個人資料
正文

拜登欲同中國合作解決俄烏戰爭

(2023-05-05 05:24:51) 下一個

布林肯突然讚賞中方斡旋,美媒:拜登政府正權衡同中國合作

熊超然 2023-05-04 觀察者網

【文/觀察者網 熊超然】俄烏衝突持續延宕,以中國為代表,越來越多的國家開始發出“勸和促談”的和平之聲。“美國對中國在解決烏克蘭危機中發揮的作用表示歡迎”——美國《華盛頓郵報》當地時間5月3日以此為題刊發了一篇評論文章。

當天,美國國務卿布林肯在《華盛頓郵報》的一次現場采訪中就公開闡述了美方的最新態度,他不僅對中國發揮重要影響力斡旋烏克蘭危機表示歡迎,還積極肯定了中方的“立場文件”,並讚賞了近期中烏領導人通話。文章指出,拜登政府似乎正在權衡是否與中國合作,尋求通過談判解決俄烏衝突。

文章稱,布林肯的這番發言,呼應了美國高級別官員最近幾天私下所說的話,即“美中可能會合作調解這場殘酷的俄烏衝突”。文章還分析認為,這與拜登政府此前的表態已有明顯不同,美方針對俄烏衝突似乎開始傾向於“承認中國的作用”。

同時,《華盛頓郵報》也進一步解讀認為,布林肯的這番話也有想要圍繞中美關係強調其所謂“合作的籃子”(cooperation basket)的說法,尋求同中方溝通接觸。采訪中,布林肯提到,他希望能夠重新安排訪問中國的行程。

《華盛頓郵報》報道截圖

《華盛頓郵報》在文章開頭認為,美國作出任何此類外交努力的前提,都是烏克蘭要在前線戰場取得進展,這樣才可能使基輔方麵處於更有利的談判地位。

當天采訪中,《華盛頓郵報》外交事務專欄作家大衛·伊格內修斯(David Ignatius)就向布林肯拋出了關於對烏軍預期中反攻前景的問題,布林肯回答說:“我相信他們將成功奪回更多領土,我認為同樣需要指出的重要一點是,對於俄羅斯而言,這已經是一個‘戰略失敗’。”

伊格內修斯形容,而當他向布林肯詢問關於美中通過合作以穩定烏克蘭局勢的問題時,布林肯給出的回答“令人驚訝的坦率”:“原則上,如果有一個國家,無論是中國還是其他有重大影響力的國家,準備追求公正和持久的和平,這都沒有錯。我們對此表示歡迎,而且中國當然有可能在這方麵發揮作用,這可能是非常有益的。”

布林肯承認,中方今年2月發布的《關於政治解決烏克蘭危機的中國立場》有“積極的內容”,比如:“各國主權、獨立和領土完整都應該得到切實保障”、“減少戰略風險,核武器用不得,核戰爭打不得”以及“逐步推動局勢降級緩和,最終達成全麵停火”等內容。

文章稱,作為俄烏衝突當事一方的烏克蘭,也希望中國能夠發揮斡旋調解的作用。近期,中烏兩國領導人通電話備受關注,對於這一通話,布林肯評價認為是“一件積極的事情”,至關重要的是,中國和其他一直在尋求“勸和促談”的國家正在傾聽俄烏雙方的聲音。

當地時間5月3日,美國國務卿布林肯接受《華盛頓郵報》現場直播采訪。圖自《華盛頓郵報》

伊格內修斯指出,一些美國政府官員告訴他,美方對中國的“和平努力”產生了興趣,原因之一是中國對於俄羅斯是具有影響力的國家。

布林肯也在采訪中說:“從原則上講,各個國家,尤其是像中國這樣具有重大影響力的國家,如果願意在努力實現和平方麵發揮積極作用,那將是一件好事。 然而,這從根本上取決於普京實際上做出那個根本性的決定,目前我們還沒有看到。”

《華盛頓郵報》分析稱,布林肯這樣公開表達對中國可能扮演斡旋者角色的興趣,認為中國可以成為調停俄烏衝突更廣泛努力的一部分,其目的是想在美中兩國競爭日益激烈的關係中,定義他所謂的“合作的籃子”(cooperation basket)這一說法。

布林肯在采訪中也再次提到,他希望能夠重新安排訪問中國的行程。文章還稱,“美中兩國之間的其他外交接觸也在進行中”。

對於中美關係,布林肯稱:“世界各地都發出了一個明確的需求信號,那就是我們要負責任地管理這種關係,這是對我們的需求信號,也是對中國的需求信號。這要從溝通接觸開始,至少我們需要在這種關係下設有‘底線’,需要在這方麵設置一些‘護欄’,而方式就是通過溝通和接觸。”

對於美方正在尋求和中方的高層級對話,包括重新安排美國國務卿布林肯的訪華行程等問題,中國外交部發言人汪文斌4月11日曾指出,當前中美關係遭遇困難,責任不在中方。美方應停止幹涉中國內政,停止損害中國利益,停止一邊聲稱要為中美關係加裝護欄,一邊破壞兩國關係的政治基礎,同中方相向而行,推動中美關係重回健康穩定發展正軌。

Opinion  

The U.S. warms to a role for China in resolving the Ukraine war

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/05/03/antony-blinken-ukraine-war-china-xi-mediation/

May 3, 2023 at 6:23 p.m. EDT  574Comments
 
Secretary of State Antony Blinken in March. (Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post)

The Biden administration appears to be weighing whether to work with China to seek a negotiated settlement of the Ukraine war after what U.S. officials predict will be Ukrainian gains in their long-planned offensive.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken publicly described the administration’s views in a Washington Post Live interview Wednesday to mark World Press Freedom Day. His comments echoed what senior officials have been saying privately in recent days about potential American and Chinese cooperation to mediate the brutal conflict.

The predicate for any such diplomatic effort would be Ukrainian gains on the battlefield, which could put Kyiv in a stronger bargaining position. Asked about Kyiv’s prospects in its anticipated counterstrike in eastern Ukraine, Blinken answered: “I feel confident that they will have success in regaining more of their territory, and I think it’s also important to note that for Russia, this is already a strategic failure.”

When I asked Blinken about working with China to achieve a stable outcome in Ukraine, he gave a surprisingly frank answer: “In principle, there’s nothing wrong with that if we have a country, whether it’s China or other countries that have significant influence that are prepared to pursue a just and durable peace. … We would welcome that, and it’s certainly possible that China would have a role to play in that effort. And that could be very beneficial.”

Blinken said there were some “positive” items in the 12-point peace plan that China announced in February. The Chinese proposals includes respecting “the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of all countries,” which implies a Russian troop withdrawal; “reducing strategic risks” and agreeing that “nuclear weapons must not be used”; and taking steps “to gradually de-escalate the situation and ultimately reach a comprehensive cease fire.”

Ukraine wants China to play a mediating role, and President Volodymyr Zelensky spoke last week by phone with President Xi Jinping. Zelensky said later that the two had discussed how to achieve a “just and sustainable peace,” without territorial compromises by Ukraine. A Chinese readout stressed that “all parties should seize the opportunity to accumulate favorable conditions for a political solution to the crisis.”

Blinken said Wednesday that the Xi-Zelensky call was “a positive thing, because it’s vitally important that China and other countries that have been seeking to advance peace hear from the victim, not just the aggressor.”

Russia has been unhappy with the Chinese mediation effort, several administration officials told me. But Moscow, subordinate to Beijing economically and militarily, can’t easily resist China’s wishes. That’s one reason administration officials are intrigued by Chinese peace efforts; they believe they might prevent Russia from trying to renew the war later — after a pause. “The only stability is China as a guarantor,” one official told me.

Discussing any durable peace effort, Blinken said “it has to basically reflect the principles that are at the heart of the United Nations charter when it comes to territorial integrity, when it comes to sovereignty. It can’t ratify what Russia has done, which is the seizure of so much of Ukraine’s territory. And it needs to be durable in the sense that we don’t want this to land in a place where Russia can simply rest, refit and reattack six months later or a year later.”

Blinken continued: “As a matter of principle, countries, particularly countries with significant influence like China, if they’re willing to play a positive role in trying to bring peace, that would be a good thing. But it starts fundamentally with Vladimir Putin actually making that fundamental decision. We’ve not seen that yet.”

Blinken’s public expression of interest in a possible Chinese mediating role is part of a broader effort to define what he likes to call a “cooperation basket” between the two countries in what is otherwise an increasingly competitive relationship. He said he was hopeful that he might be able to reschedule a trip to China that was postponed after February’s spy balloon incident. Other American diplomatic contacts with China are also underway.

“There’s a clear demand signal from around the world that we manage this relationship responsibly — a demand signal on us but also on Beijing,” Blinken said. “And that starts with engagement. … At the very least, we need to have a floor under this relationship. We need to have some guardrails on it, and the way to do that is through engagement.”

Administration officials are still debating whether a parallel U.S.-China peace effort might validate a broader Chinese role in Europe at a time when the United States has been trying to keep European allies from making sweetheart deals with Beijing. But when even Zelensky — who depends on U.S. military aid for his country’s survival — is welcoming contact with Xi, excluding China might be unrealistic.

A better strategy, toward which the administration seems to be leaning, is to acknowledge Beijing’s role but insist it must act responsibly to be treated as a great power. China could start by encouraging a just peace in Ukraine.

One year of Russia’s war in Ukraine

Portraits of Ukraine: Every Ukrainian’s life has changed since Russia launched its full-scale invasion one year ago — in ways both big and small. They have learned to survive and support each other under extreme circumstances, in bomb shelters and hospitals, destroyed apartment complexes and ruined marketplaces. Scroll through portraits of Ukrainians reflecting on a year of loss, resilience and fear.

Battle of attrition: Over the past year, the war has morphed from a multi-front invasion that included Kyiv in the north to a conflict of attrition largely concentrated along an expanse of territory in the east and south. Follow the 600-mile front line between Ukrainian and Russian forces and take a look at where the fighting has been concentrated.

A year of living apart: Russia’s invasion, coupled with Ukraine’s martial law preventing fighting-age men from leaving the country, has forced agonizing decisions for millions of Ukrainian families about how to balance safety, duty and love, with once-intertwined lives having become unrecognizable. Here’s what a train station full of goodbyes looked like last year.

Deepening global divides: President Biden has trumpeted the reinvigorated Western alliance forged during the war as a “global coalition,” but a closer look suggests the world is far from united on issues raised by the Ukraine war. Evidence abounds that the effort to isolate Putin has failed and that sanctions haven’t stopped Russia, thanks to its oil and gas exports.

Opinions about China

 
Opinion by 

David Ignatius writes a twice-a-week foreign affairs column for The Washington Post. His latest novel is “The Paladin.”  Twitter

Opinion|What 6 data points tell us about the status of the war in Ukraine

[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (0)
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.