Not only you lack a sense of logic, you have no common sense. You think cannibalism and rape have nothing to do with legality but rather ethical issues and that anyone who commit either would not be at least prosecuted and jailed in a modern society. Are you living in a time machine or some Amazonian Paleolithic cannibalistic tribe?
"三星官司數額大是正義透明，華為數額小是因為它肮髒掩蓋了" Exactly! Everything the blogger says and what others are saying support this conclusion. Whereas "你直接說評論的最後一句就行了。" reverses the cause and effect.
"知識產權，不是普世價值，不具有道德性，屬於法律範圍，每個國家的解讀是有區別，別拿其它東西（rape, cannibalism）類比。" How are rape and cannibalism not legal concepts? If you commit rape or cannibalism now, will you not be prosecuted but rather only be condemned on the ethical basis? What has changed is the legality of such behaviors over time. So has the legal concept of intellectual property rights. I am saying that you are ignorant of the evolution of the legality of intellectual property rights when comparing the behaviors of Americans two hundred years ago and those of the Chinese now, which is comparable to ignoring the change over time when comparing the legality of cannibalism and rape committed thousands of years ago and those committed now. Don't you understand?
"對了，你感興趣，應該能找到一些細節的描述，兩百年前怎麽去偷技術的。" The burden of proof is on you not me to provide the supporting details and evidence, since it is you not I, who are the one making the claim of comparability.
"去看看美國人當初怎麽去英國偷技術" Don't use that rotten old excuse. Can't you even show some creativity of your own? What do you know about how and what Americans stole English technology two HUNDRED years ago? Back then the intellectual property rights laws were still in its infancy. Two centuries have passed, the civilization and laws have both progressed matured. You need to obey the modern rules of civilization NOW. A Hundred years ago, there was no traffic rules. You can drive which ever directions and at whatever speed you want. Are you going to do that on a modern high way? Good luck! Just a few thousand years ago, cannibalism was rampant and rape was common occurrences. Why don't you use that excuse to try either now?
"三星和美國公司的官司，數額比華為大多了" That is exactly the point of the blog. The purpose of the law is to publicly, honestly, openly and transparently resolve conflict of interests. That is what the laws are designed for. What infuriates the public is precisely that Huawei is not and has no intention of playing by the rule of law, but deliberately skirting the law and play underhanded dirty tricks. Huawei is subverting the fundamental foundation and corroding the pillars of the western society, and is doing so deliberately and purposefully.