有關加州針灸師執照經營範圍的部分法規

BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE 

4936.  (a) It is unprofessional conduct for an acupuncturist to use
the title "Doctor" or the abbreviation "Dr." in connection with the
practice of acupuncture unless he or she possesses a license that
authorizes the use or possesses an earned doctorate degree from an
accredited, approved, or authorized educational institution as set
forth under Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 94800) of Part 59 of
Division 10 of Title 3 of the Education Code, which is in
acupuncture, oriental medicine, a biological science, or is otherwise
related to the authorized practice of an acupuncturist as set forth
in Sections 4927 and 4937.
   (b) The use of the title "Doctor" or the abbreviation "Dr." by an
acupuncturist as authorized in subdivision (a) without further
indicating the type of license or degree which authorizes that use
shall constitute unprofessional conduct.


4937.  An acupuncturist's license authorizes the holder thereof:
   (a) To engage in the practice of acupuncture.
   (b) To perform or prescribe the use of Asian massage, acupressure,
breathing techniques, exercise, heat, cold, magnets, nutrition,
diet, herbs, plant, animal, and mineral products, and dietary
supplements to promote, maintain, and restore health. Nothing in this
section prohibits any person who does not possess an acupuncturist's
license or another license as a healing arts practitioner from
performing, or prescribing the use of any modality listed in this
subdivision.
   (c) For purposes of this section, a "magnet" means a mineral or
metal that produces a magnetic field without the application of an
electric current.
   (d) For purposes of this section, "plant, animal, and mineral
products" means naturally occurring substances of plant, animal, or
mineral origin, except that it does not include synthetic compounds,
controlled substances or dangerous drugs as defined in Sections 4021
and 4022, or a controlled substance listed in Chapter 2 (commencing
with Section 11053) of Division 10 of the Health and Safety Code.
   (e) For purposes of this section, "dietary supplement" has the
same meaning as defined in subsection (ff) of Section 321 of Title 21
of the United States Code, except that dietary supplement does not
include controlled substances or dangerous drugs as defined in
Section 4021 or 4022, or a controlled substance listed in Chapter 2
(commencing with Section 11053) of Division 10 of the Health and
Safety Code.

所有跟帖： 

• 全麵了解請上政府網站。 -大江川- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/12/2015 postreply 23:19:11

• http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/ -TBz- ♂ (148 bytes) () 06/12/2015 postreply 23:25:29

• 更全了解，請讀美國憲法。 -大江川- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/12/2015 postreply 23:30:39

• 更深了解，請讀聖經。 -越王- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/13/2015 postreply 07:55:54

• 美國政教分開，討論法律文本，不要引起宗教爭議。憲法最大作用，最大限度限製政府權力。 -大江川- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/13/2015 postreply 08:20:30

• 美國總統宣誓就職手為什麽放在聖經上？那可是最大的政治儀式啊，為何不用憲法？ -越王- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/13/2015 postreply 08:27:44

• 這事要問最高大法官，嗬嗬。 -大江川- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/13/2015 postreply 14:17:37

• +1 -欲千北- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/14/2015 postreply 02:45:54

• 如果在美國生活N年，還會困惑如此問題，我做為1個中國草民隻好無語了，保持我的沉默，哈哈。 -大江川- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/14/2015 postreply 10:30:05

• 這不是寫的很清楚嗎，蜜蜂可以用了 -ephd- ♂ (583 bytes) () 06/13/2015 postreply 03:29:17

• 此法解釋權，不在政府，在議會。 -大江川- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/13/2015 postreply 08:16:30

• +1, 看了條文，好像可以啊，除非蜜蜂不算動物。 -欲千北- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/13/2015 postreply 09:34:17

• 法律條文指的是，可以使用動物的產品，這自然包括動物的屎和尿；但是，蜜蜂的蜇刺，則需要法官來規範。。。 -禦用文人- ♀ (45 bytes) () 06/13/2015 postreply 10:28:39

• 解釋權啊，解釋權。全看法官怎麽理解了。 -薛成- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/13/2015 postreply 12:13:21

• Jury 有解釋權嗎？我當過兩次 Jury，隻有投票權，沒讓我來解釋法律。 -禦用文人- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/13/2015 postreply 12:17:29

• 是的，法律的解釋權在法官。不服可以上訴，直到supreme court， -惡俗老狼- ♂ (199 bytes) () 06/13/2015 postreply 12:56:52

• 最重要的是：民法主要用於為人民服務，民，是法的主體，民的首要責任是不斷質疑法而非嚴守法，因此，民涉及民事，首先要質疑法 -大江川- ♂ (799 bytes) () 06/13/2015 postreply 14:28:39

• 我猜測這事兒最後的結局可能是 -惡俗老狼- ♂ (212 bytes) () 06/13/2015 postreply 12:52:18