回複：原文裏寫明了沒有你說的那些條款，簽字後這是份binding的合同，隻有在合理時間內不付錢才算違約

The announcement of not being able to perform before the performance starts is not breaching the contract, it is repudiation instead.  Usually for the injured party to get damages, they must prove their loss or the repudiating party's profit resulting from the repudiation.  The future tenant here can prove none. She cannot get damages and the contract will be rescinded by the court. 

所有跟帖： 

• 等老貓才裁判！！哈哈 -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 18:13:10

• K, nite! -idoubtitit- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 18:15:15

• 回複：回複：原文裏寫明了沒有你說的那些條款，簽字後這是份binding的合同，隻有在合理時間內不付錢才算違約 -apt- ♂ (276 bytes) () 01/09/2013 postreply 20:29:31

• 回複：回複：回複：原文裏寫明了沒有你說的那些條款，簽字後這是份binding的合同，隻有在合理時間內不付錢才算違約 -idoubtitit- ♀ (88 bytes) () 01/10/2013 postreply 10:46:16

• 每個州都有自己的rental regulation. 這些都有既定公式可以套。我讀到的都說隨便違約會有懲罰。 -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/10/2013 postreply 11:49:07

• 我個人覺得這個問題不能完全用法律的眼光來看問題. -CyberCat- ♂ (109 bytes) () 01/10/2013 postreply 12:56:43

• 大城市的話未必告，說不定有arbitration之類的 -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/10/2013 postreply 17:19:33