For all of the readers, you are welcome to post your valuable opinions in my blog, but I would like to remind everyone that personal attack will be not tolerant here.
雅美之途 發表評論於
回複 '薩蘭烏2' 的評論 : Thank you for pointing out the mistake as I changed it.
You have nothing to say about my refutation of the topic on ownership?
You are ridiculous. What is wrong with using English? Are you not in the US on a US base website? You seem to understand English despite your idiocy. I am bilingual and am free to type whatever fits my mood and liking.
"且是個灣貨"? Ha, your observational capability is as keen as your judgement.
You are more forthcoming than I expected: "什麽知識產權，什麽貿易戰，都扯蛋。" acknowledging your shamelessness with theft and robbery. A true communist. At least you are more honest than CCP who tries to weasel its way when caught red handed. Your declaration betrays the true nature of communism and leaves nothing more to prove my point that people like you who believe in communism are by nature robbers and thieves who despise the concept of property rights and are utterly shameless with regard to theft and robbery. One does not need to look far than Mao Zedong's Lenin's massacre of the land owners for their wealth. There is nothing to negotiate with these scum of the earth, but to crush them like we have the evil empire the Soviet Union.
"在軍事準裝備上誰在講知識產權，小心腦袋開花。 " Yes, you'd better make sure whose head would explode. You are more ignorant and more of a hilarious braggart than 胡鞍鋼. Let us see which military is more potent. Two US destroyers just sailed through the Taiwan Strait last Wednesday. This was not the first time US warships either passed through or docked at Taiwan. Did the some Chinese general who sounded just like you not proclaim the day any US warship passed near Taiwan would be the day the PLA occupied Taiwan. Great, where is the victorious PLA armada? They must be in your exploding head.
What does who invented capitalism have to do with anything? What does the length of history have to do with anything? You cannot even think straight.
Thirty years ago on the eve of June 4th Massacre in 1989, America under George Bush erred in not truly sanctioning China but chose appeasement. The appeasement policy was further enlarged by Clinton. It have already said in my last comment it was the small superficial dose of capitalism and the hard toil of the Chinese people, and the US provision of its huge market and capital that made China rich, in spite of the shackle on China that is CCP, not because of it.
"體製上的很多優勢，中國不是擺在那裏的嗎？"
Of course I see the institutional advantages. Along with the Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, it has the incredible efficiency and ease of killing hundreds of millions of people the government deems state enemies, with the massacre of the Beijing citizens on Tian An Man Square being just a puny afterthought, or milking the toiling working Chinese for the benefit of the countless CCP high officials so they can send their loot and concubines and children to US.
Oh, right, the CCP is now employing the institutional advantage to urge Chinese get ready to tighten their belt, "eat grass" and embrace unemployment with gratitude towards the Party Mother. It is urging the unemployed migrant workers to return to their farming land. What have you done to be a good communist party member?
唐西 發表評論於
@nightrider
You are right.
難得nightrider讚我一句，我當然right的啦。
持續並穩定發展還發達的國家多是由一黨統治，長期坐莊的結果，為什麽？
中國還是發展中的國家，就這個”發展中”的說法就已經讓人感到抖了，要是改天成發達國家了，那麽nightrider就多來點My God，My God吧。
中華人民共和國的公民就是要讓共產黨領導，也隻有共產黨最適合。它沒有排它性，歡迎挑戰。
英國人，特別是民間的人士看中美貿易戰，都笑噴啦。美國怎麽來的，美語又怎麽來的，還不是Copy, more copy.
Idiocy or lunacy? Yes! nightrider is!
唐西 發表評論於
@nightrider
Your God, you are more stupid and pretend to be.
什麽資本主義，誰發明的，美國人？美國的曆史有多長？美帝的存活期不過百年，當然不爽啊，還讓曾經的帝國中國翻了身，動搖了”美”夢。
要是我住在美國，我也難受。
民主黨，共和黨再怎麽修憲建製，就是玩不過共產黨，體製上的很多優勢，中國不是擺在那裏的嗎？
The sanctity of private property rights and contractual obligation is the foundation of free market capitalism. The fundamental principle of communism and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) stands diametrically opposite of the aforementioned foundation. They are mortal enemies of each other. The conflict is inevitable. CCP can not possibly respect property rights, least of all intellectual property rights. You are right, Liu Xin has to toe the CCP party line because she is owned by the CCP. But you, choose to believe in communism in the land of free market capitalism. Is it idiocy or lunacy?
It just begs the question: why are you still in the US or the West and do you not go back to the land of your dream, mainland China and stay there?
nightrider 發表評論於
@唐西:
Your statement "而今天的中國共產黨卻讓人耳目一新，居然在短時間裏狂掃貧困，發財致富，把新的neo政治經濟學推上了新高度，人們又開始重新學習，研究中國共產黨。" is another absurdity. It is the hard working Chinese people who made themselves rich. It is only after the communist party loosened control and adopted some superficial policies akin to capitalism, let the free market work to some very limited extent, that the hard working Chinese people gained a small breath of freedom to work hard for themselves and enrich themselves. There is no fucking neo political economy, it is the God damn good old free market capitalism, that even a sliver of it that had made the nation rich. In the process, through not thoroughly adopting the free market capitalism but blatantly holding on to monopolistic political and economic power and egregiously encroachment on private property rights, the Chinese Communist Party enriched themselves through rent seeking parasitic behavior. It has now even gotten emboldened enough to even go beyond its own border and had the gall to infringe on the property rights of the US and other western countries. The trade war is but the beginning and the first blow of an inevitable counter attack from all those who love liberty and the free market capitalism that generates it against the evil ideology that is communism.
My God, you are either stupid or pretend to be. "環看一下歐美的、所謂的民主國家都是由一個或多個政黨組成並執政的，他們都有各自的媒體在後麵撐腰。 中國由中國共產黨執政, CCTV，CGTN當然要受中國政府管理, 其員工當然要為老板說話，這有什麽不對嗎？如果博主在穀歌，微軟或蘋果打工，敢不做其喉舌嗎？" There are so many things wrong with this statement. Who are the owner of CCTV, CGTN? First, the government owning a media company is already questionable. CCTV，CGTN are government agencies. How is a government agency comparable with Microsoft and Google, both are private owned companies? Second, in the democratic countries when a political party is in power or in your words 執政, it does so temporarily, it does NOT OWN the state, whereas the Chinese Communist Party owns the state and its agencies for the past 70 years and for the foreseeable future. As you said, the CCP owned CGTN, and Liu Xin herself. The Republican Party, even if Trish is a member of, does not own her at all.
It is not surprising to hear these absurdity from you, a communist sympathizer.
