according to you, mowing lawn is exclusive use

at best, you can prove that you own the "easement" on that land, which means, he can't make you to tear down the driveway.

Your dream of somehow having a driveway entitles you to build a garage on that spot is pure fantasy.

This is how legal dispute starts, greedy clients, not greedy lawyers. 

所有跟帖： 

• You are wrong. Here is an identical example. Court approved it. -rapidestate- ♂ (104 bytes) () 05/25/2019 postreply 21:40:34

• 我也看見過幾個例子。有人把車停在dead-end的終端，結果這塊地從city轉到了他手裏。車誰都可以停，沒有什麽exclusiv -sweetptt- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/25/2019 postreply 22:14:46

• 一個案件不能成為放之四海而皆準的法律 -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (137 bytes) () 05/26/2019 postreply 03:17:24

• 這不是兩家都有自己草坪，一家幫另一家剪草然後take over. -rapidestate- ♂ (358 bytes) () 05/26/2019 postreply 06:16:04

• scope of use -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (351 bytes) () 05/26/2019 postreply 14:00:39