傑弗裏·薩克斯 美國明天可以結束加沙種族滅絕

傑弗裏·薩克斯：美國明天可以結束加沙種族滅絕

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PV47TWWdRE&t=0s&ab_channel=

2024年1月4日 YouTube，菲爾茨·艾德林格就針對巴勒斯坦人的可怕罪行采訪傑弗裏·薩克斯。 薩克斯解釋了他的和平計劃、衝突的根源以及美國在加沙地帶進行種族清洗方麵的責任。

所有必要的措施早已擺在桌麵上。 不需要新的國際進程，而是需要在國際領導下具體實施。 衝突雙方無法自行找到解決方案。 毫無疑問，領導權應該掌握在聯合國手中，作為第一個具體步驟，聯合國應該決定接納巴勒斯坦國為正式會員國。 此後，應在國際維和部隊的監督和保障下盡快結束加沙及其周邊地區的戰爭。

薩克斯計劃的一個重要組成部分是建立“聯合國重建和可持續發展基金”，擬議預算至少為1600億美元。 其資金主要來自國際軍事開支的大幅削減。

傑弗裏·薩克斯認識到美國以色列和中東政策需要徹底轉變。 他看到了這種變化的潛力，因為美國民眾越來越不同意政府激進的外交政策，並得到了眾多民意調查的支持。 他希望這種壓力與國際社會的行動相結合（鑒於大多數聯合國成員國支持立即接納巴勒斯坦加入聯合國），將迫使美國政府擺脫強大遊說團體的影響。 華盛頓。 在歐洲，他希望擺脫對美國日益增長的依賴。

總而言之，這是一個合乎邏輯且經過深思熟慮的計劃，隻缺少一件事：國際社會最終為這一長期懸而未決的國際問題找到具體解決方案所需的勇氣。 然而，國際社會絕大多數成員已經準備好接受這樣的解決方案。

所有必要的措施早已擺在桌麵上。 不需要新的國際進程，而是需要在國際領導下具體實施。 衝突雙方無法自行找到解決方案。 毫無疑問，領導權應該掌握在聯合國手中，作為第一個具體步驟，聯合國應該決定接納巴勒斯坦國為正式會員國。 此後，應在國際維和部隊的監督和保障下盡快結束加沙及其周邊地區的戰爭。

薩克斯計劃的一個重要組成部分是建立“聯合國重建和可持續發展基金”，擬議預算至少為1600億美元。 其資金主要來自國際軍事開支的大幅削減。

傑弗裏·薩克斯認識到美國以色列和中東政策需要徹底轉變。 他看到了這種變化的潛力，因為美國民眾越來越不同意政府激進的外交政策，並得到了眾多民意調查的支持。 他希望這種壓力與國際社會的行動相結合（鑒於大多數聯合國成員國支持立即接納巴勒斯坦加入聯合國），將迫使美國政府擺脫強大遊說團體的影響。 華盛頓。 在歐洲，他希望擺脫對美國日益增長的依賴。

總而言之，這是一個合乎邏輯且經過深思熟慮的計劃，隻缺少一件事：國際社會最終為這一長期懸而未決的國際問題找到具體解決方案所需的勇氣。 然而，國際社會絕大多數成員已經準備好接受這樣的解決方案。

 Jeffrey Sachs: US Could End Gaza Genocide Tomorrow
2024年1月4日, Firtz Edlinger interviews Jeffrey Sachs on the horrific crimes against the Palestinians. Sachs explains his peace plan, the root cause of the conflict and the responsibility of the United States in enabling the ethnic cleansing of the Gaza strip. 

All necessary measures have been on the table for a long time. There is no need for a new international process but for concrete implementation under international leadership. The two conflicting parties are unable to find a solution on their own. The leadership should unquestionably rest in the hands of the United Nations, which should decide, as a first concrete step, to admit the state of Palestine as a full member. Following that, the war in and around Gaza should be ended as quickly as possible, with international peacekeeping forces monitoring and ensuring it.

A crucial component of the Sachs Plan involves establishing a "UN Reconstruction and Sustainable Development Funds" with a proposed budget of at least 160 billion USD. It is intended to be primarily financed by a significant reduction in international military expenditures.

Jeffrey Sachs recognizes the need for a radical shift in U.S. Israeli and Middle East policy. He sees potential for this change, as the U.S. population increasingly disagrees with their government's aggressive foreign policy, supported by numerous opinion polls. He hopes that this pressure, combined with actions from the international community (given that a large majority of UN member states support the immediate admission of Palestine to the United Nations), will compel the U.S. administration to break free from the influence of powerful lobbies in Washington. From Europe, he hopes for a distancing from the growing dependence on the U.S.
In conclusion, it is a logical and well-thought-out plan, lacking only one thing: the necessary courage from the international community to finally address a concrete solution to the longest-standing unresolved international problem. The overwhelming majority of the international community is, however, ready for such a solution.

All necessary measures have been on the table for a long time. There is no need for a new international process but for concrete implementation under international leadership. The two conflicting parties are unable to find a solution on their own. The leadership should unquestionably rest in the hands of the United Nations, which should decide, as a first concrete step, to admit the state of Palestine as a full member. Following that, the war in and around Gaza should be ended as quickly as possible, with international peacekeeping forces monitoring and ensuring it.

A crucial component of the Sachs Plan involves establishing a "UN Reconstruction and Sustainable Development Funds" with a proposed budget of at least 160 billion USD. It is intended to be primarily financed by a significant reduction in international military expenditures.

Jeffrey Sachs recognizes the need for a radical shift in U.S. Israeli and Middle East policy. He sees potential for this change, as the U.S. population increasingly disagrees with their government's aggressive foreign policy, supported by numerous opinion polls. He hopes that this pressure, combined with actions from the international community (given that a large majority of UN member states support the immediate admission of Palestine to the United Nations), will compel the U.S. administration to break free from the influence of powerful lobbies in Washington. From Europe, he hopes for a distancing from the growing dependence on the U.S.
In conclusion, it is a logical and well-thought-out plan, lacking only one thing: the necessary courage from the international community to finally address a concrete solution to the longest-standing unresolved international problem. The overwhelming majority of the international community is, however, ready for such a solution.