個人資料
正文

為什麽印度仍被英國困住

(2023-07-07 17:05:20) 下一個

維傑·普拉沙德:為什麽印度仍被英國困住?

作者:Vijay Prashad 2023 年 5 月 6 日 中國研究院

Vijay Prashad: Why Does India Remain Entrapped by the UK?https://medium.com/@thechinaacademy/vijay-prashad-why-does-india-remain-entrapped-by-the-uk-8fce05756f1c? 

什麽是南半球? 印度曆史學家維傑·普拉沙德認為,這不再是一個地理概念,而是一場從殖民主義中爭取尊嚴的鬥爭。 今天,我們很榮幸邀請維傑·普拉沙德來告訴我們為什麽印度仍然處於殖民主義的遺產之下。

維賈伊·普拉沙德 (Vijay Prashad) 是一位印度曆史學家、編輯和記者,也是三大洲的執行董事。

我的名字是維傑·普拉沙德。 我是一名曆史學家。 我也是一名記者。 我們非常有興趣與跨國界和國界的人們進行交流。

40年前我第一次來到中國。 我是一個16歲的男孩。 我來到中國農村,去農村旅遊。 令我印象深刻的是,中國的農民、農民等等都不是尷尬的人。 他們說話時直視你的眼睛。 這就是中國革命所做的。 要知道,1949年之前,中國農村的農民是不好意思看人的。 他們走路的時候都會低著頭。 他們害怕房東。 他們被毆打。 人們不得不裹腳。 中國革命改變了農村的這種態度。 這種態度在世界許多地方仍然存在:等級製度、地主占有製等等。 這就是南方國家。 這是曾經處於相對殖民主義地位的國家的狀況,無論是哪種方式。

嗯,這些國家根本無法發展,因為他們沒有投資。 因此他們不得不向曾經殖民過他們的國家借錢。 但是,讓我們坦白地說吧。 當殖民主義結束時,從印度、許多非洲國家等社會奪走的所有財富都被用來豐富北方國家。

例如,在英國,英國工業是由印度農民資助的。 所有利潤都來自印度並投資於英國。 印度沒有工業。 1947 年英國人被逐出印度時,印度的識字率僅為 13%。 英國統治印度300年,他們讓這個國家沒有財政、沒有基礎設施、沒有財富、沒有教育體係。 一切幾乎都被摧毀了,經濟仍然致力於向西方出口初級產品。

於是印度就去找西方國家說:借錢給我們吧。 你們拿走了我們所有的財富,現在又借錢給我們發展。” 他們借了錢,卻負債累累,在債務危機之後陷入了災難性的債務危機。 許多國家幾十年來一直借錢,直到今天仍在償還債務。

那麽,新自由主義為什麽會失敗呢? 為什麽開發項目會失敗? 嗯,因為這些國家大多數根本沒有資本。 他們沒有人力資源; 他們沒有發動革命。 中國人永遠不要忘記,中國革命給這個國家帶來的是尊嚴感。 這是關鍵。 他們給人民一種尊嚴感,他們讓人民有尊嚴。

這不是全球南方其他國家能夠做到的事情。 古巴做到了。 古巴擊退了美國殖民主義,擺脫了黑手黨和賭場,人民有尊嚴。 世界上大多數國家的情況並非如此。 所以你可以嚐試任何你想要的經濟政策。 如果你沒有足夠的資本,如果人民沒有尊嚴,如果他們沒有受過教育,如果他們沒有醫療保健等等,那麽你就很難成功。 那麽,什麽是南半球? 那為什麽還沒有成功呢? 它仍然受到殖民主義遺產的影響。

這是 1961 年不結盟運動五位主要創始人在南斯拉夫貝爾格萊德會麵時的照片。南斯拉夫已不複存在,但它曾經存在過。 有約瑟普·布羅茲·鐵托,鐵托是南斯拉夫的政府首腦、國家元首。 其中有印度尼西亞總統邦·蘇加諾,一個非常有趣的人,埃及總統賈邁勒·阿卜杜勒·納賽爾,加納總統誇梅·恩克魯瑪,印度總理賈瓦哈拉爾·尼赫魯。

這張照片有趣的是,他們五人出身……鐵托和恩克魯瑪並不是1955年在印度尼西亞萬隆開的會議,而是亞非國家1955年在印度尼西亞萬隆開的一次會議,他們談到了創建的重要性。 南方的項目,第三世界的項目。 周恩來從中國來參加了那次會議,他是這次會議的明星,這是非常有趣的曆史。 六年後,他們在貝爾格萊德會麵,創建了不結盟運動。

現在不結盟運動非常重要,因為他們提出的論點是西方,主要是美國,但西歐和蘇聯必須減少軍備競賽,不要把所有的錢都浪費在武器上,並威脅到美國 毀滅世界,但利用這些財富有效地為南方創建一個發展項目。 因此,他們希望將槍支移入橋梁,將槍支移入教科書,將槍支移入醫院,等等。 這是他們信息的一部分,但他們將幾乎整個南方團結到了這個項目中。 這些國家從殖民列強手中贏得獨立後不久。

第二次世界大戰後,這些年輕的國家聚集在一起說:我們要自力更生。 我們希望您尊重我們,而且我們不會被愚弄。 舊的殖民製度仍在繼續。

“南方國家”這個概念與許多概念一樣具有誤導性。 因為你認為這與南方、南半球、北方是較富裕的國家等有關。 這有點像早期你把東西分成東西方。 西方是歐洲和美國。 東方是蘇聯或中國或其他什麽。 南方實際上是指擺脫殖民主義、被殖民並擺脫殖民主義的國家。

Vijay Prashad: Why Does India Remain Entrapped by the UK?

https://medium.com/@thechinaacademy/vijay-prashad-why-does-india-remain-entrapped-by-the-uk-8fce05756f1c?

By Vijay Prashad 6 May 2023 The China Academy  

What is Global South? Vijay Prashad, an Indian Historian, thinks it no longer a geographical concept, but a struggle for dignity from colonialism. Today, we are honoured to have Vijay Prashad to tell us why India still remains under the legacy of colonialism.

Vijay Prashad is an Indian historian, editor and journalist, executive director of Tricontinental.

Myname is Vijay Prashad. I’m a historian. I’m also a journalist. We are very interested in communicating with people across boundaries and borders.

I came to China first 40 years ago. I was a 16-year-old boy. I came to rural China and went on a tour, of the countryside. I was impressed by the fact that the peasantry in China, the farmers, and so on were not people who were embarrassed. They looked you straight in the eye when they spoke. This is what the Chinese Revolution did. You know, before 1949, the Chinese peasantry in the countryside was embarrassed to look at people. They would look down when they walked. They were scared of landlords. They get beaten. People had to bind their feet. The Chinese revolution changed that attitude in the countryside. This attitude still exists in many parts of the world: hierarchies, landlordism, and so on. That’s what the Global South is. It’s the condition of countries that had been in a position of relative colonialism, one way or the other.

Well, these countries simply were not able to develop because they didn’t have investments. So they had to borrow money from the countries that used to colonize them. But look, let’s be quite frank. When colonialism ended all the wealth that had been taken from these societies like India, many African countries, and so on, had gone to enrich the countries of the north.

So in England, for instance, the English industry was financed by the Indian peasantry. All the profits were taken from India and invested in England. In India, there was no industry. When the British were thrown out of India in 1947, the literacy rate was merely 13%. British had ruled India for 300 years, they left the country with no finances, no infrastructure, really no wealth, no education system. Everything was pretty much destroyed and the economy was still geared to exporting primary goods to the west.

So India went to the Western countries and said: “Lend to lend us money. You took all our wealth and now lend us money to develop.” They borrowed money, but they went into debt and into a catastrophic debt crisis after the debt crisis. Many countries, they continue to pay the debt till today for decades of having borrowed money.

So, why did neoliberalism fail? Why did any development project fail? Well, because most of these countries simply don’t have capital. They don’t have the human resources; they didn’t make a revolution. People in China should never forget that what the Chinese Revolution gave this country was it gave the people of this country a sense of dignity. That’s the key thing. They gave the people a sense of dignity, they dignified people.

This is not something that the rest of the Global South was able to do. Cuba did it. Cuba fought off US colonialism, got rid of the Mafias and the casinos and the people are dignified. This is not the case in most of the world. So you can try any economic policy you want. It’s gonna be hard to succeed if you don’t have sufficient capital if the people aren’t dignified, if they’re not educated, if they don’t have health care, and so on. So, what’s the Global South? It’s that then why hasn’t it succeeded? It’s still suffering from the legacy of colonialism.

 

This is a photograph of the five principal founders of the Non-Aligned Movement as they were meeting in Belgrade, Yugoslavia in 1961. Yugoslavia no longer exists, but it existed then. There was Josip Broz Tito, Tito was the head of government, head of state in Yugoslavia. There was Bung Sukarno, the president of Indonesia, a very interesting man, Gamal Abdel Nasser, president of Egypt, and Kwame Nkrumah, the president of Ghana, the prime minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru.

What’s interesting about the picture is that the five of them came out of… Tito and Nkrumah were not Bandung conferences in Indonesia in 1955, but the Asian and African countries had a conference in 1955 in Bandung, Indonesia where they talked about the importance of creating a project of the south, a third world project. Zhou En’lai came from China to that conference and he was a star of the conference, very interesting history. So 6 years later, they met in Belgrade and they created the Non-Aligned Movement.

Now the Non-Aligned Movement is very important because they were making the argument that the West, United States mainly, but Western Europe and the Soviet Union had to cut back on the arms race and not waste all his money on weapons and also threaten the destruction of the world, but use that wealth to effectively create a development project for the South. So they wanted to move guns into bridges, guns into school books, guns into hospitals, and so on. And that was a part of their message, but they united almost the entire South into this project. So soon after these countries won independence from colonial powers.

After World War two, these young states came together to say: we want to stand on our own feet. We want you to look at us with respect plus we’re not fooled. The old colonial system continues.

The concept Global South like many concepts is misleading. because you think it has something to do with the South, the southern hemisphere, the North being the richer countries, and so on. It was a little bit like in an earlier period you divided things by east and west. The West is Europe and the United States. The East is the Soviet Union or China or whatever. The South really refers to countries that came out of colonialism, that had been colonized and came out of colonialism.

In Search of New Narrative — The Global South and China 01

Written by The China Academy

[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (0)
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.