個人資料
正文

民主覺醒 美國國情筆記

(2023-11-25 08:48:05) 下一個

民主覺醒  美國國情筆記

作者:希瑟·考克斯·理查森 (作者)

紐約時報暢銷書

“引人入勝且易於接近。”——《波士頓環球報》

“這是一部充滿活力、重要的曆史,講述了美國自建國以來為實現自己的最佳理想而進行的無休止、令人憤怒和絕對引人注目的鬥爭……這既是希望的理由,也是戰鬥的號召。”——簡·梅爾,《黑錢》作者

來自曆史學家和流行日報《美國人的來信》的作者的重要敘述,解釋了美國這個曾經的民主燈塔現在如何在獨裁的邊緣搖搖欲墜,以及我們如何能夠回頭。

在 2019 年彈劾危機期間,希瑟·考克斯·理查森 (Heather Cox Richardson) 在 Facebook 上發表了一篇每日文章,提供每日新聞洪流的曆史背景。 它很快變成了一份時事通訊,其讀者群激增至超過 200 萬忠實讀者,這些讀者依賴於她對美國現在和過去的直言不諱和見多識廣的看法。

在《民主覺醒》中,理查森精心設計了一個引人入勝的原創敘述,解釋了幾十年來一小群富人如何對美國理想發動戰爭。 通過將語言武器化和宣揚虛假曆史,他們將我們帶入了威權主義——創造了一群心懷不滿的民眾,然後承諾重建一個想象中的過去,讓這些人再次感到自己很重要。 她認為,要奪回我們的國家,首先要記住邊緣化美國人一直堅持的國家真實曆史的要素。 他們對建國原則的奉獻使我們能夠更新和擴大我們過去對民主的承諾。 理查森將這段曆史視為國家未來的路線圖。

理查森的才華在於將龐大、曲折且令人困惑的新聞源整理成一個連貫的故事,指出我們應該關注的內容、先例是什麽以及未來可能的道路。 在她標誌性的冷靜散文中,她對民主的未來持現實和樂觀的態度。 她對曆史的掌握使她能夠毫不費力地從開國元勳到廢奴主義者,再到重建時期的戈德華特,再到米奇·麥康奈爾,強調了新政的政治遺產、對社會主義揮之不去的恐懼、自由主義共識的消亡以及“運動保守主義”的誕生。 ”。

許多書籍告訴我們過去五年發生了什麽。 《民主覺醒》解釋了我們如何走到了這個危險的地步,我們的曆史真正告訴我們關於我們自己的事情,以及民主的未來會是什麽樣。

<<<<<<>>>>>>

民主覺醒評論:希瑟·考克斯·理查森必要的美國曆史

這位波士頓學院教授為共和黨極端主義提供了寶貴的入門讀物,同時也提供了進步的成就

查爾斯·凱撒 2023 年 10 月 8 日

在媒體環境被沉迷於廉價刺激的政客(馬特·蓋茨、馬喬裏·泰勒·格林、橙色怪物)和沉迷於廉價刺激的專家(肖恩·漢尼提、勞拉·英格拉漢姆、史蒂夫·班農)所汙染的情況下,希瑟·考克斯·理查森的成功遠不止於此。 比吹一口新鮮空氣更重要。 這是一個真正的奇跡。

這位波士頓學院曆史學教授大約四年前開始撰寫她的時事通訊《一個美國人的來信》。 如今,她每日講述的有關當日新聞的常識,被包裹在美國曆史的優雅包裝中,擁有驚人的 120 萬訂閱者,使她成為 Substack 上最受歡迎的作家。 自從 20 世紀 60 年代愛德華·P·摩根 (Edward P Morgan) 每晚 15 分鍾的廣播吸引了自由派精英以來,還沒有一位專家同時對這麽多進步的美國人如此重要。

在社交媒體時代,理查森的成功是違反直覺的。 幾年前,當本·史密斯(Ben Smith)在《紐約時報》上介紹她時,史密斯承認他對推特如此沉迷,以至於很少有時間打開她對新聞的“豐富摘要”。 當他告訴理查森最早的發起人之一比爾·莫耶斯(Bill Moyers)同樣的事情時,這位偉大的評論員解釋道:“你生活在一個雷暴的世界,她看著海浪襲來。”

理查森的最新著作分享了她通訊中的所有情報。 它沒有她在互聯網上發表的文章那樣的新聞價值,但對於任何需要了解美國過去 150 年曆史重要事實以及這些事實如何導致我們今天所居住的令人遺憾的地方的人來說,它是一本極好的入門讀物。

與達納·米爾班克(Dana Milbank)的《破壞主義者》等其他新書一樣,理查森的新書提醒我們,唐納德·特朗普絕非異類,在共和黨迎合大企業、種族主義和基督教民族主義70年之後,唐納德·特朗普是不可避免的。

希瑟·考克斯·理查森 (Heather Cox Richardson) 於 2022 年采訪喬·拜登。希瑟·考克斯·理查森 (Heather Cox Richardson) 於 2022 年采訪喬·拜登。

從現代保守主義的萌芽到今天自由核心小組的瘋狂,可以劃出許多直接的線索。 小威廉·F·巴克利(William F Buckley Jr)是那個時代最著名的保守派專家,他在 1951 年攻擊大學教授“世俗主義和集體主義”,並宣揚自由主義者基本上都是共產主義者的謠言。 理查森寫道,在巴克利的死敵中,每個人都“相信政府應該監管商業、保護社會福利、促進基礎設施建設和保護公民權利”,並且“相信基於事實的論點”。

巴克利和他的追隨者想要一種新的“正統宗教和自由市場意識形態”,以取代富蘭克林·羅斯福新政中出現的自由主義共識。 幾年後,共和黨總統候選人巴裏·戈德華特 (Barry Goldwater) 提出反對 1964 年民權法案的競選綱領。 四年後,理查德·尼克鬆 (Richard Nixon) 的南方戰略承諾減緩最高法院 14 年前下令廢除的種族隔離政策。

在有史以來最臭名昭著的狗哨之一中,羅納德·裏根 (Ronald Reagan) 開始了 1980 年的總統競選活動,宣布了他對密西西比州費城各州權利的熱愛——該州因民權工作者詹姆斯·錢尼 (James Chaney)、安德魯·古德曼 (Andrew Goodman) 和邁克爾·施維爾納 (Michael Schwerner) 被謀殺而臭名昭著。 1964年。

理查森寫道,自 20 世紀 50 年代以來,保守派一直在努力摧毀“自由派共識的積極政府,自 20 世紀 80 年代以來,共和黨政客們已經對其進行了攻擊”,但仍然“讓政府的大部分內容完好無損”。 隨著2016年特朗普當選,這個國家終於“上任了一位將利用權力摧毀國家的總統”。 共和黨人為“結束商業監管和社會服務及其所需的稅收”奮鬥了 50 年。 特朗普走得更遠,“從寡頭政治到威權主義的飛躍”。

理查森令人耳目一新地直接談到了法西斯榜樣對特朗普及其馬加運動的重要性。 2020 年,第一夫人梅拉尼婭·特朗普 (Melania Trump) 在白宮舉辦共和黨全國代表大會時,身穿“讓人想起納粹製服的連衣裙”。 而且,理查森寫道,彌天大謊是納粹的“關鍵宣傳工具”,希特勒本人在《我的奮鬥》中對此進行了解釋,特朗普可能將這本書放在特朗普大廈的床頭櫃上(或者可能是希特勒的演講集) )。

林登·約翰遜 (Lyndon B Johnson) 在華盛頓美國國會大廈簽署了 1965 年投票權法案。

理查森甚至利用二戰期間美國情報機構戰略服務辦公室對希特勒的心理分析來提醒我們與特朗普的相似之處。 戰略情報局表示,希特勒的“主要規則是:永遠不要讓公眾冷靜下來; 絕不承認過失或錯誤; 永遠不要承認你的敵人可能有一些優點……永遠不要接受責備; 一次隻專注於一個敵人,並把所有出錯的事情歸咎於他”。

但理查森的書不僅僅是對共和黨邪惡的背誦。 這也是對進步成功的慶祝。 她提醒我們,在越南毀掉他的總統任期之前,林登·約翰遜創造了令人難以置信的記錄。 國會在一次會議上通過了令人震驚的 84 項法律。 約翰遜的“偉大社會”包括 1965 年投票權法案; 《中小學教育法》,為公立學校提供聯邦援助; 推出Head Start,為低收入家庭兒童提供早期教育; 創建醫療保險的社會保障修正案; 增加福利金; 租金補貼; 1965 年《水質法》; 以及國家藝術基金會和國家人文基金會。

這些法律產生了顯著的影響。 “1960 年有四千萬美國人很窮”; 到 1969 年,這一數字已降至 2400 萬。

1964 年,約翰遜在向密歇根大學的畢業生發表講話時,使用了至今仍適用的話語:“無論好壞,你們這一代人已被曆史指定……帶領美國走向新時代……你們可以幫助建立一個社會,滿足人們的需求。” 道德和精神的需要,可以在民族生活中實現。”

約翰遜拒絕了那些“膽怯的靈魂”,他們相信“我們注定要擁有沒有靈魂的財富。 我們有能力塑造我們想要的文明。 但如果我們要建設這樣的社會,我們需要你們的意誌、你們的勞動、你們的心。”

“美國民主的終結”:希瑟·考克斯·理查森談特朗普的曆史性威脅

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/oct/07/american-democracy-heather-cox-richardson-trump-biden

這位曆史學家和 Substack 超級巨星表示,美國正處於內戰以來從未見過的危險之中,而喬·拜登是其最好的捍衛者

作者:David Smith,華盛頓@smithinamerica,2023 年 10 月 7 日

凱文·西弗裏德做了叛軍永遠做不到的事情。 2021 年 1 月 6 日,這位 53 歲的男子舉著南方邦聯旗幟穿過美國國會大廈。 對於希瑟·考克斯·理查森等研究美國內戰的曆史學家來說,這就像對太陽神經叢的打擊。

“特朗普列車”對拜登巴士的襲擊如何預示 1 月 6 日 — — 並呼應血腥曆史

“內戰的全部意義在於確保戰旗永遠不會對美國國會大廈產生影響,”她在緬因州奧古斯塔附近通過 Zoom 說道。 “在損失了近 60 億美元和 600,000 人生命的情況下,他們把那麵旗幟拒之門外,然後,我很抱歉,但那些混蛋把它帶進來了。我看到了這一點,而且受到的打擊比任何其他都要大 對我來說,這是曆史上的一個時刻,作為一名曆史學家,我和我一樣深刻地經曆了那場內戰。”

60 歲的理查森是波士頓學院的曆史學教授,被《紐約時報》形容為時事通訊平台 Substack 的“突破之星”,她的《來自美國人的來信》在該平台上擁有超過 100 萬訂閱者。 她在 Facebook 上擁有 170 萬粉絲,而她在 X(以前稱為 Twitter)上的簡介則寫道:“曆史學家。 作者。 教授。 脾氣暴躁的萌芽者。 我研究美國形象與現實之間的對比,尤其是在政治領域。”

讀者們歡迎理查森的能力,就像肯·伯恩斯、雷切爾·馬多和喬恩·米查姆一樣,他通過向我們保證我們以前來過這裏並且幸存下來來理解特朗普時代的混亂。 她是 Vox Media 播客《Now & Then》的聯合主持人,也是有關內戰、重建、鍍金時代和美國西部的獲獎書籍的作者。

現在,她推出了《民主覺醒:美國狀況筆記》,這是對世界上最富有的民主國家如何在唐納德·特朗普的幫助下搖搖欲墜的獨裁主義懸崖的深思熟慮的研究。 事情完成了,她似乎鬆了口氣。

“每天寫 1,200 個字本身就是一件苦差事,然後在上麵寫一本書幾乎要了我的命,”理查森承認。 “寫這本書的初衷是收集一些文章來回答每個人一直問我的問題——什麽是南方戰略? 各方如何倒戈? ——但很快我就意識到這是一個關於民主如何被破壞的故事。”

其中至關重要的是,如何利用曆史和語言來分裂人口,並讓一些人相信,他們在經濟、社會或文化上落後的唯一原因是因為敵人。 理查森認為,解藥是一段明確的民主曆史,

“基於這樣的理念:邊緣化人群始終將《獨立宣言》的原則置於我們曆史的前沿和中心”。

她並沒有手下留情。 她的序言指出,美國民主的危機悄然蔓延到了許多人身上,並與阿道夫·希特勒通過政治利益和鞏固實現的崛起進行了直接比較。

“民主國家更多地死於投票箱,而不是死於槍口,”她寫道。

1 月 6 日,一麵邦聯旗幟在參議院外飄揚。1 月 6 日,一麵邦聯旗幟在參議院外飄揚。攝影:Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA

她認為,美國目前的困境始於同一個十年:20 世紀 30 年代。 就在那時,厭惡富蘭克林·羅斯福新政中的商業法規的共和黨人開始考慮與南方民主黨人結盟,他們發現羅斯福的計劃不夠種族隔離,而西部民主黨人則對聯邦政府保護土地和水的想法感到不滿。 1937年,這個邪惡的聯盟提出了一份“保守黨宣言”。

理查森說:“當消息被泄露給報紙時,他們都像老鼠一樣逃跑,因為共和黨人認為從外部對抗羅斯福比嚐試與民主黨人合作更好,而且民主黨人不想批評他們自己的總統 。 他們都否認這一點,但這份宣言在全國各地重印在親商業和種族主義的報紙和小冊子上,而且它的影響力很長。

“他們想要擺脫商業監管,他們想要擺脫基本的社會安全網並將所有這些都送回教會,他們想要擺脫羅斯福正在參與的基礎設施項目,因為他們認為成本太高 稅收,而且應該是私人投資。 他們並沒有真正談論公民權利,因為羅斯福實際上隻是在新政計劃中調侃平等的想法,但他們確實說他們想要自治和州權利,這是“我們不想要公民權利”的代碼。 權利。’”

這四項原則將成為巴裏·戈德華特和羅納德·裏根等共和黨人的藍圖,語言有時直接映射。 理查森認為,20 世紀 70 年代初,共和黨人開始推行反民主策略,例如不公正地劃分選區和司法右移。 他們還花了幾十年的時間發動“信息戰”。

一個典型的例子是 1998 年對比爾·克林頓的彈劾,試圖讓公眾相信他不是合法總統。

“那個時代正是國會開始調查抹黑民主黨的時期,”理查森說。 “這些調查沒有發現任何結果,但這並不重要,因為它讓美國人民知道了一些東西確實存在。”

特朗普登場了,他是一個吹牛大王,將虛假信息變成了商界的一種藝術形式,並成為了電視真人秀明星。 他向基督教保守派承諾,他將任命右翼法官; 他向財政保守派承諾將減稅; 他向白人工人階級承諾,他理解他們的怨恨。 他把這個聚會變成了他自己的聚會。

理查森說:“建製派共和黨人利用墮胎問題,利用‘民主黨是邪惡的’來繼續掌權,並實施了本質上是對 1933 年以來一直存在的聯邦政府的自由主義破壞。但我不知道 我不認為他們打算放棄自己的權力。 特朗普看了一眼,說道:“我要繞過你,直接繞過這個問題。”他之所以能做到這一點,是因為他是一位出色的推銷員,而且他實施了一些非常不同的東西。

“特朗普是一個有趣的人物,因為他不是政治家。 他是一名推銷員,這是一個重要的區別,因為在 2016 年,他為美國的某一部分人舉起了一麵鏡子,這部分人因 1981 年以來通過的立法而受到傷害,並給了他們他們想要的東西。

“如果你還記得 2016 年,他是當時舞台上在經濟問題上最溫和的共和黨人。 他談到了基礎設施、公平稅收、更便宜和更好的醫療保健以及恢複製造業。 他談到了所有這些經濟問題,但他也談到了種族主義和性別歧視,當然這就是他真正想要的,他可以利用的憤怒。

“利用這種憤怒對於他打造威權運動至關重要,因為至少在美國,威權右翼運動始終來自街頭暴力,而不是上層,以及法西斯主義應該是什麽樣子的想法。 他故意利用了他可能因種族主義和性別歧視而引發的憤怒情緒。”

理查森再次毫不羞澀地援引了納粹的比較,她引用了傳播學學者邁克爾·索科洛的觀察,即特朗普在 2020 年國情谘文中展示了他可以“讓受傷的個人走向榮耀”,這反映了希特勒的表現,

反映了希特勒的表演,他試圖展示一種改變生活的近乎神奇的力量。

特朗普的崛起可以說是意誌的勝利。 共和黨政客幾乎沒有提供任何辯護。

“如果有一個群體在這一切中激怒了我,那就是參議員,”理查森說。 “共和黨參議員隨時都可以阻止特朗普,他們喜歡減稅,然後他們就害怕他的追隨者。 他們應該在2015年、2016年、2017年阻止他,現在他們可以阻止他,但他們不會。 我厭倦了聽到這些人說:‘好吧,我們知道他很糟糕。’謝謝你們!”

盡管受到 91 項刑事指控,特朗普仍在共和黨初選中占據主導地位。 民調顯示他與拜登並駕齊驅。 這看起來像是一場勢均力敵的事情。 特朗普連任對美國意味著什麽?

“美國民主的終結。 我對此毫無疑問,而且他說得很清楚。 你看一下“2025計劃”,它有一千頁紙講述了如何解散自1933年以來保護公民權利、提供基本社會安全網、規範商業和促進基礎設施的聯邦政府。他2024年競選活動的主題是報複。

“我認為人們現在不明白,如果唐納德·特朗普再次獲勝,我們將讓那些想要燒毀一切的人掌權。 我的意思是,他們肯定想傷害他們的敵人,但隻要他們能夠控製,他們不在乎這是否意味著北約解體,或者美國人正在挨餓或死於流行病。 隻要有人受傷,對他們來說就足夠了。”

拜登了解這種威脅。 上個月,他在亞利桑那州鳳凰城再次發出嚴厲警告。 總統的支持率很低,一些民主黨人也焦躁不安,但理查森以曆史學家的眼光審視了他的記錄。

2022 年 2 月,喬·拜登和希瑟·考克斯·理查森在白宮中國廳談話。

2022 年 2 月,喬·拜登和希瑟·考克斯·理查森在白宮中國廳談話。攝影:世界政治檔案館 (WPA)/Alamy

“拜登是一個迷人的人物,因為他是極少數能夠遇到這一刻的人之一。 老實說,我不是拜登的支持者。 我以為我們需要一個新的、更有進取心的人,但我完全承認我錯了,因為他首先對外交事務有非常深刻的了解,而我傾向於詆毀這一點。

“我認為在 2020 年這並不重要,我的想法還能更錯嗎? 我想不是。 這確實很重要,而且仍然很重要,因為共和黨人現在退出烏克蘭的原因之一是,他們認識到,盡管美國報紙沒有報道烏克蘭問題,但烏克蘭實際上正在取得重要進展。 烏克蘭人的勝利確實會促進拜登的連任,共和黨人認識到這一點,並且願意破壞這一點,隻要這意味著他們可以在這裏重新掌權。 他對外交事務的理解是關鍵。

“拜登的另一件事是,他在交易方麵的非凡技巧使這屆國內政府成為至少自偉大社會和可能自新政以來最有效的政府。 你想想特朗普永遠無法讓基礎設施獲得國會通過的事實,盡管每個人都想要它。

“這是一個巨大的問題,但所有這一切背後的全部論點是,他需要證明政府可以為人民服務,40 年來我們一直認為政府在與我們作對。 這對他來說是一個越來越難提出的理由,因為媒體沒有注意到這一點。

“進入 2024 年的問題是:人們會理解拜登創建了一個為人民服務的政府嗎? 無論你個人是否喜歡其政策,他都在試圖利用該政府以一種自 1981 年以來共和黨從未做過的方式來滿足人民的需求。他是一位變革性的總統。 是否足夠,我們將在 14 個月後知道答案。”

拜登下個月就滿81歲了,他也是最年長的總統。 調查顯示,許多民主黨人認為他太老了。 理查森不買賬。

“他比塵土還老; 他們都是。 但年齡對於他來說其實也是一種好處。 首先,這對很多年長的白人來說沒有威脅,其次,他確實擁有 40 歲的人所沒有的聯係。

“我不斷地觀察他,不斷地閱讀他的文章,我見過他並采訪過他。 他精神狀態很好。 隨著年齡的增長,當我執行任務時,我不會錯過任何一個技巧。 在此之後我要去雜貨店,很有可能我會遇到一個我很熟悉但不記得他們名字的人。 就是那樣子。”

 

理查森在對 19 世紀曆史的挖掘和對當今熱門政治故事的連續評論之間遊走。 周三,她的 Substack 專欄專門討論了眾議院議長凱文·麥卡錫 (Kevin McCarthy) 的下台。

她反思道:“像我這樣的人所做的一件事就是為人們在沼澤中提供堅實的基礎。 也就是說,在多年無法分辨什麽是真實的之後,有人說,“這發生了,這發生了,這發生了,這裏有引文,你可以去檢查,事情就是這樣運作的,”是非常 安慰。

“也許這隻是我的問題,因為當我每天早上寫作時,我自己都不知道答案。 但是,例如,當我想知道委員會中發生了什麽時,我實際上會進行研究並說這就是發生的事情,這樣我就可以在晚上睡覺時感覺腳在我下麵。

“所以,這部分是對曆史的探索,但同時也是一種讓你再次了解世界的感覺,當你被聽證會、謊言和所有這些廢話轟炸時,這是很難做到的。 事實上,我認為它的意義與其說是關於曆史,不如說是關於回歸基於現實的社區。”

黑色星期五購物:美國總統喬·拜登買了一本書
2023 年 11 月 25 日,

傳統的“黑色星期五”購物活動標誌著美國假日購物季的開始,零售商提供大幅折扣以吸引顧客。 今年的活動是在經濟不確定的情況下舉行的,商店提供了更大的折扣,以吸引一直在應對持續通脹和 Covid-19 大流行持續影響的消費者。

在黑色星期五,前往購物中心和商店的購物者會受到各種激勵措施,從香檳到虛擬現實體驗和傳統的上門促銷。

零售商的這些努力旨在吸引今年對不必要的支出和衝動購買日益謹慎的顧客。

隨著儲蓄減少和信用卡債務增加,消費者感到手頭拮據。 盡管通貨膨脹略有緩和,但各種物品的成本,包括肉類和住房等必需品的成本,仍比三年前高得多。

繼“黑色星期五”之後,零售業也正在為“網絡星期一”做準備,這是另一項針對在線購物者的重大銷售活動。

美國總統拜登還在楠塔基特島進行了黑色星期五購物,全球都在關注加沙地帶為期四天的休戰期間哈馬斯釋放人質。 總統在兒子亨特·拜登的陪同下參觀了一家書店,秉承了家庭傳統。 他說:“不去書店就不能來。 我們有一個傳統。”

在瘋狂購物之前,拜登向全國發表了關於人質危機的講話,表示對 10 月 7 日以色列南部襲擊中被劫為人質的多達 9 名美國公民的釋放存在不確定性。 “我們不知道什麽時候會發生……我希望並期望它會很快發生,”拜登說。

哈馬斯承諾在未來三天內再釋放 26 名人質,即約 240 名人質中的 50 名人質,但這些人質的身份仍不清楚。

據《紐約郵報》報道,亨特·拜登在特拉華州麵臨聯邦槍支指控,在洛杉磯麵臨潛在的稅務指控,他在盜賊兄弟會餐廳用餐後和父親一起去購物。 拜登一家在度假期間住在億萬富翁大衛·魯賓斯坦的家裏。
拜登總統在購物時購買了曆史學家希瑟·考克斯·理查森的《民主覺醒》一書。 第一夫人吉爾·拜登向記者提到,一家人過得很開心。

Democracy Awakening: Notes on the State of America 

By Heather Cox Richardson (Author) 

New York Times Bestseller

“Engaging and highly accessible.”—Boston Globe

“A vibrant, and essential history of America’s unending, enraging and utterly compelling struggle since its founding to live up to its own best ideals… It’s both a cause for hope, and a call to arms.”–Jane Mayer, author Dark Money

From historian and author of the popular daily newsletter LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN, a vital narrative that explains how America, once  a beacon of democracy, now teeters on the brink of autocracy — and how we can turn back.

In the midst of the impeachment crisis of 2019, Heather Cox Richardson launched a daily Facebook essay providing the historical background of the daily torrent of news. It soon turned into a newsletter and its readership ballooned to more than 2 million dedicated readers who rely on her plainspoken and informed take on the present and past in America. 

In Democracy Awakening, Richardson crafts a compelling and original narrative, explaining how, over the decades, a small group of wealthy people have made war on American ideals. By weaponizing language and promoting false history they have led us into authoritarianism — creating a disaffected population and then promising to recreate an imagined past where those people could feel important again. She argues that taking our country back starts by remembering the elements of the nation’s true history that marginalized Americans have always upheld. Their dedication to the principles on which this nation was founded has enabled us to renew and expand our commitment to democracy in the past. Richardson sees this history as a roadmap for the nation’s future.

Richardson’s talent is to wrangle our giant, meandering, and confusing news feed into a coherent story that singles out what we should pay attention to, what the precedents are, and what possible paths lie ahead. In her trademark calm prose, she is realistic and optimistic about the future of democracy. Her command of history allows her to pivot effortlessly from the Founders to the abolitionists to Reconstruction to Goldwater to Mitch McConnell, highlighting the political legacies of the New Deal, the lingering fears of socialism, the death of the liberal consensus and birth of “movement conservatism.”  

Many books tell us what has happened over the last five years. Democracy Awakening explains how we got to this perilous point, what our history really tells us about ourselves, and what the future of democracy can be.

Democracy Awakening review: Heather Cox Richardson's necessary US history

The Boston College professor offers a valuable primer on Republican extremism – but also progressive achievement

   8 Oct 2023 

In a media landscape so polluted by politicians addicted to cheap thrills (Matt Gaetz, Marjorie Taylor Greene, the Orange Monster) and the pundits addicted to them (Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Steve Bannon), the success of Heather Cox Richardson is much more than a blast of fresh air. It’s a bona fide miracle.

The Boston College history professor started writing her newsletter, Letters from an American, almost four years ago. Today her daily dose of common sense about the day’s news, wrapped in an elegant package of American history, has a remarkable 1.2 million subscribers, making her the most popular writer on Substack. Not since Edward P Morgan captivated the liberal elite with his nightly 15-minute broadcasts in the 1960s has one pundit been so important to so many progressive Americans at once.

In the age of social media, Richardson’s success is counterintuitive. When she was profiled by Ben Smith in the New York Times a couple of years ago, Smith confessed he was so addicted to Twitter he rarely found the time to open her “rich summaries” of the news. When he told Bill Moyers, one of Richardson’s earliest promoters, the same thing, the great commentator explained: “You live in a world of thunderstorms, and she watches the waves come in.”

Richardson’s latest book shares all the intelligence of her newsletter. It doesn’t have the news value of her internet contributions but it is an excellent primer for anyone who needs the important facts of the last 150 years of American history – and how they got us to the sorry place we inhabit today.

Like other recent books, including The Destructionists by Dana Milbank, Richardson’s new volume reminds us that far from being an outlier, Donald Trump was inevitable after 70 years of Republican pandering to big business, racism and Christian nationalism.

Heather Cox Richardson interviews Joe Biden in 2022.Heather Cox Richardson interviews Joe Biden in 2022. 

So many direct lines can be drawn from the dawn of modern conservatism to the insanity of the Freedom Caucus today. It was William F Buckley Jr, the most famous conservative pundit of his era, who in 1951 attacked universities for teaching “secularism and collectivism” and promoted the canard that liberals were basically communists. Among Buckley’s mortal enemies, Richardson writes, were everyone “who believed that the government should regulate business, protect social welfare, promote infrastructure and protect civil rights” – and who “believed in fact-based argument”.

In place of the liberal consensus that emerged with Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal, Buckley and his henchmen wanted a new “orthodoxy of religion and the ideology of free markets”. A few years later, the Republican presidential nominee Barry Goldwater ran on a platform opposing the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Four years after that, Richard Nixon’s Southern Strategy included promises to slow down the desegregation the supreme court had ordered 14 years before.

In one of the most notorious dog whistles of all time, Ronald Reagan began his 1980 presidential campaign by declaring his love for states’ rights in Philadelphia, Mississippi – made infamous by the murders of the civil rights workers James Chaney, Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner in 1964.

Since the 1950s, Richardson writes, conservatives have fought to destroy “the active government of the liberal consensus, and since the 1980s, Republican politicians [have] hacked away at it” but still “left much of the government intact”. With Trump’s election in 2016, the nation had finally “put into office a president who would use his power to destroy it”. Republicans fought for 50 years for an “end to business regulation and social services and the taxes they required”. Trump went even further by “making the leap from oligarchy to authoritarianism”.

Richardson is refreshingly direct about the importance of the fascist example to Trump and his Maga movement. When he used the White House to host the Republican convention in 2020, the first lady, Melania Trump, wore a “dress that evoked a Nazi uniform”. And, Richardson writes, the big lie was a “key propaganda tool” for the Nazis, which Hitler himself explained in Mein Kampf, the book Trump may have kept on his night table at Trump Tower (or maybe it was a collection of Hitler’s speeches).

Lyndon B Johnson signs the Voting Rights Act of 1965, at the US Capitol in Washington.

Lyndon B Johnson signs the Voting Rights Act of 1965, at the US Capitol in Washington. 

Richardson even uses the psychological profile of Hitler by the Office of Strategic Services, the US intelligence agency during the second world war, to remind us of similarities to Trump. The OSS said Hitler’s “primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy … never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong”.

But Richardson’s book isn’t just a recitation of the evil of Republicans. It is also a celebration of progressive successes. She reminds us that before Vietnam ruined his presidency, Lyndon Johnson compiled an incredible record. In one session, Congress passed an astonishing 84 laws. Johnson’s “Great Society” included the Voting Rights Act of 1965; the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, which provided federal aid for public schools; launched Head Start for the early education of low-income children; the social security amendments that created Medicare; increased welfare payments; rent subsidies; the Water Quality Act of 1965; and the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities.

These laws had a measurable impact. “Forty million Americans were poor in 1960”; by 1969, that had dropped to 24 million.

Addressing graduates of the University of Michigan in 1964, Johnson used words that are apt today:“For better or worse, your generation has been appointed by history to … lead America toward a new age … You can help build a society where the demands of morality, and the needs of the spirit, can be realized in the life of the nation.”

Johnson rejected the “timid souls” who believed “we are condemned to a soulless wealth. We have the power to shape the civilization that we want. But we need your will, your labor, your hearts, if we are to build that kind of society.”

'An end of American democracy': Heather Cox Richardson on Trump's historic threat

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/oct/07/american-democracy-heather-cox-richardson-trump-biden

The historian and Substack superstar says the US is in peril not seen since the civil war – and Joe Biden is its best defender

By  in Washington @smithinamerica   7 Oct 2023 

Kevin Seefried did what the rebel army never could. On 6 January 2021, the 53-year-old carried a Confederate flag through the US Capitol. For historians of the American civil war such as Heather Cox Richardson, it was like a blow to the solar plexus.

How a ‘Trump train’ attack on a Biden bus foreshadowed January 6 – and echoed bloody history

“The whole point of a civil war was to make sure that battle flag never had influence in the United States Capitol,” she says, via Zoom from near Augusta, Maine. “With a loss of almost $6bn and 600,000 lives, they kept that flag out of the Capitol, and then, I’m sorry, but those fuckers brought it in. I saw that, and the gut-punch was larger than any other moment in history, for me as a historian who has lived that civil war as deeply as I have.”

Richardson, 60, a history professor at Boston College, has been described by the New York Times as “the breakout star” of the newsletter platform Substack, where her Letters from an American has more than a million subscribers. She has 1.7 million followers on Facebook while her bio on X, formerly known as Twitter, says: “Historian. Author. Professor. Budding Curmudgeon. I study the contrast between image and reality in America, especially in politics.”

Readers welcome Richardson’s ability, like Ken BurnsRachel Maddow and Jon Meacham, to make sense of Trump-era chaos by assuring us we have been here before and survived. She is the cohost of Now & Then, a Vox Media podcast, and author of award-winning books about the civil war, Reconstruction, the Gilded Age and the American west.

Now she offers Democracy Awakening: Notes on the State of America, a thoughtful study of how the world’s wealthiest democracy came to teeter on the precipice of authoritarianism with an assist from Donald Trump. She seems relieved it’s done.

“Writing 1,200 words every day is itself a chore and then to write a book on top of it damn near killed me,” Richardson admits. “The reason for the book originally was to pull together a number of essays answering the questions that everybody asks me all the time – What is the southern strategy? How did the parties switch sides? – but very quickly I came to realise that it was the story of how democracies can be undermined.”

Crucial in that is how history and language can be used to divide a population and convince some the only reason they have fallen behind economically, socially or culturally is because of an enemy. The antidote, Richardson argues, is an explicitly democratic history “based in the idea that marginalised populations have always kept the principles of the Declaration of Independence front and centre in our history”.

She is not pulling punches. Her preface observes that the crisis in American democracy crept up on many and draws a direct comparison with the rise of Adolf Hitler, achieved through political gains and consolidation.

“Democracies die more often through the ballot box than at gunpoint,” she writes.

A Confederate flag flies outside the Senate chamber on January 6.A Confederate flag flies outside the Senate chamber on January 6. Photograph: Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA

America’s current malaise, she argues, began in the same decade: the 1930s. It was then that Republicans who loathed business regulations in Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal began to consider an alliance with southern Democrats, who found Roosevelt’s programmes insufficiently segregationist, and western Democrats who resented the idea of the federal government protecting land and water. In 1937, this unholy coalition came up with a “Conservative Manifesto”.

Richardson says: “When it gets leaked to the newspapers, they all run like rats from it because the Republicans decide it’s better to fight FDR from the outside than try and work with Democrats, and Democrats don’t want to be criticising their own president. They all disavow it but that manifesto gets reprinted all over the country in pro-business and racist newspapers and pamphlets and it has very long legs.

“They want to get rid of business regulation, they want to get rid of a basic social safety net and send all that back to the churches, they want to get rid of infrastructure projects that FDR is engaging in because they think it costs too much in tax dollars and it should be private investment. They don’t really talk about civil rights because because FDR is really just flirting with the idea of equality in the New Deal programmes but they do say they want home rule and states’ rights, which is code for “We don’t want civil rights.’”

These four principles would become a blueprint for Republicans such as Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan, language sometimes mapping directly. In the early 1970s, Richardson contends, Republicans began to pursue anti-democratic strategies such as gerrymandering and shifting the judiciary rightwards. They also spent decades waging an “information war”.

A prime example was the 1998 impeachment of Bill Clinton, an attempt to convince the public he was not a legitimate president.

“That era is when congressional investigations to smear the Democrats take off,” Richardson says. “Those investigations don’t turn up anything but it doesn’t matter because it keeps it in front of the American people – the idea that something is there.”

Enter Trump, a blowhard who turned disinformation into an artform in the business world and become a reality TV star. He promised Christian conservatives he would appoint rightwing judges; he promised fiscal conservatives he would cut taxes; he promised the white working class he understood their resentments. He made the party his own.

Richardson says: “The establishment Republicans played the issue of abortion, played the issue of ‘the Democrats are evil’ to stay in power and enact what was essentially a libertarian destruction of the federal government that had been in place since 1933. But I don’t think that they intended to give up their power. Trump took one look at that and said, ‘I’m going to bypass you and go right around this.’ He could do that because he was such a good salesman and he put in place something very different.

“Trump is an interesting character because he’s not a politician. He’s a salesman and that is an important distinction because in 2016 he held up a mirror to a certain part of the American population, one that had been gutted by the legislation that has passed since 1981, and gave them what they wanted.

“If you remember in 2016, he was the most moderate Republican on that stage on economic issues. He talked about infrastructure, fair taxes, cheaper and better healthcare, bringing back manufacturing. He talked about all those economic issues but then he also had the racism and the sexism and of course that’s what he was really going for, that anger that he could tap into.

“Tapping into that anger was crucial to him forging an authoritarian movement, because at least in the United States the authoritarian rightwing movements have always come from street violence rather than the top and from ideas of what fascism should look like. He quite deliberately tapped into that emotional anger that he could spark with racism and sexism.”

Richardson is again not bashful about invoking the Nazi comparison when she cites the communications scholar Michael Socolow’s observation that Trump’s 2020 State of the Union address, in which he demonstrated that he could “raise hurting individuals up to glory”, mirrored the performances of Hitler, who sought to show an almost magical power to change lives.

Trump’s rise could be described as a triumph of the will. Republican politicians offered little defence.

“If there is one group that infuriates me in all of this, it is the senators,” Richardson says. “The Republican senators could have stopped Trump at any moment and they liked the tax cuts and then they became frightened of his followers. They should have stopped him in 2015, in 2016, in 2017, and they can stop him now and they won’t. I’m so tired of hearing these people saying, ‘Well, we knew he was bad.’ Thank you for that!”

Despite 91 criminal charges, Trump dominates the Republican primary. Polls show him neck-and-neck with Biden. It is looking like a close-run thing. What would a second Trump term mean for America?

“An end of American democracy. I have absolutely no doubt about that, and he’s made it very clear. You look at Project 2025, which is a thousand pages on how you dismantle the federal government that has protected civil rights, provided a basic social safety net, regulated business and promoted infrastructure since 1933. The theme of his 2024 campaign is retribution.

“I don’t think people understand now that, if Donald Trump wins again, what we’re going to put in power is those people who want to burn it all down. By that I mean they want to hurt their enemies for sure but, so long as they can be in control, they don’t care if it means that Nato falls apart or that Americans are starving or dying from pandemic diseases. As long as somebody gets hurt, that’s enough for them.”

Biden understands the threat. Last month in Phoenix, Arizona, he issued another stark warning. The president’s approval rating is anaemic and some Democrats are restless but Richardson casts a historian’s eye on his record.

Joe Biden and Heather Cox Richardson talk in the China Room of the White House, in February 2022.

Joe Biden and Heather Cox Richardson talk in the China Room of the White House, in February 2022. Photograph: World Politics Archive (WPA)/Alamy

“Biden is a fascinating character in that in that he is one of the very few people who could have met this moment. I was not a Biden supporter, to be honest. I thought we needed somebody new and much more aggressive, and yet I completely admit I was wrong because he has, first of all, a very deep understanding of foreign affairs, which I tended to denigrate.

“I thought in 2020 that was not going to matter and could I have been more wrong? I think not. That really mattered and continues to matter in that one of the reasons Republicans are backing off of Ukraine right now is that they recognise, for all that it’s not hitting the United States newspapers, Ukraine is actually making important gains. A win from the Ukrainians would really boost Biden’s re-election and the Republicans recognise that and are willing to scuttle that so long as it means they can regain power here. His foreign affairs understanding has been been key.

“The other thing about Biden is his extraordinary skill at dealmaking has made this domestic administration the most effective since at least the Great Society and probably the New Deal. You think about the fact that Trump could never get infrastructure through Congress, even though everybody wanted it.

“That has been huge but the whole argument behind all that has been he needs to prove that the government can work for people after 40 years in which we had a government that we felt was working against us. That has been a harder and harder case for him to make because the media is not picking that up.

“The question going into 2024 is: will people understand that Biden has created a government that does work for the people? Whether or not you like its policies personally, he is trying to use that government to meet the needs of the people in a way that the Republicans haven’t done since 1981. He is a transformative president. Whether or not it’s going to be enough, we’re going to find out in 14 months.”

Biden, who turns 81 next month, is also the oldest president. Surveys show many Democrats think he is too old. Richardson is not buying.

“He’s older than dirt; they all are. But age is actually a benefit for him. First of all it’s non-threatening to a lot of older white people, and second of all he does have those connections that you just simply don’t have if you’re 40.

“I watch him constantly, I read him constantly, and I have met him and interviewed him. He’s fine mentally. As I get older, when I’m on task, I don’t miss a trick. I’m going to leave to go to the grocery store after this, and the chances are very good I will run into somebody I know quite well and not remember their name. That’s just the way it is.”

Richardson glides between excavations of 19th-century history and a running commentary on the hot political story of the day. On Wednesday, her Substack column was devoted to the ousting of the House speaker, Kevin McCarthy.

She reflects: “One of the things that people like me do is give people firm ground to stand on in a swamp. That is, after years of not being able to tell what is real, to have somebody say, ‘This happened, this happened, this happened and here are citations that you can go to check, and this is how things work,’ is very comforting.

“Maybe that’s just me because when I write I don’t know the answers myself every morning. But when I want to know, for example, what happened in the committee, I actually do the research and say this is what happened so that I can sleep at night feeling like my feet are under me.

“So it’s partly a search for history but it’s also partly a search to feel like you understand the world again, which is hard to do when you’re being bombarded with hearings and lies and all that kind of crap. I actually think that the meaning of it is less about history than it is about returning to a reality based community.”

Black Friday shopping: US President Joe Biden buys a book

Nov 25, 2023, 

The traditional "Black Friday" shopping event marked the beginning of the holiday shopping season in the United States, with retailers offering significant discounts to attract customers. This year's event, taking place amid economic uncertainties, saw stores providing even deeper discounts to draw in consumers who have been dealing with persistent inflation and the ongoing impact of the Covid-19 pandemic.

On Black Friday, shoppers who headed to malls and stores were greeted with a variety of incentives ranging from champagne to virtual reality experiences and traditional doorbuster deals.

These efforts by retailers were aimed at attracting customers who are increasingly cautious about unnecessary spending and impulse purchases this year.

With dwindling savings and rising credit card debts, consumers are feeling the pinch. Despite a slight ease in inflation, the cost of various items, including essentials like meat and housing, remains significantly higher compared to three years ago.

Following "Black Friday," the retail industry is also gearing up for "Cyber Monday," another major sales event aimed at online shoppers.

US President Biden also engaged in Black Friday shopping in Nantucket amidst global attention on the release of hostages by Hamas during a four-day truce in the Gaza Strip. The President, accompanied by his son Hunter Biden, visited a bookstore, adhering to a family tradition. He remarked, “Can’t come without going to the bookstore. We’ve got a tradition.”

Before his shopping spree, Biden addressed the nation about the hostage crisis, expressing uncertainty about the release of up to nine American citizens taken hostage in the October 7 attacks in southern Israel. “We don’t know when that will occur… It is my hope and expectation it will be soon,” Biden said.

Hamas has committed to freeing an additional 26 hostages, totaling 50 out of approximately 240, over the next three days, though the identities of these individuals remain unknown.

According to a report in New York post, Hunter Biden, facing federal gun charges in Delaware and potential tax charges in Los Angeles, joined his father for shopping after dining at the Brotherhood of Thieves restaurant. The Bidens are staying at the home of billionaire David Rubenstein during their vacation.
While shopping, President Biden purchased the book “Democracy Awakening” by historian Heather Cox Richardson. The First Lady, Jill Biden, mentioned to reporters that the family was enjoying their time.

Heather Cox Richardson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Heather Cox Richardson
Richardson in 2016
Born 1962 (age 60–61)
Nationality American
Occupation Professor of history at Boston College
 
Academic background
Alma mater Harvard University (B.A.Ph.D.)
Academic advisors David Herbert Donald and William Gienapp

Heather Cox Richardson is an American academic historian, author, and educator. She is a professor of history at Boston College, where she teaches courses on the American Civil War, the Reconstruction Era, the American West, and the Plains Indians.[1] She previously taught history at MIT and the University of Massachusetts Amherst.

Richardson has authored seven books on history and politics. In 2014, she founded a popular history website, werehistory.org. Between 2017 and 2018, she co-hosted the NPR podcast Freak Out and Carry On.[3] More recently, Richardson started publishing Letters from an American, a nightly newsletter that chronicles current events in the larger context of American history.[4] The newsletter accrued over one million subscribers, making her, as of December 2020, the most successful individual author of a paid publication on Substack.[5] Richardson also co-hosts the podcast Now & Then with fellow historian Joanne B. Freeman.[6] In February 2022, Richardson interviewed U.S. President Joe Biden.

Early life and education

Born in Chicago in 1962 and raised in Maine, Richardson attended Phillips Exeter Academy in Exeter, New Hampshire.[8][9] She received both her B.A. and Ph.D. from Harvard University, where she studied under David Herbert Donald and William Gienapp.

Writing career

Richardson interviewing President Joe Biden in February 2022

The Greatest Nation of the Earth (1997)

Richardson’s first book, The Greatest Nation of the Earth (1997), stemmed from her dissertation at Harvard University. Inspired by Eric Foner’s work on pre-Civil War Republican ideology, Richardson analyzed Republican economic policies during the war. She contended that their efforts to create an activist federal government during the Civil War marked a continuation of Republican free labor ideology. These policies, such as war bonds and greenbacks or the Land Grant College Act and the Homestead Act, revolutionized the role of the federal government in the U.S. economy. At the same time, these actions laid the groundwork for the Republican Party's shift to big business after the Civil War.[10]

According to Professor James L. Huston at Oklahoma State University:

For nineteenth-century political historians, this will be an important book with crucial insights into the nature of the Republican Party. Richardson's attention to political economy offers a refreshing vantage point from which to assess Civil War legislation, and her willingness to delve deeply into economic doctrines is commendable. Not the least of her accomplishments is a more realistic appraisal of the Republicans, revealing their agricultural bias and their distrust of monopoly and hierarchy.... At times, Richardson's discussion of economic principles is insightful and perceptive; at other times the discussion is shallow and requires more refinement.[11]

The Death of Reconstruction (2001)[edit]

Four years later, Richardson extended her study of Republican policy into the postwar period with The Death of Reconstruction (2001).[12] Unlike other historians, she focused her analysis of the period on the "Northern abandonment of Reconstruction". Building on the earlier work of C. Vann Woodward, she argued that a more complete understanding of the period required appreciation of class, not only race. As Reconstruction continued into the 1870s and especially the 1880s, Republicans began to view African Americans in the South more from a class perspective and less from the perspective of race that had driven their earlier humanitarianism. In the midst of the labor struggles of the Gilded Age, Republicans came to compare "the demands of the ex-slaves for land, social services, and civil rights" to the demands of white laborers in the North. This ideological shift was the key to Republican abandonment of Reconstruction, as they chose the protection of their economic and business interests over their desire for racial equality.

According to Professor Michael W. Fitzgerald, at St. Olaf College:

"The Death of Reconstruction" is an important book on a big topic. It offers a full-scale reinterpretation of the great betrayal of the Civil War's egalitarian legacy, the northern public's abandonment of the freedpeople. If the book is not uniformly persuasive, that partially reflects the scope of its ambition.[13]

West from Appomattox (2007)[edit]

In West from Appomattox: The Reconstruction of America after the Civil War (2007), Richardson presented Reconstruction as a national event that affected all Americans, not just those in the South.[8] She incorporated the West into the discussion of Reconstruction as no predecessor had. Between 1865 and 1900, Americans re-imagined the role of the federal government, calling upon it to promote the well-being of its citizens. However, racism, sexism, and greed divided Americans, and the same people who increasingly benefited from government intervention—white, middle-class Americans—actively excluded African-Americans, Native Americans, immigrants, and organized laborers from the newfound bounties of their reconstructed nation.[14]

Wounded Knee (2010)[edit]

Wounded Knee: Party Politics and the Road to an American Massacre (2010), focused on the U.S. Army's slaughter of Native Americans in South Dakota in 1890.[15] She argued that party politics and opportunism led to the Wounded Knee Massacre. After a bruising midterm election, President Benjamin Harrison needed to shore up his support. To do so, he turned to The Dakotas, where he replaced seasoned Indian agents with unqualified political allies, who incorrectly assumed that the Ghost Dance Movement presaged war. In order to avoid spending cuts from Congress, the army responded by sending one-third of its force. After the event, Republicans tried to paint the massacre as a heroic battle to stifle the resurgent Democrats.

To Make Men Free (2014)[edit]

In To Make Men Free: A History of the Republican Party (2014), Richardson extended her study of the Republican Party into the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.[16] This book studied the entire life of the Republican Party, from its inception in the 1850s through the presidency of George W. Bush.[17] Believing a small group of men who controlled all three branches of government were turning the country into a slavocracy, the party’s founders united against "slave power". These Republicans articulated a new vision of an America in which all hardworking men could rise. But after the Civil War, Republicans began to emulate what they originally opposed. They tied themselves to powerful bankers and industrialists, sacrificing the well-being of ordinary Americans. A similar process took place after World War II, when Republicans sought to dismantle successful New Deal policies and prop up the wealthy. However, in both cases, reformers within the party were able to return the party to its founding vision of equality of opportunity, first Theodore Roosevelt during the Progressive Era, and then Dwight D. Eisenhower, who enforced integration and maintained the New Deal.

The Nixon and Reagan administrations represented yet another fall from the party's founding purpose. It is ironic, Richardson points out, that Republicans treated Barack Obama with an unprecedented level of disrespect, as Obama's rise from humble beginnings to the highest office in the nation embodied the vision of the original Republicans. In a new afterword, Richardson also points out the irony of one of the rioters storming the Capitol carrying the Confederate flag on January 6, 2021, despite the Republican Party starting in the 1850s as a popular movement against the men who would lead the Confederate States of America.

Newsletter (2019 — )[edit]

In September 2019, Richardson began writing a daily synopsis of political events associated with the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump. Originally posting late every evening or in the early hours of the next day on her Facebook page, Richardson later moved to add a newsletter format, entitled "Letters from an American", published via Substack.[4] The newsletter deals with contemporary events she explicates and relates to historical developments.

The newsletter became popular because of her calm voice, with straightforward explanations of the news of the day. As of December 2020, Richardson was "the most successful individual author of a paid publication on... Substack" and on track to bring in a million dollars of revenue a year.[5] The newsletter received a "Best of Boston" award for "2021 Best Pandemic Newsletter" from Boston magazine.[18]

How the South Won the Civil War (2020)[edit]

In How the South Won the Civil War: Oligarchy, Democracy, and the Continuing Fight for the Soul of America (2020), Richardson argued that America was founded with contradicting ideals, with the ideas of liberty, equality, and opportunity on one hand, and slavery and hierarchy on the other. United States victory in the American Civil War should have settled that tension forever, but at the same time that the Civil War was fought, Americans also started moving into the West. In the West, Americans found, and expanded upon, deep racial hierarchies, meaning that hierarchical values survived in American politics and culture despite the crushing defeat of the pro-slavery Confederacy. Those traditions—a rejection of democracy, an embrace of entrenched wealth, the marginalization of women and people of color—have found a home in modern conservative politics, leaving the promise of America unfulfilled. Professor Dana Elizabeth Weiner of Wilfrid Laurier University states:

With this beautifully written book, prominent US historian Heather Cox Richardson offers valuable insights to historians and general readers about the tenacity of oligarchy in American politics since the seventeenth century.[19]

Deborah M. Liles, a professor at Tarleton State University states:

Heather Cox Richardson's skill with connecting events into a cohesive narrative is on full display in this brilliant study....she dismantles the concept of equality guaranteed in the Constitution, connects western ideology with that of the Old South, and demonstrates how oligarchs and those who supported them established restrictions within society to retain their power.[20]

Democracy Awakening: Notes on the State of America (2023)[edit]

In 2023, Richardson published her seventh book, entitled Democracy Awakening: Notes on the State of America that she characterized as having grown from writings she began in 2019 and subsequent interactions with her readers.[21] Those writings deal with discussion of contemporary events Richardson relates to historical developments and that were moved from postings on Facebook to her newsletter entitled "Letters from an American" and published, almost daily, on Substack.

Personal life[edit]

In September 2022 she married Buddy Poland,[22] a Maine lobsterman.[23]

Richardson has described herself as being a Lincoln Republican, and having no affiliation with any political party.[24][25]

Awards and honors[edit]

Works[edit]

  • The Greatest Nation of the Earth: Republican Economic Policies during the Civil War (Harvard University Press, 1997) ISBN 978-0-674-36213-0
  • The Death of Reconstruction: Race, Labor, and Politics in the Post-Civil War North, 1865-1901 (Harvard University Press, 2001) ISBN 978-0-674-01366-7
  • "A Marshall Plan for the South?: The Failure of Republican and Democratic Ideology during Reconstruction." Civil War History 51.4 (2005): 378-387. online
  • West from Appomattox: The Reconstruction of America after the Civil War (Yale University Press, 2007) ISBN 978-0-300-13630-2
  • "Abraham Lincoln and the Politics of Principle." Marquette Law Review 93 (2009): 1383+ online.
  • Wounded Knee: Party Politics and the Road to an American Massacre (Basic Books, 2010) ISBN 978-1-4587-6014-2
  • To Make Men Free: A History of the Republican Party (Basic Books, 2014) ISBN 978-0-465-02431-5
  • How the South Won the Civil War: Oligarchy, Democracy, and the Continuing Fight for the Soul of America (Oxford University Press, 2020) ISBN 978-0-19-090091-5
  • Democracy Awakening: Notes on the State of America (Viking, 2023) ISBN 978-0-593-65296-1

 

[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (0)
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.