not exclusive use, not adverse posession

來源: 檸檬椰子汁 於 2019-05-25 09:55:08 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (281 bytes)
本帖於 2019-05-25 09:57:39 時間, 由版主 檸檬椰子汁 編輯
回答: 請教檸檬： Adverse possession 由 rapidestate 於 2019-05-25 08:11:04

usually they have to fence it off or build something that cause you not to use it

miwung lawn or driveway is not exclusive use, at least you need fence

and to claim title to adverse possessed land, you have to go to court

 

所有跟帖： 

• driveway is not exclusive? who else use a personal drive way? -rapidestate- ♂ 給 rapidestate 發送悄悄話 rapidestate 的博客首頁 (44 bytes) () 05/25/2019 postreply 15:52:14

• according to you, mowing lawn is exclusive use -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ 給 檸檬椰子汁 發送悄悄話 檸檬椰子汁 的博客首頁 (357 bytes) () 05/25/2019 postreply 16:18:08

• You are wrong. Here is an identical example. Court approved it. -rapidestate- ♂ 給 rapidestate 發送悄悄話 rapidestate 的博客首頁 (104 bytes) () 05/25/2019 postreply 21:40:34

• 我也看見過幾個例子。有人把車停在dead-end的終端，結果這塊地從city轉到了他手裏。車誰都可以停，沒有什麽exclusiv -sweetptt- ♂ 給 sweetptt 發送悄悄話 sweetptt 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 05/25/2019 postreply 22:14:46

• 一個案件不能成為放之四海而皆準的法律 -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ 給 檸檬椰子汁 發送悄悄話 檸檬椰子汁 的博客首頁 (137 bytes) () 05/26/2019 postreply 03:17:24

• 這不是兩家都有自己草坪，一家幫另一家剪草然後take over. -rapidestate- ♂ 給 rapidestate 發送悄悄話 rapidestate 的博客首頁 (358 bytes) () 05/26/2019 postreply 06:16:04

• scope of use -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ 給 檸檬椰子汁 發送悄悄話 檸檬椰子汁 的博客首頁 (351 bytes) () 05/26/2019 postreply 14:00:39

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！