Yes, that's what I mean too

She should be hired at all -- the other lady was on board before her, if she does not like this woman, then this woman should not be hired.

We never heard anything from the other lady, so we have no idea about her character, personality.... stuff. What we can see is that this woman keeps put up non-sense, so to keep things simple and straight, her director (if a decent one) should be able to see the easiest solution: let this woman go.

BTW, I'm sure you know, it does not have anything to do with which woman has been better educated, programming a little bit faster.... kind of stuff, nobody in this world cannot be replaced, in particular, this woman looks like a newbie -- which means she's going to cost some resources for training at job, then why bother? It's obvious.

所有跟帖： 

• I am still learning in regarding this issue. -jill08- ♀ (22 bytes) () 01/22/2009 postreply 11:45:22

• It's easy -ntking- ♂ (228 bytes) () 01/22/2009 postreply 11:53:38

• Well said! -LaTourEiffel- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/22/2009 postreply 11:58:24

• well said -dropinto- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/22/2009 postreply 14:42:23

• By the way -ntking- ♂ (682 bytes) () 01/22/2009 postreply 11:48:12

• Can you just be direct to say what were the weakpoints -LaTourEiffel- ♀ (206 bytes) () 01/22/2009 postreply 11:53:06

• We all learn from mistakes. -jill08- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/22/2009 postreply 11:53:47

• So you got the trick?:) -ntking- ♂ (317 bytes) () 01/22/2009 postreply 11:57:16

• Is that true? I thought it was not good to let the interviewer -LaTourEiffel- ♀ (52 bytes) () 01/22/2009 postreply 12:00:15

• Good or bad? You never know. -jill08- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/22/2009 postreply 12:05:46