個人資料
正文

傑弗裏·薩克斯 美外交政策是腐敗騙局

(2024-01-17 21:59:53) 下一個

隻會輸出戰爭 唐獎得主 談拜登外交政策失敗

2024-1-19 

 

  三任聯合國秘書長顧問、著名美國經濟學者和唐獎永續發展獎得主薩克斯(Jeffrey D. Sachs)本週一(15)發表了一篇專文評論了美國總統拜登的外交政策,他說美國唯一的外交政策方桉就是輸出戰爭,隻有一位卓越的總統才能抵抗這座巨大的「戰爭機器」永無休止的戰爭財,可惜拜登連試都沒試。

  據薩克斯15日刊載在《Common Dreams》上的專題文章,薩克斯認為,在外交政策方麵,美國總統有2個基本的角色。第1個是製約軍工企業複合體(MIC)因為它們總是在推動戰爭。第2個是製約「希望」美國替他們打仗的美國盟友。有些美國總統能夠成功,但大多數都失敗,而拜登顯然是一位失敗者。

  他認為最精明的總統之一是艾森豪(Dwight Eisenhower)在1956年底,他麵臨了2場同時發生的危機。第1個是由英國、法國和以色列發動的一場災難性的錯誤戰爭,目的是推翻埃及政府,重新掌控因埃及國有化而失西方掌控的的蘇伊士運河。

  艾森豪迫使盟友停止他們「肆無忌憚且非法」的攻擊,包括通過美國支持的聯合國大會決議。第2個危機是匈牙利起義,反抗蘇聯對匈牙利的統治。儘管艾森對這場起義深表同情,但他明智地讓美國不介入匈牙利,避免與蘇聯陷入危險的軍事對峙。

  艾森豪在1961年1月向美國人民發表的曆史性告別演說,警告美國民眾需要注意軍工企業複合體不斷增長的權力:

  “在政府的協商中,我們必須防範軍工企業複合體獲得不應擁有的影響力,無論是有意還是無意中得到的”

  「(他們)災難性崛起的潛在可能性永將存在。我們不能讓這樣的組合(軍工企業複合體)權力擴大,危及道我們的自由或民主過程。我們不應該對任何事情都視而不見。唯有警覺且知識淵博的公民才能迫使龐大的軍事工業機器與我們的和平方法和目標進行適當的結合,以便安全和自由可以共同繁榮。」

  即便是艾森豪,也沒能完全製約住軍工企業複合體,尤其是中央情報局(CIA)。沒有一位總統能夠完全壓製住這兩者,中央情報局於1947年成立,有兩種不同的角色。第一個是情報機構的角色,是合理的。第二個是作為總統的秘密軍隊。在後者中,中央情報局從艾森豪時代開始一次又一次地引導災難性的失敗,包括政變、暗殺和精心策劃的「顏色革命」所有這些都為世界帶來了無休止的溷亂和破壞。

  在艾森豪之後,甘迺迪總統(John F. Kennedy)1962年巧妙解決了古巴飛彈危機,避免了核末日的發生,他還得麵對自己的戰爭販子(War-mongering)的顧問們,以與蘇聯達成和平解決方桉。

  隔年,他成功地與蘇聯簽署了部分禁止核試驗條約(PTBT)還得麵對五角大廈的反對,然後贏得了參議院的批準,從而使美國和蘇聯遠離戰爭邊緣。

  許多人相信,甘迺迪的和平舉措導致了他被流亡的中情局幹員所刺殺。而拜登卻加入了那些堅守機密,並且決定刪減數千份文件的多任前總統行列,偏偏這些文件將更加闡明有關於刺殺甘迺迪的情況。

  60年過去了,軍工企業複合體仍鐵腕掌握著美國外交政策。正如我最近所描述的,外交政策已經變成了內部利益交換的工具,軍工企業複合體掌握著白宮、五角大廈、國務院、國會的武裝服務委員會,當然還有中央情報局,全部都與主要武器承包商緊密合作。隻有一位卓越的總統才能抵抗這座巨大的戰爭機器的無休止的戰爭財。

  然而,拜登甚至連試都沒試,在他漫長的政治生涯中,拜登一直得到軍工企業複合體的支持,反過來,他熱心支持「自主選擇的戰爭」、大規模軍火銷售、中情局支持的政變和北約擴張。

  “美國的外交政策毫無目標可言,總統唯一的外交政策就是戰爭”

  拜登2024年的軍事預算打破了所有紀錄,至少達到1.5兆美元包括五角大廈、中央情報局、國土安全部(NSA)、非五角大廈核武器計劃、補貼的外國武器銷售、其他與軍事相關的開支和過去的戰爭相關債務的利息。在這座龐大的軍事支出之上,拜登還尋求額外的500億美元(約1.57兆新台幣)的「緊急補充資金」來支持美國的「國防工業基地「,以繼續向烏克蘭和以色列運送彈藥。

  拜登對烏克蘭沒有任何切實可行的計劃,甚至在2022年3月拒絕了俄羅斯和烏克蘭之間的和平協議,該協議將基於烏克蘭放棄加入北約(因為俄羅斯永遠不會接受這一點)來結束衝突。

  烏克蘭對軍工企業複合體來說是一筆大生意——數百億甚至數千億美元的軍火合約、遍布美國的製造設施、開發和測試新武器係統的機會——因此,儘管烏克蘭在戰場上受到摧毀,數十萬烏克蘭人不幸而不必要地死亡,拜登仍然讓戰爭持續下去。烏克蘭對軍工企業複合體和拜登繼續回避可能結束戰爭的談判。

  在以色列,拜登的失敗更加明顯。以色列由一個極端政府領導,厭惡以色列和巴勒斯坦應該在成為2個主權實體、和平、安全的國家中共同生活的兩國方桉,或者說任何授予巴勒斯坦人政治權利的方桉。兩國方桉已經深深植根於國際法中,包括聯合國安全理事會和大會的決議,也據說包括美國的外交政策。阿拉伯和伊斯蘭領袖致力於在兩國方桉的框架內正常化並確保與以色列的安全關係。

  以色列總理納坦雅胡(Benjamin Netanyahu)和他的同僚甚至毫不隱藏他們滅絕巴勒斯坦人的意圖,儘管大多數外國觀察家不認同以色列領導人引用聖經,來將他們對巴勒斯坦人的大規模屠殺正當化。

  拜登仍然提供以色列所需的武器,以實行其大規模戰爭罪行。拜登並未像艾森豪一樣,敦促以色列結束其「違反國際法,包括種族滅絕公約的屠殺行為」反而繼續運送武器,甚至最大程度地繞過國會審查。

  結果是美國在世界上外交孤立,且美軍日益深陷一場迅速擴大至黎巴嫩、敘利亞、伊拉克、伊朗和葉門等地的戰爭,衝突的擴大是極易預測的。

  美國外交政策走向迷失,總統的唯一外交配方竟是戰爭。隨著美國已深陷烏克蘭和中東的戰爭,拜登還打算忽視中國的強烈反對,向台灣出售更多武器,即使這違反了美國對一中政策的長期承諾,包括42年前在《中美聯合公報》中所作的承諾,即美國政府「不尋求對台灣實施長期的軍售政策」。

  “艾森豪的可怕預言已經得到證實。軍工企業複合體威脅著我們的自由、我們的民主和我們的生存”      

美國外交政策是建立在腐敗之上的騙局

https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/corruption-of-us-foreign-policy

每年 1.5 萬億美元的軍事支出是一個不斷向軍工聯合體和華盛頓內部人士上演的騙局,盡管它使美國和世界陷入貧困和危險。

傑弗裏·D·薩克斯 2023 年 12 月 26 日

從表麵上看,美國的外交政策似乎完全不理性。 美國陷入了一場又一場災難性的戰爭——阿富汗、伊拉克、敘利亞、利比亞、烏克蘭和加沙。 最近幾天,美國因支持以色列對巴勒斯坦人的種族滅絕行動而陷入全球孤立,投票反對聯合國大會關於加沙停火的決議,該決議得到了占世界人口89%的153個國家的支持,而隻有美國和美國反對 9個人口不足世界1%的小國。

過去20年,美國每一項主要外交政策目標都失敗了。 美國占領阿富汗20年後,塔利班重新掌權。 後薩達姆時代的伊拉克開始依賴伊朗。 盡管中央情報局努力推翻敘利亞總統巴沙爾·阿薩德,但他仍然掌權。 在美國領導的北約特派團推翻穆阿邁爾·卡紮菲後,利比亞陷入曠日持久的內戰。 在美國秘密破壞2022年俄羅斯與烏克蘭之間的和平協議後,烏克蘭於2023年在戰場上遭到俄羅斯的重擊。

要理解外交政策騙局,請將當今的聯邦政府視為由出價最高者控製的多部門騙局。

盡管發生了這些引人注目且代價高昂的災難,但幾十年來,同一群人物仍然掌管著美國外交政策,包括喬·拜登、維多利亞·紐蘭、傑克·沙利文、查克·舒默、米奇·麥康奈爾和希拉裏·克林頓。

是什麽賦予了?

通過認識到美國的外交政策根本不關心美國人民的利益,這個難題就得到了解決。 這關係到華盛頓內部人士的利益,因為他們為自己、工作人員和家人追逐競選捐款和有利可圖的工作。 簡而言之,美國的外交政策遭到了大筆資金的黑客攻擊。

結果,美國人民損失慘重。 2000 年以來失敗的戰爭使他們損失了約 5 萬億美元的直接支出,即每個家庭約 4 萬美元。 未來幾十年還將花費約 2 萬億美元用於退伍軍人護理。 除了美國人直接付出的代價之外,我們還應該認識到國外遭受的可怕代價,戰區數百萬人喪生,財產和自然遭受數萬億美元的破壞。

成本繼續增加。 如果我們加上五角大樓的直接支出、中央情報局和其他情報機構的預算、退伍軍人管理局的預算、能源部的核預算,到 2024 年,美國與軍事相關的支出將達到約 1.5 萬億美元,即每個家庭約 12,000 美元。 武器計劃、國務院與軍事相關的“對外援助”(例如對以色列的援助)以及其他與安全相關的預算項目。 數千億美元的資金白白浪費了,浪費在無用的戰爭、海外軍事基地以及讓世界更接近第三次世界大戰的完全不必要的軍備建設上。

然而,描述這些巨大的成本也是為了解釋美國外交政策扭曲的“理性”。 1.5 萬億美元的軍事支出是一個不斷向軍工聯合體和華盛頓內部人士上當的騙局,盡管它使美國和世界陷入貧困和危險。

要理解外交政策騙局,請將當今的聯邦政府視為由出價最高者控製的多部門騙局。 華爾街部門不屬於財政部。 健康產業部門隸屬於衛生與公眾服務部。 大石油和煤炭部門隸屬於能源部和內政部。 外交政策部門由白宮、五角大樓和中央情報局負責。

每個部門都利用公共權力通過內幕交易謀取私人利益,並通過企業競選捐款和遊說支出來維持利益。 有趣的是,健康產業部門與外交政策部門競爭,是一個引人注目的金融騙局。 2022 年,美國的醫療支出總額達到驚人的 4.5 萬億美元,即每個家庭約 36,000 美元,是迄今為止世界上醫療費用最高的國家,而美國的預期壽命在世界各國中排名約第 40 位。 失敗的衛生政策會給衛生行業帶來巨額收入,就像失敗的外交政策會給軍工聯合體帶來巨額收入一樣。

當然,戰爭越多,生意就越多。

外交政策部門由一個秘密的、關係密切的小圈子管理,其中包括白宮、中央情報局、國務院、五角大樓、參眾兩院軍事委員會以及主要軍方的高層。

眾議院和參議院的軍事委員會,以及包括波音、洛克希德·馬丁、通用動力、諾斯羅普·格魯曼和雷神在內的主要軍事公司。 大約有一千名關鍵人物參與製定政策。 公共利益發揮的作用很小。

主要外交政策製定者掌管著美國 800 個海外軍事基地的運作、數千億美元的軍事合同以及部署裝備的戰爭行動。 當然,戰爭越多,生意就越多。 戰爭業務本身的私有化極大地放大了外交政策的私有化,因為越來越多的“核心”軍事職能被交給武器製造商和哈利伯頓、博思艾倫漢密爾頓和CACI等承包商。

除了數千億美元的軍事合同外,軍方和中央情報局的行動還產生了重要的商業溢出效應。 美國在全球 80 個國家設有軍事基地,中央情報局在更多國家開展行動,在決定誰統治這些國家,從而製定涉及礦產、碳氫化合物、管道等利潤豐厚的交易的政策方麵,發揮著重要但大多是秘密的作用。 ,以及農場和林地。 自 1947 年以來,美國的目標是推翻至少 80 個政府,這些政府通常由中央情報局領導,通過煽動政變、暗殺、叛亂、內亂、篡改選舉、經濟製裁和公開戰爭。 (有關 1947 年至 1989 年美國政權更迭行動的精彩研究,請參閱 Lindsey O’Rourke 的《秘密政權更迭》,2018 年)。

除了商業利益之外,當然還有真正相信美國統治世界權利的理論家。 好戰的卡根家族是最著名的例子,盡管他們的經濟利益也與軍工密切相關。 關於意識形態的要點是這樣的。 這些意識形態家幾乎在每一個場合都犯了錯誤,如果不是他們作為戰爭販子的有用性,很久以前他們就會失去華盛頓的講壇。 無論是否有意,他們都是軍工聯合體的付費表演者。

這種持續存在的商業騙局一直帶來不便。 從理論上講,外交政策是為了美國人民的利益而執行的,盡管事實恰恰相反。 (類似的矛盾當然也適用於價格過高的醫療保健、政府對華爾街的救助、石油行業的福利和其他騙局)。 美國人民偶爾聽到真相時,很少會支持美國外交政策的陰謀。 美國的戰爭不是根據民眾的要求發動的,而是根據高層的決定發動的。 需要采取特別措施來讓人們遠離決策。

從理論上講,外交政策是為了美國人民的利益而執行的,盡管事實恰恰相反。

第一項措施是不懈的宣傳。 1984年,喬治·奧威爾(George Orwell)一語道破,當時“黨”突然將外敵從歐亞大陸轉移到了東亞大陸,沒有任何解釋。 美國基本上也是這樣做的。 美國最大的敵人是誰? 根據季節選擇。 薩達姆·侯賽因、塔利班、烏戈·查韋斯、巴沙爾·阿薩德、伊斯蘭國、基地組織、卡紮菲、弗拉基米爾·普京、哈馬斯都在美國的宣傳中扮演了“希特勒”的角色。 白宮發言人約翰·柯比(John Kirby)在進行宣傳時臉上帶著壞笑,這表明他也知道自己所說的話很可笑,盡管有點有趣。

靠軍事承包商和偶爾參與美國詐騙活動的外國政府的捐款維持生計的華盛頓智庫放大了這種宣傳。 想想大西洋理事會、戰略與國際研究中心,當然還有由主要軍事承包商為您提供的廣受歡迎的戰爭研究所。

第二是隱藏外交政策運作的成本。 20世紀60年代,美國政府犯了一個錯誤,即通過征召年輕人去越南作戰、提高稅收來支付戰爭費用,迫使美國人民承擔軍工聯合體的成本。 公眾爆發了強烈反對。

從 20 世紀 70 年代開始,政府就聰明得多。 政府結束了征兵製,將兵役變成了一種雇傭工作,而不是一項公共服務,並得到五角大樓經費的支持,從較低經濟階層招募士兵。 它還放棄了政府支出應由稅收資助的奇怪想法,而是將軍事預算轉向赤字支出,以保護其免受如果由稅收資助可能引發的民眾反對。

它還吸引烏克蘭等附庸國參加美國的地麵戰爭,這樣美國的裹屍袋就不會破壞美國的宣傳機器。 不用說,沙利文、布林肯、紐蘭、舒默、麥康奈爾等美國戰爭大師仍然距離前線千裏之外。 死亡是為烏克蘭人保留的。 參議員理查德·布盧門撒爾

康涅狄格州民主黨人理查德·布盧門撒爾 (Richard Blumenthal) 辯稱,美國對烏克蘭的軍事援助花得值,因為“沒有一名美國女軍人或男軍人受傷或失蹤”,不知何故,這位好參議員沒有意識到要饒恕烏克蘭人的生命。 在美國挑起的北約東擴戰爭中,數十萬人喪生。

這一體係的基礎是美國國會完全服從戰爭事務,以避免對五角大樓過高的預算和行政部門煽動的戰爭提出任何質疑。 國會的從屬關係如下。 首先,國會對戰爭與和平的監督主要由眾議院和參議院軍事委員會負責,這些委員會在很大程度上製定了國會的總體政策(以及五角大樓的預算)。 其次,軍事工業(波音、雷神等)為兩黨軍事委員會成員的競選活動提供資金。 軍事工業還花費大量資金進行遊說,以便直接在軍事企業或華盛頓遊說公司中為退休國會議員及其工作人員和家人提供豐厚的薪水。

美國人民的緊迫任務是徹底改革其破碎、腐敗和欺騙性的外交政策,該政策使政府負債累累,同時將世界推向核末日。

對國會外交政策進行黑客攻擊的不僅僅是美國軍工聯合體。 以色列遊說團體很久以前就掌握了收買國會的藝術。 美國在以色列的種族隔離國家和加沙戰爭罪行中的共謀對於美國的國家安全和外交來說毫無意義,更不用說人類的尊嚴了。 它們是以色列遊說投資的成果,2022 年的競選捐款將達到 3000 萬美元,到 2024 年這一數字將大大增加。

當國會在一月份重新開會時,拜登、柯比、沙利文、布林肯、紐蘭、舒默、麥康奈爾、布盧門撒爾和他們的同類將告訴我們,我們絕對必須資助烏克蘭失敗的、殘酷的和欺騙性的戰爭以及烏克蘭正在進行的屠殺和種族清洗。 加沙,以免我們、歐洲和自由世界,也許還有太陽係本身,屈服於俄羅斯熊、伊朗毛拉和中國共產黨。 外交政策災難的製造者在這種散布恐慌的行為中並非不理性。 他們欺騙性極強,極其貪婪,隻為美國人民謀取狹隘利益。

美國人民的緊迫任務是徹底改革其破碎、腐敗和欺騙性的外交政策,該政策使政府負債累累,同時將世界推向核末日。 這項改革應於 2024 年開始,拒絕為災難性的烏克蘭戰爭和以色列在加沙的戰爭罪行提供更多資金。 締造和平和外交,而不是軍費開支,才是美國外交政策符合公共利益的途徑。

我們的作品已獲得知識共享 (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) 許可。 請隨意重新發布並廣泛分享。

US Foreign Policy Is a Scam Built on Corruption

https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/corruption-of-us-foreign-policy

The $1.5 trillion in military outlays each year is the scam that keeps on giving—to the military-industrial complex and the Washington insiders—even as it impoverishes and endangers America and the world.

On the surface, US foreign policy seems to be utterly irrational. The US gets into one disastrous war after another -- Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Ukraine, and Gaza. In recent days, the US stands globally isolated in its support of Israel’s genocidal actions against the Palestinians, voting against a UN General Assembly resolution for a Gaza ceasefire backed by 153 countries with 89% of the world population, and opposed by just the US and 9 small countries with less than 1% of the world population.

In the past 20 years, every major US foreign policy objective has failed. The Taliban returned to power after 20 years of US occupation of Afghanistan. Post-Saddam Iraq became dependent on Iran. Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad stayed in power despite a CIA effort to overthrow him. Libya fell into a protracted civil war after a US-led NATO mission overthrew Muammar Gaddafi. Ukraine was bludgeoned on the battlefield by Russia in 2023 after the US secretly scuttled a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine in 2022.

To understand the foreign-policy scam, think of today’s federal government as a multi-division racket controlled by the highest bidders.

Despite these remarkable and costly debacles, one following the other, the same cast of characters has remained at the helm of US foreign policy for decades, including Joe Biden, Victoria Nuland, Jake Sullivan, Chuck Schumer, Mitch McConnell, and Hillary Clinton.

What gives?

The puzzle is solved by recognizing that American foreign policy is not at all about the interests of the American people. It is about the interests of the Washington insiders, as they chase campaign contributions and lucrative jobs for themselves, staff, and family members. In short, US foreign policy has been hacked by big money.

As a result, the American people are losing big. The failed wars since 2000 have cost them around $5 trillion in direct outlays, or around $40,000 per household. Another $2 trillion or so will be spent in the coming decades on veterans’ care. Beyond the costs directly incurred by Americans, we should also recognize the horrendously high costs suffered abroad, in millions of lives lost and trillions of dollars of destruction to property and nature in the war zones.

The costs continue to mount. US Military-linked outlays in 2024 will come to around $1.5 trillion, or roughly $12,000 per household, if we add the direct Pentagon spending, the budgets of the CIA and other intelligence agencies, the budget of the Veteran’s Administration, the Department of Energy nuclear weapons program, the State Department’s military-linked “foreign aid” (such as to Israel), and other security-related budget lines. Hundreds of billions of dollars are money down the drain, squandered in useless wars, overseas military bases, and a wholly unnecessary arms build-up that brings the world closer to WWIII.

Yet to describe these gargantuan costs is also to explain the twisted “rationality” of US foreign policy. The $1.5 trillion in military outlays is the scam that keeps on giving—to the military-industrial complex and the Washington insiders—even as it impoverishes and endangers America and the world.

To understand the foreign-policy scam, think of today’s federal government as a multi-division racket controlled by the highest bidders. The Wall Street division is run out of the Treasury. The Health Industry division is run out of the Department of Health and Human Services. The Big Oil and Coal division is run out of the Departments of Energy and Interior. And the Foreign Policy division is run out of the White House, Pentagon and CIA.

Each division uses public power for private gain through insider dealing, greased by corporate campaign contributions and lobbying outlays. Interestingly, the Health Industry division rivals the Foreign Policy division as a remarkable financial scam. America’s health outlays totaled an astounding $4.5 trillion in 2022, or roughly $36,000 per household, by far the highest health costs in the world, while America ranked roughly 40th in the world among nations in life expectancy. A failed health policy translates into very big bucks for the health industry, just as a failed foreign policy translates into mega-revenues of the military-industrial complex.

The more wars, of course, the more business.

The Foreign Policy division is run by a small, secretive and tight-knit coterie, including the top brass of the White House, the CIA, the State Department, the Pentagon, the Armed Services Committees of the House and Senate, and the major military firms including Boeing, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, Northrop Grumman, and Raytheon. There are perhaps a thousand key individuals involved in setting policy. The public interest plays little role.

The key foreign policy makers run the operations of 800 US overseas military bases, hundreds of billions of dollars of military contracts, and the war operations where the equipment is deployed. The more wars, of course, the more business. The privatization of foreign policy has been greatly amplified by the privatization of the war business itself, as more and more “core” military functions are handed out to the arms manufacturers and to contractors such as Haliburton, Booz Allen Hamilton, and CACI.

In addition to the hundreds of billions of dollars of military contracts, there are important business spillovers from the military and CIA operations. With military bases in 80 countries around the world, and CIA operations in many more, the US plays a large, though mostly covert role, in determining who rules in those countries, and thereby on policies that shape lucrative deals involving minerals, hydrocarbons, pipelines, and farm and forest land. The US has aimed to overthrow at least 80 governments since 1947, typically led by the CIA through the instigation of coups, assassinations, insurrections, civil unrest, election tampering, economic sanctions, and overt wars. (For a superb study of US regime-change operations from 1947 to 1989, see Lindsey O’Rourke’s Covert Regime Change, 2018).

In addition to business interests, there are of course ideologues who truly believe in America’s right to rule the world. The ever-warmongering Kagan family is the most famous case, though their financial interests are also deeply intertwined with the war industry. The point about ideology is this. The ideologists have been wrong on nearly every occasion and long ago would have lost their bully pulpits in Washington but for their usefulness as warmongers. Wittingly or not, they serve as paid performers for the military-industrial complex.

There is one persistent inconvenience for this ongoing business scam. In theory, foreign policy is carried out in the interest of the American people, though the opposite is the truth. (A similar contradiction of course applies to overpriced healthcare, government bailouts of Wall Street, oil-industry perks, and other scams). The American people rarely support the machinations of US foreign policy when they occasionally hear the truth. America’s wars are not waged by popular demand but by decisions from on high. Special measures are needed to keep the people away from decision making.

In theory, foreign policy is carried out in the interest of the American people, though the opposite is the truth.

The first such measure is unrelenting propaganda. George Orwell nailed it in 1984 when “the Party” suddenly switched the foreign enemy from Eurasia to Eastasia without a word of explanation. The US essentially does the same. Who is the US gravest enemy? Take your pick, according to the season. Saddam Hussein, the Taliban, Hugo Chavez, Bashar al-Assad, ISIS, al-Qaeda, Gaddafi, Vladimir Putin, Hamas, have all played the role of “Hitler” in US propaganda. White House spokesman John Kirby delivers the propaganda with a smirk on his face, signaling that he too knows that what he is saying is ludicrous, albeit mildly entertaining.

The propaganda is amplified by the Washington think tanks that live off of donations by military contractors and occasionally foreign governments that are part of the US scam operations. Think of the Atlantic Council, CSIS, and of course the ever-popular Institute for the Study of War, brought to you by the major military contractors.

The second is to hide the costs of the foreign policy operations. In the 1960s, the US Government made the mistake of forcing the American people to bear the costs of the military-industrial complex by drafting young people to fight in Vietnam and by raising taxes to pay for the war. The public erupted in opposition.

From the 1970s onward the government has been far more clever. The government ended the draft, and made military service a job for hire rather than a public service, backed by Pentagon outlays to recruit soldiers from lower economic strata. It also abandoned the quaint idea that government outlays should be funded by taxes, and instead shifted the military budget to deficit spending which protects it from popular opposition that would be triggered if it were tax-funded.

It has also suckered client states such as Ukraine to fight America’s wars on the ground, so that no American body bags would spoil the US propaganda machine. Needless to say, US masters of war such as Sullivan, Blinken, Nuland, Schumer, and McConnell remain thousands of miles away from the frontlines. The dying is reserved for Ukrainians. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) defended American military aid to Ukraine as money well spent because it is “without a single American service woman or man injured or lost,” somehow not dawning on the good Senator to spare the lives of Ukrainians, who have died by the hundreds of thousands in a US-provoked war over NATO enlargement.

This system is underpinned by the complete subordination of the U.S. Congress to the war business, to avoid any questioning of the over-the-top Pentagon budgets and the wars instigated by the Executive Branch. The subordination of Congress works as follows. First, the Congressional oversight of war and peace is largely assigned to the House and Senate Armed Services Committees, which largely frame the overall Congressional policy (and the Pentagon budget). Second, the military industry (Boeing, Raytheon, and the rest) funds the campaigns of the Armed Services Committee members of both parties. The military industries also spend vast sums on lobbying in order to provide lucrative salaries to retiring members of Congress, their staffs, and families, either directly in military businesses or in Washington lobbying firms.

It is the urgent task of the American people to overhaul a foreign policy that is so broken, corrupted, and deceitful that it is burying the government in debt while pushing the world closer to nuclear Armageddon.

The hacking of Congressional foreign policy is not only by the US military-industrial complex. The Israel lobby long ago mastered the art of buying the Congress. America’s complicity in Israel’s apartheid state and war crimes in Gaza makes no sense for US national security and diplomacy, not to speak of human decency. They are the fruits of Israel lobby investments that reached $30 million in campaign contributions in 2022, and that will vastly top that in 2024.

When Congress reassembles in January, Biden, Kirby, Sullivan, Blinken, Nuland, Schumer, McConnell, Blumenthal and their ilk will tell us that we absolutely must fund the losing, cruel, and deceitful war in Ukraine and the ongoing massacre and ethnic cleansing in Gaza, lest we and Europe and the free world, and perhaps the solar system itself, succumb to the Russian bear, the Iranian mullahs, and the Chinese Communist Party. The purveyors of foreign policy disasters are not being irrational in this fear-mongering. They are being deceitful and extraordinarily greedy, pursuing narrow interests over those of the American people.

It is the urgent task of the American people to overhaul a foreign policy that is so broken, corrupted, and deceitful that it is burying the government in debt while pushing the world closer to nuclear Armageddon. This overhaul should start in 2024 by rejecting any more funding for the disastrous Ukraine War and Israel’s war crimes in Gaza. Peacemaking, and diplomacy, not military spending, is the path to a US foreign policy in the public interest.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
 
JEFFREY D. SACHS
Jeffrey D. Sachs is a University Professor and Director of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University, where he directed The Earth Institute from 2002 until 2016. He is also President of the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network and a commissioner of the UN Broadband Commission for Development. He has been advisor to three United Nations Secretaries-General, and currently serves as an SDG Advocate under Secretary-General Antonio Guterres. Sachs is the author, most recently, of "A New Foreign Policy: Beyond American Exceptionalism" (2020). Other books include: "Building the New American Economy: Smart, Fair, and Sustainable" (2017) and "The Age of Sustainable Development," (2015) with Ban Ki-moon.
[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (0)
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.