金山投資理財

風險聲明:這是一個記載學習理財炒股的個人心得筆記. 對他人采用本博客信息導致的失誤和損失本人不承擔任何義務和責任,敬請鑒涼.
個人資料
jim366 (熱門博主)
  • 博客訪問:
正文

Stock market \'winter\' is moving in(ZT)

(2007-12-23 07:05:41) 下一個

Where in the world can you safely put your money? Not in equities, two top investors warn. They're not perpetual bears -- just investment analysts with enviable records.

By Jon Markman

Growing numbers of market veterans in recent weeks have stuck out their necks and declared the 2002-07 bull market over, done and dead.

At considerable risk to their reputations, considering the U.S. market is down a mere 8% from its high, they're asserting that a one-two-three punch of earnings recession, credit constriction and inflation have created bear-market conditions that could push the average stock down at least 20% over the next year.

Although the news media and amateur analysts sometimes throw the term "bear market" around carelessly, like a schoolyard curse, it is not a concept that institutional analysts and fund managers take lightly. Yet they're making the case now in an effort to help clients avoid what they believe will be the agony of watching profits that took years to amass disappear in a few months.

Among the most prominent market sceptics today are Jim Rogers, a former partner of George Soros in the famed Quantum Fund, and Paul Desmond, the head honcho of the venerable demand-analysis firm Lowry's Reports, based in Florida. Neither is a "permabear" -- they just call 'em as they see 'em, combining intuition and experience with proprietary measures of supply and demand.

Bundle up
Let's start with Desmond, who observes that bear markets have occurred over the past two centuries every 52 months or so, roughly every four and a half years. Although they seem like rare events, they're actually as regular a part of the market cycle as winter is part of the seasonal cycle. Past market lows in just the past half-century include 1957, 1962, 1970, 1974, 1978, 1982, 1987, 1990, 1994, 1998 and 2002. Surely you recall at least a couple of those.

Desmond notes that just as winter corrects the excesses of a summertime abundance of plants and animals to ensure a sustainable natural balance come spring, bear markets and recessions clear out excesses in business inventories, consumer accumulations and human emotions to make way for the next bull market.

The first 12 to 15 months of the market life cycle are the equivalent of springtime: a time for planting (or buying fresh stocks). The next 12 to 15 months are a time for watering, weeding and nurturing. The third phase, which can last around 30 months, is the time, like autumn, for harvesting. And the fourth phase, which is where we are headed now, is a time for protecting seeds to make sure you can replant the next spring.

Desmond says one sign indicating stocks have peaked was a gauge showing the supply of stocks for sale surpassed demand in midsummer. Because such behaviour took 10 months longer than usual to emerge, he says, it will likely lead to a longer-than-normal bear phase. If precedence is meaningful, then he believes we can look for a decline that persists at least through 2008.

Desmond generally recommends moving portfolios to cash and selected shorts at the start of a bear phase, since virtually all groups of stocks tend to move down together at first, and waiting to see which groups of stocks emerge as countertrend heroes. In the early 1970s, the heroes were energy stocks, while in 2000-02 they were value and small-cap financial stocks. He guesses that energy, health care and utilities may buck the trend this time, but it's too early to say with certainty.

'Cheap' is a relative term
One thing he says he is certain of, however, is that although the market appears soft now, we ain't seen nothing yet. So far, he says, the market has drifted down primarily due to a lack of buying. It will really collapse later on, Desmond says, when investors lose hope and begin to engage in high-volume selling.

"You need to put the idea that the Fed or some other force will ride in like a white knight out of your head," he warns. "Don't buy in to lower values too early. Cheap becomes a very relative term in a bear market, as people don't respond to value -- they respond to a sense that they need to just stop the pain, as they'll dump fast-growing, seemingly valuable stocks with abandon." How nice.

Rogers, who is equally negative on stocks, was one of the earliest proponents of investing in China and in metals, long before their surge of the past few years. He achieved notoriety three years ago by warning that shares of Fannie Mae (FNM.N) would get crushed once the market realized that it was "unbelievably over-leveraged" and would sink under the weight of its out-of-control derivatives positions. At the time, the U.S. government-sponsored mortgage-lending titan was on top of its game, and his warning drew derision. But no one's mocking him now that Fannie shares have lost 60% of their value.

"There was clearly outright fraud, as they were reporting earnings for years when they really had no idea whether they were making money -- they were just making stuff up," he says. "People are still in denial about Fannie Mae's value. They took every phony mortgage loan ever made by banks, losing billions, and now the (U.S.) government wants them to take on even more bad loans to bail people out? They should just let it go bankrupt!"

Rogers, who is short Fannie Mae shares, is also short Citigroup (C.N) and highly negative on its prospects, too.

"Technically, it's bankrupt, with gigantic off-balance-sheet derivatives positions whose value it cannot possibly know," he says. Though he believes some large banks can and will go under in the next year or two under the weight of billions of dollars worth of bad loans and blown-up derivatives positions, he doubts the American government will allow Citi or Fannie to fail. "They'll nationalize them in some way. It's wrong, but they can't let the two largest lenders in the nation go down."

The fund manager, who has traveled extensively in emerging markets and lives part of the year in Asia, says sovereign wealth funds in Abu Dhabi and Singapore that recently made large investments in Citigroup and UBS AG (UBS.N) are likely to lose a lot of money on their ploys. "They're making a big mistake; these banks have many more problems still ahead. They should wait until these companies are really on the ropes a few years from now... and trading at $5 a share."

But aren't they supposed to be the smart money? Maybe not. "I know these people, and they have never given me the impression that they're smarter than anyone else," Rogers says. "They have gigantic amounts of money, but they've made a bad judgment in these cases."

US economic problems contagious
As for the rest of the market, well, Rogers doesn't see equities to buy right now, as he forecasts that a U.S. recession -- already in progress, in his view -- will choke off earnings growth at companies worldwide. He calls the emerging markets "overexploited" and likes only a few commodities, such as farm goods and energy.

"The number of acres devoted to wheat farming is at a 30-year low while inventories of food worldwide are at their lowest since 1972," Rogers says. "With so much corn going into our tanks as ethanol, a growing middle class worldwide eating more corn-fed meat and wearing more cotton than ever, agriculture has a great future, if you ask me, and that's why I'm buying."

Though many top economists still say the U.S. will avoid a recession, Rogers scoffs at that. He contends housing and auto manufacturing are in a depression, says financial companies are in a funk that's at least worse than a recession and notes that freight-car loadings are down.

"If all these sectors are in recession or depression, then some other part of the economy must be extremely strong as an offset," he says. "I'd like someone to tell me what it is because I'd like to invest in it."

In summary, Rogers says: "We are in a bear market, and only a few big stocks that are holding up the big indexes make it look like we're not. Stocks are done, and many favourites will go down 80% after people figure out how long they've been reporting phony earnings."

So what's worth owning? U.S. and Chinese farming, pollution control, power-generation utilities and electrical-plant construction.

Desmond and Rogers could be wrong, of course, but with all the nonstop bullishness that rules investment marketing these days, it's a good idea to at least pause a moment to consider their views.

Fine print
To learn more about Desmond's work, visit the Lowry on Demand Web site... Rogers has a new book out, "A Bull in China." It's a great read. His book "Hot Commodities," recently issued in paperback, is also good. To make investing in agriculture easier, Rogers has created a set of securities similar to exchange-traded funds. One called Agricultural Elements tracks his Rogers International Commodity Index (RJA).

At the time of publication, Jon Markman did not own or control shares of any companies mentioned in this column.

[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (0)
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.