簡體 | 繁體
loading...
海外博客
    • 首頁
    • 新聞
    • 讀圖
    • 財經
    • 教育
    • 家居
    • 健康
    • 美食
    • 時尚
    • 旅遊
    • 影視
    • 博客
    • 群吧
    • 論壇
    • 電台
  • 熱點
  • 原創
  • 時政
  • 旅遊
  • 美食
  • 家居
  • 健康
  • 財經
  • 教育
  • 情感
  • 星座
  • 時尚
  • 娛樂
  • 曆史
  • 文化
  • 社區
  • 幫助
您的位置: 文學城 » 博客 »Value: What made America great?

Value: What made America great?

2016-04-05 09:34:53

TJKCB

TJKCB
寧靜純我心 感得事物人 寫樸實清新. 閑書閑話養閑心,閑筆閑寫記閑人;人生無虞懂珍惜,以沫相濡字字真。
首頁 文章頁 文章列表 博文目錄
給我悄悄話
打印 被閱讀次數

America isn't easy: Democracy comes with a price, too high now ever in history, making us wonder if it's worth. What made America great was his pioneer, cowboy spirit (freedome, liberal); however, conservative family value was its core to prosperity. When time evolves, what's the definition of that value today - it's how debate goes on. Such value is up to interpretation by different politicians while voters say theirs with their vote.

I gotta say I monitor closely what's going as I constantly listen to satellite radio shows: Rachel Maddow (MSNBC), Fox Megyn Kelly, CNN, etc. I thought Donald Trump with cowboy spirit, but little substances, no specific policy thinking, only shouting, screaming, more like a school bully. Bernie Sanders burning your blood, but lack of implementation as human nature of selfish and greedy, a driver for many. Ted Cruz, clueless about diversity of society, with bad mouth all others except himself - selfish with dark mindset - lack of kindness, graciousness. Hillary Clinton, lack of vitality and new ideas. Sad, what's our hero?

Wait, is democracy about you and me - your ideas and my ideas? Can't trust any human beings - sinners like you and me. Flaw is part of hallmark for any politicians - perfect? no way. I pray for such a powerful hero, nevertheless, for prosperity, peace and security of America, still high hope in my mind.

For those staying in America, you have any ideas why you do what you do? What's your interpretation? Some thought reading this morning's headline:

 

Bill Clinton would lose 2016 Democratic primary: Column

Gary Bauer 3:20 a.m. EDT April 5, 2016

The DNC has shifted left since the '90s, and Hillary is running against her husband's policies.

635948621401509505-bauer.JPG

Bill Clinton campaigns for his wife in Spokane, Wash., on March 21, 2016.(Photo: Tyler Tjomsland, The (Spokane, Wash.) Spokesman-Review, via AP)

13 CONNECTTWEETLINKEDIN 2 COMMENTEMAILMORE

It has become something of a mantra on the left that the Republican Party has moved so far to the right that even conservative icon Ronald Reagan couldn’t get nominated by today’s party. Last month, Vice President Biden asserted that the Gipper “could no more get the nomination of the Republican Party than I could get the nomination.”

It’s a cheap and self-serving claim, but it raises an interesting question: Less than 20 years since the conclusion of his presidency, could Bill Clinton receive the presidential nomination in today’s Democratic Party?

Clinton portrayed himself as a “new Democrat” — a politician who, though fairly liberal on many issues, was pragmatic enough to reach across the political aisle to get things done when necessary. Some of his primary accomplishments — welfare reform, telecommunications and financial deregulation, NAFTA, the Defense of Marriage Act and balanced budgets — were evidence that Clinton wasn’t blowing smoke when he declared that “the era of big government is over.”

He also signed a crime bill that helped lead to plummeting crime rates, instituted the military’s "don’t ask don’t tell" policy on gays and, at least rhetorically, signaled that the goal of public policy should be to make abortion not just safe and legal but also rare. Clinton even signed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which most liberals deplore today and which preserved citizens’ right not to violate their deeply held beliefs.

Clinton even embraced a conservative approach on illegal immigration, signing a law that raised deportations and strengthened penalties for illegal immigrants. Little of this would be acceptable in this year's Democratic primary.

Perhaps the most telling example of how far left today's Democratic Party has moved in the past decade is the campaign of his wife. Hillary Clinton is running against her husband’s legacy almost as much as she is running against her GOP opponents.

She’s promising to raise taxes; she repudiates her husband’s tough approach to crime prevention and she is all in for gay marriage by judicial fiat.

USA TODAY

Kirsten Powers: The Republican blame game

 

And on immigration, Hillary has followed Bernie Sanders’ lead in promising not to deport anyone without a criminal record if she’s elected president. Hillary has even declined to state whether she supports her husband’s welfare reform law, which is almost universally seen as an accomplishment.

On free trade, she once supported NAFTA and other free-trade agreements. She even supported the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a deal between the U.S. and Asian nations, stating her support dozens of times as secretary of State. Now? She’s against it.

The Democratic front-runner is moving left not because the country has moved left (though it has on some cultural issues) but rather because her party has — dramatically so.

USA TODAY

Why a Stanford grad joined the Trump revolt: Column

 

For example, in 1992, Bill Clinton defeated several candidates who ran to his left — liberals such as Tom Harkin, Paul Tsongas and Jerry Brown. In 2016, Hillary Clinton is not only running against her husband's centrist policies, she also has an avowed socialist running to her left!

A recent American Enterprise Institute report found that while the ideological makeup of the GOP has changed some since the end of Clinton’s presidency, the profile of the Democratic Party has undergone a much bigger shift. Examining Gallup polling data, AEI researchers found that the percentage of Democrats who self-identify as liberal has soared from 29% in 2000 to 45% in 2015. Among Republicans, the percentage who identified as conservative increased only 6 percentage points over the time period, from 62% to 68%.

AEI’s Michael Barone found that while the Democratic electorate is moving lef, it is also shrinking. He found large increases in the share of liberals voting in the first three Democratic primary states compared with 2008, even as the number of Democrats voting overall decreased substantially. Hillary’s embrace of liberal policies is likely both a cause and an effect of moderate and conservative Democrats fleeing the Democratic Party.

USA TODAY

Trump's nuclear views are terrifying: Column

 

POLICING THE USA: A look at race, justice, media

Bill Clinton made headlines in recent days for taking a shot at the "awful legacy" of the Obama era.

He has a point. During Clinton's presidency, economic growth averaged roughly 3.8% per quarter in real GDP. Under President Obama, annual economic growth has averaged an anemic 1.8%.

If Hillary Clinton is promising to give us more of the same failed liberal policies of the past "awful" eight years, why would anyone vote for her?

So, could Bill Clinton get the nomination in today’s Democratic Party? Given the Democrats' lurch to the left over the past two decades, and considering Hillary Clinton’s renunciation of the more moderate and bipartisan (not to mention successful) elements of her husband’s legacy, the answer is a resounding no.

Former Republican presidential candidate Gary Bauer is president of American Values and chairman of the Campaign for Working Families. Follow @GaryLBauer.

In addition to its own editorials, USA TODAY publishes diverse opinions from outside writers, including our Board of Contributors. To read more columns like this, go to the Opinion front page.

TJKCB 發表評論於 2016-04-06 23:24:07
您的位置: 文學城 ? 論壇 ? 時事述評 ? Value: What made America great? Value: What made America great?
來源: TJKCB 於 2016-04-05 09:04:53 [檔案] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀:2043 次 (24841 bytes)
TJKCB 發表評論於 2016-04-05 11:26:14
http://bbs.wenxuecity.com/currentevent/798597.html
您的位置: 文學城 ? 論壇 ? 時事述評 ? Value: What made America great?
全部論壇列表Value: What made America great? 來源: TJKCB 於 2016-04-05 09:04:53 [檔案] [博客] [轉至博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀:116 次 (24841 bytes)
登錄後才可評論.
  • 文學城簡介
  • 廣告服務
  • 聯係我們
  • 招聘信息
  • 注冊筆名
  • 申請版主
  • 收藏文學城

WENXUECITY.COM does not represent or guarantee the truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any of communications posted by other users.

Copyright ©1998-2026 wenxuecity.com All rights reserved. Privacy Statement & Terms of Use & User Privacy Protection Policy

今日熱點

  • 五種常吃食物:微波爐加熱的風險遠遠的霧
  • 伊朗要幫中國預習一下大饑荒了luren_1970
  • 天涯何處是吾家?mychina
  • 五十不建房。。。謙謙美君子
  • 拖著兩娃,成了有錢男人的前任,越南老板山裏人家168
  • 咖啡的生命循環rokkorhunter
  • pickleball對健康的益處以及如何在運動中保護自己不受傷Oona
  • 不是人類選擇了動物,是動物篩選了人類牛城地主
  • 台灣問題:武統,和統,還是不統?一顆慈悲心
  • 霍爾木茲海峽不是籌碼格利
  • 《大峽穀:老司機帶娃Rim to Rim,差點成了“救人專業戶”》風帆在加
  • 從“教父”到“黃石” – 也聊我的認知成長曆程(1)Oasisflying
  • 社會主義是共產主義前過渡社會yongbing1993
  • 漢奸,台奸和美奸大號螞蟻

一周熱點

  • 美國醫療費用:高得讓人驚心遠遠的霧
  • 伊朗戰爭:中國將下場朱頭山
  • 深挖洞 廣積糧 不稱霸, 另類價值觀BeijingGirl1
  • 關於房子的夢想多倫多橄欖樹
  • “勝利”的解剖:一場兩個人都贏了的停戰ThinkingWithTony
  • 老年人的長期護理謙謙美君子
  • 退休半年後,我才明白最難的不是沒錢,而是不知道該做什麽experience
  • 《教父》的啟示,Kay 與 Michael:兩種秩序的分裂calm01
  • 川普大大地推進了美國的分裂偉業caizane
  • 司徒醫生手記:手抖與帕金森氏病Kwseeto
  • 我家老P的死裏逃生喝白開水健康
  • 春風二十裏 - 北京晨跑東河山村
  • 華人的問題不是“窩裏鬥”是“單打獨鬥”和不懂政治世事滄桑
  • 馬克談天下(602) 如何在報稅時避免被IRS查稅markyang
Value: What made...
切換到網頁版
TJKCB

TJKCB

Value: What made America great?

TJKCB (2016-04-05 09:34:53) 評論 (2)

America isn't easy: Democracy comes with a price, too high now ever in history, making us wonder if it's worth. What made America great was his pioneer, cowboy spirit (freedome, liberal); however, conservative family value was its core to prosperity. When time evolves, what's the definition of that value today - it's how debate goes on. Such value is up to interpretation by different politicians while voters say theirs with their vote.

I gotta say I monitor closely what's going as I constantly listen to satellite radio shows: Rachel Maddow (MSNBC), Fox Megyn Kelly, CNN, etc. I thought Donald Trump with cowboy spirit, but little substances, no specific policy thinking, only shouting, screaming, more like a school bully. Bernie Sanders burning your blood, but lack of implementation as human nature of selfish and greedy, a driver for many. Ted Cruz, clueless about diversity of society, with bad mouth all others except himself - selfish with dark mindset - lack of kindness, graciousness. Hillary Clinton, lack of vitality and new ideas. Sad, what's our hero?

Wait, is democracy about you and me - your ideas and my ideas? Can't trust any human beings - sinners like you and me. Flaw is part of hallmark for any politicians - perfect? no way. I pray for such a powerful hero, nevertheless, for prosperity, peace and security of America, still high hope in my mind.

For those staying in America, you have any ideas why you do what you do? What's your interpretation? Some thought reading this morning's headline:

 

Bill Clinton would lose 2016 Democratic primary: Column

Gary Bauer 3:20 a.m. EDT April 5, 2016

The DNC has shifted left since the '90s, and Hillary is running against her husband's policies.

635948621401509505-bauer.JPG

Bill Clinton campaigns for his wife in Spokane, Wash., on March 21, 2016.(Photo: Tyler Tjomsland, The (Spokane, Wash.) Spokesman-Review, via AP)

13 CONNECTTWEETLINKEDIN 2 COMMENTEMAILMORE

It has become something of a mantra on the left that the Republican Party has moved so far to the right that even conservative icon Ronald Reagan couldn’t get nominated by today’s party. Last month, Vice President Biden asserted that the Gipper “could no more get the nomination of the Republican Party than I could get the nomination.”

It’s a cheap and self-serving claim, but it raises an interesting question: Less than 20 years since the conclusion of his presidency, could Bill Clinton receive the presidential nomination in today’s Democratic Party?

Clinton portrayed himself as a “new Democrat” — a politician who, though fairly liberal on many issues, was pragmatic enough to reach across the political aisle to get things done when necessary. Some of his primary accomplishments — welfare reform, telecommunications and financial deregulation, NAFTA, the Defense of Marriage Act and balanced budgets — were evidence that Clinton wasn’t blowing smoke when he declared that “the era of big government is over.”

He also signed a crime bill that helped lead to plummeting crime rates, instituted the military’s "don’t ask don’t tell" policy on gays and, at least rhetorically, signaled that the goal of public policy should be to make abortion not just safe and legal but also rare. Clinton even signed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which most liberals deplore today and which preserved citizens’ right not to violate their deeply held beliefs.

Clinton even embraced a conservative approach on illegal immigration, signing a law that raised deportations and strengthened penalties for illegal immigrants. Little of this would be acceptable in this year's Democratic primary.

Perhaps the most telling example of how far left today's Democratic Party has moved in the past decade is the campaign of his wife. Hillary Clinton is running against her husband’s legacy almost as much as she is running against her GOP opponents.

She’s promising to raise taxes; she repudiates her husband’s tough approach to crime prevention and she is all in for gay marriage by judicial fiat.

USA TODAY

Kirsten Powers: The Republican blame game

 

And on immigration, Hillary has followed Bernie Sanders’ lead in promising not to deport anyone without a criminal record if she’s elected president. Hillary has even declined to state whether she supports her husband’s welfare reform law, which is almost universally seen as an accomplishment.

On free trade, she once supported NAFTA and other free-trade agreements. She even supported the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a deal between the U.S. and Asian nations, stating her support dozens of times as secretary of State. Now? She’s against it.

The Democratic front-runner is moving left not because the country has moved left (though it has on some cultural issues) but rather because her party has — dramatically so.

USA TODAY

Why a Stanford grad joined the Trump revolt: Column

 

For example, in 1992, Bill Clinton defeated several candidates who ran to his left — liberals such as Tom Harkin, Paul Tsongas and Jerry Brown. In 2016, Hillary Clinton is not only running against her husband's centrist policies, she also has an avowed socialist running to her left!

A recent American Enterprise Institute report found that while the ideological makeup of the GOP has changed some since the end of Clinton’s presidency, the profile of the Democratic Party has undergone a much bigger shift. Examining Gallup polling data, AEI researchers found that the percentage of Democrats who self-identify as liberal has soared from 29% in 2000 to 45% in 2015. Among Republicans, the percentage who identified as conservative increased only 6 percentage points over the time period, from 62% to 68%.

AEI’s Michael Barone found that while the Democratic electorate is moving lef, it is also shrinking. He found large increases in the share of liberals voting in the first three Democratic primary states compared with 2008, even as the number of Democrats voting overall decreased substantially. Hillary’s embrace of liberal policies is likely both a cause and an effect of moderate and conservative Democrats fleeing the Democratic Party.

USA TODAY

Trump's nuclear views are terrifying: Column

 

POLICING THE USA: A look at race, justice, media

Bill Clinton made headlines in recent days for taking a shot at the "awful legacy" of the Obama era.

He has a point. During Clinton's presidency, economic growth averaged roughly 3.8% per quarter in real GDP. Under President Obama, annual economic growth has averaged an anemic 1.8%.

If Hillary Clinton is promising to give us more of the same failed liberal policies of the past "awful" eight years, why would anyone vote for her?

So, could Bill Clinton get the nomination in today’s Democratic Party? Given the Democrats' lurch to the left over the past two decades, and considering Hillary Clinton’s renunciation of the more moderate and bipartisan (not to mention successful) elements of her husband’s legacy, the answer is a resounding no.

Former Republican presidential candidate Gary Bauer is president of American Values and chairman of the Campaign for Working Families. Follow @GaryLBauer.

In addition to its own editorials, USA TODAY publishes diverse opinions from outside writers, including our Board of Contributors. To read more columns like this, go to the Opinion front page.