伍迪艾倫的反駁：迪藍的指控是受米婭的洗腦教唆。而米婭是對自己的報複。伍迪艾倫與米婭法羅有過12年的男女友關係，但從未結婚，兩人生有一個共同的兒子沙切（後改名為柔南法羅）。米婭法羅就像安吉麗娜玖麗一樣（抑或後者學了她的樣，畢竟法羅比玖麗大了一輩）在世界各地領養了許多孩子，其中有與前夫音樂家安德烈普雷文(Andre Previn)共同領養的亞洲女孩宋宜。法羅和艾倫在紐約市城東和城西各有自己的住所，11個領養的和親生的孩子與媽媽米婭法羅住在一起。這次女兒迪藍的指控受到兒子柔南的支持，但另一名兒子摩西法羅卻出麵站在艾倫一邊。伍迪艾倫提到米婭法羅對於艾倫娶走其養女宋宜的反應是親手交給他一封瓦倫丁節卡片，艾倫當時還向她道謝。後來打開一看，卡片上是一張全家福，一把牛排餐刀直戳米婭心髒，餐刀的把手上貼著宋宜的頭像，卡片上米婭寫道：你把我的女兒帶走，我也要把你的女兒帶走 （You take my daughter, and I will take your daughter)。那麽，按照摩西法羅說的，讓迪藍相信自己受到伍迪艾倫的性侵並提出指控，便是米婭將艾倫的女兒”帶走“的體現。用摩西的話來說，迪藍說的那天發生的事似不可能發生，因為那天大家幾個孩子都在共同的家庭活動室裏，母親出門上商店去了，父親與孩子們一直在一起。摩西認為母親米婭法羅對孩子有無條件服從的要求，否則會大發雷霆。那麽妹妹迪藍按照母親的說辭去想去說去做就會讓母親高興，這是個很強大的指控艾倫的動機。
（“Of course Woody did not molest my sister,” Moses said. “She loved him and looked forward to seeing him when he would visit. She never hid from him until our mother succeeded in creating the atmosphere of fear and hate towards him. The day in question, there were six or seven of us in the house. We were all in public rooms and no one, not my father or sister, was off in any private spaces. My mother was conveniently out shopping. I don’t know if my sister really believes she was molested or is trying to please her mother. Pleasing my mother was very powerful motivation because to be on her wrong side was horrible.”
Moses himself made some accusations in the interview with the magazine. “From an early age, my mother demanded obedience and I was often hit as a child,” he said. “She went into unbridled rages if we angered her, which was intimidating at the very least and often horrifying, leaving us not knowing what she would do.”）
其實對於伍迪艾倫所作的虐童和性侵指控已經有22年之久，但是從來未有證實過。22年前就有耶魯紐黑文醫院主管兒童虐待的專家團隊做過調查，結論是伍迪艾倫沒有做過虐童和性侵的事，而主管此案的州最高法院的法官艾略特魏爾克則說如果艾倫做過他不知道。
［Woody Allen was never charged with molesting Dylan. An investigative team of child-abuse experts at Yale-New Haven Hospital said he didn’t do it, while the state Supreme Court judge on the case, Elliot Wilk, said he didn’t know if Allen did it.］
伍迪艾倫的那一地雞毛其實就是米婭法羅。她曾經在19歲時邂逅名人歌星辛那屈，21歲時嫁給比她大幾乎40歲的辛那屈，未幾離異。又遇著名已婚鋼琴家普雷文，促使普與妻離婚之後再娶她（普妻因之傷心欲絕）；但她與普的婚姻也未長久。她有不斷收養孩子的習慣，但並不是一個稱職的母親：她的孩子中有好幾個品行不端，如商店行竊，逃學，偽造支票簽名。她說起來應該是個還不錯的演員，如果你還記得1978年的電影“尼羅河上的慘案（Death on the Nile)”的話，那個有些神經兮兮的女主角的女友傑琪就是她演的。她在指控伍迪艾倫虐待兒童的同時，並未打算同伍迪艾倫劃清界限，還在同他商量她要在正準備拍攝的“曼哈頓謀殺案”裏的演出服裝。對於政治，她的態度很鮮明。與鮮嫩石頭（Sharon Stone）一樣，她支持藏獨反對中國（尤其是反對08年在北京的奧運，稱之為“種族滅絕的奧林匹克”）。
偶看：
這件事是因為有child abuse and sexual abuse引起我的注意。無疑，性侵和虐童是個令人深惡痛絕的罪行。誰做了誰就應該入獄受罰，哪怕是最令人欣賞的電影大師伍迪艾倫。話說回來，性侵和虐童盡管是人人喊打的罪惡，但在實際生活中卻非常難以定罪。因為涉及兒童，他們往往不知道哪些是大人不該做的，哪些是自己的權益需要維護；而性侵則由於人們往往難以啟齒，侵犯者往往是有權威者，受侵者往往還要顧及生計采取隱忍，而讓性侵者逃脫懲治。因此，網民會對於敢於站出來披露性侵和虐童者給予高度的讚賞和鼓勵。如果迪藍法羅真的經曆過伍迪艾倫的性侵，那麽對他做出揭露和批判無疑是應該做的，伍迪艾倫是罪有應得。 但是，（對了， 這是一個巨大的“但是”），如果迪藍法羅真是象她的哥哥摩西指出的，她這麽做是為了取悅母親，幫助她對當年背叛她而娶走其養女而報一箭之仇，這麽做是不應該的。在心理學對於記憶力的研究裏，還確實出現過虛假記憶的現象。
［以上圖片分別是（從左到右）：伍迪艾倫，宋宜與伍迪，米婭法羅，迪藍法羅，摩西法羅；凱特布蘭且特］
伍迪艾倫反駁詞中的一段：“Notwithstanding, Mia insisted that I had abused Dylan and took her immediately to a doctor to be examined. Dylan told the doctor she had not been molested. Mia then took Dylan out for ice cream, and when she came back with her the child had changed her story. The police began their investigation; a possible indictment hung in the balance. I very willingly took a lie-detector test and of course passed because I had nothing to hide. I asked Mia to take one and she wouldn’t. Last week a woman named Stacey Nelkin, whom I had dated many years ago, came forward to the press to tell them that when Mia and I first had our custody battle 21 years ago, Mia had wanted her to testify that she had been underage when I was dating her, despite the fact this was untrue. Stacey refused. I include this anecdote so we all know what kind of character we are dealing with here. One can imagine in learning this why she wouldn’t take a lie-detector test.”
伍迪艾倫的反駁：迪藍的指控是受米婭的洗腦教唆。而米婭是對自己的報複。伍迪艾倫與米婭法羅有過12年的男女友關係，但從未結婚，兩人生有一個共同的兒子沙切（後改名為柔南法羅）。米婭法羅就像安吉麗娜玖麗一樣（抑或後者學了她的樣，畢竟法羅比玖麗大了一輩）在世界各地領養了許多孩子，其中有與前夫音樂家安德烈普雷文(Andre Previn)共同領養的亞洲女孩宋宜。法羅和艾倫在紐約市城東和城西各有自己的住所，11個領養的和親生的孩子與媽媽米婭法羅住在一起。這次女兒迪藍的指控受到兒子柔南的支持，但另一名兒子摩西法羅卻出麵站在艾倫一邊。伍迪艾倫提到米婭法羅對於艾倫娶走其養女宋宜的反應是親手交給他一封瓦倫丁節卡片，艾倫當時還向她道謝。後來打開一看，卡片上是一張全家福，一把牛排餐刀直戳米婭心髒，餐刀的把手上貼著宋宜的頭像，卡片上米婭寫道：你把我的女兒帶走，我也要把你的女兒帶走 （You take my daughter, and I will take your daughter)。那麽，按照摩西法羅說的，讓迪藍相信自己受到伍迪艾倫的性侵並提出指控，便是米婭將艾倫的女兒”帶走“的體現。用摩西的話來說，迪藍說的那天發生的事似不可能發生，因為那天大家幾個孩子都在共同的家庭活動室裏，母親出門上商店去了，父親與孩子們一直在一起。摩西認為母親米婭法羅對孩子有無條件服從的要求，否則會大發雷霆。那麽妹妹迪藍按照母親的說辭去想去說去做就會讓母親高興，這是個很強大的指控艾倫的動機。
（“Of course Woody did not molest my sister,” Moses said. “She loved him and looked forward to seeing him when he would visit. She never hid from him until our mother succeeded in creating the atmosphere of fear and hate towards him. The day in question, there were six or seven of us in the house. We were all in public rooms and no one, not my father or sister, was off in any private spaces. My mother was conveniently out shopping. I don’t know if my sister really believes she was molested or is trying to please her mother. Pleasing my mother was very powerful motivation because to be on her wrong side was horrible.”
Moses himself made some accusations in the interview with the magazine. “From an early age, my mother demanded obedience and I was often hit as a child,” he said. “She went into unbridled rages if we angered her, which was intimidating at the very least and often horrifying, leaving us not knowing what she would do.”）
其實對於伍迪艾倫所作的虐童和性侵指控已經有22年之久，但是從來未有證實過。22年前就有耶魯紐黑文醫院主管兒童虐待的專家團隊做過調查，結論是伍迪艾倫沒有做過虐童和性侵的事，而主管此案的州最高法院的法官艾略特魏爾克則說如果艾倫做過他不知道。
［Woody Allen was never charged with molesting Dylan. An investigative team of child-abuse experts at Yale-New Haven Hospital said he didn’t do it, while the state Supreme Court judge on the case, Elliot Wilk, said he didn’t know if Allen did it.］
伍迪艾倫的那一地雞毛其實就是米婭法羅。她曾經在19歲時邂逅名人歌星辛那屈，21歲時嫁給比她大幾乎40歲的辛那屈，未幾離異。又遇著名已婚鋼琴家普雷文，促使普與妻離婚之後再娶她（普妻因之傷心欲絕）；但她與普的婚姻也未長久。她有不斷收養孩子的習慣，但並不是一個稱職的母親：她的孩子中有好幾個品行不端，如商店行竊，逃學，偽造支票簽名。她說起來應該是個還不錯的演員，如果你還記得1978年的電影“尼羅河上的慘案（Death on the Nile)”的話，那個有些神經兮兮的女主角的女友傑琪就是她演的。她在指控伍迪艾倫虐待兒童的同時，並未打算同伍迪艾倫劃清界限，還在同他商量她要在正準備拍攝的“曼哈頓謀殺案”裏的演出服裝。對於政治，她的態度很鮮明。與鮮嫩石頭（Sharon Stone）一樣，她支持藏獨反對中國（尤其是反對08年在北京的奧運，稱之為“種族滅絕的奧林匹克”）。
偶看：
這件事是因為有child abuse and sexual abuse引起我的注意。無疑，性侵和虐童是個令人深惡痛絕的罪行。誰做了誰就應該入獄受罰，哪怕是最令人欣賞的電影大師伍迪艾倫。話說回來，性侵和虐童盡管是人人喊打的罪惡，但在實際生活中卻非常難以定罪。因為涉及兒童，他們往往不知道哪些是大人不該做的，哪些是自己的權益需要維護；而性侵則由於人們往往難以啟齒，侵犯者往往是有權威者，受侵者往往還要顧及生計采取隱忍，而讓性侵者逃脫懲治。因此，網民會對於敢於站出來披露性侵和虐童者給予高度的讚賞和鼓勵。如果迪藍法羅真的經曆過伍迪艾倫的性侵，那麽對他做出揭露和批判無疑是應該做的，伍迪艾倫是罪有應得。 但是，（對了， 這是一個巨大的“但是”），如果迪藍法羅真是象她的哥哥摩西指出的，她這麽做是為了取悅母親，幫助她對當年背叛她而娶走其養女而報一箭之仇，這麽做是不應該的。在心理學對於記憶力的研究裏，還確實出現過虛假記憶的現象。
［以上圖片分別是（從左到右）：伍迪艾倫，宋宜與伍迪，米婭法羅，迪藍法羅，摩西法羅；凱特布蘭且特］
伍迪艾倫反駁詞中的一段：“Notwithstanding, Mia insisted that I had abused Dylan and took her immediately to a doctor to be examined. Dylan told the doctor she had not been molested. Mia then took Dylan out for ice cream, and when she came back with her the child had changed her story. The police began their investigation; a possible indictment hung in the balance. I very willingly took a lie-detector test and of course passed because I had nothing to hide. I asked Mia to take one and she wouldn’t. Last week a woman named Stacey Nelkin, whom I had dated many years ago, came forward to the press to tell them that when Mia and I first had our custody battle 21 years ago, Mia had wanted her to testify that she had been underage when I was dating her, despite the fact this was untrue. Stacey refused. I include this anecdote so we all know what kind of character we are dealing with here. One can imagine in learning this why she wouldn’t take a lie-detector test.”
