I have two offers:
1. Contract to hire, hourly rate for contract is $49/hour(w2), perm is $83K, which is not written in the paper as currently the paper is from the recruiting company as a contractor for $48/hour
2. direct hire, $88K
Two companies are about the same, but I have totally different interview experiences with them. For #1: one phone and onsite interview with the hiring manager, no other team member/director/VP. The manager did not ask any technical questions, just asked my past working experience and how many years I used XXX, etc on the phone interview. For onsite, mainly the behavior questions, with one HR people sit aside taking the notes(HR did not ask me any question). The onsite and phone interview each lasted only last 30 minutes. Company #2 has an intensive technical phone interview with 3 people, onsite interview includes intensive technical interview with all the team member(4), with the director, and with the VP. It lasted 3+ hours.
#2 is half way closer to where I live, the hiring manager is a korean.
I like the $48/hour rate, but not sure how long the contract period will last as it is a contract-to-hire position. The recruiter mentioned about 3 months, but not written in the paper. How long does it normally last for the contract period for contract-to-hire position?
I really need your opinion on which one to pick. I will have to make the decision today. Thanks a lot!
Two offers, which one to choose
所有跟帖:
•
要穩定,就選2。
-sigma-
♂
(258 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
06:25:18
•
Thanks, but
-sarah2-
♀
(538 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
06:39:12
•
那你就直說你隻要幹contracor吧。
-sigma-
♂
(177 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
06:48:24
•
Well,
-sarah2-
♀
(365 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
07:25:44
•
你的risk management的關念不太正確。
-sigma-
♂
(603 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
07:53:05
•
選三!!!!!!!!
-眼冒金星-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
10:59:43
•
Ding!!!! 回複:你的risk management的關念不太正確。
-歡諺-
♂
(449 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
18:24:12
•
2
-豬胖子-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
06:32:34
•
Can you explain, thanks
-sarah2-
♀
(172 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
06:42:34
•
perm 有Benefit
-豬胖子-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
06:46:34
•
Option 2 - it's a no-brainer
-Kaolin007-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
06:53:52
•
Can you shed some light on
-sarah2-
♀
(252 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
07:20:08
•
No layoffs for contractor (if this is what the
-屋漏痕-
♂
(256 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
07:34:41
•
Another possibility
-sarah2-
♀
(236 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
07:39:15
•
Yes, that's called contract to hire.
-屋漏痕-
♂
(128 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
07:59:42
•
回複:Two offers, which one to choose
-sarah2-
♀
(357 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
07:44:41
•
#1...
-HappyNow?!-
♂
(297 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
07:52:51
•
Umm...
-sarah2-
♀
(600 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
08:37:33
•
幹活太累了,爬上來亂講講
-veggiedoggie-
♀
(1074 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
08:45:25
•
“爬”字用的VERY好!
-HappyNow?!-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
09:01:29
•
怎麽好法,展開談談
-veggiedoggie-
♀
(26 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
09:04:07
•
意境,心境,環境。不吃方便麵!!!
-HappyNow?!-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
09:17:18
•
哈哈,老大,你老有才了。
-veggiedoggie-
♀
(203 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
10:06:50
•
can't help getting up to say
-Cathy_Bay-
♀
(442 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
11:21:02
•
actually it's totally opposite, imo
-Kaolin007-
♂
(815 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
12:34:07
•
熱烈歡迎,紮堆高人NO.3
-veggiedoggie-
♀
(243 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
13:03:07
•
回複:熱烈歡迎,紮堆高人NO.3
-Kaolin007-
♂
(150 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
13:13:55
•
嗬嗬,也對哈。我代表我那閨蜜謝謝你對她的表揚。
-veggiedoggie-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
13:25:45
•
你的回貼寫得很好,更難得碼那麽多字
-Kaolin007-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
13:39:37
•
啊?我也遭到表揚鳥?嗬嗬,是不是對我比較普通的安慰獎啊
-veggiedoggie-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
13:50:30
•
普通銀是永遠得不到表揚和獎狀滴!
-Kaolin007-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
14:05:59
•
人皆雲選2,吾獨雲選1
-胡說之-
♂
(554 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
09:32:46
•
That's what I thought
-sarah2-
♀
(352 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
09:45:11
•
眾人皆醉我獨醒,醒來爬回醉夢中;我意不在酒壇內,醉後箴言意多重?
-HappyNow?!-
♂
(74 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
10:16:34
•
copyright: “爬”字乃某“醉仙姑”之獨創,謹此敬禮!
-HappyNow?!-
♂
(10 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
10:22:37
•
謝就不必了,分帳的時候call我~~
-veggiedoggie-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
10:24:03
•
老大,你今天是不是又穿馬甲了?穿的是哪一個,我就不說了
-veggiedoggie-
♀
(106 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
10:26:39
•
回複:老大,你今天是不是又穿馬甲了?穿的是哪一個,我就不說了
-HappyNow?!-
♂
(20 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
12:45:39
•
老大,你把馬甲脫了給我看看,我就相信你,hehe.
-veggiedoggie-
♀
(84 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
14:45:34
•
紮堆高人NO.2!下麵誰再來?深情呼喚中......
-veggiedoggie-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
10:23:19
•
哇塞,我說的吧,紮堆高人NO.1
-veggiedoggie-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
10:22:36
•
隻知道在 88ph 和 48pa 中難以選擇,你這個反過來居然也要想? 不懂。
-letstalk-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
12:32:56
•
2,這還用問麽?
-撅著挺好-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
14:28:18
•
The thing is
-sarah2-
♀
(351 bytes)
()
12/10/2009 postreply
14:55:57