Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes are High
所有跟帖:
•
very good book summary.
-小謀-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
09:32:40
•
但做起來不容易, 要隨時隨地地練習. 我已經在公司和我LG
-小謀-
♀
(21 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
09:36:08
•
少讀那些破書,多玩玩。
-吃糖?-
♂
(70 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
10:20:34
•
嗬嗬, 你也許沒看過這本書, 交流中第一要做到的就是要誠懇.
-小謀-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
10:37:46
•
Jill08說的對,不過是common sense,
-吃糖?-
♂
(46 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
10:41:43
•
I agree those are common sense. but it takes a lot of
-小謀-
♀
(219 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
10:50:55
•
有時是聰明反被聰明誤。
-jill08-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
10:54:23
•
看來你已經是大師了, PFPF.
-小謀-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
10:55:44
•
how to avoid that?
-future2020-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
10:56:39
•
you just kicked 吃糖?'s crucial point~
-future2020-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
10:54:49
•
you just kicked 吃糖?'s crucial point~
-future2020-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
10:55:10
•
Ha, I know. It's really bad. I still have long way to go.
-小謀-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
11:07:18
•
人的性格是天生的,不可改變。
-吃糖?-
♂
(254 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
15:53:08
•
性格不容易變,但人的思維方式還是很容易變的。
-future2020-
♂
(84 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
16:39:54
•
這些也是隻能知道,不能改,一遇壓力全出來了。
-吃糖?-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
16:49:30
•
研究結果都說可以改。 所以才看書努力。試試唄, 改不了就算了
-future2020-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
16:53:38
•
你看小謀,就是一個最好的例子,改了多少啊
-future2020-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
16:55:24
•
你是吳用的馬甲嗎?
-小謀-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
17:01:51
•
嗯:)
-future2020-
♂
(36 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
17:08:44
•
feel like being stalked. :S
-小謀-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
17:15:06
•
sorry, my bad.
-future2020-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
17:25:06
•
交流中第一要做到的就是要讓對方感到很誠懇. 象馬英九計筆記那樣. 人人都感到馬英九很誠懇
-去美國-
♂
(42 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
20:46:28
•
交流中第一要做到的就是要讓對方"感到"很誠懇. 內心真正誠懇是另一回事
-去美國-
♂
(199 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
20:55:38
•
這個是欺騙,也是本質區別
-future2020-
♂
(92 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
21:02:25
•
真心,人家"可能"會感覺到. Otherwise, 就不會有誤解了.
-去美國-
♂
(84 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
21:29:29
•
為啥一看到這類書,就自動以為是欺騙,還common sense啊。
-future2020-
♂
(261 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
21:45:01
•
There is cultural issue. The book is for corporate america.
-小謀-
♀
(155 bytes)
()
03/28/2010 postreply
07:28:34
•
衝突的技巧:內行的看門道,外行的看熱鬧
-Easy.Spin-
♂
(378 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
12:34:51
•
I've got this: appreciate, acknowledge, agree each has
-HappyNow?!-
♂
(141 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
13:13:12
•
this one also is good: Crucial Confrontations
-HappyNow?!-
♂
(10301 bytes)
()
03/27/2010 postreply
13:36:03