A review by a panel of 15 experts commissioned by NASA recommended against extending the data analysis phase beyond . They warned that the required reduction in noise level (due to classical torques and breaks in data collection due to solar flares) "is so large that any effect ultimately detected by this experiment will have to overcome considerable (and in our opinion, well justified) skepticism in the scientific community".
Publication of GP-B Special Volume (Volume #32, Issue #22) in the peer-reviewed journal, Classical and Quantum Gravity
北美老閑人 發表評論於
愛因斯坦早在1936年前就在Physical Review發表過著名的“蟲洞”文章！
隨後又發表了關於引力波不存在的論文。
何祈愚：PRL憑什麽? 拒稿引力波預測, 愛因斯坦走下神壇! 發表於 2016 年 02 月 17 日
http://hx.cnd.org/2016/02/17/%e4%bd%95%e7%a5%88%e6%84%9a%ef%bc%9aprl%e5%87%ad%e4%bb%80%e4%b9%88-%e6%8b%92%e7%a8%bf%e5%bc%95%e5%8a%9b%e6%b3%a2%e9%a2%84%e6%b5%8b-%e7%88%b1%e5%9b%a0%e6%96%af%e5%9d%a6%e8%b5%b0%e4%b8%8b%e7%a5%9e/
'愛因斯坦此前(1936年）在Physical Review已經發表過3篇論文，包括和羅森那篇著名的蟲洞文章。但這一衝突之後，他和Physical Review從此一刀兩斷，再也沒給Physical Review寫過文章。科學巨人的脾氣，看起來有時候還不小！
想知道Physical Review為什麽拒稿這篇文章麽？ 引力波存在嗎？ 不存在！ 這是愛因斯坦這篇文章的結論！
文章改頭換麵發表了。
那麽，這篇文章又是什麽命運呢？改投其他期刊唄。在這一點上，愛因斯坦和咱們今天這些攢論文的學者，也沒有什麽區別。他轉手就將論文投給了 the Journal of the Franklin
Institute，並很快原文接受，不需修改。'
Adam Frank
http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2016/02/16/466109612/was-einstein-wrong
Adam Frank is a co-founder of the 13.7 blog, an astrophysics professor at the University of Rochester, a book author and a self-described "evangelist of science."
"Physics offers radical new perspectives on what lies beneath, ... But for Bergson, relativity was not a theory that addressed time on its most ..."
A review by a panel of 15 experts commissioned by NASA recommended against extending the data analysis phase beyond . They warned that the required reduction in noise level (due to classical torques and breaks in data collection due to solar flares) "is so large that any effect ultimately detected by this experiment will have to overcome considerable (and in our opinion, well justified) skepticism in the scientific community".
Publication of GP-B Special Volume (Volume #32, Issue #22) in the peer-reviewed journal, Classical and Quantum Gravity
