個人資料
正文

中國 殺死印度成為經濟超級大國的雄心壯誌

(2025-03-22 21:12:24) 下一個

中國 殺死印度成為經濟超級大國的雄心壯誌

 (2025-03-22 21:12:24)

@towhidenterprise2104 8小時前

我們剛剛訪問了中國昆明臨沂青島上海廈門。印度落後中國50多年。美國、歐洲落後中國10多年,大多數行業都是如此。

本文是來自YouTube留言

《全球化如何適得其反:中國以自己的方式擊敗西方》

How Globalization Backfired: China BEAT the West at Its Own Game

GVS Deep Dive, Mar 22, 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXgG5KPvMbI

全球化本應遏製中國,而不是讓中國占據全球主導地位。在這段視頻中,我們分析了西方國家如何建立一個旨在維護其權力的全球體係,但最終卻賦予了他們想要控製的國家權力。

JD Vance 詳細闡述了外包、廉價勞動力和經濟傲慢如何幫助中國從製造 iPhone 轉向設計自己的技術,在從人工智能到電動汽車等各個領域威脅美國。

我們探討了蘋果的崛起、華盛頓共識的失敗以及“曆史的終結”信念如何蒙蔽了西方。

這不僅僅是經濟學。這是幻覺的破滅。

以 JD Vance、蘋果、國際貨幣基金組織數據、曆史相似之處以及全球化承諾背後的殘酷真相為特色。

174 條評論

已由 GVS Deep Dive 置頂
@markvelber8664 6 小時前
中國采取大膽舉措,將迫使印度重新考慮其成為經濟超級大國的雄心壯誌,出台了一係列嚴格的出口管製,這可能會削弱印度製造業作為高科技生產和供應鏈全球領導者的地位。中國實際上已經切斷了印度工業增長和擴張所依賴的關鍵出口。這些限製針對的是生產電子產品、電動汽車、太陽能電池板等所需的基本設備和技術,印度製造商運營所需的機械和零部件現在都被鎖在中國。

這些限製到底意味著什麽?中國已經暫停了重要設備的出口,從電子組裝使用的機械設備到太陽能電池板和電動汽車行業必不可少的零部件,這些曾經可以從中國輕易獲得的產品現在被歸類為過於敏感和有價值,不適合出口。中國實施了新的管製措施,將某些機械標記為軍事技術,並執行嚴格的出口限製。這次打擊不僅僅是為了擾亂印度的生產。它還破壞了我們本應推動印度經濟崛起的那些行業,現在讓我們來看看受這些措施打擊最嚴重的行業,首先是電子行業。印度一直大聲疾呼計劃將電子產品製造業從中國轉移到本國,夢想成為全球科技中心。然而,中國最近的行動正在將這些夢想變成嚴酷的現實。

這些限製意味著依賴中國設備的印度工廠,如福克斯工廠的蘋果 iPhone 裝配線,現在正麵臨延誤和瓶頸。大規模生產所需的機械設備被封鎖,對印度成為電子製造業領導者的願望造成了嚴重打擊,蘋果等公司以及 Fox Kontron 和 Flex 等供應商原本計劃將更多生產轉移到印度,但現在正努力從中國獲得必要的設備。電動汽車行業首當其衝地受到中國限製的影響,比亞迪等中國公司在幫助印度發展電動汽車行業方麵發揮著關鍵作用,但現在他們被拒絕獲得製造這些汽車所需的零部件。中國的電動汽車熱潮到來,中國的零部件和機械設備突然被禁止進入。

這些雄心壯誌正在迅速破滅,這不僅僅是一次延遲,更是一次巨大的挫折,這個行業原本希望點燃一個可持續發展的未來,印度蓬勃發展的電動汽車市場現在似乎更像是一個遙不可及的夢想,因為中國收緊的限製擠壓了它的潛力。太陽能電池板行業幸免於這場混亂,印度對中國製造的太陽能組件的依賴使其極易受到北京最近行動的影響。

對太陽能電池板關鍵機械的出口限製對已經在努力應對供應鏈中斷的行業是一個重大打擊。印度渴望成為太陽能領域的全球領跑者,而中國則主導著製造這些太陽能電池板所需設備的供應。印度的進步遇到了瓶頸,似乎中國已經加強了對印度可再生能源野心的控製,迫使該國重新考慮其整個方法。現在讓我們退一步來看看這些發展帶來的更廣泛後果。印度領導人多年來一直在計算該國不斷增長的 GDP 和光明的經濟前景,經常聲稱印度將很快超過中國成為世界第二大經濟體,但現實開始顯現。盡管印度一直在談論經濟實力,但印度一直在幻想中運作。印度忽視了一個關鍵的事實,如果得不到中國的技術機械和專業知識,它的工業夢想就隻不過是幻想而已。

最近的舉措粉碎了印度能夠實現經濟主導地位的幻想。盡管印度經濟近年來取得了顯著增長,但它如此自信地向世界承諾

多年來,印度一直嚴重依賴外部依賴,蓬勃發展的數字經濟由數百萬花時間在線支持國家事業和慶祝經濟成就的藥品推動,這掩蓋了該國在全球經濟中的真正地位,盡管印度的 GDP 數字在紙麵上看起來令人印象深刻,但它們掩蓋了其大部分工業進步依賴於中國技術和外國投資的事實,中國商品的流通受到限製,這種脆弱的結構開始崩潰,盡管印度領導層對競爭對手中國的所有大膽宣稱都生活在泡沫之中。

事實是,印度在工業或技術實力方麵遠遠無法與中國競爭,盡管印度在某些領域取得了長足進步。它仍然缺乏與中國競爭主導地位所必需的基礎要素,然而,印度所做的是巧妙地利用其龐大的人口,通過關注其人口優勢和促進其不斷增長的消費市場來創造經濟強國的假象。印度成功地樹立了經濟快速增長的形象,但如果沒有獲得基本原材料、先進機械和尖端技術,這種形象就會變得脆弱,而所有這些都被中國控製著,印度所謂的蓬勃發展的經濟是建立在搖搖欲墜的基礎上的。這座紙牌屋像被刺破的氣球一樣倒塌、漏氣,這隻是時間問題。

中國最近的出口限製使這一現實成為人們關注的焦點。這些限製不隻是小小的不便。它們通過限製關鍵零部件和技術的流動,直接挑戰了印度的經濟雄心。中國已經暴露了印度經濟崛起的脆弱性。世界現在開始意識到,印度成為經濟領袖的夢想一直為時過早。說實話,印度的經濟敘事一直受到無休止的宣傳的推動,這些宣傳得到了大量數字存在和大批在線支持者的支持,他們不知疲倦地宣傳印度即將成為全球主導地位的想法,但數字不會說謊,現實也不會說謊。

印度的製造業基礎、技術基礎設施和工業能力遠不及中國,而中國花了幾十年時間建立了一個由工廠、供應鏈和創新中心組成的強大生態係統。印度一直在努力跟上這些限製的步伐。中國強加的政策提醒我們,盡管印度聲稱印度和中國在半導體、可再生能源、人工智能和先進製造業等領域都處於劣勢,但印度的經濟崛起一直以來都更多地取決於觀念和實質。印度未能發展在全球舞台上與中國競爭所需的關鍵產業和技術,從半導體到可再生能源,從人工智能到先進製造業。印度仍然嚴重依賴進口,其中許多進口自中國,而中國正在加強對重要出口的控製。印度的經濟泡沫開始破滅,超越中國的宏偉夢想已被揭穿,真正的幻想是建立在宣傳炒作和過度自信的不牢固基礎上的幻想。

與此同時,中國仍然牢牢控製著其在技術、基礎設施和全球貿易網絡方麵的戰略投資,使其成為爭奪經濟霸權的無可爭議的領導者,而印度可能會繼續誇大其 GDP 數據並推動其數字經濟。現實情況是,印度完全沒有準備好挑戰中國,中國實施的出口限製給印度敲響了警鍾,它們揭示了印度經濟主張背後的真相,並凸顯了印度的脆弱性,因為印度的製造業受到這些限製的影響。經濟基礎的裂縫越來越難以忽視,所謂的經濟巨人印度自稱隻不過是一隻紙老虎,中國剛剛向全世界揭露了這一點,這不僅僅是暫時的挫折。

這是印度經濟戰略的一個根本缺陷,從長遠來看,無法在關鍵行業實現自給自足將繼續阻礙其發展,而中國則致力於建設自力更生的經濟。印度過於依賴進口和外國投資,這種依賴使其容易受到外部壓力,正如我們現在看到的中國出口限製,除非印度能夠解決結構性弱點,否則其經濟領導力仍將隻是夢想,而印度可能具有增長潛力。印度在工業和技術能力方麵仍落後中國數十年,兩國之間的差距不僅僅是規模問題。

這是一個戰略執行和長期規劃的問題。中國最近的行動已經明確表明,印度的經濟崛起遠未得到保證,全世界都在關注,這些信息明確表明,印度的經濟雄心仍在實現中,中國不會在短期內放棄其全球經濟領袖的地位。

smoray9750 11小時前
所以全球化基本上就像印度的種姓製度,就像種姓製度一樣,中國不應該在價值鏈中向上移動。美國對日本也做了同樣的事情。日本被迫接受“廣場協議”。美國的經濟殺手給了日本一個他們無法拒絕的提議。在 youtube 上搜索“日本 80 年代的抨擊”。它解釋了這一點。

@waichui2988 7小時前
全球化並沒有適得其反。不同之處在於各方如何利用全球化帶來的利潤。美國從全球化中獲益比中國多,但把利潤花在了購物狂歡和戰爭上。僅伊拉克和阿富汗戰爭就花費了 4 萬億美元。這筆錢足以完全重建美國的基礎設施並教育整整一代美國公民。中國就是這樣做的。中國沒有參加任何戰爭,而是用這筆錢來建設基礎設施和教育他們的人民。

全球化正如宣傳的那樣發揮作用。每個國家都從全球化中獲利。正是每個國家如何花費全球化的利潤,才造成了今天的差異。

@muhammadtufail8677 8小時前
中國巨龍已經有效地吞噬了西方霸權

@Rubicon365 5小時前
感謝您以如此有趣和易於理解的方式解釋這一點。您說的話完全有道理。

@maxchen7229 3小時前
你說的是實話,這與民主和人權無關,一切都是為了錢!

@Best-Qalaam 8小時前
出色而正確的分析。道德準則從未存在。呈現得非常好
真誠地感謝您的努力。

@christinatan6734 3小時前
很棒的內容。喜歡你的作品。

@wjshih3786 2小時前
您的公正觀點和聲音應該被所有西方國家聽到!他們真可恥!

@MHamzaMamar 3 小時前
很棒的作品 Bravo

@casimmahmood 1 小時前
這是您最好的視頻博客之一,前 2 分鍾就吸引了我

@KK-zl8gq 11 小時前
您的頻道很棒,內容也很棒。它被低估了,但請繼續努力——我相信您會成功成長!

@loirecheung4440 11 小時前
非常全麵的敘述中蘊含了深刻的見解。用事實說話!
謝謝????

@cheeneeusa 2 小時前
Najma Minhas 的轉變令人印象深刻。您已經弄清楚了如何使用視覺手勢、外觀和聲音來實現在社交媒體上展示的最佳實踐。視頻編輯也令人印象深刻。我預測,如果您能保留製作此視頻時使用的所有因素,訂閱量將飛漲。當然內容也開發得很好

@danielsamuel1995 11小時前
這很有見地,謝謝

@christopherward2748 10小時前
我認為問題是,如果你真的把製造業帶回美國,你就沒有一批能夠理解基本技術、足夠成熟來建立最先進的工廠來製造芯片等的熟練勞動力。精英們放棄了美國製造業,作為回應,人們把重點放在我們永遠需要的工作上,比如醫療係統、保險、執法。技術階層已經不複存在。我認為這是一個致命的錯誤——但任何受過技術培訓的人都能預見到。

@naeemawan9237 11小時前
用簡單的語言進行了很好的分析。

@peterthehappywaiguoren 1小時前
很棒的視頻,很好地解釋了西方列強推動全球化如何塑造了當前的局勢。謝謝!

@ptseti 5小時前
精彩的評論。恰到好處。

@Addictedtoyoutube9 4小時前
jd vance不應該抱怨美國公司使用來自中國的更便宜、更好、更快的生產和勞動力。

@simsimNYC 5小時前
我最近開始看你的節目,你很棒,研究得很好。vlog

@joni8090 5小時前
自由貿易
言論自由
自由的Dom...
但是,隻有當你是美國人時!?!

@robertng2398 4小時前
誠實、真實的評論。謝謝

@jon_nomad 1小時前
任何政策或倡議在涉及惡意時都會失敗。隻有當它是公平的,沒有惡意和自負時,它才會更好地發揮作用。

@glenrooney1068 1小時前
精英、權力和金錢。曆史重演。

@Dreamers867 6小時前
太棒了,妙招。

@dts724 21分鍾前
說得好!全球化隻是 19 世紀英國帝國主義的美國版本。我理解並同意,美國有權阻止其衰落的趨勢並維持其公民的生活水平,特別是工人階級。但我們不要假裝中國是其當前經濟困境的罪魁禍首。沒有人拿槍指著美國公司的頭,強迫他們外包。同樣,美國消費者在過去 30 年享受低成本商品時也沒有抱怨(而美國資本家一路笑著去銀行)

@chrisyong8719 3 小時前
真正令人信服的解釋,說明了全球貿易發生了什麽。我從來沒有這樣想過,因為我們隻被主流媒體新聞所灌輸。你的想法很有見地,很有啟發性。謝謝你給我們。

@tsham3101 8 小時前
?幹得好!繼續加油

@sword7872 1小時前
克林頓、奧巴馬等美國領導人使用了最具欺騙性的言辭。我很高興特朗普和萬斯

更誠實。謝謝你指出這一點。

@michaellee8843 2小時前
教我們做飯是一個很好的比喻。但想想看:教中國人做飯?嗯?

@towhidenterprise2104 8小時前
別擔心,中國可以對付美國

@nayabtahir6393 10小時前
所以在偉大的遊戲中,“道德”隻有在對你有利時才會使用。

@kishaniramsey5913 2小時前
隻是美國輸掉了這場由他們自己製定的規則的遊戲。他們瞧不起全球南方,當他們被欺負卻被拋在塵土中時,他們感到震驚。

@174scotch 10小時前
非常有趣的深刻觀點。我們過去幾年在巴基斯坦的情況足以暴露西方的雙重標準。你說得對,特朗普和他的團隊對西方的擔憂是誠實的,而其他人則發表高調的演講,但動機相似!

@Kevin-s3s 4小時前
聰明又有才華的年輕女士。

@bennyng2414 1小時前
你終於直言不諱了

@3d4fun96 5小時前(修改過)
假設製造業回歸美國,但在美國生產相同商品的成本更高,這些產品在全球市場上將沒有競爭力,除非它們隻在美國境內銷售,同時阻止外國產品進入美國市場。因此,美國人將不得不為技術並不一定更先進的產品支付更高的價格。長此以往,美國將徹底孤立於全球化市場之外,美元自然失去霸權地位,美國全球主導地位將徹底崩塌。美國唯一正確的選擇是合作共贏,必須拋棄所謂“美國優先”的短視思維,努力讓美國再次偉大,同時確保全人類的福祉!

@lijewy 5小時前
這是金融資本主義與工業資本主義的較量!除了半導體、綠色能源和先進技術(人工智能、機器人)等關鍵行業外,製造業並不重要。一切都是關於金融和債務作為控製工具。通過廣場協議擊敗日本是一種金融手段。金磚國家的對立麵是一種金融手段。

How Globalization Backfired: China BEAT the West at Its Own Game

GVS Deep Dive, Mar 22, 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXgG5KPvMbI

Globalization was supposed to keep China in check—not launch it into global dominance. In this video, we break down how Western nations built a global system that was meant to preserve their power—but ended up empowering the very countries they wanted to control.

JD Vance lays out exactly how outsourcing, cheap labor, and economic arrogance helped China move from manufacturing iPhones to designing its own tech, threatening the U.S. in everything from AI to electric cars.

We explore Apple’s rise, the failure of the Washington Consensus, and how the “End of History” belief blinded the West.

This isn’t just economics. It’s the collapse of an illusion.

Featuring JD Vance, Apple, IMF data, historical parallels—and the harsh truth behind globalization’s promises.

174 條評論

已由GVS Deep Dive置頂
@markvelber8664 6小時前
In a bold move that should force India to reconsider its lofty ambitions of becoming an economic superpower, China has introduced a series of strict export controls that could cripple India’s manufacturing sector as the global leader in high-tech production and supply chains. China has effectively cut off critical exports to India exports that Indian industries have depended on for growth and expansion. These restrictions target essential equipment and technology used in producing electronics electric vehicles solar panels and more the machinery and components that Indian manufacturers rely on for their operations are now locked away in China.

What exactly do these restrictions entail? China has halted the export of vital equipment ranging from machine machinery used in electronics assembly to components essential for the Solar Panel and EV industries these items once easily accessible from China are now classified as too sensitive and valuable for export China has imposed new controls labelling certain machinery is military technology and enforcing strict export bands. This crackdown isn’t just about disrupting production in India. It’s about undermining the very industries that we’re supposed to fuel India’s economic ascent now let’s look at the sectors hit hardest by these measures first up electronics. India has been vocal about its plans to shift electronics manufacturing from China to its soil with dreams of becoming a global tech hub. Still, China’s latest actions are turning those dreams into a harsh reality.

The restrictions mean Indian factories dependent on Chinese equipment like Fox Cons assembly lines for Apple iPhones are now facing delays and bottlenecks. The machinery needed for a scale of production has been blocked dealing a severe blow to India’s aspirations of becoming an electronics manufacturing leader companies like Apple and suppliers including Fox Kontron and Flex which were already planning to move more production to India are now struggling to secure the essential equipment from China next. The electric vehicle sector is the brunt of China’s restrictions Chinese firms like BYD play a key role and helping India develop its EV industry but now they’re being denied access to the very components needed to manufacture these vehicles arrival China’s EV boom with Chinese parts and machinery suddenly off limits.

Those ambitions are being swiftly derailed and it’s not just a delay it’s a massive setback for an industry that hoped would ignite a sustainable future division of a flourishing EV market in India now seems more like a far-off dream with China’s tightening restriction squeezing its potential. The Solar Panel industry is spared from this chaos India's dependence on Chinese-made components for solar energy production has made it highly susceptible to Beijing‘s recent actions.

The export bands on essential machinery for solar panels are a significant blow to an industry already grappling with supply chain disruptions. India aspires to be a global front-runner in solar energy with China dominating the supply of the very equipment needed to manufacture those panels advancement has hit a wall as if China has tightened its grip on India’s renewable energy ambitions forcing the country to reconsider its entire approach now let’s step back and examine the wider consequences of these developments. Indian leaders have spent years counting the nation's rising GDP and its promising economic future often claiming that India would soon surpass China as the world second second-largest economy but the reality is starting to sink in India has been operating under a delusion despite all the talk of economic strength. India has overlooked a critical truth without access to Chinese technology machinery and expertise, its industrial dreams are little more than fantasies.

Recent moves have shattered the illusion that India could achieve economic dominance. It is so confidently promised the world India's economy despite remarkable growth in recent years has always relied heavily on external dependencies a thriving digital economy fuelled by millions of medicines who spend their time online championing national causes and celebrating economic achievements has obscured the country's true position in the global economy while India is GDP figures look impressive on paper they hide the fact that much of its industrial progress depends on Chinese technology and foreign investment with the flow of Chinese goods restricted that fragile structure is starting to collapse India’s leadership for all their bold claims about rival China has been living in a bubble. The truth is India is far from being able to compete with China in terms of industrial or technological strength while India has made strides in certain areas. It still lacks the foundational elements necessary to rival China’s dominance what India has done however is cleverly leveraging its massive population to create the illusion of economic power by focusing on its demographic advantage and promoting its growing consumer market. India has managed to project an image of rapid economic growth but this image is fragile without access to essential raw materials advanced machinery and cutting-edge technology all of which China controls India's so-called booming economy is built on shaky ground. It’s only a matter of time before this house of cards comes tumbling down deflating like a punctured balloon.

China’s recent export restrictions have brought this reality into sharp focus. These restrictions are not just a minor inconvenience. They are a direct challenge to India’s economic ambitions by limiting the flow of critical components and technologies China has exposed the fragility of India’s economic rise. The world is now beginning to see that India’s dream of becoming an economic leader was always premature. Let’s be honest India’s economic narrative has been driven by relentless propaganda supported by a massive digital presence and an army of online supporters who tirelessly push the idea that India is on the verge of global dominance but the numbers don’t lie and neither does the on-the-ground reality. India's manufacturing base technological infrastructure and industrial capacity are nowhere near China’s level while China has spent decades building a robust ecosystem of factories supply chains and innovation hubs. India has struggled to keep pace with the restrictions. China has imposed served as a sobering reminder that India’s economic rise has always been more about perception and substance despite all its claims both India has failed to develop the critical industries and technologies needed to compete with China on the global stage from semiconductors to renewable energy from artificial intelligence to advanced manufacturing. India remains heavily reliant on imports many of which come from China now with China tightening its grip on vital exports. India’s economic bubble is beginning to burst the grand dreams of overtaking China have been exposed for what they truly are an illusion built on shaky foundations of propaganda hype and overconfidence.

China meanwhile remains firmly in control of its strategic investments in technology, infrastructure and global trade networks have positioned it as the undisputed leader in the race for economic supremacy while India may continue to inflate its GDP figures and promote its digital economy. The reality is that it is woefully unprepared to challenge China the export restrictions imposed by China are a wake-up call for India they revealed the truth behind India’s economic claims and highlighted the country's vulnerability as India’s manufacturing sector reels from the impact of these curbs. The cracks in the economic foundation are becoming impossible to ignore so-called economic giant India claimed to be nothing more than a paper tiger and China has just exposed it for the world to see this is not just a temporary setback.

It’s a fundamental flaw in India’s economic strategy in the long run inability to develop self-sufficiency in critical industries will continue to hold it back while China has focused on building a self-reliant economy. India has relied too heavily on imports and foreign investment this dependence has left it vulnerable to external pressures as we’re seeing now with China’s export restrictions unless India can address the structural weaknesses its stream of economic leadership will remain that dreams while India may have the potential to grow. It is still decades behind China in terms of industrial and technological capability gap between the two nations is not just a matter of scale.

It’s a matter of strategic execution and long-term planning China’s recent actions have made it clear that India’s economic rise is far from guaranteed the world is watching and the messages clear India’s economic ambitions are still a work in progress and China is not about to relinquish its position as the global economic leader anytime soon.

@cosmoray9750 11小時前
So basically Globalization is like the Indian cast system and just like the cast system, China wasn't suppose to move up in the value chain. USA did the same to Japan. Japan was forced to accept " Plaza Accord. American's economic hit-men gave Japan an offer they can not refuse." Look up "Japan Bashing 1980's" on youtube. It explains it.

@waichui2988 7小時前
Globalization did not backfire.  It is how each party used the profit from globalization that made the difference.  The US benefited more from globalization than China but spent the profit on shopping spree and war.  Just the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan cost 4 trillion dollars.  That is more than enough money to completely rebuild the infrastructure of the US and educate a whole generation of US citizens.  China did just that.  China did not participate in any war and used the money to build infrastructure and educate their people. 

Globalization worked as advertised.  Every country profited from globalization.  It is how each country spent the profit of globalization that made the difference today.

@muhammadtufail8677 8小時前
Chinese dragon has effectively swallowed Western hegemony

@Rubicon365 5小時前
Thank you for explaining this in such interesting and easy understanding way. What you said makes total sense.

@maxchen7229 3小時前
You speak the truth, it’s not about democracy and human rights, it’s all about money!

@Best-Qalaam 8小時前
Excellent and correct analysis. Moral compass was never there. Very well presented 
Your effort is sincerely appreciated.

@christinatan6734 3小時前
Great content. Love your work.

@wjshih3786 2小時前
Your unbiased view and voice should be heard over all of the western countries! Shame on them!

@MHamzaMamar 3小時前
Fantastic piece of work Bravo

@casimmahmood 1小時前
This was one of your best vlogs and had me hooked up in the first 2 minutes

@KK-zl8gq 11小時前
You have a great channel with excellent content. It's underrated, but keep working hard—I’m sure you’ll grow successfully!

@loirecheung4440 11小時前
Great insight in the really comprehensive narrative. Talking with facts!
Thank you

@cheeneeusa 2小時前
Impressive transformation of Najma Minhas. You have figured out how to use visual gestures, look and voice to achieve the best practices for presentation on social media. Impressive video editing too. I predict subscriptions will sky rocker if you can maintain all factors you have employed in constructing this video. Of course content is also well developed

@danielsamuel1995 11小時前
This is very insightful, thanks

@christopherward2748 10小時前
I think the problem is that if you do bring manufacturing back to the US you don't have a pool of skilled labor that can understands the basic technology and is sophisticated enough to set up state of the art plants to make chips etc. The elite abandoned US manufacturing and in response people focused on jobs that we will always be require, health system, insurance, law enforcement. The technical class is gone. I think this was a fatal error - but one that was foreseen by anyone with a technical training..

@naeemawan9237 11小時前
Great analysis in a simple words.

@peterthehappywaiguoren 1小時前
Awesome video, great explanation of how the western powers push for globalization shaped the current situation. Thank you!

@ptseti 5小時前
Excellent commentary. Spot on.

@Addictedtoyoutube9 4小時前
jd vance shouldnt complain about us companies using cheaper better faster production and labor from china.

@simsimNYC 5小時前
i recently start watching you, you are good, well research vlog

@joni8090 5小時前
Free Trade
Free Speech
Free Dom ...
But , only if ,You're American !?!  

@robertng2398 4小時前
Good honest factual comments.. Thank you

@jon_nomad  1小時前
Any policy or initiative will fail when there is malice involved. Only when it is fair and free from malicious intent and ego, it will then work better.

@glenrooney1068 1小時前
Elites, power and money. History repeats itself.

@Dreamers867 6小時前
Superb, a master stroke.

@dts724 21分鍾前
Well said!  Globalization is just America’s version of British Imperialism in the 19th century. I understand and agree that the U.S. has a right to stem the tide of its decline and maintain the living standards of its citizens, particularly in the working class. But let’s not pretend that China was the culprit for its current economic woes.  No one pointed a gun at American companies’ head to force them to outsource.  Likewise, American consumers didn’t complain when they enjoyed low cost goods for the past 30 years (while the American capitalists laughed all the way to their bank)

@chrisyong8719 3小時前
A truly compelling explanation of what’s having to global trade. I never saw it that way as we have been fed with nothing but main stream media news. Your thoughts are insightful and illuminating. Thank u for this to us.

@tsham3101 8小時前
great job! Keep it up

@sword7872 1小時前
American leaders such as Clinton, Obama etc used the most deceptive words. I'm glad that Trump and Vance are more honest. Thanks for pointing it out.

@michaellee8843 2小時前
Teaching us how to cook was a good analogy. But then think about it: teaching Chinese to cook? Huh?

@towhidenterprise2104 8小時前
Don't worry, China can handle usa

@nayabtahir6393 10小時前
So in great game, "morals" are only used when they favor you.

@kishaniramsey5913 2小時前
It is just that the US lost the game played with the rules set by themselves.  They looked down on the global South and were horrified when they were left in the dust despite all the bullying.

@174scotch 10小時前
Very interesting insightful perspective. Our situation in Pakistan last few years is enough to expose western double standards. You are right that Trump and team are honest about western concerns while others give tall speeches but share similar motives!

@Kevin-s3s  4小時前
Smart and intelligent young lady.

@bennyng2414  1小時前
Finally you have called a spade a spade

@towhidenterprise2104 8小時前
Just we visited China kunming linyi Qingdao Shanghai Xiamen. India is 50+ years behind China. Usa,Europe 10+ years behind China, maximum sectors.

@3d4fun96 5小時前(修改過)
Assuming manufacturing returns to the United States, but the cost of producing the same goods is higher in the U.S., these products would not be competitive in the global market unless they are sold exclusively within the U.S. while blocking foreign products from entering the American market. Consequently, Americans would have to pay higher prices for products that are not necessarily more technologically advanced. Over time, the U.S. would completely isolate itself from the globalized market, and the dollar would naturally lose its hegemonic status, leading to the complete collapse of American global dominance.The only correct choice for the United States is to pursue win-win cooperation. It must abandon the shortsighted mindset of so-called "America First" and strive to make America great again while simultaneously ensuring benefits for all of humanity!

@lijewy 5小時前
It's finance capitalism vs industrial capitalism! Except keys industries like semiconductors, green energy and advanced technologies (AI, robotics), manufacturing doesn't really matters. It's all about finance and debt as tool of control. The defeat of Japan through the Plaza Accord is a finance move. The counterpoint of BRICS is a finance move.

[ 打印 ]
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.