回複 '雨中人生' 的評論 :
Nice! You are the best person to say. But can't agree with your judgment on Western internal medicine. We don't want to go from one extreme to another. Thanks for your post though.
雨中人生 發表評論於
回複 'WriteItOut' 的評論 : I graduated from one of the best Western Medical schools from China and got my PhD degree major in Immunology in one of the best universities in U.S.A. also I have good background of Chinese Medicine too.
WriteItOut 發表評論於
回複 '雨中人生' 的評論 :
Wow, another extreme on the other end! "西醫的內科理論的確不怎樣". Do you have a medical background to say so?
雨中人生 發表評論於
過去醫生(應該說中醫醫生)在病人心目中的地位是高的。為什麽現代有那麽多醫鬧，有那麽多病人殺醫生的事件呢?大家除了把責任完全歸於經濟利益之外是否考慮過還有其它的因素?。第一，這不能怪醫生，醫生是盡職的。也不能責病人，因病人的確付出大量的錢財，但是疾病是越治越壞。這其實要怪西醫的理論。西醫的內科理論立確不怎樣。對於疾病，西醫認為隻要把症狀mask了就是給病人治了病。而這mask得長期使用激素或類激素的消炎藥或抗生藥，最後給病人的付作用是chain reactions。同時要wean off 這些藥還不易。若您從這點看，西醫的理論其實一點也不科學。但西醫的診斷的確是高科技的。西醫其實乘下的是外科和高科技的診斷手斷，內科學的確不咋的。
回複 'westwind180' 的評論 :
登上《科學》雜誌還不叫認可？！難道是滿紙荒唐言不成？下麵這段話又作何理解：The intent of this section is to provide a means for authors from institutions around the world to showcase their state-of-the-art traditional medicine research through review/perspective-type articles that highlight recent progress in this burgeoning area.
WriteItOut 發表評論於
回複 'westwind180' 的評論 :
但是不是說了嗎：however, all manuscripts have
been critically evaluated by an international editorial team consisting of experts in traditional medicine research selected by the project editor.
《科學》的審稿編輯有幾個懂傳統醫學的，當然要請懂行的專家了。《科學》是最嚴謹的雜誌了，也不是隨便讚助就能發表文章的。中藥和針灸的文章很有說服力！
Science 雜誌登的有關中醫的文章是北京中醫大學和香港浸信大學讚助的。和Science雜誌沒有絲毫關係，也不代表雜誌對中醫的認可。下麵是雜誌的解釋：
The content contained in this special, sponsored section was commissioned, edited, and published by the Science/AAAS Custom
Publishing Office. It was not peer-reviewed or assessed by the Editorial staff of the journal Science; however, all manuscripts have
been critically evaluated by an international editorial team consisting of experts in traditional medicine research selected by the
project editor. The intent of this section is to provide a means for authors from institutions around the world to showcase their
state-of-the-art traditional medicine research through review/perspective-type articles that highlight recent progress in this burgeoning
area. The editorial team and authors take full responsibility for the accuracy of the scientific content and the facts stated.
Articles can be cited using the following format: [Author Name(s)], Science 346 (6216 Suppl), Sxx-Sxx (2014).
