個人資料
正文

Jeffrey Sachs 中央情報局世界穩定

(2024-02-17 16:48:46) 下一個

中央情報局如何破壞世界穩定

作者:JEFFREY D. SACHS,2024 年 2 月 12 日 共同的夢想
https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/cia-destablizes-the-world

要是中情局的流氓行動能夠因為教會委員會揭露的罪行而成為曆史,或者至少讓中情局接受法治和公眾問責就好了,  但事實並非如此。

中央情報局存在三個基本問題:目標、方法和不負責任。 其行動目標是中央情報局或美國總統在特定時間定義的符合美國利益的任何目標,無論國際法或美國法律如何。 其手段是秘密且兩麵性的。 它的不負責任意味著中央情報局和總統在沒有任何公眾監督的情況下製定外交政策。 國會是一個受氣包,一個餘興節目。

正如新任中央情報局局長邁克·蓬佩奧在談到他在中央情報局的時光時所說:“我是中央情報局局長。我們撒謊、我們欺騙、我們偷竊。我們接受了完整的培訓課程。這讓你想起了美國實驗的榮耀。” ”

中央情報局 (CIA) 成立於 1947 年,前身是戰略情報局 (OSS)。 戰略情報局在第二次世界大戰中扮演了兩個不同的角色:情報和顛覆。 中央情報局接管了這兩個角色。 一方麵,中央情報局向美國政府提供情報。 另一方麵,中央情報局要顛覆“敵人”,即總統或中央情報局定義為敵人的任何人,使用各種措施:暗殺、政變、策劃騷亂、武裝叛亂分子和其他手段。

事實證明,後一種角色對全球穩定和美國法治具有毀滅性影響。 這是中央情報局今天繼續追求的角色。 實際上,中央情報局是美國的一支秘密軍隊,有能力在世界各地製造混亂而不承擔任何責任。

當德懷特·艾森豪威爾總統認定非洲冉冉升起的政治新星、民主選舉產生的紮伊爾(現剛果民主共和國)的帕特裏斯·盧蒙巴為“敵人”時,中央情報局在 1961 年密謀暗殺了他,從而破壞了非洲的民主希望。 他不可能是最後一位被中央情報局打倒的非洲總統。

中央情報局行動失誤造成的持續混亂程度令人震驚。

在其 77 年的曆史中,中央情報局隻在 1975 年接受過一次嚴肅的公眾問責。那一年,愛達荷州參議員弗蘭克·丘奇 (Frank Church) 領導了一項參議院調查,揭露了中央情報局令人震驚的暗殺、政變、破壞穩定、監視和破壞行為。 門格勒式的酷刑和醫學“實驗”。

調查記者詹姆斯·裏森(James Risen)最近在一本精彩的書中記錄了教會委員會對中央情報局令人震驚的瀆職行為的揭露,《最後一個誠實的人:中央情報局、聯邦調查局、黑手黨和肯尼迪家族——以及一位參議員的拯救之戰》 民主。

這一單一事件的監督是由於罕見的事件同時發生而發生的。

在教會委員會成立的前一年,水門事件醜聞推翻了理查德·尼克鬆並削弱了白宮。 作為尼克鬆的繼任者,傑拉爾德·福特未當選,曾任國會議員,不願反對國會的監督特權。 由參議院歐文委員會調查的水門事件也賦予了參議院權力,並證明了參議院監督行政部門濫用權力的價值。 至關重要的是,中央情報局由局長威廉·科爾比新領導,他希望清理中央情報局的行動。 此外,聯邦調查局局長 J·埃德加·胡佛 (J. Edgar Hoover) 已於 1972 年去世,他也是教會委員會揭露的普遍違法行為的作者。

1974 年 12 月,調查記者西摩·赫什(Seymour Hersh)發表了一篇關於中情局針對美國反戰運動的非法情報行動的報道,當時的西摩·赫什(Seymour Hersh)是一名出色的記者,擁有中央情報局內部的消息來源。 當時的參議院多數黨領袖邁克·曼斯菲爾德(Mike Mansfield)是一位有性格的領袖,隨後任命丘奇調查中央情報局。 丘奇本人是一位勇敢、誠實、聰明、思想獨立、勇敢的參議員,這些特征在美國政壇長期缺乏。

要是中情局的流氓行動能夠因為教會委員會揭露的罪行而成為曆史,或者至少讓中情局接受法治和公眾問責就好了。 但事實並非如此。 中央情報局在美國外交政策(包括海外顛覆活動)中保持著卓越的地位,笑到了最後,或者更準確地說,讓世界落淚。

自 1975 年以來,中央情報局一直在阿富汗開展支持伊斯蘭聖戰分子的秘密行動,這些行動徹底摧毀了阿富汗,同時催生了基地組織。 中央情報局可能在巴爾幹地區針對塞爾維亞、在高加索地區針對俄羅斯以及在中亞針對中國開展秘密行動,所有這些行動都部署了中央情報局支持的聖戰分子。 2010 年代,中央情報局再次與伊斯蘭聖戰分子一起開展致命行動,推翻敘利亞的巴希爾·阿薩德。 至少 20 年來,中央情報局一直深度參與

煽動烏克蘭日益嚴重的災難,包括 2014 年 2 月暴力推翻烏克蘭總統維克多·亞努科維奇 (Viktor Yanukovych),引發了目前席卷烏克蘭的毀滅性戰爭。

我們對這些操作了解多少? 隻有舉報人、少數勇敢的調查記者、少數勇敢的學者和一些外國政府願意或能夠告訴我們的部分,所有這些潛在的證人都知道他們可能會麵臨美國政府的嚴厲報複。 美國政府本身幾乎沒有承擔任何責任,國會也沒有施加有意義的監督或限製。 相反,政府變得越來越隱秘,對機密信息的披露采取積極的法律行動,即使是當或特別是當這些信息描述了政府本身的非法行為時。

偶爾,一位前美國官員會泄露秘密,例如茲比格涅夫·布熱津斯基透露,他誘使吉米·卡特指派中央情報局訓練伊斯蘭聖戰分子,以破壞阿富汗政府的穩定,目的是誘使蘇聯入侵 那個國家。

就敘利亞而言,我們從《紐約時報》2016年和2017年的一些報道中了解到,中央情報局按照巴拉克·奧巴馬總統的命令,開展了破壞敘利亞穩定並推翻阿薩德的顛覆行動。 這是中央情報局一次嚴重誤導的行動,公然違反了國際法,導致了十年的混亂、地區戰爭不斷升級、數十萬人死亡和數百萬流離失所,但迄今為止,還沒有 白宮或國會對這場由中央情報局領導的災難的誠實承認。

就烏克蘭而言,我們知道美國在推翻亞努科維奇並使烏克蘭陷入十年流血的暴力政變中發揮了重要的秘密作用,但直到今天,我們還不知道細節。 俄羅斯攔截並公布了時任美國助理國務卿(現為副國務卿)維多利亞·紐蘭(Victoria Nuland)與美國駐烏克蘭大使傑弗裏·皮亞特(現為助理國務卿)之間的通話,為世界提供了了解政變的一扇窗口。 他們策劃了政變後的政府。 政變後,中央情報局秘密訓練了美國幫助上台的政變後政權的特種作戰部隊。 美國政府對中央情報局在烏克蘭的秘密行動一直保持沉默。

正如現任獨立記者西摩·赫什所說,我們有充分的理由相信中央情報局特工摧毀了北溪管道。 與 1975 年不同的是,當時赫什在《紐約時報》工作,當時該報仍在試圖追究政府的責任,而《紐約時報》甚至不屑於調查赫什的說法。

讓中央情報局承擔起公眾責任當然是一場艱苦的鬥爭。 總統和國會甚至都不會嚐試。 主流媒體不調查中央情報局,而是更願意引用“不知名的高級官員”和官方的掩蓋行為。 主流媒體是否懶惰、被收買、害怕來自軍工聯合體的廣告收入、受到威脅、無知,還是以上所有? 誰知道。

還有一絲希望。 早在 1975 年,中央情報局就由一位改革者領導。 如今,中央情報局由美國長期領先的外交官之一威廉·伯恩斯領導。 伯恩斯自2008年擔任駐俄羅斯大使以來就了解烏克蘭的真相,並就推動北約擴大烏克蘭的嚴重錯誤向華盛頓發電報。 考慮到伯恩斯的地位和外交成就,也許他會支持迫切需要的問責製。

中央情報局行動失誤造成的持續混亂程度令人震驚。 在阿富汗、海地、敘利亞、委內瑞拉、科索沃、烏克蘭以及其他更遠的地方,中央情報局顛覆活動造成的不必要的死亡、不穩定和破壞至今仍在繼續。 主流媒體、學術機構和國會應盡其所能調查這些行動,並要求公布文件以實現民主問責。

明年是教會委員會聽證會成立 50 周年。 五十年過去了,在教會委員會本身的先例、啟發和指導下,現在是時候打開窗簾,揭露美國領導的混亂的真相,並開始一個美國外交政策變得透明、負責任的新時代了。 遵守國內和國際法治,並致力於全球和平而不是顛覆所謂的敵人。

How the CIA Destabilizes the World

BY JEFFREY D. SACHS Feb 12, 2024 Common Dreams

If only the CIA’s rogue operations had been consigned to history as a result of the crimes exposed by the Church Committee, or at the least had brought the CIA under the rule of law and public accountability. But that was not to be.

There are three basic problems with the CIA: its objectives, methods, and unaccountability. Its operational objectives are whatever the CIA or the President of the United States defines to be in the U.S. interest at a given time, irrespective of international law or U.S. law. Its methods are secretive and duplicitous. Its unaccountability means that the CIA and president run foreign policy without any public scrutiny. Congress is a doormat, a sideshow.

As a recent CIA Director, Mike Pompeo, said of his time at the CIA: "I was the CIA director. We lied, we cheated, we stole. We had entire training courses. It reminds you of the glory of the American experiment."

The CIA was established in 1947 as the successor to the Office of Strategic Services (OSS). The OSS had performed two distinct roles in World War II, intelligence and subversion. The CIA took over both roles. On the one hand, the CIA was to provide intelligence to the US Government. On the other, the CIA was to subvert the “enemy,” that is, whomever the president or CIA defined as the enemy, using a wide range of measures: assassinations, coups, staged unrest, arming of insurgents, and other means.

It is the latter role that has proved devastating to global stability and the U.S. rule of law. It is a role that the CIA continues to pursue today. In effect, the CIA is a secret army of the U.S., capable of creating mayhem across the world with no accountability whatsoever.

When President Dwight Eisenhower decided that Africa’s rising political star, democratically elected Patrice Lumumba of Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of Congo), was the “enemy,” the CIA conspired in his 1961 assassination, thus undermining the democratic hopes for Africa. He would hardly be the last African president brought down by the CIA.

The extent of the continuing mayhem resulting from CIA operations gone awry is astounding.

In its 77-year history, the CIA has been held to serious public account just once, in 1975. In that year, Idaho Senator Frank Church led a Senate investigation that exposed the CIA’s shocking rampage of assassinations, coups, destabilization, surveillance, and Mengele-style torture and medical “experiments.”

The expose by the Church Committee of the CIA’s shocking malfeasance has recently been chronicled in a superb book by the investigative reporter James Risen, The Last Honest Man: The CIA, the FBI, the Mafia, and the Kennedys―and One Senator's Fight to Save Democracy.

That single episode of oversight occurred because of a rare confluence of events.

In the year before the Church Committee, the Watergate scandal had toppled Richard Nixon and weakened the White House. As successor to Nixon, Gerald Ford was unelected, a former Congressman, and reluctant to oppose the oversight prerogatives of the Congress. The Watergate scandal, investigated by the Senate Ervin Committee, had also empowered the Senate and demonstrated the value of Senate oversight of Executive Branch abuses of power. Crucially, the CIA was newly led by Director William Colby, who wanted to clean up the CIA operations. Also, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, author of pervasive illegalities also exposed by the Church committee, had died in 1972.

In December 1974, investigative reporter Seymour Hersh, then as now a great reporter with sources inside the CIA, published an account of illegal CIA intelligence operations against the U.S. antiwar movement. The Senate Majority Leader at the time, Mike Mansfield, a leader of character, then appointed Church to investigate the CIA. Church himself was a brave, honest, intelligent, independent-minded, and intrepid Senator, characteristics chronically in short supply in U.S. politics.

If only the CIA’s rogue operations had been consigned to history as a result of the crimes exposed by the Church Committee, or at the least had brought the CIA under the rule of law and public accountability. But that was not to be. The CIA has had the last laugh —or better said, has brought the world to tears—by maintaining its preeminent role in U.S. foreign policy, including overseas subversion.

Since 1975, the CIA has run secretive operations backing Islamic jihadists in Afghanistan that utterly wrecked Afghanistan while giving rise to al-Qaeda. The CIA has likely run secretive operations in the Balkans against Serbia, in the Caucuses against Russia, and in Central Asia targeting China, all deploying CIA-backed jihadists. In the 2010s, the CIA ran deadly operations to topple Syria’s Bashir al-Assad, again with Islamic jihadists. For at least 20 years, the CIA has been deeply involved in fomenting the growing catastrophe in Ukraine, including the violent overthrow of Ukraine’s President Viktor Yanukovych in February 2014 that triggered the devastating war now engulfing Ukraine.

What do we know of these operations? Only the parts that whistleblowers, a few intrepid investigative reporters, a handful of brave scholars, and some foreign governments have been willing or able to tell us, with all of these potential witnesses knowing that they might face severe retribution from the U.S. government. There has been little to no accountability by the U.S. government itself, or meaningful oversight or restraint imposed by Congress. On the contrary, the government has become ever-more obsessively secretive, pursuing aggressive legal actions against disclosures of classified information, even when, or especially when, that information describes the illegal actions by the government itself.

Once in a while, a former U.S. official spills the beans, such as when Zbigniew Brzezinski revealed that he had induced Jimmy Carter to assign the CIA to train Islamic jihadists to destabilize the government of Afghanistan, with the aim of inducing the Soviet Union to invade that country.

In the case of Syria, we learned from a few stories in the New York Times in 2016 and 2017 of the CIA’s subversive operations to destabilize Syria and overthrow Assad, as ordered by President Barack Obama. Here is the case of a dreadfully misguided CIA operation, blatantly in violation of international law, that has led to a decade of mayhem, an escalating regional war, hundreds of thousands of deaths, and millions of displaced people, and yet there has not been a single honest acknowledgment of this CIA-led disaster by the White House or Congress.

In the case of Ukraine, we know that the U.S. played a major covert role in the violent coup that brought down Yanukovych and that swept Ukraine into a decade of bloodshed but to this day, we don’t know the details. Russia offered the world a window into the coup by intercepting and then posting a call between Victoria Nuland, then U.S. Assistant Secretary of State (now Under-Secretary of State) and U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt (now Assistant Secretary of State), in which they plot the post-coup government. Following the coup, the CIA covertly trained special operations forces of the post-coup regime the U.S. had helped bring to power. The U.S. government has been mum about the CIA’s covert operations in Ukraine.

We have good reason to believe that CIA operatives carried out the destruction of the Nord Stream pipeline, as per Seymour Hersh, who is now an independent reporter. Unlike in 1975, when Hersh was with the New York Times at a time when the paper still tried to hold the government to account, the Times does not even deign to look into Hersh’s account.

Holding the CIA to public account is of course a steep uphill struggle. Presidents and the Congress don’t even try. The mainstream media don’t investigate the CIA, preferring instead to quote “senior unnamed officials” and the official cover-up. Are the mainstream media outlets lazy, suborned, afraid of advertising revenues from the military-industrial complex, threatened,
ignorant, or all of the above? Who knows.

There is a tiny glimmer of hope. Back in 1975, the CIA was led by a reformer. Today, the CIA is led by William Burns, one of America’s long-standing leading diplomats. Burns knows the truth about Ukraine, since he served as Ambassador to Russia in 2008 and cabled Washington about the grave error of pushing NATO enlargement to Ukraine. Given Burns’ stature and diplomatic accomplishments, perhaps he would support the urgently needed accountability.

The extent of the continuing mayhem resulting from CIA operations gone awry is astounding. In Afghanistan, Haiti, Syria, Venezuela, Kosovo, Ukraine, and far beyond, the needless deaths, instability, and destruction unleashed by CIA subversion continues to this day. The mainstream media, academic institutions, and Congress should be investigating these operations to the best of their ability and demanding the release of documents to enable democratic accountability.

Next year is the 50th anniversary of the Church Committee hearings. Fifty years on, with the precedent, inspiration, and guidance of the Church Committee itself, it’s urgently time to open the blinds, expose the truth about the U.S.-led mayhem, and begin a new era in which U.S. foreign policy becomes transparent, accountable, subject to the rule of law both domestic and international, and directed towards global peace rather than subversion of supposed enemies.

The CIA; a covert army of mayhem across the world

https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/the-cia--a-covert-army-of-mayhem-across-the-world?

By Al Mayadeen English  13 Feb 2024

Jeffrey Sachs describes how the CIA has had a destructive impact on global stability and the rule of law in the US through its various chaotic and illegal methods.

At the center of the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) lies 3 major problems that disregard foreign policy and international law, an opinion piece in Common Dreams by Jeffrey Sachs revealed. 

According to Sachs, the CIA's aims and tactics, along with its covert methods and deceptive strategies, ensure a lack of accountability.

He calls Congress a "doormat" and notes that the agency's objectives are whatever the CIA and president determine at the time, irrespective of international and domestic law.

Sachs recalls Mike Pompeo's comments when he admitted, as CIA director, that the agency "lied, cheated, and stole."

The CIA, founded in 1947, has two main missions. One is to provide intelligence to the US government, while the other is to undermine whoever is considered an "enemy" by the current president, by a variety of techniques, including assassinations, coups, manufactured disturbances, arming of rebels, and other methods.

CIA creates mayhem, no accountability

Sachs notes that the second objective has had a destructive impact on global stability and the rule of law in the US. He calls the CIA a covert army of the US "capable of creating mayhem across the world with no accountability whatsoever."

He recalls how former President Dwight Eisenhower orchestrated the 1961 assassination of African president Patrice Lumumba of Zaire.

Sachs also details how in its 77-year history, the CIA has only been called to meaningful public account only once: in 1975. That year, Idaho Senator Frank Church led a Senate investigation into the CIA's stunning campaign of killings, coups, instability, monitoring, and Mengele-style torture and medical "experiments".

In December 1974, investigative writer Seymour Hersh revealed an exposé of unlawful CIA spy activities against the US antiwar movement, prompting Mike Mansfield, the Senate Majority Leader at the time, to select Church to examine the CIA.

Sachs details the many operations of the CIA in Afghanistan, Serbia, Russia, China, and Syria and how for the last 20 years, it has been "deeply involved in fomenting the growing catastrophe in Ukraine," which is not limited to the overthrowing of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych in February 2014 that triggered a "decade of bloodshed" leading up to the war with Russia.

The author notes that the little or no accountability and no restraint imposed by Congress has not slowed down the agency, rather it has become "ever-more obsessively secretive, pursuing aggressive legal actions against disclosures of classified information, even when, or especially when, that information describes the illegal actions by the government itself."

In Syria, Sachs discusses New York Times stories that revealed the CIA's operations to destabilize the country and overthrow President Bashar al-Assad, which were ordered by then-President Barack Obama.

This blatant violation of international laws, he argues, led to the escalation that resulted in a "regional war, hundreds of thousands of deaths, and millions of displaced people, and yet there has not been a single honest acknowledgment of this CIA-led disaster by the White House or Congress."

In February 2023, Seymour Hersh wrote that there was good reason to believe US Navy divers planted explosives to destroy the Nord Stream pipelines in 2022.

"Last June, the Navy divers, operating under the cover of a widely publicized mid-summer NATO exercise known as BALTOPS 22, planted the remotely triggered explosives that, three months later, destroyed three of the four Nord Stream pipelines, according to a source with direct knowledge of the operational planning," Hersh wrote in his Substack newsletter.

Naturally, the White House responded and dismissed the claims as "false and complete fiction."

No attempts to hold CIA accountable

Sachs expresses that the "continuing mayhem" from CIA operations has resulted in "needless deaths, instability, and destruction" that continue to this day.

He criticizes mainstream media for not questioning or investigating such operations and demanding the release of data that allows the CIA to be held accountable.

The author calls for the urgent need to expose the truth about the "US-led mayhem" and attempt to start a new epoch in which US foreign policy is more "transparent, accountable, subject to the rule of law both domestic and international, and directed towards global peace rather than subversion of supposed enemies."

[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (0)
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.