奧巴馬現在到處批判華盛頓如何妨礙他的改革，華盛頓如何把黨派的利益置於美國人民利益之上，好象他多麽勇敢無畏，多麽為民作主似的。
真是可笑啊，他這是在攻擊誰啊？白宮是你當家，國會是你的民主黨當家，最高法院也有你推薦的人，誰是華盛頓啊？ 不就是你和你的民主黨嗎？您這不是賊喊捉賊是什麽？
這個競選能手除了能煽動群眾鬧群眾，把美國人階級化，對立化，大嘴一張，花納稅人的錢不上千億他沒興趣以外，再沒有任何本事。
美國聯邦政府三權鼎立，互相製約。政治上兩黨對立，旗鼓相當，這是美國立國之本，其目的就是要防止美國出獨裁總統，防止一黨專政，保護美國人民的自由。
奧巴馬對此很不習慣，很反感。 反感到了在國會演講中對最高法院進行攻擊的地步。一群民主黨議員們起立鼓掌叫好。
當三權鼎立的兩權被一黨控製，兩權聯合攻擊第三權的時候，美國大難臨頭了！！！
Supreme Court chief fights back after criticism from Obama
It\'s no secret that many think the fierce mood of partisanship is routinely crippling Washington. While most of the fur flies between the major parties in Congress — with the president weighing in occasionally to keep his party leaders on message — this week has seen an outbreak of hostilities in a less traditional venue: between the Supreme Court and the president.
In a controversy stretching back to January’s State of the Union Address, Chief Justice John Roberts told a group of law students at the University of Alabama that President Obama’s very public dissent from the Court’s Citizens United ruling, which effectively rolled back most existing restraints on corporate funding of political campaigns, was a provocation to the court’s cherished independence.
On the other hand, there is the issue of the setting, the circumstances, and the decorum, said Roberts. The image of having the members of one branch of government standing up, literally surrounding the Supreme Court, cheering and hollering while the court — according the requirements of protocol — has to sit there expressionless, I think is very troubling.
It\'s true that Obama pulled few punches in characterizing the Citizens United ruling, which had been handed down just prior to the State of the Union speech.
Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit in our elections, Obama said. Well, I don\'t think American elections should be bankrolled by America\'s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities.
Some of the lawmakers on hand interrupted Obama’s remarks with cheers of support. But television cameras panned the Court members in attendance and caught Justice Samuel Alito mouthing the words not true.
美國大難臨頭了?!
noso (2010-03-10 14:38:08) 評論 (3)奧巴馬現在到處批判華盛頓如何妨礙他的改革，華盛頓如何把黨派的利益置於美國人民利益之上，好象他多麽勇敢無畏，多麽為民作主似的。
真是可笑啊，他這是在攻擊誰啊？白宮是你當家，國會是你的民主黨當家，最高法院也有你推薦的人，誰是華盛頓啊？ 不就是你和你的民主黨嗎？您這不是賊喊捉賊是什麽？
這個競選能手除了能煽動群眾鬧群眾，把美國人階級化，對立化，大嘴一張，花納稅人的錢不上千億他沒興趣以外，再沒有任何本事。
美國聯邦政府三權鼎立，互相製約。政治上兩黨對立，旗鼓相當，這是美國立國之本，其目的就是要防止美國出獨裁總統，防止一黨專政，保護美國人民的自由。
奧巴馬對此很不習慣，很反感。 反感到了在國會演講中對最高法院進行攻擊的地步。一群民主黨議員們起立鼓掌叫好。
當三權鼎立的兩權被一黨控製，兩權聯合攻擊第三權的時候，美國大難臨頭了！！！
Supreme Court chief fights back after criticism from Obama
It\'s no secret that many think the fierce mood of partisanship is routinely crippling Washington. While most of the fur flies between the major parties in Congress — with the president weighing in occasionally to keep his party leaders on message — this week has seen an outbreak of hostilities in a less traditional venue: between the Supreme Court and the president.
In a controversy stretching back to January’s State of the Union Address, Chief Justice John Roberts told a group of law students at the University of Alabama that President Obama’s very public dissent from the Court’s Citizens United ruling, which effectively rolled back most existing restraints on corporate funding of political campaigns, was a provocation to the court’s cherished independence.
On the other hand, there is the issue of the setting, the circumstances, and the decorum, said Roberts. The image of having the members of one branch of government standing up, literally surrounding the Supreme Court, cheering and hollering while the court — according the requirements of protocol — has to sit there expressionless, I think is very troubling.
It\'s true that Obama pulled few punches in characterizing the Citizens United ruling, which had been handed down just prior to the State of the Union speech.
Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit in our elections, Obama said. Well, I don\'t think American elections should be bankrolled by America\'s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities.
Some of the lawmakers on hand interrupted Obama’s remarks with cheers of support. But television cameras panned the Court members in attendance and caught Justice Samuel Alito mouthing the words not true.