登政府的觀點。美國副國務卿維多利亞紐蘭說：“如果俄羅斯入侵烏克蘭，北溪2號將不會前進。”事情就這樣發生了，對德國的投資造成嚴重的經濟損失。

 

五角大樓在烏克蘭的病毒學實驗室

有關美國在烏克蘭的利益，值得一提的是位於烏克蘭的病毒學實驗室，這些實驗室受五角大樓的控製，似乎隻有具有外交豁免權的美國專家直接受雇於美國國防部。

我們應該還記得普京關於收集人口基因組數據的抱怨，這些數據可用於具有基因選擇的細菌武器。有關烏克蘭實驗室活動的信息顯然難以證實，但俄羅斯聯邦認為這些實驗室可能對民眾安全構成額外的細菌威脅，這是可以理解的。美國大使館已從其網站刪除了與減少生物威脅計劃相關的所有文件。

毛裏齊奧·布隆代（Maurizio Blondet ）寫道：
    “事件 201 ，在大流行爆發的前一年模擬這場流行，由顯然沒有冒犯性的約翰霍普金斯大學及受其祝福的健康安全中心（如常地與比爾和梅琳達一起）參加。長期以來，人道主義機構的名字不那麽天真：它被稱為平民生物防禦戰略中心，它不處理美國人的健康問題，而是處理它的反麵：對生物恐怖主義軍事襲擊的反應。它實際上是一個軍民組織。當它於 1999 年 2 月在五角大樓所在的阿靈頓 [弗吉尼亞州] 水晶城舉行第一次會議時，它召集了 950 名醫生、軍事人員、聯邦官員和衛生官員參加模擬演習。模擬的目的是對抗想象中的“軍事化”天花攻擊。這隻是將在 201 事件和流行病假象中遍地開花的演習中的第一個”。

烏克蘭軍隊也出現了實驗，而美國大使館在2016 年對烏克蘭檢察官盧岑科（ Lutsenko） 的幹預，使他無法調查“Ｇ．索羅斯（G. Soros） 和 Ｂ.奧巴馬（B. Obama） 間的億萬資金”。

 

對中國對台灣擴張野心的間接威脅

當前的烏克蘭危機對中國和台灣之間的地緣政治平衡產生了次要但同樣嚴重的後果。俄羅斯和烏克蘭是鈀和氖的唯二的生產國，而鈀和氖是微芯片生產必不可少的。

“在市場研究機構 Techcet 發表了一份報告強調許多半導體製造商對俄羅斯和烏克蘭原產材料（如氖、鈀等）的依賴後，莫斯科可能的報複行為在最近幾天引起了更多關注。據 Techcet 估計，美國 90% 以上的半導體氖源供應來自烏克蘭，而美國 35% 的鈀來自俄羅斯。 […] 據美國國際貿易委員會稱，在 2014 年俄羅斯吞並克裏米亞半島之前，霓虹燈價格上漲了 600%，因為芯片公司依賴於一些烏克蘭公司”。

“如果中國入侵台塑真會危及全球技術供應鏈，那麽俄羅斯原材料突然短缺可能會使生產停止，從而使台灣失去“微芯片盾牌”，並誘使北京企圖吞並台北。”

 

拜登在烏克蘭的利益衝突

另一個我們傾向於不深入分析的問題與布裏斯馬 （Burisma） 有關，該公司是一家自 2002 年以來在烏克蘭市場上運營的石油和天然氣公司。回想一下，“在巴拉克·奧巴馬 (Barack Obama) 擔任美國總統期間（2009 年至 2017 年），他處理國際政治的“代表”是得力助手喬·拜登，正是從那時起，美國民主黨領導人提供的“保護”就給了烏克蘭民族主義者。這一路線造成了基輔和莫斯科之間不可調和的分歧。 […] 那些年正是喬·拜登（Joe Biden）推行使烏克蘭更接近北約的政策。他想奪走俄羅斯的政治和經濟權力。 […] 近年來，喬·拜登的名字也與烏克蘭的醜聞有關，這也動搖了他的候選資格。 […] 2014 年 4 月，烏克蘭最大的能源公司（活躍於天然氣和石油領域）布裏斯馬控股（Burisma Holdings） 聘請亨特·拜登擔任顧問[…]，月薪 50,000 美元。一切都是透明的，除了在那幾個月裏，喬·拜登繼續執行美國政策，旨在奪回烏克蘭對頓巴斯那些現已成為俄羅斯承認的共和國的地區的占有。頓涅茨克地區被認為富含未開發的氣田，這些氣田已被布裏斯馬控股公司盯上。在那些年裏，一項與經濟政策交織在一起的國際政策讓美國媒體嗤之以鼻”。

 

烏克蘭的核問題

最後，還有烏克蘭核武器問題。 2022 年 2 月 19 日，在慕尼黑的一次會議上，澤連斯基宣布他打算終止禁止烏克蘭發展、擴散和使用原子武器的布達佩斯備忘錄（1994 年）。在備忘錄的其他條款中，還有一條要求俄羅斯、美國和英國不得利用對烏克蘭的經濟壓力來影響其政策：國際貨幣基金組織和美國提供經濟援助的以換取與大重置一致的改革的壓力，是對協議的進一步違反。

烏克蘭駐柏林大使安德烈·梅爾尼克 (Andriy Melnyk) 於 2021 年在 Deutschlandfunk 電台上辯稱，如果烏克蘭未能加入北約，烏克蘭需要重新獲得核地位。烏克蘭的核電站由國有企業 NAEK Energoatom 運營、重建和維護，該企業在 2018 年至 2021 年間徹底結束了與俄羅斯公司的關係。其主要合作夥伴是可以追溯到美國政府的公司。不難理解，俄羅斯聯邦如何將烏克蘭獲得核武器的可能性視為一種威脅，並要求基輔遵守不擴散條約。

這是喬治·索羅斯（George Soros）讚助的一項行動，他坦率地告訴美國有線電視新聞網：“自從烏克蘭獨立之前，我就在烏克蘭建立了基金會；該基金會一直在開展業務，並在今天的事件中發揮了決定性作用。”

烏克蘭的顏色革命與克裏米亞、頓涅茨克和盧甘斯克的獨立

另一個事實。 2013年，在總統維克托·亞努科維奇政府決定暫停烏克蘭與歐盟的結盟協議並與俄羅斯建立更密切的經濟關係後，一係列被稱為“歐洲邁丹”的抗議示威開始了，持續了幾個月，最終以革命告終，這推翻了亞努科維奇並導致了新政府的成立。這是喬治·索羅斯（George Soros）讚助的一項行動，他坦率地告訴美國有線電視新聞網：“自從烏克蘭獨立之前，我就在烏克蘭建立了基金會；該基金會一直在開展業務，並在當今的事件中發揮了決定性作用”。這一政府更迭激起了亞努科維奇（Yanukovych）的支持者和部分烏克蘭民眾的反應，他們反對烏克蘭的親西方轉變，這種民眾並不想要的轉變，是通過顏色革命獲得的，往年這一招曾在格魯吉亞、摩爾多瓦和白俄羅斯反複上演。

在 2014 年 5 月 2 日的衝突之後，民族主義準軍事組織（包括右翼地帶）也介入了衝突，敖德薩也發生了大屠殺。西方媒體也以駭人聽聞的方式談論這些可怕的事件；國際大赦（點解這裏）和聯合國譴責這些罪行並記錄下它們的暴行。但沒有國際法院對責任人提起任何訴訟，正如今天打算針對俄羅斯軍隊所做的罪行指控。

在許多未得到遵守的協議中，還有由烏克蘭、俄羅斯、頓涅茨克人民共和國和盧甘斯克人民共和國代表組成的烏克蘭問題三方聯絡小組於 2014 年 9 月 5 日簽署的《明斯克議定書》（Minsk Protocol）。該協議的要點還包括在歐安組織的監督下從烏克蘭境內清除武裝非法團體、軍事裝備以及戰鬥人員和雇傭軍，並解除所有非法團體的武裝。與商定的相反，新納粹準軍事組織不僅得到政府的正式承認，其成員甚至被執行官方任務。

同樣在 2014 年，克裏米亞、頓涅茨克和盧甘斯克以國際社會承認的人民自決的名義宣布從烏克蘭獨立，並宣布自己並入俄羅斯聯邦。烏克蘭政府仍然拒絕承認這些地區的獨立性，並通過全民公決批準，讓新納粹民兵和正規軍隊任意對民眾進行攻擊，盡管這些實體被認為是恐怖組織。確實，2014 年 11 月 2 日的兩次公投構成了明斯克協議的延伸，該協議僅規定了權力下放和頓涅茨克和盧甘斯克地區的特殊地位。

正如弗朗哥·卡迪尼教授最近指出的那樣，“2022 年 2 月 15 日，俄羅斯向美國提交了一份條約草案，旨在結束這種局麵並保護講俄語的民眾，這淪為廢紙。這場戰爭始於 2014 年”。對於那些想與頓巴斯的俄羅斯少數民族作戰的人來說，這是一場戰爭：“我們將有工作和養老金，而他們不會。我們會因生孩子而獲得獎勵，而他們不會。我們的孩子會有學校和幼兒園；他們的孩子將住在地下室。通過這種方式，我們將贏得這場戰爭，”　波羅申科總統在 2015 年（說。不言而喻，這些措施類似於對被剝奪工作、工資和教育的所謂“未接種疫苗”的歧視。在頓涅茨克和盧甘斯克進行了八年的轟炸，數十萬受害者，150 名兒童死亡，以及非常嚴重的酷刑、強奸、綁架和歧視案件。

令人沮喪的是，歐盟和美國——布魯塞爾和華盛頓——正在無條件地支持澤連斯基總統，他的政府八年來一直在繼續迫害講俄語的烏克蘭人而不受懲罰。

2022 年 2 月 18 日，由於頓巴斯人民民兵與烏克蘭武裝部隊之間的持續衝突，頓涅茨克和盧甘斯克的總統丹尼斯·普希林和列昂尼德·帕舍尼克下令將其省份的平民疏散到俄羅斯聯邦。 2月21日，國家杜馬（俄羅斯議會下院）一致批準了普京總統與頓涅茨克和盧甘斯克人民共和國提出的友好合作互助條約。與此同時，俄羅斯總統下令從俄羅斯聯邦派出軍隊，恢複頓巴斯地區的和平。

在這裏，人們可能想知道為什麽在新納粹軍隊和準軍事機構（他們懸掛帶有納粹標誌的旗幟並展示阿爾道夫·希特勒的肖像）公然侵犯獨立共和國的講俄語的人口的情況下，國際社會感到有義務認為俄羅斯聯邦的幹預值得譴責，並確實將暴力事件歸咎於普京。 1991 年 8 月 24 日烏克蘭宣布獨立並得到國際社會承認的大肆吹噓的人民自決權在哪裏？為什麽我們今天對俄羅斯對烏克蘭的幹預感到震驚，而當北約在南斯拉夫（1991 年）、科索沃（1999 年）、阿富汗（2001 年）、伊拉克（2003 年）以及利比亞和敘利亞（2011 年）進行同樣的事情時)，沒有人提出任何反對意見？更不用說在過去十年中，以色列多次打擊敘利亞、伊朗和黎巴嫩的軍事目標，以防止在其北部邊境建立敵對武裝陣線，但沒有一個國家提議對特拉維夫實施製裁。

令人沮喪的是，歐盟和美國——布魯塞爾和華盛頓——以多麽虛偽的態度無條件地支持澤倫斯基總統，他的政府八年來一直在繼續迫害講俄語的烏克蘭人而不受懲罰，因為他們甚至被禁止說自己的語言，在一個包含眾多民族的國家中，說俄語的人占 17.2%。他們對烏克蘭軍隊用平民作為人體盾牌保持沉默是可恥的，烏克蘭軍隊將防空陣地設置在人口中心、醫院、學校和幼兒園內，以便它們的破壞可能導致人口死亡。

主流媒體小心翼翼地不展示俄羅斯士兵幫助平民到達安全位置或組織人道主義走廊的圖像，烏克蘭民兵向這些走廊開火。正如他們同樣對澤連斯基把武器派發給烏克蘭的邊緣人群所導致的算老賬、屠殺、暴力和盜竊保持沉默一樣：這些視頻在互聯網上加劇內戰氛圍，被烏克蘭政府巧妙地利用。除此之外，我們還可以加上被征召入伍的被釋放的罪犯以及外國軍團的誌願者：一群沒有規則和沒有訓練的狂熱分子，將導致局勢惡化，使其無法控製。

澤連斯基製作並出演的這部由 57 集組成的電視連續劇表明，媒體計劃了他的烏克蘭總統候選人資格和競選活動。

正如各界所指出的，烏克蘭總統澤連斯基的候選和選舉契合了近年來喜劇演員娛樂明星投身政界的陳詞濫調。別相信沒有合適的進階資質是晉升到機構高層的障礙；恰恰相反：一個人對政黨世界越是明顯陌生，就越會認為他的成功是由掌權者決定的。澤連斯基的變裝表演完全符合 LGBTQ 意識形態，該意識形態與性別平等、墮胎和綠色經濟一起，被其歐洲讚助商視為每個國家都應該接受的不可或缺的“改革”議程。難怪世界經濟論壇的成員澤連斯基能夠從施瓦布及其盟友的支持中受益，獲得權利並確保烏克蘭也將進行大重置。

澤連斯基製作並出演的這部由 57 集組成的電視連續劇表明，媒體計劃了他的烏克蘭總統候選人資格和競選活動。在小說《人民公仆》中，他飾演一位意外成為共和國總統並與政治腐敗作鬥爭的高中教師。這部絕對平庸的劇集仍然獲得 WorldFest Remi 獎（美國，2016 年），在首爾國際戲劇獎（韓國）中進入喜劇片類別前四名並獲獎，並在漢堡世界媒體電影節娛樂電視連續劇類Intermedia Globe銀獎，這絕非巧合。

澤連斯基在電視連續劇中獲得的媒體轟動為他在 Instagram 上帶來了超過 1000 萬粉絲，並為建立同名的　“人民公仆黨”　創造了先決條件，該政黨中，Kvartal 95 Studio 的總經理兼股東（還有澤連斯基本人和寡頭 Kolomoisky）伊萬·巴卡諾夫和 TV 1+1 電視網絡的所有者也是成員。澤連斯基的形象是一種人造產品，一種媒體虛構，一種操縱共識的操作，它成功地在烏克蘭集體想象中創造了政治人物，在現實而非小說中，它已斬獲權力。

“就在他 2019 年大選獲勝前一個月，澤倫斯基將公司 [Kvartal 95 Studio] 賣給了一位朋友，仍然想方設法從他正式放棄給家人的生意中獲得收益。那個朋友是謝爾希·謝菲爾（Serhiy Shefir），後來被任命為總統府顧問。 […] 股份出售是為了 Maltex Multicapital Corp. 的利益，該公司由謝菲爾擁有並在英屬維爾京群島注冊”（。

至少可以說烏克蘭現任總統用一則令人不安的廣告宣傳他的競選活動，他手持兩挺機槍向被指腐敗或屈從於俄羅斯的國會議員開火。然而，烏克蘭總統以“人民公仆”的身份鼓吹的反腐鬥爭與他在所謂的　“潘多拉文件”　中出現的形象並不相符，文件顯示在他選舉前日，猶太億萬富翁 Kolomoisky[1] 通過離岸賬戶想他支付了 4000 萬美元。 [2]在他的祖國，許多人指責他從親俄寡頭手中奪取權力不是為了給烏克蘭人民，而是為了加強他自己的利益集團，同時清除他的政治對手：“他清算了老衛兵的部長們，首先是強大的內政部長，[Arsen] Avakov。他粗魯地讓正在監督他的憲法法院院長退休。他關閉了七個反對派電視頻道。他逮捕並指控維克托·梅德韋丘克叛國罪，後者是親俄羅斯的同情者、但最重要的是 “反對平台——為生命黨” （Platform of Opposition– For Life party）的領導人，這是烏克蘭議會繼他的 “人民公仆黨”之後的第二大黨。他還以叛國罪審判了前總統波羅申科，後者對所有人都持懷疑態度，除了那些與俄羅斯人或他們的朋友合得來的人。基輔市長、廣受歡迎的前世界拳擊冠軍維塔利·克裏奇科（Vitaly Klitchko）已經遭到多次搜查和扣押。簡而言之，澤連斯基似乎想徹底掃除任何與他的政治不一致的人”。

2019年4月21日，澤連斯基以73.22%的高票當選烏克點解這裏蘭總統，並與5月20日就職。2019年5月22日，他任命伊凡.巴卡諾夫 (Ivan Bakanov) 為Kvartal 95總幹事、烏克蘭安全局副局長、烏克蘭安全局中央局打擊腐敗和有組織犯罪主要局局長。與巴卡諾夫同樣值得一提的，是世界經濟論壇成員、副總裁兼數字化轉型部長米哈伊洛·費多羅夫（Mykhailo Fedorov）。就連澤連斯基本人也承認，他的靈感來自加拿大總理賈斯汀·特魯多。

另一方麵，就在四個月前，克裏斯塔利娜·格奧爾基耶娃（Kristalina Georgieva）與克勞斯·施瓦布（Klaus Schwab）、查爾斯王子和聯合國秘書長安東尼奧·古特雷斯（António Guterres）一起發起了大重置。

澤連斯基與國際貨幣基金（IMF）和國際經濟論壇（WEF）的關係

 

正如希臘的悲慘先例所表明的那樣，國家主權和議會表達的民意實際上被國際金融機構的決定所抹殺，這些機構通過訛詐和經濟性質的公然勒索幹預政府政策。烏克蘭是歐洲最貧窮的國家之一，也不例外。

在澤連斯基選舉後不久，國際貨幣基金組織威脅如果烏克蘭滿足他們的要求，就不給50億美元貸款。在與國際貨幣基金組織首席執行官克裏斯塔利娜·格奧爾基耶娃的電話交談中，烏克蘭總統因用他信任的人凱裏洛·舍甫琴科（Kyrylo Shevchenko）取代雅基夫·斯莫利（Yakiv Smolii）而受到指責，後者不太願意遵守國際貨幣基金組織的命令。 安德斯·阿斯隆德（Anders Åslund） 在給大西洋理事會的信中寫道：“圍繞澤連斯基政府的問題正在以驚人的速度增長。首先，自 2020 年 3 月以來，總統的領導不僅導致了他所尋求的改革的逆轉，也使得他的前任彼得·波羅申科發起的改革流產。其次，他的政府沒有提出合理的建議來解決國際貨幣基金組織對烏克蘭未履行承諾。第三，總統似乎不再擁有執政的議會多數席位，而且他似乎對形成改革派多數派不感興趣。

很明顯，國際貨幣基金組織的幹預旨在讓烏克蘭政府承諾與全球主義議程所規定的經濟、財政和社會政策保持一致，首先是烏克蘭中央銀行“獨立”於政府：是國際貨幣基金組織呼籲基輔政府放棄對其中央銀行的合法控製的一種委婉說法。與發行貨幣和管理公共債務一樣，這本是行使國家主權的方式之一。另一方麵，就在四個月前，克裏斯塔利娜·格奧爾基耶娃與克勞斯·施瓦布、查爾斯王子和聯合國秘書長安東尼奧·古特雷斯一起發起了大重置。

在與 BCU 的新任州長 Kyrylo Shevchenko 一起得到世界經濟論壇（點解這裏）的青睞的澤連斯基總統的領導下，前幾屆政府不可能做到的事情完成了。不到一年後，為了證明他的服從，舍甫琴科為世界經濟論壇寫了一篇題為“中央銀行是各國氣候目標的關鍵，烏克蘭正在指明方向”的文章。因此，《2030 年議程》在敲詐之下得以實施。

還有其他與世界經濟論壇有聯係的烏克蘭公司：烏克蘭國家儲蓄銀行（烏克蘭最大的金融機構之一）、DTEK 集團（烏克蘭能源部門的重要私人投資者）和 Ukr Land Farming農業領域的領導者）。銀行、能源和食品是完全符合克勞斯·施瓦布理論的大重置和第四次工業革命的行業。

2021 年 2 月 4 日，烏克蘭總統關閉了包括 ZIK、Newsone 和烏克蘭 112 在內的 7 家電視台，這些電台均因不支持政府而獲罪。正如 Anna Del Freo 所寫：“歐洲記者聯合會和國際記者聯合會也對這種剝奪自由的行為進行了嚴厲譴責，他們要求立即取消關閉名利。這三個廣播公司五年內不能廣播：他們雇用了大約1500 名員工，這些人的工作處於危險之中。除了烏克蘭政治最高層的任意指責它們威脅信息安全並受到“俄羅斯的惡意影響”，並沒有真正的理由關閉這三間廣播公司。烏克蘭記者工會 NUJU 也做出了強烈反應，因為數百名記者被剝奪了表達自己的機會，數十萬公民被剝奪了言論自由，該工會表示對言論自由的攻擊非常嚴重被告知的權利。正如我們所看到的，普京被指控的實際上是由澤連斯基，最近由歐盟，還有社交媒體平台的同謀下進行的。 “關閉電視廣播公司是限製新聞自由的最極端形式之一，”EFJ 秘書長Ricardo Gutierrez 說。 “各國有義務確保信息的有效多元化。很明顯，總統否決權根本不符合言論自由的國際標準”。

知道歐洲記者聯合會和國際記者聯合會在今日俄羅斯和歐洲人造衛星停電後發表了什麽聲明會很有趣。

從事軍事和準軍事行動的新納粹運動在烏克蘭自由活動，通常得到公共機構的官方支持。

 

烏克蘭的新納粹和極端主義運動

 

一個呼籲國際社會提供人道主義援助以保護其人民免受俄羅斯侵略的國家應該在集體想象中脫穎而出，尊重民主原則並立法禁止極端主義意識形態活動和宣傳傳播。

從事軍事和準軍事行動的新納粹運動在烏克蘭自由活動，通常得到公共機構的官方支持。其中包括：Stepan Bandera 的烏克蘭民族主義者組織 (OUN)，這是一個已活躍在車臣的納粹、反猶太主義和種族主義的混合運動，它是右翼組織的一部分，該組織是2013/2014 年歐洲邁丹（Euromaidan） 政變期間成立的極右翼運動協會；烏克蘭起義軍（UPA）； UNA/UNSO，極右翼政黨烏克蘭國民議會的準軍事部門；在基輔為 ISIS 成員提供保護的科爾欽斯基兄弟會（點解這裏）； 厭世視覺（Misanthropic Vision (MD)），一個遍布 19 個國家的新納粹網絡，公開煽動恐怖主義、極端主義和對基督徒、穆斯林、猶太人、共產主義者、同性戀者、美國人和有色人種的仇恨（點解這裏）。

應該記住，政府通過派總統衛隊參加他們代表的葬禮，以及支持亞速營（Azov Battalion），對這些極端組織給予了明確的支持。亞速營是正式隸屬於烏克蘭軍隊的準軍事組織，以亞速特種作戰團的新名稱被編入國民警衛隊。亞速團由烏克蘭猶太寡頭 伊戈爾·科洛莫伊斯基（Igor Kolomoisky ）資助，他是第聶伯羅彼得羅夫斯克的前州長，他也被認為是 Pravyi Sektor 民族主義民兵的資助者，這些民兵被認為對敖德薩大屠殺負有責任。我們談論的是潘多拉文件中提到的作為澤連斯基總統的讚助人的科洛莫伊斯基。該營與歐洲和美國的幾個極右翼組織有關係。

國際特赦組織秘書長薩利爾·謝蒂和總理阿爾謝尼·亞采紐克在 2014 年 9 月 8 日會晤後，呼籲烏克蘭政府結束與基輔武裝部隊一起行動的誌願營所犯下的虐待和戰爭罪行。烏克蘭政府已對此事展開正式調查，宣布亞速營似乎沒有任何官兵正在接受調查。

2015 年 3 月，烏克蘭內政部長阿爾森·阿瓦科夫宣布，亞速營將成為美國陸軍部隊訓練的首批單位之一，作為其 “無畏衛隊行動” 訓練任務的一部分。美國的訓練於 2015 年 6 月 12 日停止。當時美國眾議院通過了一項修正案，禁止對該營提供所有援助（包括武器和訓練），因為該營過去曾是新納粹分子。隨後，在中央情報局的壓力下，該修正案被撤銷，亞速營的士兵在美國（點解這裏和點解這裏）接受了訓練：“我們已經訓練這些人八年了。他們真的是很好的戰士。該機構的計劃可能產生嚴重影響。”

2016 年，歐安組織的一份報告 【歐洲安全與合作組織]】發現，亞速營對大規模屠殺囚犯、在萬人坑中隱藏屍體以及係統地使用身體和心理酷刑技術負有責任。就在幾天前，該營副指揮官瓦迪姆·特羅揚（Vadim Troyan）被內政部長阿爾森·阿瓦科夫（Arsen Avakov）任命為州地區警察局長。

這些是與烏克蘭軍隊一起對抗俄羅斯士兵的“英雄”。而這些亞速營的英雄，不但不保護自己的孩子，竟敢將自己的骨肉變成屠宰肉供，招募男孩和女孩，這違反了《聯合國兒童權力另擇公約議定書》，涉及讓未成年人卷入武裝衝突：這項特別法律文書規定對於18 歲以下兒童，不得由國家武裝部隊或武裝團體強行招募或直接用於敵對行動。

不可避免地，在“反法西斯”政黨的支持下，由包括德拉吉領導的意大利在內的歐盟所提供的致命武器，注定要被用來對付這些孩子。

 

世界新秩序計劃中的烏克蘭戰爭

 

對俄羅斯廣播公司實施的審查顯然是為了防止官方說辭被事實推翻。但是，當西方媒體展示了電子遊戲戰爭雷霆的圖像，電影星球大戰的畫麵，中國大爆炸，閱兵視頻，阿富汗的鏡頭，羅馬地鐵或移動火葬場的圖像並通過將這些偽裝成烏克蘭戰爭的真實和近期的場景，現實被忽略了，因為決意用挑起衝突作為分散大眾注意力的武器，以使根據世界經濟論壇的大重置計劃和聯合國 2030 年議程而針對西方國家自由的新限製合法化。

很明顯，除外交可解決的問題外，烏克蘭人民也是超國家大國正在實施的同一場全球政變的受害者，這些政變的目的不是國家之間的和平，而是建立新世界秩序暴政。就在幾天前，烏克蘭議員基拉·魯迪克手持卡拉什尼科夫衝鋒槍對福克斯新聞說：“我們知道，我們不僅在為烏克蘭而戰，也在為世界新秩序而戰。”

烏克蘭的侵犯人權行為和普京一再譴責的新納粹民兵罪行無法找到政治解決方案，因為它們是由全球主義精英所策劃和煽動，由歐盟、北約和美國深層政府所合作，帶有反俄羅斯語氣的，旨在製造一場不可避免戰爭的、主要在歐洲強製實施能源配給和旅行限製為目標的 ，要用電子貨幣代替紙幣並采用數字身份證的。我們不是在談論理論項目。這些決定將在歐洲層麵及個別國家具體作出。

北約、美國和歐盟對烏克蘭的幹預似乎沒有任何合法性。

 

尊重法律與標準

 

北約、美國和歐盟對烏克蘭的幹預似乎沒有任何合法性。烏克蘭不是北約成員國，因此它不應受益於以保衛其成員國為目的實體援助。歐盟也是如此，就在幾天前，歐盟邀請澤連斯基加入。與此同時，烏克蘭自2014 年以來從美國獲得了 25 億美元，僅在 2021 年就獲得了 4 億美元（點解這裏），外加其他資金總計46 億美元（點解這裏）。就他而言，普京已向烏克蘭提供了 150 億美元的貸款，以使其免於破產。歐盟方麵，除了來自各個國家的資金外，還提供了 1700 萬美元的資金。但這種援助對烏克蘭民眾的幫助微乎其微。

此外，歐盟委員會主席烏爾蘇拉·馮德萊恩以歐盟的名義幹預烏克蘭戰爭，違反了《裏斯本條約》第9、11和12條。歐盟在這方麵的權限屬於歐洲理事會和高級代表。在任何情況下，它都不屬於委員會主席。馮德萊恩主席以什麽身份冒充歐盟首腦，篡奪一個不屬於她的角色？為什麽沒有人幹預，特別是考慮到歐洲公民因俄羅斯可能進行報複而麵臨的危險？

此外，在許多情況下，今天向烏克蘭提供支持和武器的國家的憲法並未規定進入衝突的可能性。例如，意大利憲法第 11 條規定：“意大利拒絕將戰爭作為侵犯其他人民自由的工具和解決國際爭端的手段。” 向既不屬於北約也不屬於歐盟的國家派遣武器和士兵構成對與其交戰的國家（在這種情況下為俄羅斯）事實上的宣戰，因此需要事先考慮宣戰，正如意大利憲法第 78 條所預見的那樣：“國會審議戰爭狀態並將必要的權力授予政府。” 迄今為止，似乎沒有要求各國會據此表達自己的意見，亦或共和國總統也沒有進行幹預以要求遵守憲法規定。由全球主義陰謀集團任命的總理德拉吉是為了摧毀意大利並使其徹底被超國家權利所奴役，他是將公民意願當成是執行世界經濟論壇議程的煩人障礙的國家政府首腦之一。在有係統地侵犯基本權利和憲法兩年之後，很難相信他會把意大利的國家利益置於那些讓他掌權的人的利益之上。相反：他的政府所采取的製裁措施造成的後果越嚴重，他就越能認為自己受到賦予他權力的人的賞識。今天，通過精神大流行緊急情況實施的政變帶來了新的不幸決定，得到了沒有脊梁的議會批準。

俄烏衝突是針對烏克蘭、俄羅斯和歐洲國家設置的一個非常危險的陷阱。

允許意大利公民，甚至是政府中的大多數成員和政治領導人回應烏克蘭大使關於加入外國軍團的呼籲，也違反了意大利刑法第 288 條：“任何在[意大利]領土上未經政府批準招募或武裝公民為外國[在軍隊中]服務，將被處以4至15年的監禁。”　至少目前沒有任何地方法官出麵幹預以懲罰應對此罪行負責的人。

發現的另一種違規行為，是意大利夫婦違反第 40/2004 號法律指令將通過代孕獲得的兒童從烏克蘭轉移到意大利（可能也轉移到其他國家），對犯罪者及同謀也沒有任何處罰。

 

還應該記住，政府成員或政治領導人關於俄羅斯聯邦及其總統的言論，對俄羅斯采取的製裁措施，以及對俄羅斯公民、公司、藝術家和運動隊的歧視，而原因僅僅是他們是俄羅斯人。這不僅是應該避免的挑釁，以便平靜和平地解決烏克蘭危機。而且這也會將意大利公民的安全置於非常嚴重的危險之中（同時，對俄羅斯采取類似立場的其他國家公民的安全也是如是）。如此魯莽冒失的原因是不可理解的，除非是有意引起對方的反應。

 

俄烏衝突是針對烏克蘭、俄羅斯和歐洲國家的一個非常危險的陷阱。

 

這場危機已經準備和煽動了很長時間，肯定是從 2014 年美國深層政府以反俄為重點的白色政變開始的。

烏克蘭是成功劊子手的最新受害者

俄烏危機並沒在一個月前突然爆發，可已經準備和煽動了很長時間。肯定是從 2014 年美國深層政府在反俄關鍵中所欲求的白色政變開始的。除其他無可爭辯的事實外，中央情報局對亞速營的訓練“殺死俄羅斯人”證明了這一點，中央情報局強迫撤銷國會於 2015 年製定的禁止亞速營的修正案。喬·拜登和亨特·拜登的幹預也是同一方向。因此，有證據表明這是長期的預謀，這與北約無情地向東方擴張是一致的。 歐洲邁丹（Euromaidan）顏色革命，以及由世界經濟論壇和喬治索羅斯訓練的新人組成的親北約政府的建立，旨在為烏克蘭從屬於北約集團創造條件，將其從俄羅斯聯邦的影響中拉出來。為此，這位匈牙利慈善家的非政府組織在媒體宣傳的支持下采取了顛覆行動，對新納粹準軍事組織的罪行保持沉默，這些組織由讚助澤倫斯基的人所資助。

但是，即便西方國家主流媒體的洗腦成功地傳達了一種完全扭曲的現實敘事，那麽烏克蘭就不是這樣了，當地民眾非常清楚當權政治階層的腐敗以及它遠離烏克蘭民族的真正問題。西方的我們認為，“寡頭”隻存在於俄羅斯，而現實卻是，他們存在於前蘇聯組成的整個銀河係中，他們隻需將自己置於外國“慈善家”和跨國公司的外衣之下。他們的離岸賬戶使得這國家的公民貧困、醫療保健係統落後、官僚機構權力過大、幾乎完全沒有公共服務、外國控製戰略公司的主要原因，主權和國家認同的逐漸喪失，這都無關緊要：重要的是要“賺錢”，並與政治人物、銀行家、軍火商和那些讓人民挨餓的人一起永垂不朽。然後來到 維西利亞（Versilia） 或阿馬爾菲海岸的時尚度假勝地，向敖德薩的服務員或基輔的清潔工炫耀他們的遊艇和白金卡，他們將微薄的工資寄給回家的親戚。這些戴著猶太小黑帽（kippahs）的烏克蘭億萬富翁是那些將烏克蘭出賣給腐敗和腐敗的西方的人，他們到處使用同樣無情和不道德的製度，將自己的同胞出賣給正接管世界的高利貸者奴役，以換取自己的好處。過去他們削減了雅典和塞薩洛尼基工人的工資；今天，他們則將視野擴大到整個歐洲，那裏的人們仍然難以置信地看著先是健康獨裁，然後是環境獨裁正被實施。

另一方麵，如果沒有戰爭的借口，他們如何能夠為飆升的天然氣和燃料價格辯護，迫使被上麵為控製貧困群眾而強加的“生態”轉型過程？當大流行的鬧劇正在瓦解並揭露大藥廠（ BigPharma） 犯下的反人類罪行時，他們怎麽能讓西方世界的人民接受新世界秩序的暴政？

盡管歐盟和政府首腦將這場即將到來的災難歸咎於俄羅斯，但西方精英表明他們甚至想要摧毀農業，以便在全球範圍內應用大饑荒的恐怖。另一方麵，在許多國家（包括意大利），為了跨國公司的利益以及控製和限製農業活動的目的，水道私有化正在被理論化——而水是不可剝奪的公共物品。基輔親北約政府的行為並沒有太大的不同：八年來，克裏米亞被剝奪了第聶伯河的水源，以防止灌溉農田並使人民挨餓。今天，鑒於對俄羅斯實施的製裁和糧食供應的大幅減少，我們可以理解比爾蓋茨在農業上的巨額投資，遵循疫苗運動已經經曆過的同樣無情的盈利邏輯。

烏克蘭人民，無論他們屬於哪個族群，都隻是超國家極權主義政權最新的不知情的人質，在公開理論化有必要進行大規模毀滅之後，它們通過 Covid 欺騙使整個世界的國民經濟長跪不起。公開理論化地消減世界人口，並將幸存者轉變為免疫係統無法彌補的慢性病患者。

烏克蘭人民應該認真考慮呼籲北約或歐盟的幹預，前提是確實是烏克蘭人民這樣做，而不是在他們的腐敗統治者，後者受助於種族主義雇傭軍和拿體製俸祿的新納粹團體。因為他們雖然被承諾從入侵者手中獲得自由——而這些侵略者與他們有共同宗教和大俄羅斯文化遺產，分享曾經是大俄羅斯一部分的遺產——但實際上，具有諷刺意味的斯等待他們的事他們的無可避免的被取消。可以預見除了保護他們的身份、主權和邊界之外，他們會被大重置的所奴役。

讓烏克蘭人民看看歐盟國家發生了什麽：繁榮和安全的幻影被歐元和布魯塞爾遊說團留下的瓦礫所摧毀。非法移民入侵的國家，助長犯罪和賣淫；政治正確的意識形態破壞了他們的社會結構；因魯莽的經濟和財政政策而帶來眾所周知的破產；由於取消勞動和社會保障保護而導致貧困；由於家庭的破壞以及新一代的道德和智力腐敗而被剝奪的未來。

種族、語言、文化和宗教特性上各不相同的曾經繁榮獨立的國家，現在已經變成了一群沒有脊梁的烏合之眾，沒有理想、沒有希望、沒有信仰，甚至沒有反抗對他們虐待和犯罪的統治者。即使麵對明晃晃的欺詐證據，仍然是那些公司的客戶群，也是大流行鬧劇所施加的詳細控製係統的奴隸。一群沒有個人身份的、用二維碼標記的人，像集約化農場裏的動物，也像一個巨大的購物中心的產品。如果這是所有國家放棄國家主權的結果——那些把自己委托給歐盟的巨大騙局的每個國家，無一例外！——憑什麽烏克蘭會有所不同？

當你們的父親和弗拉基米爾大帝一起在第聶伯河畔接受洗禮時，這難道是他們所想、所望，所求的嗎？

如果說我們每個人都能在這場危機中認識到積極的一麵，那就是它揭示了全球主義暴政的恐怖，它無情的玩世不恭，以及它摧毀殲滅它所觸及的一切的能力。不是烏克蘭人應該加入歐盟或北約，而是其他國家應該最終以自豪和勇氣離開他們，擺脫這可惡的枷鎖，重新發現自己的獨立、主權、身份，和信仰，和他們自己的靈魂。

需要明確的是：新秩序不是無法逃避的命運，它可以被顛覆和譴責，隻要世界人民意識到他們被一個由明顯可辨認的罪犯組成的寡頭集團所蒙蔽和欺騙，今天他們對任何在他們麵前不肯屈膝的實施製裁和凍結資金，終有一天他們會為他們的逍遙法外的行為承當責任。

呼籲第三羅馬

對俄羅斯來說，這場衝突也是一個陷阱。這是因為它將實現美國深層政府的夢想，在其商業和文化關係中將俄羅斯從歐洲環境中徹底驅逐，將其推入中國的懷抱，也許是希望北京的獨裁政權能夠說服俄羅斯人接受迄今為止俄羅斯至少部分避免的社會信用體係和大重置的其他方麵。

這是一個陷阱，並不是因為俄羅斯想要將烏克蘭的極端組織“去納粹化”並保證對講俄語的烏克蘭人提供保護是錯誤的，而是因為正是這些理由——理論上站得住腳——專門用來挑釁和誘導它入侵烏克蘭，以激起由深層國家和全球主義精英準備了一段時間的北約反應。宣戰理由是衝突的真正肇事者故意策劃的，他們知道它會得到普京的確切回應。無論他是否正確，普京都應該不落入陷阱，而是扭轉局麵，在不繼續衝突的情況下為烏克蘭提供體麵和平的條件。事實上，普京越相信他是對的，他就越需要通過不屈服於挑釁來展示他的國家的偉大和他對人民的愛。

 

請允許我重複先知以賽亞的話： DISSOLVE COLLIGATIONES IMPIETATIS, SOLVE FASCICULOS DEPRIMENTES, DIMITTE EOS QUI CONFRACTI SUNT LIBEROS, ET OMNE ONUS DIRUMPE； FRANGE ESURIENTI PANEM TUUM, ET EGENOS VAGOSQUE INDUC IN DOMUM TUAM； CUM VIDERIS NUDUM, OPERI EUM, ET CARNEM TUAM NE DESPEXERIS。 TUNC ERUMPET QUASI MANE LUMEN TUUM； ET SANITAS TUA CITIUS ORIETUR, ET ANTEIBIT FACIEM TUAM JUSTITIA TUA, ET GLORIA DOMINI COLLIGET TE.

鬆開邪惡的繩索，解開壓迫的捆綁，讓被打垮的人自由，打破每一個重擔。與饑餓者分享你的麵包，歡迎無家可歸的受苦人來你的家；有赤身裸體，給他衣服蔽體，不要背棄自己的骨肉。然後你的光會像黎明般升起，你的傷口會很快愈合，公義將行在你的麵前，主的榮耀將緊隨著你。 （賽 58:6-8）。

正準備解散傳統社會的世界危機也牽涉到天主教會，其等級製度被那些追逐權力的叛教者扣為人質。 [4]曾幾何時，教皇和主教可直麵對國王而行塵世禮儀，因為他們知道他們在以萬王之王耶穌基督的聲音說話。凱撒和教皇的羅馬現在荒涼而寂靜，就像幾世紀以來君士坦丁堡的第二羅馬保持沉默一樣。或許天意安排了莫斯科，即第三羅馬，今天將在世人麵前扮演 κατ?χον（帖撒羅尼迦後書 2:6-7）的角色，成為敵基督者的末世障礙。如果共產主義的錯誤是由蘇聯傳播的，甚至強加於教會，俄羅斯和烏克蘭今天可以在恢複基督教文明方麵發揮劃時代的作用，為世界帶來一個和平時期，此間教會也將在牧師們中再次淨化和更新。

美利堅合眾國和歐洲國家不應將俄羅斯邊緣化，而應與她結盟，不僅是為了恢複貿易以促進所有人的繁榮，而且是為了重建基督教文明，以挽救來自全球主義技術健康超人類怪物的世界。

 

最後的考慮

 

人們非常擔心世界人民的命運掌握在精英手中。在政治家和主流媒體同謀下，他們不為他們的決定對任何人負責，他們不承認任何高於自己的權威，他們為了追求自己的利益毫不猶豫地危及數十億人的安全、經濟狀況和性命。他們篡改事實、對現實荒謬造假，用新聞傳播黨派偏見的同時封殺不同的聲音，他們導致對俄裔公民的種族迫害，而這些人恰恰在自稱民主尊重基本權利的國度。

我急切地希望我的建立團結世界人民反對世界新秩序暴政的反全球主義聯盟的呼籲，能被這樣的人所接受，這些人心係共同福祉、國家間和平、所有人的和睦、所有公民的自由和新一代的未來。甚至在此之前，即使是在這些對烏克蘭戰爭深感憂慮的時刻，願我的言論——以及許多思想上誠實的人的言論——有助於揭露那些利用謊言和欺詐來為其罪行辯護的人的共謀和腐
敗。

“願強者傾聽我們，以免在不公中變得軟弱。願有權勢者傾聽我們，如果他們希望他們的力量不是破壞，而是支持人民，保護秩序和工作的安寧”（這是庇護十二世，在1939 年 8 月 24 日戰爭迫在眉睫之際給世界各國元首和人民的廣播信息，）。

願聖靈帶領所有基督徒向上主請求赦免那些踐踏祂神聖律法的人的罪過。願懺悔和禁食能獲得上帝憐憫，而我們重複先知喬爾的話：Parce，Domine：parce populo tuo； et ne des hæreditatem tuam in opprobrium, ut dominentur eis nationales。主啊，赦免你的子民，不要讓你的產業受辱，受外邦人的嘲笑（Jl 2:17）。

2022年３月６日

[1] 2011 年，Kolomoisky 與億萬富翁 Vadim Rabinovich 是猶太歐洲議會的聯合創始人之一。參照。 http://ejp.eu/。請注意，拉比諾維奇是烏克蘭親俄政黨“終身反對黨”的成員，其領導人維克托·梅德韋丘克（Viktor Medvedcuk）被澤連斯基逮捕。

[2] 據俄羅斯政治家維克托·弗拉迪斯拉沃維奇·祖巴列夫（Viktor Vladislavovich Zubarev）稱，據說澤連斯基在哥斯達黎加的德累斯頓銀行存入了 12 億美元，並以 3400 萬美元購買了邁阿密的一座別墅(here)。如需更全麵的圖片，請參閱烏克蘭獨立調查新聞機構 Slidstvo-info 的調查　(here)。

[3] 應該指出的是，意大利生態轉型部長羅伯托·辛戈拉尼（Roberto Cingolani）幾天前決定向烏克蘭出售一部分石油庫存，“作為能源方麵的具體援助”，就像他在大流行期間一樣向中國贈送了數百萬個口罩，但不久之後又從北京買回來 (here)。

[4] Famiglia Cristiana 在其 3 月 6 日的問題上做了一個標題，評論了 Sant’Egidio 社區創始人 Andrea Riccardi 的一篇文章：“讓我們停止戰爭，建立一個新的世界秩序”。(here).

原文鏈接：

https://insidethevatican.com/news/newsflash/letter-45-2022-mon-mar-7-vigano/

Letter #45, 2022, Mon, Mar 7: Viganò

https://insidethevatican.com/news/newsflash/letter-45-2022-mon-mar-7-vigano/

 

    “All can be lost with war. Let men return to understanding. Let them resume negotiating.” —The words of Pope Pius XII to the nations of Europe just before the beginning of the Second World War, on August 24, 1939, cited by Archbishop Viganò at the opening of his Declaration on the Russia-Ukraine Crisis (text below), written yesterday, March 6, and published today, March 7. One week after Pius XII’s words on August 24, 1939, World War II began, and it continued for nearly six years…

    “The Russian-Ukrainian conflict is a very dangerous trap that has been set against Ukraine, Russia, and the nations of Europe.”—Archbishop Viganò, in his March 6 “Declaration”

    “The United States of America and the European nations should not marginalize Russia, but rather form an alliance with her, not only for the restoration of trade for the prosperity of all, but in view of the reconstruction of a Christian Civilization, which alone can save the world from the globalist techno-health transhumanist monster.” —Archbishop Viganò, in his March 6 “Declaration”

    “I earnestly hope that my appeal for the establishment of an Anti-Globalist Alliance that unites the peoples of the world in opposition against the tyranny of the New World Order will be accepted by those who have at heart the common good, peace between nations, concord among all peoples, freedom for all citizens and the future of the new generations.”—Archbishop Viganò, at the end of his “Declaration”

    Letter #45, 2022, Monday, March 7: Viganò

    Earlier today, Italian Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, 81, sent via internet his Declaration on the Russia-Ukraine Crisis, dated yesterday, March 6.

    The archbishop’s declaration begins with a quotation from Pope Pius XII.

    On August 24, 1939, Pope Pius attempted to call the nations of Europe to “return to understanding” and to “resume negotiating” rather than begin a war that, even at that time — before anyone knew of the horrors it would bring — was nevertheless dreaded as the likely bringer of enormous suffering and much death (also because World War One had ended only 21 years before, in 1918, and no one wished for a similar new war).

    This enables us to understand Viganò’s intention in writing this very long Declaration — it runs to 24 pages type-written — 83 years after the heartfelt but ultimately unsuccessful appeal of Pius XII in 1939.

    Viganò, like Pius XII, wishes to cry out in order to forestall a war which looms before us.

    Viganò wishes us to “return to understanding” and “resume negotiating” rather than prepare to unleash “the dogs of war.”

    Readers may not agree with all that the archbishop writes. (I myself am still working my way a second time through his text and clicking on the links he offers to see whether there really is supporting evidence for the statements he makes. Certainly if readers find egregious errors in what the archbishop writes, they may write back to me, and I will try to communicate the objections and eventual corrections to the archbishop.)

    Of one thing I am persuaded: the archbishop writes this, sets forth this narrative, in the hope of helping to accomplish what Pius XII was unable to accomplish: to avoid, if it is possible, a world war.    

    Viganò was until not very long ago one of the highest-ranking diplomats in the entire world.

    For five years, from 2011 to 2016, he was the ambassador of the Holy See (an institution with a continuous history reaching back 2,000 years) to the United States of America (arguably the most powerful country in the world).

    During those years, Viganò, who had passed through the rigorous Vatican program for training diplomats and had spent years in Iraq, Great Britain, and Nigeria, came to know the United States well, meeting with presidents, senators and leaders in the cultural and economic life of the country.

    Because of this training, this experience, this background, it seemed fitting to present in full the arguments of this retired diplomat.

    Here, then, is Archbishop Vigano’s complete March 6 Declaration on the Russia-Ukraine Crisis. —RM

    (Full text below)

 

SUPPORT THE MOYNIHAN LETTERS

 

DECLARATION

of Msgr. Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop,

Former Apostolic Nuncio to The United States of America

on the Russia-Ukraine Crisis

    Nothing is lost with peace. All can be lost with war. Let men return to understanding. Let them resume negotiating. Negotiating with good will and with respect for each other’s rights, let them realize that an honorable success is never precluded when there are sincere and active negotiations. And they will feel great – with true greatness – if imposing silence on the voices of passion, whether collective or private, and leaving reason to its proper domain, they will spare their brothers bloodshed and their homeland ruin.

    Thus it was that on August 24, 1939, Pius XII addressed both rulers and peoples as war was imminent. These were not words of empty pacifism, nor of complicit silence about the multiple violations of justice that were being carried out in many quarters. In that radio message, which some people still remember hearing, the appeal of the Roman Pontiff invoked “respect for each other’s rights” as a prerequisite for fruitful peace negotiations.

    The Media Narrative

    If we look at what is happening in Ukraine, without being misled by the gross falsifications of the mainstream media, we realize that respect for each other’s rights has been completely ignored; indeed, we have the impression that the Biden Administration, NATO and the European Union deliberately want to maintain a situation of obvious imbalance, precisely to make impossible any attempt at a peaceful resolution of the Ukrainian crisis, provoking the Russian Federation to trigger a conflict. Herein lies the seriousness of the problem. This is the trap set for both Russia and Ukraine, using both of them to enable the globalist elite to carry out its criminal plan.

    It should not surprise us that pluralism and freedom of speech, so praised in countries that claim to be democratic, are daily disavowed by censorship and intolerance towards opinions not aligned with the official narrative. Manipulations of this kind have become the norm during the so-called pandemic, to the detriment of doctors, scientists and dissenting journalists, who have been discredited and ostracized for the mere fact of daring to question the effectiveness of experimental serums. Two years later, the truth about the adverse effects and the unfortunate management of the health emergency has proven them right, but the truth is stubbornly ignored because it does not correspond to what the system wanted and still wants today.

    If the world media have so far been able to lie shamelessly on a matter of strict scientific relevance, spreading lies and hiding reality, we should ask ourselves why, in the present situation, they should suddenly rediscover that intellectual honesty and respect for the code of ethics widely denied with Covid.

    But if this colossal fraud has been supported and disseminated by the media, it must be recognized that national and international health institutions, governments, magistrates, law enforcement agencies and the Catholic Hierarchy itself all share responsibility for the disaster – each in its own sphere by actively supporting or failing to oppose the narrative – a disaster that has affected billions of people in their health, their property, the exercise of their individual rights and even their very lives. Even in this case, it is difficult to imagine that those who have been guilty of such crimes in support of a pandemic that was intended and maliciously amplified could suddenly have a jolt of dignity and show solicitude for their citizens and their homeland when a war threatens their security and their economy.

    These, of course, can be the prudent reflections of those who want to remain neutral and look with detachment and almost disinterest at what is happening around them. But if we deepen our knowledge of the facts and document them, relying on authoritative and objective sources, we discover that doubts and perplexities soon become disturbing certainties.

    Even if we only want to limit our investigation to the economic aspect, we understand that news agencies, politics and public institutions themselves depend on a small number of financial groups belonging to an oligarchy that, significantly, is united not only by money and power, but by the ideological affiliation that guides its action and interference in the politics of nations and the whole world. This oligarchy shows its tentacles in the UN, NATO, the World Economic Forum, the European Union, and in “philanthropic” institutions such as George Soros’ Open Society and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

    All these entities are private and answer to no one but themselves, and at the same time they have the power to influence national governments, including through their own representatives who are made to be elected or appointed to key posts. They admit it themselves, when they are received with all the honors by Heads of State and world leaders, beginning with Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi, respected and feared by these leaders as the true masters of the fate of the world. Thus, those who hold power in the name of the “people” find themselves trampling on the people’s will and restricting their rights, in order to be obedient like courtiers to masters whom nobody has elected but who nevertheless dictate their political and economic agenda to the nations.

    We come then to the Ukraine crisis, which is presented to us as a consequence of Vladimir Putin’s expansionist arrogance towards an independent and democratic nation over which he is trying to claim absurd rights. The “warmonger Putin” is said to be massacring the defenseless population, who have courageously arisen to defend the soil of their homeland, the sacred borders of their nation and the violated freedoms of the citizens. The European Union and the United States, “defenders of democracy,” are therefore said to be unable not to intervene by means of NATO to restore Ukraine’s autonomy, drive out the “invader” and guarantee peace. In the face of the “tyrant’s arrogance,” it is said that the peoples of the world ought to form a common front, imposing sanctions on the Russian Federation and sending soldiers, weapons and economic aid to “poor” President Zelensky, “national hero” and “defender” of his people. As proof of Putin’s “violence,” the media spread images of bombings, military searches, and destruction, attributing responsibility to Russia. And there’s still more: precisely in order to guarantee a “lasting peace,” the European Union and NATO are opening wide their arms to welcome Ukraine as members. And in order to prevent “Soviet propaganda”, Europe is now blacking out Russia Today and Sputnik, in order to ensure that information is “free and independent.”

    This is the official narrative, to which everyone conforms. Being at war, dissent immediately becomes desertion, and those who dissent are guilty of treason and deserving of more or less serious sanctions, starting with public execration and ostracism, well experienced with Covid against those who are “un-vaxxed”. But the truth, if you want to know it, allows us to see things differently and to judge the facts for what they are and not for how they are presented to us. This is a true and proper unveiling, as indicated by the etymology of the Greek word ?λ?θεια. Or perhaps, with an eschatological gaze, a revelation, an ?ποκ?λυψις.

    The expansion of NATO

    First of all, it is necessary to remember the facts, which do not lie and are not susceptible to alteration. And the facts, however irritating they are to recall to those who try to censor them, tell us that since the fall of the Berlin Wall the United States has extended its sphere of political and military influence to almost all the satellite states of the former Soviet Union, even recently, annexing into NATO Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary (1999); Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Bulgaria and Romania (2004); Albania and Croatia (2009); Montenegro (2017); and North Macedonia (2020). The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is preparing to expand to Ukraine, Georgia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Serbia. Practically speaking, the Russian Federation is under military threat – from weapons and missile bases – just a few kilometers from its borders, while it has no military base in similar proximity to the United States.

    To be considering the possible expansion of NATO into Ukraine, without thinking that it will arouse Russia’s legitimate protests, is nothing short of puzzling, especially given the fact that in 1991 NATO pledged to the Kremlin not to expand further. Not only that: at the end of 2021, Der Spiegel published drafts of a treaty with the United States and an agreement with NATO on security guarantees (here, here and here). Moscow demanded legal guarantees from its Western partners that would prevent NATO from further eastward expansion by adding Ukraine to the alliance and also from establishing military bases in post-Soviet countries. The proposals also contained a clause on the non-deployment of offensive weapons by NATO near Russia’s borders and on the withdrawal of NATO forces in Eastern Europe back to their 1997 positions.

    As we can see, NATO has failed to keep its commitments to Russia, or has at least forced the situation at a very delicate moment for geopolitical balances. We should ask ourselves why the United States – or rather the American deep state which regained power after the electoral fraud that brought Joe Biden to the White House – wants to create tensions with Russia and involve its European partners in the conflict, with all the consequences we can imagine.

    As General Marco Bertolini, former commander of the Joint Summit Operational Command, has lucidly observed: “The United States did not just win the Cold War but also wanted to humiliate [Russia] by taking everything that in a certain sense fell within its area of influence. [Putin] bore with the Baltic countries, Poland, Romania and Bulgaria [joining NATO]. Faced with Ukraine [joining NATO], which would have taken away any possibility of access to the Black Sea, he reacted” (here). And he adds: “There is a problem of the regime’s stability, a situation has arisen with a fairly unlikely prime minister [Zelensky], one who comes from the world of entertainment.” The general does not fail to recall, in the case of a US attack on Russia, that “the Global Hawks flying over Ukraine depart from Sigonella [Italy]; Italy is an American military base in large part. The risk is there, it is present and real” (here).

    Interests arising from the blockade of Russian gas supplies

    We should also ask ourselves whether, behind the destabilization of the delicate balance between the European Union and Russia, there are also economic interests, deriving from the need of EU countries to obtain American liquid gas (for which we also need the regasification plants which many nations are deprived of, and for which in any case we will have to pay much more) instead of Russian gas (which is more ecological).

    The decision of Italian oil and gas company ENI to suspend investments in Gazprom’s Blue Stream pipeline (from Russia to Turkey) also entails the deprivation of an additional source of supply, since it feeds the Trans-Atlantic Pipeline (from Turkey to Italy).

    It therefore does not sound like a coincidence if, in August 2021, Zelensky declared that he considered the Nord Stream 2 pipeline between Russia and Germany as “a dangerous weapon, not only for Ukraine but for all of Europe” (here): bypassing Ukraine, it deprives Kiev of about one billion euros per year in revenue from transit tariffs. “We view this project exclusively through the prism of security and consider it a dangerous geopolitical weapon of the Kremlin” “the Ukrainian president said, agreeing with the Biden administration. American Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland said: “If Russia invades Ukraine, Nord Stream 2 will not go forward.” And so it has happened, not without serious economic damage to German investments.

    The Pentagon’s virological laboratories in Ukraine

    Still on the subject of American interests in Ukraine, it is worth mentioning the virological laboratories located in Ukraine which are under the control of the Pentagon and where it seems that only US specialists with diplomatic immunity are employed directly under the American Ministry of Defense.

    We should also remember the complaint made by Putin regarding the collection of genomic data about the population, which can be used for bacteriological weapons with genetic selection (here, here and here). Information about the activity of laboratories in Ukraine is obviously difficult to confirm, but it is understandable that the Russian Federation considered, not without reason, that these laboratories could constitute an additional bacteriological threat to the safety of the population. The U.S. Embassy has removed all files related to the Biological Threat Reduction Program from its website (here).

    Maurizio Blondet writes: “Event 201, which simulated the pandemic explosion a year before it happened, was attended (along with the usuals, Bill and Melinda) by the apparently inoffensive John Hopkins University with its blessed Center for Health Security. The humanitarian institution had for a long time a less innocent name: it was called Center for Civilian Biodefence Strategies and did not deal with the health of Americans, but rather with its opposite: the response to military attacks of bio-terrorism. It was practically a civil-military organization. When it held its first conference in February 1999 in Crystal City in Arlington [Virginia], where the Pentagon is located, it brought together 950 doctors, military personnel, federal officials and health officials to participate in a simulation exercise. The aim of the simulation is to counter an imagined “militarized” smallpox attack. It is only the first of the exercises that will blossom in Event 201 and in the Pandemic Imposture” (here).

    Experiments also emerge on the Ukrainian military (here) and interventions by the American Embassy regarding the Ukrainian Prosecutor Lutsenko in 2016 so that he would not investigate “a billionaire round of funds between G. Soros and B. Obama” (here).

    An indirect threat to China’s expansionist ambitions on Taiwan

    The current Ukrainian crisis entails secondary, but no less serious, consequences on the geopolitical balance between China and Taiwan. Russia and Ukraine are the only producers of palladium and neon, which are indispensable for the production of microchips.

    “Moscow’s possible retaliation has attracted more attention in recent days after market research group Techcet published a report highlighting the dependence of many semiconductor manufacturers on materials of Russian and Ukrainian origin such as neon, palladium and others. According to Techcet’s estimates, more than 90% of U.S. supplies of semiconductor neon come from Ukraine, while 35% of U.S. palladium comes from Russia. […] According to the US International Trade Commission, neon prices rose by 600% before Russia’s annexation of the Crimean peninsula in 2014, because chip companies relied on some Ukrainian companies” (here).

    “If it is true that a Chinese invasion of Formosa would put the global technology supply chain at risk, it is also true that a sudden shortage of raw materials from Russia could stop production, so as to make the island lose the “microchip shield” and induce Beijing to attempt the annexation of Taipei.”

    The Biden’s’ conflict of interest in Ukraine

    Another issue that we tend not to analyze in depth is that related to Burisma, an oil and gas company operating on the Ukrainian market since 2002. Recall that “during the American presidency of Barack Obama (from 2009 to 2017) his right hand man with a “delegation” to handle international politics was Joe Biden, and it is since then that the “protection’ offered by the Democrat US leader was given to Ukrainian nationalists, a line that created the irreconcilable disagreement between Kiev and Moscow. […] It was Joe Biden in those years who carried out the policy of bringing Ukraine closer to NATO. He wanted to take away political and economic power from Russia. […] In recent years, Joe Biden’s name has also been associated with a scandal over Ukraine that had also shaken his candidacy. […] It was April 2014 when Burisma Holdings, the largest energy company in Ukraine (active in both gas and oil), hired Hunter Biden as a consultant […] with a salary of $50,000 a month. All transparent, except that during those months Joe Biden continued the American policy aimed at regaining possession by Ukraine of those areas of the Donbass that have now become Republics recognized by Russia. The Donetsk area is believed to be rich in unexplored gas fields that have been targeted by Burisma Holdings. An international policy intertwined with the economic one that made the American media turn up their noses in those years” (here).

    Democrats claimed that Trump had created a media scandal to harm Biden’s campaign, but his accusations turned out to be true. Joe Biden himself, during a meeting at the Rockefeller Council for Foreign Relations, admitted to having intervened on then-President Petro Poroshenko and Prime Minister Arsenij Yatseniuk to prevent investigations into his son Hunter by Procurator General Viktor Shokin. Biden had threatened “to withhold a billion dollars loan guarantee in the United States during a December 2015 trip to Kiev,” reports the New York Post. (here). “If [the Procurator General Shokin] is not fired, you will not have the money” (here e here). And the Prosecutor was effectively fired, saving Hunter from further scandal, after those involving him.

    Biden’s interference in Kiev politics, in exchange for favors to Burisma and corrupt oligarchs, confirms the current US President’s interest in protecting his family and image, fueling disorder in Ukraine and even a war. How can a person who uses his role to take care of his own interests and cover up the crimes of his family members govern honestly and without being subject to blackmail?

    The Ukrainian nuclear question

    Finally, there is the issue of Ukrainian nuclear weapons. On February 19, 2022, at a conference in Munich, Zelensky announced his intention to end the Budapest Memorandum (1994), which prohibits Ukraine from developing, proliferating and using atomic weapons. Among the other clauses of the Memorandum, there is also the one that obliges Russia, the United States and the United Kingdom to refrain from using economic pressure on Ukraine to influence its policy: the pressure of the IMF and the United States to grant economic aid in exchange for reforms consistent with the Great Reset represent a further violation of the agreement.

    The Ukrainian Ambassador in Berlin, Andriy Melnyk, argued on Deutschlandfunk radio in 2021 that Ukraine needed to regain nuclear status if the country failed to join NATO. Ukraine’s nuclear power plants are operated, rebuilt and maintained by the state-owned enterprise NAEK Energoatom, which completely ended its relationship with Russian companies between 2018 and 2021. Its main partners are companies that can be traced back to the US government. It is easy to understand how the Russian Federation considers the possibility of Ukraine acquiring nuclear weapons as a threat and demands Kiev’s adherence to the non-proliferation pact.

    The color revolution in Ukraine and the independence of Crimea, Donetsk and Lugansk

    Another fact. In 2013, after the government of President Viktor Yanukovych decided to suspend the association agreement between Ukraine and the European Union and to forge closer economic relations with Russia, a series of protest demonstrations known as Euromaidan began, which lasted several months and culminated in the revolution that overthrew Yanukovych and led to the installation of a new government. It was an operation sponsored by George Soros, as he candidly told CNN: “I have had a foundation in Ukraine since before it became independent of Russia; this foundation has always been in business and has played a decisive role in today’s events” (here, here and here). This change of government provoked the reaction of Yanukovych’s supporters and of a part of the Ukrainian population opposed to the pro-Western shift of Ukraine, which had not been wanted by the population but was obtained by a color revolution, of which there had been general rehearsals in previous years in Georgia, Moldova and Belarus.

    Following the clashes of May 2, 2014, in which nationalist paramilitary fringes (including those of Pravyi Sektor) also intervened, there was also the massacre in Odessa. The Western press also spoke of these terrible events in a scandalized way; Amnesty International (here) and the UN denounced these crimes and documented their brutality. But no international court initiated any proceedings against those responsible, as is intended to be done today against the alleged crimes of the Russian army.

    Among the many agreements not respected is also the Minsk Protocol, signed on September 5, 2014 by the Trilateral Contact Group on Ukraine, composed of representatives of Ukraine, Russia, the Donetsk People’s Republic and the Lugansk People’s Republic. Among the points of the agreement was also the removal of armed illegal groups, military equipment, as well as fighters and mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under the supervision of the OSCE and the disarmament of all illegal groups. Contrary to what was agreed, neo-Nazi paramilitary groups are not only officially recognized by the government, but their members are even given official assignments.

    Also in 2014, Crimea, Donetsk and Lugansk declared their independence from Ukraine – in the name of self-determination of peoples recognized by the international community – and declared themselves annexed to the Russian Federation. The Ukrainian government still refuses to recognize the independence of these regions, sanctioned by popular referendum, and leaves the neo-Nazi militias and the regular military forces themselves free to rage against the population, since it considers these entities as terrorist organizations. It is true that the two referendums of November 2, 2014 constitute a stretching of the Minsk Protocol, which provided only for a decentralization of power and a form of special status for the Donetsk and Lugansk regions.

    As Professor Franco Cardini recently pointed out, “on February 15, 2022, Russia delivered to the United States a draft of a treaty to end this situation and defend the Russian-speaking populations. Wastepaper. This war began in 2014” (here and here). And it was a war in the intentions of those who wanted to fight the Russian minority of Donbass: “We will have a job and pensions, and they will not. We will receive bonuses for having children, and they will not. Our children will have schools and kindergartens; their children will stay in the basements. In this way we will win this war,” said President Petro Poroshenko in 2015 (here). It will not escape notice that these measures are similar to the discrimination against the so-called “un-vaxxed,” who have been deprived of work, pay and education. Eight years of bombing in Donetsk and Lugansk, with hundreds of thousands of victims, 150 dead children, and very serious cases of torture, rape, kidnapping and discrimination (here).

    On February 18, 2022 the Presidents of Donetsk and Lugansk, Denis Pushilin and Leonid Pasechnik, ordered the evacuation of the civilian population of their provinces into the Russian Federation due to the ongoing clashes between the Donbass People’s Militia and the Ukrainian Armed Forces. On February 21, the State Duma (Lower House of the Russian Parliament) unanimously ratified the treaties of friendship, cooperation and mutual assistance introduced by President Putin with the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics. At the same time, the Russian President ordered the sending of troops from the Russian Federation to restore peace in the Donbass region.

    Here one may wonder why, in a situation of blatant violation of human rights by neo-Nazi military forces and paramilitary apparatuses (who fly flags bearing swastikas and display the effigy of Aldolf Hitler) against the Russian-speaking population of the independent republics, the international community feels obliged to consider the intervention of the Russian Federation worthy of condemnation, and indeed to blame Putin for the violence. Where is the much-vaunted right of the people to self-determination, which was held valid on August 24, 1991 for the proclamation of Ukraine’s independence and recognized by the international community? And why are we scandalized today by a Russian intervention in Ukraine, when NATO carried out the same sort of thing in Yugoslavia (1991), Kosovo (1999), Afghanistan (2001), Iraq (2003), and in Libya and Syria (2011), without anyone raising any objections? Not to mention that in the last ten years Israel has repeatedly hit military targets in Syria, Iran and Lebanon to prevent the creation of a hostile armed front on its northern border, and yet no nation has proposed imposing sanctions on Tel Aviv.

    It is dismaying to see with what hypocrisy the European Union and the United States – Brussels and Washington – are giving their unconditional support to President Zelensky, whose government for eight years now has continued to persecute Russian-speaking Ukrainians with impunity (here), for whom it is even forbidden to speak in their own language, in a nation that includes numerous ethnic groups, of which those who speak Russian represent 17.2%. And it is scandalous that they are silent about the use of civilians as human shields by the Ukrainian army, which places anti-aircraft positions inside population centers, hospitals, schools and kindergartens precisely so that their destruction can cause deaths among the population.

    The mainstream media is careful not to show images of Russian soldiers helping civilians reach safe positions (here and here) or organizing humanitarian corridors, which Ukrainian militias fire upon (here and here). Just as it is also silent about the settling of scores, massacres, violence and theft by fringes of the civilian population, to whom Zelensky has given weapons: the videos that can be seen on the internet give an idea of the climate of civil war that has been artfully fueled by the Ukrainian Government. To this we may also add the convicts released to be drafted into the Army and also the volunteers of the foreign legion: a mass of fanatics without rules and without training that will contribute to worsening the situation, making it unmanageable.

    President Volodymyr Oleksandrovych Zelensky

    As has been pointed out by many parties, the candidacy and election of Ukrainian President Zelensky corresponds to that recent cliché, inaugurated in recent years, of a comic actor or entertainment personality being lent to politics. Do not believe that being without a suitable cursus honorum is an obstacle to the rising to the top of institutions; on the contrary: the more a person is apparently a stranger to the world of political parties, the more it is to be assumed that his success is determined by those who hold power. Zelensky’s performances in drag are perfectly consistent with the LGBTQ ideology that is considered by its European sponsors as an indispensable requirement of the “reform” agenda that every country ought to embrace, along with gender equality, abortion and the green economy. No wonder Zelensky, a member of the WEF (here), was able to benefit from the support of Schwab and his allies to come to power and ensure that the Great Reset would also be carried out in Ukraine.

    The 57-part television series that Zelensky produced and starred in, demonstrates that the media planned his candidacy for President of Ukraine and his election campaign. In the fiction show The Servant of the People he played the part of a high school teacher who unexpectedly became President of the Republic and fought against the corruption of politics. It is no coincidence that the series, which was absolutely mediocre, still won the WorldFest Remi Award (USA, 2016), came among the top four finalists in the category of comedy films at the Seoul International Drama Awards (South Korea) and was awarded the Intermedia Globe Silver award in the entertainment TV series category at the World Media Film Festival in Hamburg.

    The media stir obtained by Zelensky with the television series brought him over 10 million followers on Instagram and created the premise for the establishment of the homonymous Servant of the People political party, of which Ivan Bakanov, General Manager and shareholder (along with Zelensky himself and the oligarch Kolomoisky) of Kvartal 95 Studio, and the owner of the TV 1+1 television network, is also a member. Zelensky’s image is an artificial product, a media fiction, an operation of manipulation of consensus that has managed to create the political character in the Ukrainian collective imagination that in reality, and not in fiction, has conquered power.

    “Just one month before the 2019 elections that saw him win, Zelensky sold the company [Kvartal 95 Studio] to a friend, still finding a way to get the proceeds of the business he had officially renounced to his family. That friend was Serhiy Shefir, who was later appointed Councilor to the Presidency. […] The sale of the shares took place for the benefit of Maltex Multicapital Corp., a company owned by Shefir and registered in the British Virgin Islands” (here).

    The current Ukrainian President promoted his election campaign with a commercial that was disturbing, to say the least (here), in which, holding two machine guns, he fired on members of Parliament, pointed out as corrupt or subservient to Russia. The fight against corruption trumpeted by the Ukrainian President in the role of “servant of the people” does not correspond, however, to the picture that emerges of him from the so-called Pandora papers, in which 40 million dollars appear to have been paid to him on the eve of the elections by the Jewish billionaire Kolomoisky[1] through offshore accounts (here, here and here).[2] In his homeland, many accuse him of having taken power away from the pro-Russian oligarchs not to give it to the Ukrainian people, but rather to strengthen his own interest group and at the same time remove his political adversaries: “He liquidated the ministers of the old guard, first of all the powerful Minister of the Interior, [Arsen] Avakov. He rudely retired the president of the Constitutional Court who was acting as a check on his laws. He closed seven opposition TV channels. He arrested and accused of treason Viktor Medvedcuk, a pro-Russian sympathizer but above all the leader of the Platform of Opposition – For Life party, the second party of the Ukrainian Parliament after his Servant of the People party. He is also placing on trial for treason former President Poroshenko, who was suspicious of everyone except for those who got along with the Russians or their friends. The mayor of Kiev, the popular former world boxing champion Vitaly Klitchko, has already been subjected to several searches and seizures. In short, Zelensky seems to want to make a clean sweep of anyone who is not aligned with his politics” (here).

    On April 21, 2019, Zelensky was elected President of Ukraine with 73.22% of the votes, and on May 20 he was sworn in. On May 22, 2019 he appointed Ivan Bakanov, Director General of Kvartal 95, as First Deputy Head of the Security Services of Ukraine and Head of the Main Directorate for the Fight against Corruption and Organized Crime of the Central Directorate of the Security Service of Ukraine. Along with Bakanov, it is worth mentioning Mykhailo Fedorov, Vice President and Minister of Digital Transformation, a member of the World Economic Forum (here). Zelensky himself has admitted to having as his inspiration the Prime Minister of Canada Justin Trudeau (here and here).

    Zelensky’s relations with the IMF and the WEF

    As Greece’s tragic precedent has shown, national sovereignties and the popular will expressed by parliaments are de facto erased by the decisions of international high finance, which interferes with government policies by means of blackmail and outright extortion of an economic nature. The case of Ukraine, which is one of the poorest countries in Europe, is no exception.

    Shortly after Zelensky’s election, the International Monetary Fund threatened not to grant Ukraine a $5 billion loan if he did not comply with their demands. During a telephone conversation with the CEO of the IMF, Kristalina Georgieva, the Ukrainian President was rebuked for replacing Yakiv Smolii with a man he trusted, Kyrylo Shevchenko, who was less inclined to comply with the diktats of the IMF. Anders Åslund writes at Atlantic Council: “The problems surrounding the Zelensky government are mounting alarmingly. First of all, since March 2020, the President has led a reversal not only of the reforms pursued under him, but also those initiated by his predecessor Petro Poroshenko. Second, his government has not presented plausible proposals to resolve IMF concerns about Ukraine’s unfulfilled commitments. Third, the President appears to no longer have a ruling parliamentary majority, and he seems disinterested in forming a reformist majority (here).

    It is evident that the IMF’s interventions are aimed at obtaining the Ukrainian government’s commitment to align itself with the economic, fiscal and social policies dictated by the globalist agenda, beginning with the “independence” of the Central Bank of Ukraine from the government: a euphemism with which the IMF calls on the Kiev government to renounce legitimate control over its Central Bank, which is one of the ways in which national sovereignty is exercised, along with the issuance of money and the management of public debt. On the other hand, just four months earlier Kristalina Georgieva had launched the Great Reset together with Klaus Schwab, Prince Charles and UN Secretary-General António Guterres.

    What had not been possible with previous governments was brought to completion under the presidency of Zelensky, who entered the good graces of the WEF (here) along with the new Governor of the BCU, Kyrylo Shevchenko. Less than a year later, in order to prove his subjection, Shevchenko wrote an article for the WEF entitled Central banks are the key to countries’ climate goals and Ukraine is showing the way (here). Thus the Agenda 2030 is implemented, under blackmail.

    There are also other Ukrainian companies that have ties to the WEF: the State Savings Bank of Ukraine (one of the largest financial institutions in Ukraine), the DTEK Group (an important private investor in the Ukrainian energy sector) and Ukr Land Farming (an agricultural leader in cultivation). Banks, energy and food are sectors perfectly in line with the Great Reset and the Fourth Industrial Revolution theorized by Klaus Schwab.

    On February 4, 2021, the Ukrainian president shut down seven television stations, including ZIK, Newsone and 112 Ukraine, all guilty of not supporting his government. As Anna Del Freo writes: “A harsh condemnation of this liberticidal act has arrived, among others, also from the European Federation of Journalists and the International Federation of Journalists, who have asked for the immediate lifting of the veto. The three broadcasters will no longer be able to broadcast for five years: they employ about 1500 people, whose jobs are now at risk. There is no real reason why the three networks should be shut down, except for the arbitrariness of the Ukrainian political apex, which accuses them of threatening information security and being under “malign Russian influence.” A strong reaction also comes from NUJU, the Ukrainian journalists’ union, which speaks of a very heavy attack on freedom of speech, given that hundreds of journalists are being deprived of the opportunity to express themselves and hundreds of thousands of citizens are being deprived of the right to be informed. As we can see, what Putin is accused of was actually carried out by Zelensky and, more recently, by the European Union, with the complicity of social media platforms. “Shutting down television broadcasters is one of the most extreme forms of restriction of the freedom of the press,” said EFJ Secretary General Ricardo Gutierrez. “Nations have an obligation to ensure effective pluralism of information. It is clear that the presidential veto is not at all in line with international standards on freedom of expression” (here).

    It would be interesting to know what statements were made by the European Federation of Journalists and the International Federation of Journalists after the blackout of Russia Today and Sputnik in Europe.

    Neo-nazi and extremist movements in Ukraine

    A country that calls for humanitarian aid from the international community to defend its population from Russian aggression should, in the collective imagination, stand out for respect for democratic principles and for legislation that prohibits activities and the spread of propaganda by extremist ideologies.

    Neo-Nazi movements engaged in military and paramilitary actions operate freely in Ukraine, often with the official support of public institutions. These include the following: Stepan Bandera’s Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), a movement with a Nazi, anti-Semitic and racist matrix already active in Chechnya and which is part of the Right Sector, an association of far-right movements formed at the time of the Euromaidan coup in 2013/2014; the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA); the UNA/UNSO, paramilitary wing of the far-right political party Ukraine National Assembly; the Korchinsky Brotherhood, which offered protection in Kiev to ISIS members (here); Misanthropic Vision (MD), a neo-Nazi network spread across 19 countries that publicly incites terrorism, extremism and hatred against Christians, Muslims, Jews, Communists, homosexuals, Americans and people of color (here).

    It should be remembered that the government has given explicit support to these extremist organizations both by sending the presidential guard to the funerals of their representatives, as well as by supporting the Azov Battalion, a paramilitary organization that is officially part of the Ukrainian Army under the new name of Azov Special Operations Regiment and organized into the National Guard. The Azov Regiment is financed by the Ukrainian Jewish oligarch Igor Kolomoisky, the former governor of Dnepropetrovsk, who is also thought to be the financier of the nationalist militias of Pravyi Sektor, which are considered responsible for the Odessa massacre. We are talking about the same Kolomoisky mentioned in the Pandora Papers as a sponsor of President Zelensky. The battalion has relations with several far-right organizations in Europe and the United States.

    Amnesty International, after a meeting on September 8, 2014 between Secretary General Salil Shetty and Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, called on the Ukrainian Government to end the abuses and war crimes committed by the volunteer battalions that operate together with the Kiev Armed Forces. The Ukrainian government has opened an official investigation into the matter, declaring that no officers or soldiers of the Azov Battalion appear to be under investigation.

    In March 2015, Ukrainian Interior Minister Arsen Avakov announced that the Azov Battalion would be one of the first units to be trained by US Army troops, as part of their Operation Fearless Guard training mission. US training was discontinued on June 12, 2015, when the US House of Representatives passed an amendment banning all aid (including weapons and training) to the battalion because of its neo-Nazi past. The amendment was then revoked under pressure from the CIA (here and here) and the soldiers of the Azov Battalion were trained in the United States (here and here): “We have been training these guys for eight years now. They are really good fighters. That’s where the Agency’s program could have a serious impact.”

    In 2016, an OSCE report [Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe] found that the Azov Battalion was responsible for the mass killing of prisoners, the concealment of corpses in mass graves and the systematic use of physical and psychological torture techniques. Just a few days ago the Deputy Commander of the Battalion, Vadim Troyan, was appointed Chief of Police of the Oblast Region by Interior Minister Arsen Avakov.

    These are the “heroes” fighting together with the Ukrainian Army against the Russian soldiers. And these heroes of the Azov Battalion, instead of protecting their children, dare to make their own flesh into meat for slaughter, enlisting boys and girls (here and here), in violation of the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (here), concerning the involvement of minors in armed conflicts: an ad hoc legal instrument that establishes that no child under 18 is to be forcibly recruited or used directly in hostilities, either by the armed forces of a state nor by armed groups.

    Inevitably, the lethal weapons provided by the EU, including Draghi’s Italy, with the support of “anti-fascist” political parties, are destined to be used against these children.

    The Ukrainian war in the plans of the NWO

    The censorship being imposed against Russian broadcasters is clearly aimed at preventing the official narrative from being disproven by the facts. But while the Western media shows images of the video game War Thunder (here), frames from the movie Star Wars (here), explosions in China (here), videos of military parades (here), footage from Afghanistan (here), the Rome metro (here) or images of mobile crematoria (here) by passing them off as real and recent scenes of the war in Ukraine, reality is ignored because it has already been decided to provoke a conflict as a weapon of mass distraction that legitimizes new restrictions of freedoms in Western nations, according to the plans of the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset and the United Nations’ Agenda 2030.

    It is evident that the Ukrainian people, beyond the issues that diplomacy can resolve, are victims of the same global coup d’état being carried out by supranational powers that intend, not peace between nations, but rather the establishment of the tyranny of the New World Order. Just a few days ago, Ukrainian parliamentarian Kira Rudik told Fox News, while holding a kalashnikov: “We know that we are not only fighting for Ukraine, but also for the New World Order.”

    The human rights violations in Ukraine and the crimes of the neo-Nazi militias repeatedly denounced by Putin could not find a political solution because they were planned and fomented by the globalist elite, with the collaboration of the European Union, NATO and the American deep state, with an anti-Russian tone intended to make inevitable a war whose goal is to impose, primarily in Europe, the forced adoption of energy rationing (here),^[1] travel restrictions, the replacement of paper money with electronic money (here and here) and the adoption of digital ID (here and here). We are not talking about theoretical projects. These are decisions that are about to be taken concretely at the European level as well as in individual countries.

    Respect for the Law and Standards

    The intervention in Ukraine by NATO, the United States, and the European Union does not appear to have any legitimacy. Ukraine is not a member of NATO, and as such it should not benefit from the assistance of an entity whose purpose is the defense of its member nations. The same can be said of the European Union, which just a few days ago invited Zelensky to join it. In the meantime, Ukraine has received $2.5 billion from the United States since 2014 and another $400 million in 2021 alone (here), plus other funds for a total of $4.6 billion dollars (here). For his part, Putin has given $15 billion in loans to Ukraine to save it from bankruptcy. The European Union, for its part, has sent $17 million in funding, in addition to funding sent from various individual nations. But this assistance has benefitted the Ukrainian population only minimally.

    Furthermore, by intervening in the war in Ukraine in the name of the European Union, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is violating articles 9, 11, and 12 of the Treaty of Lisbon. The competence of the European Union in this area belongs to the European Council and the High Representative. In no case does it belong to the Commission President. In what capacity does President von der Leyen presume to act as if she were the head of the European Union, usurping a role that does not belong to her? Why does no one intervene, especially considering the danger to which European citizens are being exposed due to the possibility of Russian retaliation?

    Furthermore, in many cases the constitutions of the nations that are today sending support and weapons to Ukraine do not provide for the possibility of entering into a conflict. For example, article 11 of the Italian Constitution states: “Italy repudiates war as an instrument of offense for the liberty of other peoples and as a means of resolving international controversies.” Sending weapons and soldiers to a nation that is not a part of either NATO or the European Union constitutes a de facto declaration of war on the nation belligerent with it (in this case, Russia), and should therefore require the prior deliberation of declaring war, as is foreseen by article 78 of the Italian Constitution: “The Chambers [of Parliament] deliberate on the state of war and confer the necessary powers on the government.” It does not appear that to date the Chambers have been called upon to express themselves in this sense, or that the President of the Republic has intervened to demand compliance with the constitutional provision. Prime Minister Draghi, appointed by the globalist cabal for the destruction of Italy and its definitive enslavement to supranational powers, is one of the many Heads of national governments who considers the will of the citizens as an annoying obstacle to the execution of the agenda of the World Economic Forum. After two years of systematic violations of fundamental rights and of the Constitution, it is difficult to believe that he will want to place the interests of the Italian nation ahead of the interests of those who have placed him in power. On the contrary: the more disastrous are the effects of the sanctions adopted by his government, the more he can consider himself appreciated by those who have given him power. The coup perpetrated by means of the psychopandemic emergency proceeds today with new unfortunate decisions, ratified by a Parliament without a spine.

    It is also a violation of article 288 of the Italian Penal Code to permit Italian citizens – and even members of the majority in the Government and political leaders – to respond to the appeal of the Ukrainian Ambassador for enrollment in the foreign legion: “Anyone in the territory of [Italy] who without government approval enlists or arms citizens to serve [in the military] in favor of a foreign nation, is to be punished with imprisonment for a period of 4 to 15 years.” No magistrate, at least for the time being, has intervened to punish those responsible for this crime.

    Another violation is found in the activity of transferring children from Ukraine to Italy (and presumably also to other nations) who have been obtained via surrogate motherhood, ordered by Italian couples in violation of Law 40/2004, without any penalty being imposed on those guilty of this crime, as well as their accomplices.

    It should also be remembered that the utterances of members of the Government or of political leaders with regard to the Russian Federation and its President, along with the sanctions that have been adopted against Russia and the repeated instances of arbitrary discrimination against Russian citizens, companies, artists, and sports teams for the sole fact of being Russian, are not only provocations that ought to be avoided in order to allow for a serene and peaceful settlement of the Ukraine crisis, but also place the safety of Italian citizens in very serious danger (as well as the safety of citizens of other nations who are adopting a similar stance toward Russia). The reason for such rash temerity is incomprehensible, unless there is an intentional desire to trigger reactions from the opposing party.

    The Russian-Ukrainian conflict is a very dangerous trap that has been set against Ukraine, Russia, and the nations of Europe.

    Ukraine is the latest victim of accomplished executioners

    The Russian-Ukrainian crisis did not suddenly erupt a month ago. It has been prepared and fomented for a long time, certainly beginning with the 2014 white coup that was desired by the American deep state in an anti-Russian key. This is demonstrated, among other incontestable facts, by the training of the Azov Battalion by the CIA “to kill Russians” (here), with the CIA forcing the revocation of the amendment banning aid to the battalion made by Congress in 2015. The interventions made by Joe and Hunter Biden have gone in the same direction. Thus there is evidence of long-term premeditation, consistent with NATO’s relentless expansion towards the East. The Color Revolution of Euromaidan, as well as the establishment of a pro-NATO government composed of homines novi trained by the World Economic Forum and George Soros, was intended to create the conditions for the subordination of Ukraine to the NATO bloc, removing it from the influence of the Russian Federation. To this end, the subversive action of the Hungarian philanthropist’s NGOs, supported by media propaganda, has kept silent about the crimes of neo-Nazi paramilitary organizations, financed by the same people who sponsor Zelensky.

    But if the brainwashing carried out by the mainstream media in Western nations has succeeded in conveying a completely distorted narrative of reality, the same cannot be said for Ukraine, where the population is well aware of the corruption of the political class in power as well as of its remoteness from the real problems of the Ukrainian nation. We in the West believe that the “oligarchs” are only in Russia, while the reality is that they are present above all throughout the entire galaxy of nations that formerly composed the Soviet Union, where they can accumulate wealth and power simply by placing themselves at the disposition of foreign “philanthropists” and multinational corporations. It matters little if their offshore accounts are the primary cause of the poverty of the citizens of these nations, the backwardness of the health care system, the excessive power of the bureaucracy, the almost total absence of public services, foreign control of strategic companies, and the progressive loss of sovereignty and national identity: the important thing is to “make money” and be immortalized along with political personalities, bankers, arms dealers, and those who starve the people. And then to come to the fashionable resorts of Versilia or the Amalfi Coast to flaunt their yachts and platinum cards to the waiter from Odessa or the cleaning lady from Kiev who send their paltry wages to their relatives back home. These Ukrainian billionaires wearing kippahs are those who are selling out Ukraine to the corrupted and corrupting West, trading their own well-being for the enslavement of their compatriots to the usurers who are taking over the world, using the same ruthless and immoral systems everywhere. In the past they cut the salaries of workers in Athens and Thessaloniki; today they have simply enlarged their horizons to the whole of Europe, where the population still looks on incredulously while first a health dictatorship and then an environmental dictatorship is being imposed.

    On the other hand, without the pretext of a war, how would they have been able to justify the soaring price of gas and fuels, forcing the process of an “ecological” transition imposed from on high in order to control the impoverished masses? How could they have made the peoples of the Western world swallow the establishment of the tyranny of the New World Order, when the pandemic farce was unraveling and bringing to light crimes against humanity committed by BigPharma?

    And while the EU and heads of government blame Russia for the impending disaster, the Western elites demonstrate that they even want to destroy agriculture, in order to apply the horrors of the Holodomor on a global scale (here). On the other hand, in many nations (including Italy) the privatization of waterways is being theorized – and water is an inalienable public good – for the advantage of multinationals and with the aim of controlling and limiting agriculture activities. The pro-NATO government of Kiev did not behave much differently: for eight years the Crimea was deprived of water from the Dnieper River in order to prevent the irrigation of the fields and starve the people. Today, in light of the sanctions being imposed on Russia and the huge reduction of grain supplies, we can understand Bill Gates’ enormous investments in agriculture (here), following the same ruthless profit-making logic already experienced with the vaccine campaign.

    The Ukrainian people, regardless of what ethnic group they may belong to, are merely the latest unwitting hostages of the supranational totalitarian regime that brought the national economies of the entire world to their knees through the Covid deception, after publicly theorizing about the need to decimate the world population and transform the survivors into chronically ill patients who have irreparably compromised their immune systems.

    The Ukrainian people should think hard about calling upon the intervention of NATO or the EU, provided that it is really the Ukrainian people who do it and not rather their corrupt rulers aided by racist mercenaries and neo-nazi groups in the pay of hierarchs. Because while they are promised freedom from the invader – with whom they share the common religious and cultural heritage of having once been part of Great Russia – in reality what is cynically being prepared is their definitive cancellation, their enslavement to the Great Reset that foresees everything except the protection of their identity, their sovereignty, and their borders.

    Let the Ukrainian people look at what has happened to the nations of the European Union: the mirage of prosperity and security is demolished by the contemplation of the rubble left by the euro and the lobbies of Brussels. Nations invaded by illegal immigrants who feed crime and prostitution; destroyed in their social fabric by politically correct ideologies; knowingly brought to bankruptcy by reckless economic and fiscal policies; led towards poverty by the cancellation of labor and social security protections; deprived of a future by the destruction of the family and the moral and intellectual corruption of the new generations.

    What were once prosperous and independent nations, diverse in their respective ethnic, linguistic, cultural, and religious specificities, have now been transformed into a shapeless mass of people without ideals, without hopes, without faith, without even the strength to react against the abuses and crimes of those who govern them. A mass of corporate customers, slaves of the system of detailed control imposed by the pandemic farce, even in the face of evidence of the fraud. A mass of persons without individual identity, marked with QR codes like animals on an intensive farm, like products of a huge shopping center. If this has been the result of the renunciation of national sovereignty for all the nations – every single one, without exception! – that have entrusted themselves to the colossal scam of the European Union, why would Ukraine be any different?

    Is this what your fathers wanted, what they hoped for, what they desired, when they received Baptism along with Vladimir the Great on the banks of the Dnieper?

    If there is a positive aspect that each of us can recognize in this crisis, it is that it has revealed the horror of the globalist tyranny, its ruthless cynicism, its capacity to destroy and annihilate everything it touches. It is not the Ukrainians who ought to enter the European Union or NATO, it is rather the other nations who ought to finally be jolted by pride and courage to leave them, shaking off this detestable yoke and rediscovering their own independence, sovereignty, identity, and faith. Their own souls.

    To be clear: the New Order is not an inescapable destiny, and it can be subverted and denounced, if only the peoples of the world realize that they have been deceived and swindled by an oligarchy of clearly identifiable criminals, who one day will have to answer for those sanctions and those blocks of funds that today they apply with impunity to anyone who does not bend the knee before them.

    An appeal to the Third Rome

    For Russia too, this conflict is a trap. This is because it would fulfill the dream of the American deep state to definitively oust Russia from the European context in its commercial and cultural relations, pushing it into the arms of China, perhaps with the hope that the dictatorship in Beijing can persuade the Russians to accept the system of social credit and other aspects of the Great Reset that thus far Russia has been able to avoid, at least in part.

    It is a trap, not because Russia is wrong in wanting to “denazify” Ukraine of its extremist groups and guarantee protection to Russian-speaking Ukrainians, but because it is precisely these reasons – theoretically tenable – that were created specifically to provoke it and induce it to invade Ukraine, in such a way as to provoke the NATO reaction that has been prepared for some time by the deep state and the globalist elite. The casus belli was deliberately planned by the real perpetrators of the conflict, knowing that it would obtain exactly that response from Putin. And it is up to Putin, regardless of whether he is right, not to fall into the trap, and to instead turn the tables, offering Ukraine the conditions of an honorable peace without continuing the conflict. Indeed, the more Putin believes he is right, the more he needs to demonstrate the greatness of his nation and his love for his people by not giving into provocations.

    Permit me to repeat the words of the Prophet Isaiah: Dissolve colligationes impietatis, solve fasciculos deprimentes, dimitte eos qui confracti sunt liberos, et omne onus dirumpe; frange esurienti panem tuum, et egenos vagosque induc in domum tuam; cum videris nudum, operi eum, et carnem tuam ne despexeris. Tunc erumpet quasi mane lumen tuum; et sanitas tua citius orietur, et anteibit faciem tuam justitia tua, et gloria Domini colliget te.

    Loose the bands of wickedness, undo the bundles that oppress, let those who are broken go free, and break asunder every burden. Share your bread with the hungry, welcome into your house the afflicted and homeless; when you see a naked man, clothe him, and do not turn your back on your own flesh. Then your light will arise like the dawn, and your wound will quickly be healed. Your justice shall go before you, the glory of the Lord will closely follow you. (Is 58:6-8).

    The world crisis with which the dissolution of traditional society is being prepared has also involved the Catholic Church, whose Hierarchy is held hostage by apostates who are courtiers of power.[1] There was a time in which Popes and Prelates confronted Kings without concern for human respect, because they knew they spoke with the voice of Jesus Christ, the King of kings. The Rome of the Caesars and Popes is now deserted and silent, just as for centuries the Second Rome of Constantinople has also been silent. Perhaps Providence has ordained that Moscow, the Third Rome, will today in the sight of the world take on the role of κατ?χον (2 Thess 2:6-7), of eschatological obstacle to the Antichrist. If the errors of communism were spread by the Soviet Union, even to the point of imposing themselves within the Church, Russia and Ukraine can today have an epochal role in the restoration of Christian Civilization, contributing to bringing the world a period of peace from which the Church too will rise again purified and renewed in her Ministers.

    The United States of America and the European nations should not marginalize Russia, but rather form an alliance with her, not only for the restoration of trade for the prosperity of all, but in view of the reconstruction of a Christian Civilization, which alone can save the world from the globalist techno-health transhuman monster.

    Final Considerations

    There is great concern that the destinies of the peoples of the world is in the hands of an elite that is not accountable to anyone for its decisions, that does not recognize any authority above itself, and that in order to pursue its own interests does not hesitate to jeopardize security, the economy, and the very lives of billions of people, with the complicity of politicians in their service and the mainstream media. The falsification of facts, the grotesque adulterations of reality, and the partisanship with which the news is spread stand alongside the censorship of dissenting voices and leads to forms of ethnic persecution against Russian citizens, who are discriminated against precisely in the countries that say they are democratic and respectful of fundamental rights.

    I earnestly hope that my appeal for the establishment of an Anti-Globalist Alliance that unites the peoples of the world in opposition against the tyranny of the New World Order will be accepted by those who have at heart the common good, peace between nations, concord among all peoples, freedom for all citizens and the future of the new generations. And even before that, may my words – along with those of many intellectually honest people – contribute to bringing to light the complicity and corruption of those who use lies and fraud to justify their crimes, even in these moments of great apprehension about the war in Ukraine.

    “May the strong listen to us, so as not to become weak in injustice. May the powerful listen to us, if they want their power not to be destruction but support for the peoples and protection for tranquility in order and work” (Pius XII, Radio message to Heads of State and Peoples of the World in Imminent Danger of War, August 24, 1939).

    May Holy Lent lead all Christians to ask pardon from the Divine Majesty for the sins of those who trample His Holy Law. May penance and fasting move the Lord God to mercy, while we repeat the words of the Prophet Joel: Parce, Domine: parce populo tuo; et ne des hæreditatem tuam in opprobrium, ut dominentur eis nationes. Forgive your people, Lord, and do not expose your inheritance to reproach, to the derision of the nations (Jl 2:17).

    + Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop,

    Former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America

    March 6, 2022

    First Sunday of Lent    

[1] In 2011, Kolomoisky was one of the co-founders of the Jewish European Parliament, along with billionaire Vadim Rabinovich. Cf. http://ejp.eu/. Note that Rabinovich is a member of the Opposition Platform – For Life, the Ukrainian pro-Russian political party whose leader Viktor Medvedcuk was arrested by Zelensky.

[2] According to Russian politician Viktor Vladislavovich Zubarev, a member of the State Duma, Zelensky is also said to have $1.2 billion deposited at Dresdner Bank in Costa Rica and a villa in Miami purchased for $34 million (here). For a more comprehensive picture, see the investigation by Slidstvo-info, an independent Ukrainian agency of investigative journalism (here).

[3] It should be noted that the Italian Minister of Ecological Transition, Roberto Cingolani, decided a few days ago to sell a share of oil stocks to Ukraine “as a concrete aid also on the energy front,” exactly as during the pandemic he gave away millions of masks to China, only to then buy them back from Beijing shortly thereafter (here).

[4] In its March 6 issue, Famiglia Cristiana has a headline, commenting on an article by the founder of the Sant’Egidio Community, Andrea Riccardi: “Let’s stop the war and build a new world order” (here).

6 Comments

 

Carl A Cascio PA

I have not yet read the letter in full but many of the excerpts and the headings. So far it is in total alignment with my own thinking. I am currently uncertain if Putin has fallen for a trap or he is so principaled against a NATO expansion that he is willing to continue an all out onvasion of Ukraine to make his point. Putin is certainly taking unprecedented attack by the overwhelming majority of the globalist Mainstream Media in the US and internationally and he and the Russian people (the later more indirectly as a result of direct and woke sanctions) are now being demonized by globalis…See More

Like · Reply · 2 · 5w

 

KJay Girard

It's excellent. He's a man in command of the facts. Many are making the mistake in the Church aligning this as a "Latin Church vs. Eastern Orthodox Church." It's not. It's an east vs. west" fight, one in which he believes we need to unite with Russia & not do what the globalists want to ostracize & cut Russia out. The US & Russia are natural allies against globalism. Worth the read!

Like · Reply · 5w

 

Collin Gorman

God Bless you Archbishop Vigano. Thank you for your wisdom and bravery in publishing the full picture of what’s in play by the elite and how they are leading the people like lemmings to the sea to drown their freedoms and emerge as the servants to those that control the new world order. This is a war between good and evil. I stand with Jesus Christ in God’s glory and triumph!

Like · Reply · 5w

 

Thomas Skrobola

While I do not doubt the veracity of the facts as presented, it is a completely one-sided presentation, one-side assessment, one-sided conclusions and condemnation of those who are against Putin.

Where are the pages and pages of allegations of wrong-doing of Putin and his followers? If we are to take Vigano's claims at face value that everything we hear in the media is wrong or distorted, doesn't he have a moral responsibility to present the facts of wrongdoing by Putin and his people and followers?

I do not trust anyone, not even a Catholic bishop, who presents a completely one-sided polemic, especially in a complex situation and especially in the present low-information/propaganda environment that every War creates in real time.

Like · Reply · 5w

 

Andrew McArthur

I value Archbishop Vigano calling out the corruption in the Catholic Church, anti-Christian politics and election corruption and hope he continues to call out these and others - George Soros, the Global Reset movement / Davos, other globalists, the Global Warming apocalypse cult, Freemasons (solve et coagula) etc.
Christians who pray and read the bible understand where destructive forces originate and the underlying fuel for secular attacks on biblical truth, Christian values, the family, marriage etc are readily discerned.
Regarding Ukraine, AV has demonstrated the complexity surrounding th…See More

Like · Reply · 4w

 

Marylin Krepf

Brilliant ,courageous and truthful. How wonderful,in the midst of all this corruption and immoral madness, a light shines! Thank you so much Archbishop Vigano!

Like · Reply · 3d