這不是Form １０A

這不是Form １０A。F１０A是third party claim (defendant's claim against third party)，你要的是joinder（co-defendant). 區別是third party claim 是 A <-1-> B <-2-> C (三方兩個官司），joinder是 A <-1-> (B & C) (三方一個官司）。

好好學習。 http://www.isthatlegal.ca/index.php?name=pretrial.small_claims_court_law_ontario#Transfer, Merger and Joinder

(d) Joinder

Another aspect of the general principle that multiple proceedings are discouraged CJA s.138], is that of "joinder". The concept of "joinder" is related to that of merger, but while merger relates to combining related "proceedings" between different courts, "joinder" relates to adding parties (and less often claims) to a proceeding already in the court.

While the Small Claims rules - unlike the more extensive "Rules of Civil Procedure" which apply to the higher courts - do not set out detailed rules for joinder, the Small Claims court is given express discretion in a settlement conference to order "joinder of parties" [R13.03(3)]. Similarly, while the Small Claims Rules are silent as to joinder of claims, the "Rules of Civil Procedure" which govern the procedure in the Superior Court do expressly consider this. As such it would appear that the general jurisdiction provisions of the Small Claims court are broad enough to encompass authority to join unpleaded claims and issues to a proceeding [R1.03(2)].

所有跟帖： 

• 你真吵啊。我就是不要把CONTRACTOR加成被告。你怎麽老非拉我把他們加一起呢。誰打官司找你幫忙，算是倒黴了。 -Veronica007- ♀ (2056 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 12:26:52

• 覺得lexm5其實是在幫你，他隻是從另一個角度讓你認清你處的形勢。 -水中撈月- ♂ (596 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 13:34:17

• 她實際上是假設合同工根本找不到 -lexm5- ♀ (1374 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 14:06:07

• 你還沒明白，你出的主意，什麽假裝成客戶等等。你的前提是建立在被告說的是實話。 -Veronica007- ♀ (526 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 15:09:47

• 看不下去了。法官說讓你加，老貓和Lexm5也解釋了加contractor對你有好處。 -單行旅程- ♀ (282 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 14:14:31

• 不要緊，因為我隻有半瓶醋，醋壇子打不翻。 -lexm5- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 14:22:11

• 不是我假設，而是我根本就找不到。當時法官要求我加之後，那家具店老板的臉樂開了花了。 -Veronica007- ♀ (903 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 14:58:07

• 那你要向法官抱怨 -lexm5- ♀ (985 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 15:13:20

• 終於聽點了正經的了。我現在要引用的是CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT。２００２。 -Veronica007- ♀ (160 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 15:23:44

• 建議你不要再跟她的貼了，她來這裏不是來尋求谘詢的， -水中撈月- ♂ (145 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 15:27:52

• 我好像一頭獵狗，看見狐狸就停不下來，也是缺點 -lexm5- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 15:29:16

• 雖然您嘴巴差，但是我還是很感謝您的參與的。 -Veronica007- ♀ (167 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 15:51:22

• 開始還滿感謝你的建議的。但是現在我不明白， -Veronica007- ♀ (658 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 15:49:19

• 撈月同學 -Veronica007- ♀ (249 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 16:07:32