個人資料
正文

James Galbraith 美國經濟滋生不平等和不安全 如何解決

(2024-08-04 11:10:14) 下一個

James Galbraith 美國經濟滋生不平等和不安全 如何解決

破碎的美國經濟滋生了不平等和不安全感。以下是如何解決這個問題

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/oct/07/us-economy-growth-inequality-james-k-galbraith

詹姆斯·K·加爾布雷斯

一邊是財富和權力的海洋。另一邊是動蕩和無能為力。但我們有改革的工具
2022 年 10 月 7 日 13.47 BST
利率上升、股市下跌、汽油價格波動、美元走高和世界金融混亂——我們再次看到,試圖通過中央銀行來管理世界最大經濟體的愚蠢行為。是時候重新思考基本問題了:美國發生了什麽?應該怎麽做?

亞當·斯密寫道:“正如霍布斯先生所說,財富就是權力。”如今,在美國,一邊是財富和權力的孤島,另一邊是動蕩和無能為力的海洋,還有貧窮。這是 50 多年來結構性發展的結果,是政治和政策的影響,也是工業變革、全球化和新技術的影響,具有強烈的區域、社會、人口和政治影響。

美國抵押貸款利率攀升至 6.7%,為 15 年來的最高水平

從 20 世紀 30 年代到 70 年代,美國擁有以腹地為中心的中產階級經濟,為世界提供機械和商品,同時將勞動力從貧困的南部吸引到繁榮的中西部——強大的工會和世界主導企業的經濟體。這已成為一個由全球化金融、保險和高端服務主導的兩岸經濟,而另一岸則由信息技術、航空航天和娛樂主導。

金融和技術並不能創造很多就業機會,而這些行業的商業行為是貪婪和掠奪性的,常常演變成欺詐。幾年前,我們計算了 1990 年代繁榮時期各縣之間的收入不平等加劇情況,發現其中一半的增長僅歸因於五個縣的收入增長:曼哈頓、矽穀、西雅圖。此後,還有其他一些縣的收入大幅增長,但事實依然存在:美國最大的收入和財富增長高度集中在少數非常特定的地方、行業和人群中。

然而,過去 30 年創造的幾乎所有新工作崗位都來自服務業,而且大多數來自“停滯的服務業”——餐館、零售店、醫院和診所、辦公室和娛樂場所的大量湧現,這些行業的推動力是家庭收入(和借款)超過物質商品需求。這些工作的薪水一般,就業也不穩定。家庭通過擁有兩個或兩個以上掙錢的人來彌補,每個人有時都從事兩份或兩份以上工作,而 50 年前,常態是一個掙錢的人有一份穩定的工作,能支付生活工資。然後,新冠疫情重創了該行業。

不管好壞,我們都無法回頭:全球化和數字革命是生活中不可逆轉的事實。2021 年 6 月白宮對供應鏈的評估以半導體、稀土、電池和藥品為例,明確說明了這一點。我們的先進行業需要世界市場(包括中國市場),就像它們需要獲得世界資源一樣。美國消費者受益於進口商品和信息時代的效率。

問題是:我們現在該怎麽做?我們可以調整,建立一個公平、安全的中產階級社會,擺脫貧困和寡頭政治,使用我們廣泛熟悉的工具。這些工具包括:

擴大社會保險
社會保障、醫療保險、醫療補助、失業保險和 Snap 已經大大減少了美國的貧困、不安全和饑餓。它們可以擴大和加強。如果我們不能實現全民醫保,那麽就把參保年齡降低到 55 歲——這將覆蓋大部分最脆弱的人口,並一下子減輕雇主的私人醫療保險負擔。

提高最低工資
每小時 15 美元的聯邦最低工資將為至少 20% 的美國勞動者提供加薪。這將一下子解決所謂的“勞動力短缺”問題——而不會損害任何雇主的利益。它也不會鼓勵移民,因為美國工人會主動接受薪水不錯的工作。

實施就業保障
聯邦就業保障是一項精心準備的提案,它將消除非自願失業,設定基本工資標準,並為有意願的工人提供有用項目的持續就業,為私人雇主提供勞動力資源,他們可以從中輕鬆招募所需的工人。

穩定能源價格和供應
田納西河流域管理局和其他機構根據長期合同提供穩定的電力。為什麽石油和天然氣應該由私募股權在繁榮與蕭條的基礎上經營?穩定能源價格和供應——通過監管、配額、價格控製(如德國目前的做法)、長期合同和公用事業——許多其他問題將變得更容易解決。

建設公共服務、基礎設施,應對氣候問題

改變
同時削減軍事承諾和開支。基礎設施的主要作用是改善生活質量,提供清潔的水和空氣、良好的交通和通訊,並緊急改變資源結構,盡可能緩解全球變暖。我們不能滿足這些需求,同時又把我們的才能和資源投入到戰爭中——阿富汗和伊拉克戰爭之後,這種限製已經很明顯了。是時候結束美國能夠或應該統治世界的幻想了。

將稅收轉向土地租金
古典經濟學的一個重要原則是,稅收應該鼓勵勞動和企業,同時阻止公共和私人領域的浪費。在 20 世紀 80 年代,稅收從個人和企業收入和資本收益轉移到工資和銷售額——不出所料,結果是超級富豪寡頭的崛起。現在的補救措施是對這些積累和相關租金(土地價值、礦產權、技術“準租金”)征稅,以便讓新富豪回歸現實。更嚴格的遺產稅和贈與稅可以刺激巨額財富向基金會和非營利組織(如醫院、大學和教堂)轉移,同時防止金融和政治王朝的出現。

趁為時未晚,改革銀行業
《格拉斯-斯蒂格爾法案》保護了中產階級(商業銀行的普通存款人)免受精英投機衝動的影響。今天,盡管發生了嚴重的金融危機,但大資金又重新掌權了——美國公眾和全世界的大部分人都對此感到厭倦。也許最艱難、最必要的改革是減少債務(包括學生債務)、縮小銀行規模、恢複有效監管、起訴欺詐行為,以及規範金融以服務於公眾利益。這將使銀行家失去魅力,也使管理美聯儲失去令人陶醉的權力。

該計劃現實嗎?也許不現實。但請考慮一下我們所走的道路。我提出的是另一種選擇——遠離幹草叉、無政府狀態和內戰。

詹姆斯·K·加爾布雷斯 (James K Galbraith) 是德克薩斯大學奧斯汀分校林登·B·約翰遜公共事務學院政府/商業關係專業的 Lloyd M Bentsen Jr 教授。20 世紀 70 年代,他起草了《漢弗萊-霍金斯充分就業和平衡增長法案》原版的貨幣政策監督條款

這就是我們麵臨的
來自富人和權貴的律師團隊試圖阻止我們發表他們不想讓你看到的故事。

資金不透明的遊說團體決心破壞有關氣候緊急情況和其他既定科學的事實。

不顧新聞自由的專製國家。

壞人在網上傳播虛假信息以破壞民主。

***

但我們擁有強大的力量。

我們擁有你。

《衛報》由像你一樣的加拿大讀者資助,唯一能決定我們發表什麽內容的人是我們的編輯。

如果你想加入我們的使命,向世界分享獨立的全球新聞,我們很樂意與你站在一起。

The broken US economy breeds inequality and insecurity. Here’s how to fix it

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/oct/07/us-economy-growth-inequality-james-k-galbraith

On one side, oceans of wealth and power. On the other, precarity and powerlessness. But we have the tools for reform
 7 Oct 2022 13.47 BST

Rising interest rates, a falling stock market, a seesaw in the price of gas, a high dollar and chaos in world finance – we see in all this, once again, the folly of trying to run the world’s largest economy through a central bank. It’s time to rethink the basics: what has happened in America? And what should be done?

Adam Smith wrote: “Wealth, as Mr Hobbes says, is power.” Today in the United States we find islands of wealth and power on one side and an ocean of precarity and powerlessness, alongside poverty, on the other. This is a structural development over 50 years, the effect of politics and policies, but also of industrial change, globalization and new technologies, with intense regional, social, demographic and political implications.

US mortgage rates climb to 6.7%, highest for 15 years

From the 1930s to the 1970s America had a middle-class economy centered in the heartland, feeding and supplying the world with machinery and goods while drawing labor from the impoverished south to the thriving midwest – an economy of powerful trade unions and world-dominant corporations. This has become a bicoastal economy dominated by globalized finance, insurance and high-end services on one coast, and by information technology, aerospace and entertainment on the other.

Finance and technology do not create many jobs, and the conduct of business in those sectors is rapacious and predatory, shading often into fraud. Some years ago we calculated the rise of income inequality measured between counties during the 1990s boom years, and found that half the increase was due to income gains in just five counties: Manhattan, Silicon Valley, Seattle. There have been other big gainers since, but the fact remains: the largest income and wealth gains in America have become highly concentrated in a few very specific places, sectors – and people.

Yet practically all new jobs created in the past 30 years have been in services, and most of those in “stagnant services” – the profusion of restaurants, retail shops, hospitals and clinics, offices and entertainment venues, fueled by household incomes (and borrowings) exceeding requirements for material goods. Pay in these jobs is mediocre and employment is unstable. Families compensated by having two or more earners, each sometimes holding two or more jobs, where 50 years ago the norm was one earner with a steady job paying a living wage. Then Covid blasted the sector.

For better or worse, we can’t go back: globalization and the digital revolution are irreversible facts of life. The June 2021 White House Review on the supply chain made this very clear, using semiconductors, rare earths, batteries and pharmaceuticals as examples. Our advanced sectors need world markets – including the Chinese market – as much as they need access to the world’s resources. US consumers benefit from imported goods and from the efficiencies of the information age.

The question is: what do we do now? We can adjust, and build a fair and secure middle-class society, free of poverty and of oligarchy alike, with tools that are broadly familiar. These tools include:

Expand social insurance

Social security, Medicare, Medicaid, unemployment insurance and Snap already greatly reduce poverty, insecurity and hunger in America. They can be broadened and strengthened. If we can’t get Medicare for All, then drop the age of eligibility to 55 – that would cover a large part of the most vulnerable population and reduce in a stroke the burden of private health insurance on employers.

Raise the minimum wage

A federal minimum wage at $15 per hour would provide a raise to at least 20% of all working Americans. It would solve in a stroke the supposed problem of “labor shortage” – without hurting any employer relative to any other. Nor would it encourage immigration, since US workers would step up to take decently paid jobs.

Implement a job guarantee

A federal job guarantee is well-prepared proposal that would eliminate involuntary unemployment, set a basic wage standard, and provide willing workers with continuous employment on useful projects, giving private employers a labor pool from which they can easily recruit the workers that they need.

Stabilize energy prices and supplies

The TVA and other agencies provide stable power under long-term contracts. Why should oil and gas be run by private equity on a boom-and-bust basis? Stabilize energy prices and supplies – with regulation, quotas, price controls (as in Germany right now), long-term contracts and public utilities – and many other problems would become much easier to solve.

Build public services, infrastructure, and fight climate change

And do this while cutting military commitments and spending. The main job of infrastructure is to improve the quality of life, with clean water and air, good transport and communications, and – urgently – to change the resource mix so as to mitigate, so far as possible, global warming. We cannot meet these needs and at the same time devote our talents and resources to wars – the limits to that are clear after Afghanistan and Iraq. It is past time to end the illusion that the United States can or should run the world.

Shift taxation toward land rent

A great principle of classical economics was that taxes should encourage labor and enterprise while discouraging waste in both the public and private spheres. In the 1980s, taxes were shifted away from personal and corporate incomes and capital gains and toward payrolls and sales – and the unsurprising result was the rise of an oligarchy of hyper-wealthy persons. The remedy now is to tax these accumulations and the associated rents – land values, mineral rights, technology “quasi-rents” – so as to bring the new plutocrats back to earth. A stronger estate-and-gift tax can spur the transfer of great fortunes to foundations and non-profits, such as hospitals, universities and churches, while working to prevent the emergence of dynasties, financial and political.

Reform banking before it’s too late

The Glass-Steagall Act protected the middle class – the ordinary depositor at a commercial bank – from the speculative whims of the elites. Today big money is back in charge, despite the great financial crisis – and much of the American public as well as the larger world is sick of it. Perhaps the toughest, most necessary reform is to reduce debts including student debts, to shrink the banks, to restore effective regulation, to prosecute frauds, and to discipline finance to serve the public good. This will take the glamour out of being a banker – and the intoxicating power out of running the Federal Reserve.

Is this program realistic? Perhaps not. But consider the path we’re on. What I propose is an alternative – to pitchforks, anarchy and civil war.

  • James K Galbraith holds the Lloyd M Bentsen Jr chair in government/business relations at the Lyndon B Johnson School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin. In the 1970s, he drafted the monetary policy oversight provisions of the original version of the Humphrey-Hawkins Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act

This is what we're up against

Teams of lawyers from the rich and powerful trying to stop us publishing stories they don’t want you to see. 

Lobby groups with opaque funding who are determined to undermine facts about the climate emergency and other established science. 

Authoritarian states with no regard for the freedom of the press.

Bad actors spreading disinformation online to undermine democracy. 

***

But we have something powerful on our side. 

We’ve got you. 

The Guardian is funded by readers like you in Canada and the only person who decides what we publish is our editor.

If you want to join us in our mission to share independent, global journalism to the world, we’d love to have you on side.

[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (0)
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.