回複：請教： 取消阻房合同

you are just rescinding the contract, which did not cause any damages to her.  She has no rights to ask for any unpaid rent.  Even if the court takes the case, it would only either announce the contract to be rescinded or decide that you repudiated the contract.  Even if you repudiated the contract, she did not pay the deposit and did not reasonably reply on your contract,and did not suffer any damages, while u did not profit from repudiating the contract, therefore, there will be no damages.  

You can tell her that 1)she did not pay the desposit, therefore, she is the party who repudiated the damages first, and as a result, the contract is void. 2) even if it is you who repudiated the contract, she cannot get any damages . 

所有跟帖： 

• 人家就隔夜的時間，哪有可能付定金，不合理嘛 -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 17:43:00

• 如果她拿出一堆單據，說自己已經付了誰誰搬家費，買/賣了多少家具，預定了這個那個，怎麽辦？ -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 17:43:55

• 隻要證明麽得地方住了，隻好住旅館，或更貴的地方。 -jin_yin_hua- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 17:49:59

• 回複：人家就隔夜的時間，哪有可能付定金，不合理嘛 -idoubtitit- ♀ (142 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 18:03:18

• 原文裏寫明了沒有你說的那些條款，簽字後這是份binding的合同，隻有在合理時間內不付錢才算違約 -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 18:08:19

• 回複：原文裏寫明了沒有你說的那些條款，簽字後這是份binding的合同，隻有在合理時間內不付錢才算違約 -idoubtitit- ♀ (408 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 18:11:19

• 等老貓才裁判！！哈哈 -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 18:13:10

• K, nite! -idoubtitit- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 18:15:15

• 回複：回複：原文裏寫明了沒有你說的那些條款，簽字後這是份binding的合同，隻有在合理時間內不付錢才算違約 -apt- ♂ (276 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 20:29:31

• 回複：回複：回複：原文裏寫明了沒有你說的那些條款，簽字後這是份binding的合同，隻有在合理時間內不付錢才算違約 -idoubtitit- ♀ (88 bytes) () 01/10/2013 postreply 10:46:16

• 每個州都有自己的rental regulation. 這些都有既定公式可以套。我讀到的都說隨便違約會有懲罰。 -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/10/2013 postreply 11:49:07

• 我個人覺得這個問題不能完全用法律的眼光來看問題. -CyberCat- ♂ (109 bytes) () 01/10/2013 postreply 12:56:43

• 大城市的話未必告，說不定有arbitration之類的 -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/10/2013 postreply 17:19:33