中國外交部，中國媒體公然吹噓造假？轉剛剛聯合國決議部分內容！

https://www.un.org/press/en/2017/sc12756.doc.htm

“33.  Reaffirms its support to the ongoing Afghan-led regional efforts within the framework of the “Heart of Asia-Istanbul Process on Regional Security and Cooperation for a Secure and Stable Afghanistan” and the Regional Economic Cooperation Conference on Afghanistan (RECCA) Summits, and welcomes ongoing efforts to build trust and cooperation, including by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), and Conference on Interaction and Confidence Building Measures in Asia (CICA), as well as through the Trilateral Summit of Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan, the Trilateral Summit of Afghanistan, Pakistan and Turkey, the Trilateral Summit of Afghanistan, Pakistan and the UK;

“34.  Welcomes and urges further efforts to strengthen the process of regional economic cooperation, including measures to facilitate regional connectivity, trade and transit, including through regional development initiatives such as the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road (the Belt and Road) Initiative, and regional development projects, such as the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline project, the Central Asia South Asia Electricity Transmission and Trade Project (CASA-1000), the Chabahar port project, agreed between Afghanistan, India and the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Lapis Lazuli Transit, Trade and Transport Route agreement and the Turkmenistan-Aqina and Herat-Khawaf railway segments, and bilateral transit trade agreements, expanded consular visa cooperation and facilitation of business travel, to expand trade, increase foreign investments and develop infrastructure, including infrastructural connectivity, energy supply, transport and integrated border management, with a view to promoting sustainable economic growth and the creation of jobs in Afghanistan and the region, and in this regard urges all relevant stakeholders to ensure a secure environment, integrate their development policies and strategies and promote the practical connectivity cooperation for these development initiatives and trade agreements to be fully implemented;

所有跟帖： 

• 中國外交部，中國媒體竟公然將安理會關於幫助阿富汗的決議歪曲成關於一帶一路的決議 -austraveller- ♂ (2341 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 00:21:14

• 曆史證明聯合國信譽太差，對美國侵略者來說屁都不是，中國人拿這種聯合國搞笑很正常。 -海邊居- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 03:57:44

• 中國對美國，對聯合國有心理優勢，港台地區的人是無法理解的。 -海邊居- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 04:38:41

• 它所有其它的地區計劃都代表到： -thrawn- ♂ (689 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:41:27

• 確實如此 -austraveller- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 09:00:45

• 嗬嗬， 又來勁了：） -鐵肩20- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 12:41:48

• 不造假才是新聞 -有才有財- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 06:40:29

• 參考樓下。不造假才是新聞正是你們的真實寫照。 -Dumbhead- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 10:10:04

• 聯合國網站關於該決議的中文新聞：“安理會一致通過決議延長阿富汗援助團任務期一年”。日本是提案國。沒提“一帶一路”。 -lfyanjiu- ♂ (6375 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:09:08

• 這一帶一路是作為很多經濟項目中的一個，被聯合國決議提到，但卻被中國外交部和媒體當作決議的重點進行報導 -austraveller- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:14:25

• 1. 決議確實有提到一帶一路 2. 中國媒體，突出報道和中國相關的部分合情合理。 -benliu- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:28:37

• 請給出決議原文。 -lfyanjiu- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:31:15

• 在你貼的文章裏有，你自己沒看過你貼的文章嗎？還是你看不懂？ -NEWHNAD- ♂ (109 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:38:38

• 我貼的文章裏哪裏有“一帶一路”？這麽小一篇文章你也敢公然造謠？ -lfyanjiu- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:41:47

• 再教你一遍，英文的一帶一路，官方翻譯，主貼原文裏有，第34條，自己看 -NEWHNAD- ♂ (1526 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:42:40

• 我貼過英文？栽贓不帶這麽粗的吧？ -lfyanjiu- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:44:34

• 不是你貼的，主貼的原文裏有，你回複不看主貼嗎？ -NEWHNAD- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:46:22

• 你承認了你這貼是造謠：“ 在你貼的文章裏有，你自己沒看過你貼的文章嗎？還是你看不懂？ - NEWHNAD - ” -lfyanjiu- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:48:24

• 這點我錯了，發主貼的不是你，但原文確實有一帶一路 -NEWHNAD- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:50:40

• 我在細節上出問題，而你在原則上出問題，所以你要糾纏細節，是吧 -NEWHNAD- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:51:34

• 不是細節不細節。而是顯而易見的“有或沒有”。 -lfyanjiu- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:56:15

• 討論問題,誰說的不重要,重要是提案中有"一帶一路" -NEWHNAD- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:58:30

• 雖然有但是不是重點，更不是唯一項目 -austraveller- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:59:23

• 一帶一路是決議中和其他項目一起列出；這個決議重點是阿富汗，不是一帶一路。中國官方和媒體的宣傳相當荒謬 -austraveller- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:56:45

• 你單單針對中國雞蛋裏挑骨頭的吐槽精神極為荒謬 -benliu- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 09:20:55

• 故意篡改聯合國決議主旨，叫雞蛋裏挑骨頭？ -austraveller- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 09:28:02

• 居然代表日本來“力挺一帶一路”，又是這個臉皮最厚的環球時報： -lfyanjiu- ♂ (318 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:28:54

• 這份報道裏提了日本了嗎？在文章裏沒有提到日本啊？ -NEWHNAD- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:36:00

• 有。報道說日本是提案國。 -lfyanjiu- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:38:26

• 在你鏈接的這篇文章裏沒有提日本，我從頭到尾搜索了，沒有任何一個詞提到日本 -NEWHNAD- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:41:14

• 我說的是聯合國發布的新聞中指出日本是提案國。 -lfyanjiu- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:43:32

• 不是這篇文章提的啊？是你自己搜索的，然後栽贓到這篇文章裏，人家根本沒提日本 -NEWHNAD- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:47:41

• 作為大型媒體，環球時報理應知道誰是提案國。 -lfyanjiu- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:50:01

• 人家知道，但人家根本沒提日本，你卻造謠人家說了日本 -NEWHNAD- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:52:43

• 我說他們“代表日本”。你不要再次造謠。 -lfyanjiu- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:54:45

• 誰說環球時報代表日本了？這又是你造謠吧 -NEWHNAD- ♂ (143 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:57:06

• HOHO，你可以代表日本來支持一帶一路哇。支持的，多多益善 -benliu- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2017 postreply 08:52:24