風蕭蕭_Frank
以文會友
“加拿大，奮起直追”模塊3 文字記錄：
Stephen Mirran 的《全球貿易體係重構用戶指南》摘要與分析
幻燈片1：
歡迎大家。今天，我們將通過 Stephen Miran 的論文《全球貿易體係重構用戶指南》探討國際貿易。Miran 巧妙地將關稅、貨幣調整和國家安全整合成一個統一的戰略，以鞏固特朗普第二屆政府領導下的美國產業。這篇分析由卡爾頓大學斯普羅特商學院的 Tony Bailetti 博士和 Ian Lee 博士共同呈現，旨在挑戰我們重新構想全球貿易及其對我們經濟未來的影響。讓我們深入探討，在快速變化的世界中，這些相互關聯的因素將如何重塑我們的產業。
幻燈片2：
現在，讓我們聚焦於斯蒂芬·米蘭（Stephen Miran）在2024年11月發表的論文中提出的一份大膽變革的美國全球經濟主導藍圖。米蘭是特朗普政府內閣人選，
他提供了對特朗普主義的唯一係統性分析，並揭示了未來四年的詳細路線圖。他的見解對我們的鄰國加拿大尤其重要，因為他們現在必須應對由美國旨在利用美國經濟實力的戰略性關稅威脅所塑造的格局。其影響深遠，促使所有利益相關者重新評估其在競爭日益激烈的全球舞台上的地位。在我們深入探討這些觀點的同時，
不妨思考一下：一個擁有如此激進戰略的經濟體，將如何重塑國際貿易，乃至全球權力的架構？讓我們在繼續分析的同時，共同探討這些問題。
幻燈片3
讓我們關注斯蒂芬·米蘭論文《重組全球貿易體係用戶指南》背後的真正目的。在本書中，米蘭提出了一份全麵的藍圖，旨在通過將關稅、貨幣調整和國家安全問題整合到一個戰略框架中來重新定義國際貿易。他的目標很明確：增強美國工業，並在競爭日益激烈的全球舞台上鞏固美國的經濟主導地位。
在審視這一戰略時，必須同時考慮其前景和風險。就其益處而言，米蘭的方法具有諸多顯著優勢。首先，它為振興美國製造業提供了清晰、係統的路線圖，幫助美國工業重新獲得競爭優勢。其次，通過將經濟政策與國家安全需求相結合，該戰略構建了一個有凝聚力的願景，有助於在全球不確定時期簡化決策。最後，對於11位政策製定者和商界領袖中的兩位而言，這份藍圖提供了他們急需的清晰思路——在這個經濟動蕩和快速變革的時代，它是一盞指路明燈。
然而，與任何大膽的戰略一樣，它也存在一些固有的缺點，需要我們謹慎關注。一個重大風險是貿易夥伴可能采取報複措施——這些行動可能升級為更廣泛的經濟衝突，並擾亂全球供應鏈。此外，激進的關稅和貨幣調整措施可能會無意中導致市場扭曲，破壞國際貿易規範的微妙平衡。雖然重點是美國的主導地位，但這種做法也可能引發意想不到的長期地緣政治影響，從而破壞全球經濟穩定。本質上，米蘭的論文挑戰我們權衡這些變革性益處與破壞我們互聯互通的世界穩定的風險。它迫使我們自問：重振工業實力和戰略清晰度的前景是否值得冒著經濟混亂和地緣政治後果的風險？在我們推進討論的過程中，讓我們擁抱這種雙重視角——認識到每一項開創性的戰略都既蘊含著機遇，也蘊含著不確定性。這種平衡，這種大膽設想與謹慎反思之間的動態張力，正是真正具有變革意義的經濟思想的核心。
幻燈片 4
現在，讓我們來總結一下斯蒂芬·米蘭的論文《重構全球貿易體係用戶指南》的精髓。米蘭在此勾勒出一幅全麵的藍圖，引領我們重新思考國際貿易的根基。請允許我為您梳理其中的關鍵要素：
1. 核心問題：
本文的核心是一個關鍵問題——我們當前的全球貿易體係究竟存在哪些根本性的缺陷？米蘭指出，根深蒂固的失衡和過時的政策正在破壞公平競爭和國內產業的可持續增長。
2. 擬議的美國戰略：
作為回應，本文概述了一項大膽的美國戰略。這不僅僅是一些想法的集合；而是一個精心策劃的路線圖，旨在利用美國的經濟實力重新定義全球貿易，
恢複競爭力並確立戰略主導地位。
3. 關稅政策及其經濟影響：
關稅並非本文所描繪的鈍器。相反，米蘭探討了精心調整的關稅政策如何保護國內產業，同時重塑國際經濟互動。這種方法旨在重新調整貿易動態，以促進強勁的國民經濟。
4. 美國貿易夥伴分類：
鑒於並非所有貿易關係都相同，本文對美國貿易夥伴進行了分類。通過了解其獨特的經濟角色和行為，可以製定針對性的戰略來應對特定挑戰並利用獨特的機遇。
3/11
5. 貨幣政策與儲備資產調整：
該戰略的一個關鍵支柱是重新審視貨幣政策和調整儲備資產。
本部分探討了貨幣估值的變化如何影響全球金融穩定並幫助平衡貿易差距。
6. 金融市場後果與風險：
任何轉型戰略都存在風險。米蘭敏銳地意識到，如此全麵的政策變革可能帶來的潛在影響——市場波動、意外的經濟中斷以及更廣泛的金融不穩定。
7. 國際貿易關係的長期重構：
最終，本文展望了國際貿易的長期重構。它呼籲我們重新構想全球經濟關係，努力建立一個不僅更加平衡、公平，而且能夠應對新興挑戰的體係。
所有這些觀點相互交織，形成了一個統一且大膽的戰略——一個挑戰傳統範式，並鼓勵我們展望美國領導改革後的全球貿易體係的未來。當我們反思這些要素時，請思考工業複蘇的希望與經濟中斷的潛在可能性之間的微妙平衡。正是這種風險與回報之間的動態張力，使得米蘭的分析既引人注目又發人深省。
現在，讓我們深入探討這些主題，繼續探索這一全球貿易變革願景。
幻燈片 5
在此之前，讓我們先來了解一下我們傑出的經濟學家斯蒂芬·米蘭 (Stephan Miran) 的簡介，他的著作是我們討論的大部分內容的基礎。想象一下，一位學者的思想之旅連接著公共和私營部門，他的見解持續影響著經濟政策的走向。斯蒂芬於2005年在波士頓大學獲得經濟學、哲學和數學學士學位——這為他探索我們經濟世界的複雜性奠定了堅實的基礎。在此基礎上，他繼續在哈佛大學攻讀經濟學博士學位，並有幸師從受人尊敬的經濟學家馬丁·費爾德斯坦 (Martin Feldstein)。這段深入的學術研究時期不僅磨練了他的分析能力，也使他形成了應對經濟挑戰的遠見卓識。
2024年12月，當選總統唐納德·特朗普提名斯蒂芬擔任經濟顧問委員會主席，他的專業知識得到了政府最高層的認可。這一關鍵職位賦予斯蒂芬就經濟政策問題向總統提供建議的重任，彰顯了人們對他指導國家戰略能力的信任。斯蒂芬的職業生涯中擔任過一係列舉足輕重的職位。在疫情期間的經濟衰退期間，他擔任美國財政部經濟政策高級顧問，在11項關鍵財政支持措施中的4項中發揮了關鍵作用。後來，他擔任哈德遜灣資本管理公司的高級策略師，專注於全球投資策略——以洞察力和精準度在動蕩的國際金融海域中航行。當他與他人共同創立資產管理公司Amberwave Partners時，他的企業家精神得到了充分展現，這體現了他對創新金融解決方案的承諾。此外，作為曼哈頓研究所的高級研究員，他參與了深入的研究和政策分析，這些研究和分析持續影響著公眾辯論。
在他的職業生涯中，斯蒂芬·米蘭為財政和貨幣政策的學術和公共討論做出了廣泛的貢獻，他的作品發表在《美國經濟學期刊》、《華爾街日報》和彭博社等知名出版物上。他的貢獻提醒我們，嚴謹的學術研究與實際應用的結合不僅是可能的，而且對於製定持久的政策至關重要。
今天，當我們思考他的戰略願景時，讓我們欣賞他經驗的深度和廣度——這證明了深思熟慮的分析在推動變革方麵的力量。現在，讓我們繼續探索，從他非凡的曆程和他為重塑全球經濟格局提供的洞見中汲取靈感。
幻燈片6
現在，讓我們深入探討米蘭分析的核心問題：持續存在的美國貿易失衡，而美元高估加劇了這一問題。美元憑借其全球儲備貨幣的地位，仍然人民幣持續被高估。這種高估並非僅僅是一個小小的經濟怪癖——它從根本上扭曲了國際貿易。當美元走高時，美國出口產品的價格會更高，從而導致其在全球舞台上的競爭力下降。相反，進口產品會變得更便宜，進一步打破國內生產的平衡，並導致美國製造業的衰落。
此外，美國需要向全球經濟提供儲備資產，這給美國帶來了固有的財政負擔。這項義務不僅加劇了貿易逆差，也給國內產業帶來了額外的壓力，加劇了不平衡的貿易框架帶來的挑戰。
本質上，這種高估會引發一係列負麵影響——提高出口價格、削弱國內商品的競爭力以及加劇貿易逆差。當我們考慮這些因素時，我們不禁要問：如何改革這樣的體係才能恢複平衡並提振美國產業？正是這個問題推動著我們不斷探索。
幻燈片 7
介紹擬議的美國戰略——一項旨在徹底改變國際經濟關係結構的大膽願景。想象一下，一個統一的框架將關稅、貨幣調整和國家安全問題無縫整合成一項連貫的政策。這並非零敲碎打的做法；而是一項旨在同時完成多項任務的綜合戰略。
5/11
首先，通過整合這些工具，該框架旨在通過有針對性的貿易政策來增加政府收入，同時降低通脹壓力。這種方法不僅僅是應對當前的失衡，而是積極主動地為更加平衡的經濟未來奠定基礎。
這一戰略的核心是國際經濟關係的重大轉變。在這裏，美國的貿易夥伴不再被視為一個單一的群體。相反，它們根據其貿易慣例和安全立場進行分類。這種分類至關重要——它允許製定差異化的政策。例如，關稅
可以作為一種杠杆，迫使各國開放那些對美國企業關閉的本土產業或產品市場。換句話說，如果一個國家執意限製市場準入，它將麵臨全麵的經濟懲罰。
不妨考慮一下這一戰略雄心勃勃的一麵：它旨在向主要貿易夥伴（尤其是中國和其他國家）施壓，迫使它們做出有利於美國經濟的經濟讓步。該計劃概述了一項大規模的關稅政策——對中國征收60%的關稅，對其他國家征收至少10%的關稅。這並非一種微妙的
暗示；而是一項旨在重新調整全球貿易平衡的大膽而果斷的舉措。
但是，與所有大膽的戰略一樣，它也存在固有的風險。這些全麵的措施也帶來了重大擔憂：金融市場波動、可能采取的報複性貿易措施，以及對美國出口商可能陷入這些激進政策交火的意外後果。
本質上，這項擬議戰略既富有遠見，又飽受爭議——它刻意將經濟政策作為鞏固國家實力的工具。它挑戰我們不僅要思考重塑工業主導地位的潛力，還要思考強硬的政策製定與不可預測的全球市場動態之間的微妙平衡。當我們反思這一點時，不妨捫心自問：我們如何才能在有效利用這些強大工具的同時，降低它們必然帶來的風險？這正是我們持續進行的關於重塑國際貿易的討論的核心問題。
幻燈片 8
這項變革性戰略的一個關鍵組成部分占據了中心位置：關稅政策及其預期的經濟影響。想象一下，關稅不僅僅是一種防禦性工具，而是一個旨在重新調整全球貿易平衡的戰略杠杆。擬議戰略設想使美元相對於我們貿易夥伴的貨幣貶值。這一刻意調整旨在提升美國商品的競爭力——使出口更具吸引力，吸引重要的投資，並最終在全國範圍內創造製造業就業機會。
為了更好地理解這一點，該提案要求對中國征收高達 60% 的關稅，並對其他國家征收至少 10% 的關稅。這些高額關稅不僅旨在增加政府收入，還能在貿易談判中成為強有力的籌碼。通過利用這些關稅，美國有可能迫使其貿易夥伴重新考慮並調整自身的貿易政策。
6/11
這種方法的另一個有趣之處在於它依賴於貨幣調整。該策略假設，通過允許外幣相對於美元貶值，可以有效地抵消此類關稅通常可能產生的通脹壓力。本質上，即使美國實施更為強硬的貿易政策，這
也將有助於維持穩定的經濟環境。
總而言之，此處的關稅政策並非僅僅關乎保護主義。它是一個多方麵的工具——旨在
通過增加收入、提升國際談判籌碼以及
最終鞏固美國工業的支柱來重塑貿易格局。在思考這個問題時，我們必須自問：這種平衡運用關稅和貨幣調整的策略能否真正推動經濟複蘇？還是說，市場波動和意外後果的內在風險過於巨大？這是全球貿易重組討論的核心挑戰。
幻燈片 9
將焦點轉移到如何根據這一戰略對美國貿易夥伴進行分類，揭示了一個關鍵要素，它強調了量身定製的外交和經濟杠杆的藝術。本文將根據三個核心標準對各國進行係統排名：貿易公平、貨幣政策和國家安全一致性。
這種細致入微的方法認識到並非所有貿易夥伴都是生來平等的。對於那些符合美國貿易和安全預期的盟友和國家，該戰略提供了一條降低關稅的途徑——這是一種獎勵遵守與合作的經濟善意。
相反，那些從事不公平貿易行為，或其貨幣和安全政策偏離既定規範的國家，可能麵臨更高的關稅和更嚴重的經濟後果。這種雙重方法不僅激勵了全球舞台上的公平競爭，也強調了將經濟政策與更廣泛的國家安全利益相一致的重要性。
最終，通過以這種方式對貿易夥伴進行分類，該戰略創建了一個動態框架，其中明確界定了經濟獎勵和懲罰。它挑戰我們將國際貿易視為一種靜態的、一刀切的關係，而是一個經過精心校準的體係，獎勵負責任的行為，懲罰破壞全球貿易平衡的行為。
展望未來，讓我們思考這一分類體係的更廣泛影響——它將如何重塑我們的國際關係，並重新定義公平貿易在快速發展的全球經濟中的意義。
幻燈片 10
讓我們將焦點轉向這一戰略的一個重要組成部分——貨幣政策和儲備資產調整。在這方麵，美國準備探索單邊和多邊方法來調整外幣價值，此舉旨在創造公平的經濟競爭環境。
曆史上，我們看到美國依靠多邊合作來影響貨幣價值——這一戰略的根基在於在國際夥伴之間建立共識。但在當今快速變化的全球格局中，該戰略並不局限於這條傳統路徑。現在，美國正在考慮采取單邊幹預措施中的7項，這是一項大膽舉措，旨在抵消持續存在的外幣低估現象，這種現象可能會扭曲貿易，並使美國產業處於不利地位。
設想這樣一個場景：美國能夠直接影響這些貨幣動態——確保我們的出口保持競爭力，同時保護國內市場免受不公平的外部壓力。這種雙重策略，將久經考驗的多邊參與方式與果斷的單邊行動相結合，旨在確保更加平衡的經濟環境。
本質上，通過重新調整貨幣價值，該戰略旨在增強美國經濟抵禦海外低估的負麵影響。這是一項具有前瞻性的舉措，它認識到全球金融相互依存的複雜性，並致力於利用這些因素來增強國家經濟韌性。在我們繼續探索的過程中，不妨思考一下，這些積極的政策調整不僅可能重塑貿易，甚至可能重塑全球經濟穩定的架構。
幻燈片 11
審視這一雄心勃勃的戰略對金融市場的影響和潛在風險，對於理解其更廣泛的影響至關重要。在我們踏上這條變革之路之際，必須承認，任何重大的政策轉變都伴隨著內在的不確定性。
該戰略建立在通過實施關稅和貨幣調整來重新平衡貿易的前提上。然而，這些措施可能會給全球金融市場帶來波動。一個迫在眉睫的風險是外國政府可能采取報複性貿易措施——這種反應可能引發貿易壁壘的針鋒相對升級，破壞國際貿易微妙的平衡。
此外，市場不確定性的加劇也是一個真正的擔憂。隨著投資者在這些動蕩的環境中前行，
全球投資可能會受到不利影響，信心動搖，資本流動中斷。這種不確定性不僅僅是暫時的不便，它可能對全球經濟穩定產生持久影響。
另一個美國出口商麵臨著重大風險。在關稅上升和對外貿易政策更加嚴格的背景下，這些企業可能麵臨更高的生產成本和難以逾越的貿易壁壘。
這些挑戰可能會削弱它們在全球舞台上的競爭力——這一結果必須謹慎應對。
總而言之，雖然擬議的戰略旨在重塑全球貿易體係，使其有利於美國的經濟利益，但它也帶來了市場波動、報複性行動以及國內出口商意外受挫的可能性。在反思這些風險時，我們必須捫心自問：如何在大膽的經濟轉型與審慎管理其後果之間取得適當的平衡？這是重新構想我們國際貿易方針的核心挑戰。
8/11
幻燈片12
展望長遠願景，揭示了重構國際貿易關係的變革藍圖。這一戰略不僅僅是短期調整；它設想了全球經濟關係構想和管理方式的根本性轉變。
首先，該戰略力求將貿易政策明確地與國家安全和經濟自給自足聯係起來。
想象一下這樣一個世界：每一項貿易決策的評估不僅基於市場指標，還基於其對國家整體韌性和安全的貢獻。在這種新模式下，經濟政策將成為維護國家利益和促進可持續增長的工具。
其次，該戰略使美國能夠從其貿易夥伴那裏獲得更大的財政貢獻。通過分擔提供儲備資產的負擔，該戰略為國際金融創造了一個更加平衡和公平的框架。這意味著我們的貿易夥伴將為全球金融體係的穩定做出更大的貢獻——這一轉變不僅有望減輕我們的經濟負擔，也有望促進一個更具協作性的全球經濟秩序。
最終，我們的願景是在不犧牲美元作為全球儲備貨幣的尊貴地位的情況下提升美國製造業的競爭力。這是一項雄心勃勃的平衡之舉：一方麵，鞏固我們的工業基礎；另一方麵，維護美元作為全球最值得信賴的貨幣所帶來的穩定性和影響力。
從本質上講，這項長期重組呼籲我們重新構想我們在世界上的地位。它挑戰我們將安全、公平和經濟韌性融入國際貿易的根本結構中。當我們思考這一變革性願景時，讓我們捫心自問：這樣一個改革後的全球貿易架構如何才能不僅服務於我們的國家利益，還能促進建立更加穩定和公正的全球經濟秩序？這是21世紀重新思考國際貿易的前景，也是深刻的挑戰。
幻燈片 13
現在，當我們回顧並評估《全球貿易體係重組用戶指南》中提出的總體戰略時，我們發現自己麵對的是一種既大膽又激進的策略。這並非膽怯之人能采取的策略；它是一種對全球經濟秩序的強硬重塑——旨在使力量平衡向有利於美國的方向傾斜。
其核心在於，該戰略充分利用了關稅、蓄意操縱匯率和基於安全的貿易政策等一係列強有力的手段。這些並非孤立的工具，而是相互關聯的杠杆，每個杠杆都旨在推動重構全球體係的願景——在這個體係中，美國的經濟利益高於一切。
激進的關稅運用，加上精心策劃的貨幣價值調整，共同構建了一個旨在保護和支持國內產業的動態框架。同時，通過將11項國家安全考量中的9項納入貿易政策，該戰略使美國不僅能夠在經濟交流中發號施令，還能維護其地緣政治利益。
本質上，這是一種全麵、無所顧忌的策略——它挑戰了傳統的貿易範式，倡導國際經濟關係管理方式的徹底轉變。它敢於提出這樣的問題：我們能否重塑全球貿易體係，使其更好地服務於我們的國家利益，同時應對互聯互通世界帶來的不確定性？
在評估這一主張時，我們必須認識到其變革潛力和其蘊含的重大風險。這項戰略需要仔細審視，它促使我們在重塑工業實力的希望與重塑全球經濟格局所固有的挑戰之間取得平衡。現在，讓我們更深入地探討這些大膽舉措對國際貿易的未來以及我們自身經濟命運的意義。
探究這一擬議戰略如何使美國受益，可以揭示其與經濟政策和國家安全緊密交織的潛在優勢。
首先，並考慮增加美國財政部收入的前景。通過戰略性地征收關稅，政府將獲得可觀的收入。這筆資金的流入不僅是為了平衡預算，還在於通過抵消赤字和為關鍵的國內部門投資提供新的資源來增強整個美國經濟。
其次，我們有機會重新平衡貿易，使之有利於美國。想象一下這樣一個場景：通過協調一致的貨幣調整，美國商品在全球舞台上重新獲得競爭優勢。隨著外幣匯率的調整，我們的出口產品將變得更具吸引力，我們的國內產業也將在國際市場上煥發新的活力。
另一個關鍵優勢在於，這一戰略賦予了我們與貿易夥伴之間的杠杆作用。通過將關稅作為談判工具，美國可以敦促達成更公平的貿易協定。這種杠杆作用在遏製知識產權盜竊和其他不公平貿易措施等行為方麵尤其有效——而這正是我們與中國等國家打交道時麵臨的一個重大問題。
此外，該戰略旨在通過經濟手段加強國家安全。通過將貿易政策與國家安全目標相結合，該戰略確保鋼鐵和半導體等關鍵行業仍處於美國的掌控之下。這樣，經濟政策就不會脫離我們更廣泛的安全利益，而是可以作為抵禦關鍵行業脆弱性的壁壘。
最後，考慮製造業創造就業機會的潛力。通過抑製進口並激勵國內生產，這項政策可能會刺激美國製造業就業崗位的複蘇，尤其是在對國家經濟健康至關重要的行業。
從本質上講，該戰略不僅旨在重新調整國際貿易格局，而且還將從多個角度鞏固美國經濟——通過增加收入、增強貿易競爭力、提升議價能力、加強國家安全和強勁創造就業機會。當我們反思這些好處時，不難發現，這是一項旨在確保美國繁榮未來的全麵舉措。現在，讓我們展望未來，思考這些優勢將如何重塑我們的經濟未來。
幻燈片 15-16
審視這項擬議戰略中的潛在弱點，可以坦誠地評估其雄心勃勃的雄心壯誌背後所麵臨的挑戰。
首先，我們必須承認報複性關稅的風險。在這個充滿活力的全球貿易舞台上，各國——尤其是像中國和歐盟這樣的強大參與者——可能會對美國出口產品征收反關稅。這種報複性措施可能會產生連鎖反應，損害依賴全球市場的美國企業。
其次，還要考慮市場波動和投資者不確定性的影響。貿易政策的快速、徹底變化，加上潛在的貨幣貶值，可能會引發金融不穩定。這種不確定性可能會引發資本外逃，進一步破壞本已脆弱的經濟平衡。
此外，我們還麵臨通脹風險的挑戰。雖然該戰略依靠外幣貶值來抵消物價上漲，但現實世界的貨幣反應是出了名的難以預測。實際上，進口成本上升可能轉化為消費價格上漲，給家庭和整體經濟帶來壓力。
此外，美國出口商也麵臨重大影響。如果金融市場做出負麵反應——可能導致美元走強——美國出口的競爭力可能會進一步下降，從而損害該戰略試圖保護的行業。
另一個關鍵擔憂是國際關係可能麵臨的壓力。激進的經濟舉措可能會促使我們的傳統盟友轉向其他經濟聯盟，例如中國的“一帶一路”倡議。這種轉變可能會削弱長期存在的聯盟，並減少在關鍵全球安全和經濟問題上的合作。
最後，或許最深遠的風險是美元可能失去其儲備貨幣地位。如果美國被視為積極操縱貨幣並對其貿易夥伴施加不利條件，我們可能會見證替代性全球金融體係的出現——可能由中國主導——這可能會從根本上改變全球經濟秩序。
本質上，雖然擬議的戰略旨在重新調整我們的經濟未來，但它並非沒有重大風險。這些挑戰清醒地提醒我們，任何變革性政策都必須在大膽創新與審慎風險管理之間取得平衡。在反思這些弱點時，讓我們捫心自問：
潛在的利益真的能夠超過風險嗎？還是意想不到的後果會損害我們試圖實現的目標？這是重新思考我們處理全球貿易方式的核心關鍵矛盾。
11/11
結束語
當我們將這一探索引向……
最後，我邀請各位思考雄心勃勃的雄心與謹慎的管理之間的雙重性。我們探討的戰略挑戰我們重新構想全球貿易——呼籲我們
將風險轉化為機遇，將不確定性轉化為行動。捫心自問：我們準備好塑造一個由美國的創新和安全重新定義遊戲規則的經濟未來了嗎？
現在不是被動觀察的時刻，而是積極參與的時刻。讓我們運用集體智慧，積極辯論，邁出果斷的步伐，邁向一個我們的政策賦能產業、
鞏固我們的聯盟、並激發持久進步的未來。現在是采取深思熟慮、勇敢行動的時候了。
"Up Our Game, Canada" Module 3 Transcript:
A Summary and Analysis of Stephen Mirran's “A User's Guide to
Restructuring the Global Trading System”
Slide 1:
Welcome, everyone. Today, we explore international trade through Stephen Miran’s paper, ‘A User’s
Guide to Restructuring the Global Trading System.’ Miran masterfully integrates tariffs, currency
adjustments, and national security into a unified strategy to fortify American industry under a second
Trump administration. Brought to you by Tony Bailetti, Ph.D., and Ian Lee, Ph.D. of the Sprott School of
Business, Carleton University, this analysis challenges us to reimagine global trade and its impact on our
economic future. Let’s dive in and uncover how these interlocking elements can reshape our industries
in a rapidly changing world.
Slide 2:
So, let’s now focus on a bold, transformative blueprint for U.S. global economic domination
from Stephen Miran’s November 2024 paper. Miran, a Trump administration cabinet pick,
offers the only systematic analysis of the Trump doctrine, revealing a detailed roadmap for the
next four years. His insights are especially crucial for our Canadian neighbours, who must now
navigate a landscape shaped by strategic U.S. tariff threats aimed at harnessing American
economic power. The implications are profound, urging all stakeholders to reassess their
positions in an increasingly competitive global arena. As we delve deeper into these ideas,
consider this: How might an economy, armed with such an aggressive strategy, reshape not
only international trade but also the very fabric of global power? Let’s explore these questions
together as we continue our analysis.
Slide 3
Taking our attention to the very purpose behind Stephen Miran’s paper, A User’s Guide to Restructuring
the Global Trading System. In this work, Miran sets forth a comprehensive blueprint that seeks to
redefine international trade by integrating tariffs, currency adjustments, and national security concerns
into one strategic framework. His aim is clear: to bolster American industry and assert U.S. economic
dominance in an increasingly competitive global arena.
As we examine this strategy, it is essential to consider both its promises and its pitfalls. On the benefits
side, Miran’s approach offers several compelling advantages. First, it provides a clear, systematic
roadmap for revitalizing American manufacturing, positioning U.S. industries to regain a competitive
edge. Second, by aligning economic policy with national security imperatives, the strategy creates a
cohesive vision that can help streamline decision-making in times of global uncertainty. Finally, for
2 of 11
policymakers and business leaders alike, this blueprint offers much-needed clarity—a guiding light in an
era marked by economic turbulence and rapid change.
Yet, as with any bold strategy, there are inherent disadvantages that demand our careful attention. One
significant risk is the potential for retaliatory measures from trade partners—actions that could escalate
into broader economic conflicts and disrupt global supply chains. Moreover, the aggressive use of tariffs
and currency adjustments might inadvertently lead to market distortions, unsettling the delicate balance
of international trade norms. While the focus is on American dominance, such an approach may also
trigger unintended long-term geopolitical repercussions that could undermine global economic stability.
In essence, Miran’s paper challenges us to weigh these transformative benefits against the risks of
destabilizing our interconnected world. It compels us to ask: Is the promise of renewed industrial
strength and strategic clarity worth the potential for economic disruption and geopolitical fallout? As we
move forward in our discussion, let us embrace this dual perspective—recognizing that every pioneering
strategy carries both opportunity and uncertainty. This balance, this dynamic tension between bold
vision and cautious reflection, is at the heart of truly transformative economic thought.
Slide 4
Let’s now distill the essence of Stephen Miran’s paper, A User’s Guide to Restructuring the Global Trading
System. Here, Miran lays out a comprehensive blueprint that invites us to rethink the very foundations of
international trade. Allow me to guide you through the key elements:
1. Core Problem:
At the heart of the paper lies a critical question—what is fundamentally broken in our current
global trading system? Miran identifies deep-seated imbalances and outdated policies that
undermine fair competition and the sustainable growth of domestic industries.
2. Proposed U.S. Strategy:
In response, the paper outlines a bold U.S. strategy. This isn’t merely a collection of ideas; it’s a
calculated roadmap aimed at leveraging American economic power to redefine global trade,
restoring competitiveness and asserting strategic dominance.
3. Tariff Policy and Economic Impact:
Tariffs are not portrayed as blunt instruments here. Instead, Miran details how carefully
calibrated tariff policies can protect domestic industries while reshaping economic interactions
on the international stage. This approach is intended to recalibrate trade dynamics in favor of a
robust national economy.
4. Categorizing U.S. Trading Partners:
Recognizing that not all trading relationships are alike, the paper categorizes U.S. trading
partners. By understanding their distinct economic roles and behaviors, tailored strategies can
be developed to address specific challenges and leverage unique opportunities.
3 of 11
5. Currency Policy and Reserve Asset Adjustments:
A crucial pillar of the strategy involves revisiting currency policies and adjusting reserve assets.
This component addresses how shifts in currency valuations can influence global financial
stability and help balance trade disparities.
6. Financial Market Consequences and Risks:
No transformative strategy is without risk. Miran is keenly aware of the potential
repercussions—market volatility, unintended economic disruptions, and broader financial
instability—that may result from such sweeping policy changes.
7. Long-Term Restructuring of International Trade Relations:
Ultimately, the paper envisions a long-term reordering of international trade. It’s a call to
reimagine our global economic relationships, striving for a system that is not only more balanced
and fair but also resilient in the face of emerging challenges.
Each of these points interlocks to form a unified, if audacious, strategy—a strategy that challenges
conventional paradigms and dares us to envision a future where the U.S. leads a reformed global trading
system. As we reflect on these components, consider the delicate balance between the promise of
renewed industrial strength and the potential for economic disruption. This dynamic tension between
risk and reward is what makes Miran’s analysis both compelling and provocative.
Now, let’s delve deeper into these themes as we continue our exploration of this transformative vision
for global trade.
Slide 5
Before we do that, let’s take a peek into the profile of our distinguished economist whose work
underpins much of our discussion—Stephan Miran. Imagine a scholar whose intellectual journey bridges
both the public and private sectors, an individual whose insights continue to shape the contours of
economic policy. Stephan earned his Bachelor of Arts in economics, philosophy, and mathematics from
Boston University in 2005—a rigorous foundation that prepared him to explore the complexities of our
economic world. Building on this, he pursued a Ph.D. in economics at Harvard University, where he had
the privilege of studying under the esteemed economist Martin Feldstein. This period of deep academic
inquiry not only sharpened his analytical prowess but also instilled in him a visionary approach to
economic challenges.
In December 2024, his expertise was acknowledged at the highest levels of government when Presidentelect Donald Trump nominated him to serve as the Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers. This
pivotal role entrusted Stephan with advising the president on matters of economic policy, highlighting
the trust placed in his capacity to guide national strategy.
Stephan’s career is marked by a series of influential positions. He served as Senior Advisor for Economic
Policy at the U.S. Department of the Treasury during the pandemic recession, playing a key role in
4 of 11
implementing critical fiscal support measures. Later, as Senior Strategist at Hudson Bay Capital
Management, he focused on global investment strategies—navigating the turbulent waters of
international finance with insight and precision. His entrepreneurial spirit shone through when he cofounded Amberwave Partners, an asset management firm that reflects his commitment to innovative
financial solutions. Moreover, as a Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute, he has engaged in in-depth
research and policy analysis that continues to inform public debate.
Throughout his career, Stephan Miran has contributed extensively to academic and public discourse on
fiscal and monetary policy, with his work appearing in respected publications such as the American
Economic Journal, The Wall Street Journal, and Bloomberg. His contributions remind us that the blend of
rigorous scholarship and real-world application is not only possible but essential for crafting policies that
endure.
Today, as we consider his strategic vision, let us appreciate the depth and breadth of his experience—a
testament to the power of thoughtful analysis in driving transformative change. Now, let’s continue our
exploration, drawing inspiration from his remarkable journey and the insights he offers for reimagining
our global economic landscape.
Slide 6
Let’s now delve into the core problem at the heart of Miran’s analysis: the persistent U.S. trade
imbalances exacerbated by an overvalued dollar.
The U.S. dollar, by virtue of its status as the global reserve currency, remains stubbornly overvalued. This
overvaluation isn’t just a minor economic quirk—it fundamentally distorts international trade. When the
dollar is high, American exports become more expensive and, as a result, less competitive on the global
stage. Conversely, imports are rendered cheaper, further tipping the balance away from domestic
production and contributing to the decline of American manufacturing.
Moreover, there is an inherent financial burden placed on the U.S. by the need to supply reserve assets
to the global economy. This obligation not only deepens trade deficits but also places additional strain on
domestic industries, compounding the challenges posed by an imbalanced trade framework.
In essence, this overvaluation sets off a cascade of adverse effects—raising export prices, undermining
the competitiveness of domestic goods, and intensifying trade deficits. As we consider these factors, we
are compelled to ask: How can such a system be reformed to restore equilibrium and bolster American
industry? It’s this very question that propels our exploration forward.
Slide 7
Introducing the proposed U.S. strategy—a bold vision poised to revolutionize the very structure of
international economic relations. Imagine, if you will, a unified framework that seamlessly integrates
tariffs, currency adjustments, and national security concerns into one coherent policy. This isn’t a
piecemeal approach; it’s a comprehensive strategy designed to do several things at once.
5 of 11
First, by aligning these tools together, the framework seeks to boost government revenue through
targeted trade policies while simultaneously reducing inflationary pressures. It’s an approach that
doesn’t simply react to current imbalances but proactively sets the stage for a more balanced economic
future.
Central to this strategy is a major shift in international economic relations. Here, U.S. trading partners
aren’t viewed as a monolithic group. Instead, they are categorized based on their trade practices and
security alignment. This categorization is critical—it allows for differentiated policies. For instance, tariffs
can be used as a lever to compel countries to open up local industries or product markets that have been
closed off to U.S. corporations. In other words, if a country is determined to restrict market access, it will
face the full weight of economic penalties.
Consider the ambitious aspect of this strategy: it aims to pressure major trade partners, notably China,
and others, into making economic concessions that favor the U.S. economy. The plan outlines a largescale tariff policy—60% tariffs on China, and at least 10% tariffs on other nations. This is not a subtle
nudge; it’s a bold, decisive move intended to recalibrate global trade balances.
But, as with every bold strategy, there are inherent risks. Such sweeping measures come with significant
concerns: financial market volatility, the likelihood of retaliatory trade measures, and unintended
consequences for U.S. exporters, who might find themselves caught in the crossfire of these aggressive
policies.
In essence, this proposed strategy is both visionary and contentious—a deliberate attempt to use
economic policy as a tool for asserting national strength. It challenges us to consider not only the
potential for renewed industrial dominance but also the delicate balance between assertive policymaking and the unpredictable dynamics of global markets. As we reflect on this, ask yourself: How can
we harness these powerful instruments while mitigating the risks they inevitably bring? This is the
question at the heart of our ongoing discussion on reshaping international trade.
Slide 8
A key component of this transformative strategy takes center stage: the tariff policy and its anticipated
economic impact. Imagine a scenario where tariffs are not merely a defensive tool, but a strategic lever
designed to recalibrate the balance of global trade. The proposed strategy envisions devaluing the U.S.
dollar relative to the currencies of our trading partners. This deliberate adjustment is aimed at boosting
the competitiveness of American goods—making exports more attractive, drawing in vital investment,
and ultimately sparking the creation of manufacturing jobs across the country.
To put this into perspective, the proposal calls for imposing a hefty 60% tariff on China, coupled with at
least a 10% tariff on other nations. These significant rates are intended to not only increase government
revenue, but also serve as a powerful bargaining chip in trade negotiations. By leveraging such tariffs, the
U.S. could potentially compel its trading partners to reconsider and adjust their own trade policies.
6 of 11
Another interesting aspect of this approach lies in its reliance on currency adjustments. The strategy
assumes that by allowing foreign currencies to devalue relative to the U.S. dollar, the inflationary
pressures that might normally arise from such tariffs can be effectively neutralized. In essence, this
would help maintain a stable economic environment even as the U.S. exercises a more assertive trade
policy.
In summary, the tariff policy here is not solely about protectionism. It is a multifaceted tool—designed to
reshape trade dynamics by increasing revenue, improving leverage in international negotiations, and
ultimately reinforcing the backbone of American industry. As we ponder this, we must ask: Can this
balanced use of tariffs and currency adjustments truly drive economic revitalization, or will the inherent
risks of market volatility and unintended consequences prove too formidable? This is the critical
challenge at the heart of the discussion on restructuring global trade.
Slide 9
Shifting focus to how U.S. trading partners are categorized under this strategy reveals a key element that
underscores the art of tailored diplomacy and economic leverage. Here, countries will be systematically
ranked based on three core criteria: trade fairness, currency policies, and national security alignment.
This nuanced approach recognizes that not all trading partners are created equal. For those allies and
nations that meet U.S. trade and security expectations, the strategy offers a path toward lower tariffs—a
kind of economic goodwill that rewards compliance and cooperation.
Conversely, nations that engage in unfair trade practices, or whose currency and security policies deviate
from established norms, could face higher tariffs and more severe economic consequences. This dual
approach not only incentivizes fair play on the global stage but also reinforces the importance of aligning
economic policies with broader national security interests.
Ultimately, by categorizing trading partners in this manner, the strategy creates a dynamic framework
where economic rewards and penalties are clearly defined. It challenges us to think about international
trade not as a static, one-size-fits-all relationship, but as a carefully calibrated system that rewards
responsible behavior and penalizes practices that undermine the balance of global trade.
As we move forward, let’s consider the broader implications of this classification system—how it might
reshape our international relationships and redefine what fair trade means in a rapidly evolving global
economy
Slide 10
Let’s turn our focus to an essential component of this strategy—currency policy and reserve asset
adjustments. Here, the U.S. is prepared to explore both unilateral and multilateral approaches to adjust
the value of foreign currencies, a move aimed at leveling the economic playing field.
Historically, we’ve seen the U.S. lean on multilateral cooperation to influence currency values—a strategy
rooted in building consensus among international partners. But in today’s rapidly shifting global
landscape, the strategy isn’t confined to this traditional path. It now contemplates unilateral
7 of 11
interventions as well, a bold step designed to counteract the persistent undervaluation of foreign
currencies that can distort trade and disadvantage American industry.
Imagine a scenario where the U.S. can directly influence these currency dynamics—ensuring that our
exports remain competitive while protecting the domestic market from unfair external pressures. This
dual approach, blending the time-tested method of multilateral engagement with the decisiveness of
unilateral action, is intended to secure a more balanced economic environment.
In essence, by recalibrating currency values, the strategy aims to fortify the U.S. economy against the
adverse effects of undervaluation abroad. It’s a forward-thinking measure that recognizes the complexity
of global financial interdependencies and seeks to harness them in the service of national economic
resilience. As we continue our exploration, consider how such proactive policy adjustments might
reshape not only trade, but the very architecture of global economic stability.
Slide 11
Examining the financial market consequences and potential risks of this ambitious strategy is crucial to
understanding its broader implications. As we embark on this transformative path, it is essential to
acknowledge that any significant shift in policy comes with inherent uncertainties.
The strategy is built on the premise of rebalancing trade through tariff implementation and currency
adjustments. However, such measures are likely to introduce volatility into global financial markets. One
immediate risk is the possibility of retaliatory trade measures from foreign governments—a reaction that
could spark a tit-for-tat escalation in trade barriers, destabilizing the delicate balance of international
commerce.
Moreover, increased market uncertainty is a real concern. As investors navigate these turbulent waters,
global investment could be adversely affected, with confidence shaken and capital flows disrupted. This
uncertainty is not just a fleeting inconvenience; it could have lasting implications for economic stability
worldwide.
Anothersignificant risk lies with U.S. exporters. In a landscape of higher tariffs and more restrictive
foreign trade policies, these businesses may face higher production costs and formidable trade barriers.
Such challenges could undermine their competitiveness on the global stage—an outcome that must be
carefully managed.
In summary, while the proposed strategy aims to reconfigure the global trading system in favor of U.S.
economic interests, it also brings with it the potential for market volatility, retaliatory actions, and
unintended setbacks for domestic exporters. As we reflect on these risks, we must ask ourselves: How
can we strike the right balance between bold economic transformation and the prudent management of
its consequences? This is the challenge at the heart of reimagining our approach to international trade.
8 of 11
Slide 12
Looking ahead to the long-term vision reveals a transformative blueprint for restructuring international
trade relations. This strategy is not merely about short-term adjustments; it envisions a fundamental
shift in how global economic relationships are conceived and managed.
Firstly, the strategy seeks to tie trade policies explicitly to national security and economic self-sufficiency.
Imagine a world where every trade decision is evaluated not just on market metrics, but on how it
contributes to the overall resilience and security of our nation. In this new paradigm, economic policy
becomes a tool for safeguarding national interests and promoting sustainable growth.
Secondly, the strategy positions the U.S. to extract greater financial contributions from its trading
partners. By sharing the burden of providing reserve assets, it creates a more balanced and equitable
framework for international finance. This means that our trading partners will contribute more
significantly to the stability of the global financial system—a shift that promises not only to ease our
economic burdens but also to foster a more collaborative global economic order.
Ultimately, the vision is to boost U.S. manufacturing competitiveness without sacrificing the dollar’s
revered status as the global reserve currency. It’s an ambitious balancing act: on one side, strengthening
our industrial base, and on the other, maintaining the stability and influence that comes from having the
world’s most trusted currency.
In essence, this long-term restructuring is a call to reimagine our place in the world. It challenges us to
integrate security, equity, and economic resilience into the very fabric of international trade. As we
contemplate this transformative vision, let us ask ourselves: How can such a reformed global trade
architecture serve not only our national interests but also contribute to a more stable and just global
economic order? This is the promise—and the profound challenge—of rethinking international trade in
the 21st century.
Slide 13
Now, as we step back and assess the overall strategy presented in A User’s Guide to Restructuring the
Global Trading System, we find ourselves face-to-face with an approach that is both bold and aggressive
in its ambition. This is not a strategy for the timid; it is an assertive reimagining of the global economic
order—one that seeks to tilt the balance of power in favor of the United States.
At its core, this strategy leverages a potent mix of tariffs, deliberate currency manipulation, and securitybased trade policies. These are not isolated tools but interconnected levers, each designed to drive
home the vision of a restructured global system—one where American economic interests are prioritized
above all else.
The aggressive use of tariffs, combined with calculated adjustments in currency values, creates a
dynamic framework intended to protect and bolster domestic industries. Simultaneously, by embedding
9 of 11
national security considerations into trade policy, this strategy positions the U.S. to not only dictate
terms in economic exchanges but also to safeguard its geopolitical interests.
In essence, this is a comprehensive, no-holds-barred approach—a strategy that challenges traditional
trade paradigms by advocating for a radical shift in how international economic relations are managed. It
dares to ask: Can we reengineer the global trading system to better serve our national interests while
confronting the uncertainties of an interconnected world?
As we assess this proposition, it is essential to recognize both its transformative potential and the
significant risks it carries. This is a strategy that demands careful scrutiny, urging us to balance the
promise of renewed industrial strength with the challenges inherent in reshaping the global economic
landscape. Let us now delve deeper into what these bold measures might mean for the future of
international trade and for our own economic destiny.
Exploring how this proposed strategy benefits the United States reveals potential advantages intricately
woven into both economic policy and national security.
First, consider the prospect of increased revenue for the U.S. Treasury. With the strategic imposition of
tariffs, the government stands to generate significant revenue. This influx of funds isn’t just about
balancing budgets—it’s about strengthening the entire U.S. economy by offsetting deficits and providing
new resources for investment in critical domestic sectors.
Next, we have the opportunity to rebalance trade in favor of the U.S. Imagine a scenario where, through
coordinated currency adjustments, U.S. goods regain their competitive edge on the global stage. As
foreign currencies adjust, our exports become more attractive and our domestic industries find new
vigor in the international marketplace.
Another key benefit lies in the leverage this strategy affords over our trade partners. By using tariffs as a
bargaining tool, the U.S. can press for fairer trade agreements. This leverage could be especially effective
in curbing practices such as intellectual property theft and other unfair trade measures—a significant
concern in our dealings with countries like China.
Furthermore, the strategy is designed to strengthen national security through economic means. By
aligning trade policies with national security objectives, it ensures that critical industries—such as steel
and semiconductors—remain under U.S. control. In this way, economic policy is not isolated from our
broader security interests; rather, it serves as a bulwark against vulnerabilities in key sectors.
Lastly, consider the potential for job creation in manufacturing. By discouraging imports and incentivizing
domestic production, this policy could spark a resurgence in U.S. manufacturing jobs, particularly in
industries that are vital to our national economic health.
In essence, the proposed strategy is designed not only to recalibrate international trade dynamics but
also to fortify the U.S. economy from multiple angles—through revenue generation, enhanced trade
competitiveness, increased bargaining power, strengthened national security, and robust job creation. As
we reflect on these benefits, it becomes clear that this is a comprehensive approach aimed at securing a
10 of 11
prosperous future for America. Let’s now move forward and consider how these advantages can reshape
our economic future.
Slide 15 – 16
Examining the potential weaknesses in this proposed strategy reveals a candid assessment of the
challenges beneath its bold ambitions.
First, we must acknowledge the risk of retaliatory tariffs. In this dynamic arena of global trade, nations—
especially formidable players like China and the European Union—might respond by imposing countertariffs on U.S. exports. This retaliatory measure could have a ripple effect, harming American businesses
that depend on access to global markets.
Next, consider the specter of market volatility and investor uncertainty. Rapid, sweeping changes to
trade policies, coupled with potential currency devaluations, could stir financial instability. Such
uncertainty might prompt capital flight, further destabilizing an already delicate economic balance.
Then, we face the challenge of inflationary risks. While the strategy banks on foreign currency
devaluations to offset rising prices, real-world currency reactions are notoriously unpredictable. In
practice, higher import costs could translate into increased consumer prices, exerting pressure on
households and the broader economy.
Furthermore, there is a significant impact on U.S. exporters to consider. If financial markets react
negatively—potentially causing the dollar to strengthen—U.S. exports could become even less
competitive, undermining the very industries this strategy seeks to protect.
Another key concern is the potential strain on international relations. Aggressive economic maneuvers
might drive our traditional allies toward alternative economic alliances, such as China’s Belt and Road
Initiative. This shift could erode long-standing alliances and reduce cooperation on critical global security
and economic issues.
Lastly, perhaps the most profound risk is the possible loss of the U.S. dollar’s reserve currency status. If
the U.S. is seen as aggressively manipulating its currency and imposing adverse conditions on its trading
partners, we might witness the emergence of alternative global financial systems—potentially led by
China—that could fundamentally alter the global economic order.
In essence, while the proposed strategy is designed to recalibrate our economic future, it is not without
significant risks. These challenges serve as a sober reminder that any transformative policy must balance
bold innovation with prudent risk management. As we reflect on these weaknesses, let us ask ourselves:
Can the potential benefits truly outweigh the risks, or will the unintended consequences undermine the
very goals we seek to achieve? This is the critical tension at the heart of rethinking our approach to
global trade.
11 of 11
Closing
As we draw this exploration to a close, I invite you to reflect on the dual nature of bold ambition and
cautious stewardship. The strategy we’ve examined challenges us to reimagine global trade—a call to
transform risk into opportunity and uncertainty into action. Ask yourself: Are we ready to shape an
economic future where American innovation and security redefine the rules of the game?
This is not a moment for passive observation but for active engagement. Let us harness our collective
insight, debate with vigor, and take decisive steps toward a future where our policies empower industry,
fortify our alliances, and inspire lasting progress. The time for thoughtful, courageous action is now.
