各國網友熱議京廣高鐵：美國將更加落後中國
世界最長高鐵線路中國京廣高鐵26日全線開通，這條2298公裏的線路把北京到廣州的火車旅行時間從過去的20多個小時縮減至了8小時。京廣高鐵的“全球最長”在引發外媒讚歎的同時，報道也吸引了大批外國網友熱議，這裏特別選譯了部分網友的看法：
英國網友“詹姆斯”：中國很早就超越了鄰國印度，我在猜想印度何時會承認這一點，試圖與比他們先進多的鄰國示好。這可能需要一點時間，拉美國家在接受美國 是拉美地區之王也花了很長時間。印度最好在中國取代印度在行業呼叫中心或者後台辦公支持方麵的優勢之前快速承認這一點。這將毀滅印度的全球經濟，使印度成 為黎巴嫩那樣的國家，除了出口吃苦耐勞的人口之外沒有什麽可供出口的。
.China has long surpassed neighbouring India. I'm wondering when India is going to concede and try to befriend their much advanced neighbour. This may take awhile like; Latin Americas slow acceptance that the US is king of their hemisphere. But its occurring country by country. India better recognize quickly before China takes it only dominate industry-Call Centers or back office support. That would spell the destruction of India's global economy and turn India into Lebanon a country with very little industry outside exporting industrious people.
- James, Toledo, United Kingdom, 27/12/2012 12:19
英國網友“多什”：作為英國公民，我感到嫉妒。
as a British citizen I'm jealous。。
- Maidenhead-doshi, Maidenhead, Uk, 27/12/2012 3:37
英國網友“DJR”：很不幸，我們現在是一個垂死國家，看在上帝的份上，是我們發明了鐵路！!!!
Sadly we are a dying nation now. For gods sake we invented the railways!!!!
- DJR, Preston, 27/12/2012 3:13
英國網友“米歇爾”：這樣的事情絕對不可能在這裏發生，因為對於按部就班的人來說研究提議將花太長的時間，這就是我們如此落後於中國人的原因。
Such a thing could never happen here because it would take too long for the jobsworths to look at the proposal. This is why we are so far behind the Chinese。
- michael, durham, 27/12/2012 2:29
南非網友“馬丁”：曾坐過中國的高鐵，很幹淨、票價低、安靜、買票後肯定有座。非常準點。
Travelled on them. They are clean, cheap,quiet and a guaranteed seat when you purchase a ticket. Oh and they leave and arrive on time to the second.
- Martin, Cape Town, 27/12/2012 4:00
居住在美國的英國網友“Terry-Proud” ：為什麽英國或者美國不能有這樣的項目？美國的唯一競爭是“水陸兩用車”，讓許多人就業的任何項目都沒有經費。在這個被認為是最富有的國家。我可以肯定在 經濟衰退或者富有時期，美國建設了大型項目，例如胡佛大壩和州際高速公路項目。這是偉大的成就，它們使這個國家更好。美國現在的基礎設施狀況很糟糕，是 D-。這些完整的項目，不管是下水道、水資源、電力、運輸都迫切需要重建，將可以刺激經濟，促進就業，收入稅稅收能給國庫帶來收入。我對那些一度被認為是 第二世界的國家取得這樣偉大的成就，橋梁、隧道、高鐵。我們英國和美國人應當仍具有這樣的信心。我們交稅了，需要建設這些項目。
These very integral systems, be they sewer, water, the electrical grid, transportation, etc., are in dire need and would spark the economy by the people it would employ that would return income taxes to the coffers. I get so frustrated with how countries that were once deemed second world are undertaking these great feats, bridges, tunnels, high speed rail/trains, we in the UK/USA should still have this determination. We pay taxes and they are required.
- Terry-Proud UK Expat, Wi*****ech CAMBS-Washington State, United States, 27/12/2012 3:21
美國《時代》周刊網友“更好的世界”：考慮到中國巨大的人口，提供除航空以外的其它出行方式是重要的。
Considering huge population in China, it is important to provide alternative ways of traveling besides flights。
- Better-World，2 hours ago
美國網友“herbertpop”：美國將更加落後於中國。
The USA is going to fall farther behind China。
- herbertpop，9 hours ago
雅虎新聞網網友“Kristof”：問題在於當美國兒童忙於熟悉娛樂名人的時候，中國的孩子在學微積分。
the problem is that Chinese kids learn calculus while US kids learn Kardashianism。
- Kristof，23 hrs ago
雅虎新聞網網友“James ”：當中國取得這一成就時，美國國會裏的兒童們還未能就如何平衡預算、減少開支、退出中東或者其它需要做的事情達成共識。
While China is doing that, the children in Congress still can't agree on how to balance a budget, cut spending, create jobs, stay out of the Middle East, or much of any else that needs to happen..。。
- James，23 hrs ago
雅虎新聞網網友“Tomcat”：至少中國政府在欠債的同時拿出了一些實在的東西，可我們這裏還是一切照舊，我們政府裏充斥著小偷和騙子。
At least China has something tangible to show for their debt. Here, it's just business as usual, with the thieves and crooks running our government..。。
- Tomcat，22 hrs ago
英國網友“HasnMcJason”：我們應當在英國也建設這樣的高鐵線路。
we should have a one like this in Britain。
- HasnMcJason, Manchester, United Kingdom, 27/12/2012 2:38
英國網友“托尼”：即便我們在這裏建設了這樣的高鐵線路，票價將比共擔私人飛機的費用更高！!
Even if we built such a track here, the train fare would be more than sharing the price of hiring a private jet!!
英國網友“斯圖爾特”：在英國鋪設這樣的鐵路線將要花200年，組建安全委員會就需要100年。
It would take the UK about 200 years to lay that much track with elf n safety committee's taking up about half that。
- Stuart, Merthyr, 27/12/2012 2:30
泰國網友“薩姆杜克”：105歐元將無法使你從倫敦抵達任何其它城市。英國火車票價完全是荒誕的 ，可怕的衛生和安全部為何阻止人們去做那些風險很小的事情，但卻允許火車公司在高峰期間把大量乘客塞入車廂，許多站台上到處都是乘客，這在高速相撞時肯定是非常危險的。
105 Euro's wouldn't get you to any city from London. The cost of train travel in the UK is utterly ridiculous. How come also that the dreaded Health and safety can stop people from doing things where there is little or even a perceived risk of injury yet allows train companies to cram passengers onto trains at rush hour making many stand crammed together which surely must be very dangerous in the event of a high-speed crash ?
- SamuiDunc, Koh Samui Thailand, Thailand, 27/12/2012 12:31
英國網友“斯蒂弗裏克爾”：你把這樣的活給中國人 ，當他們想幹的時候，他們就去幹了！
You have to hand it to the Chinese, when they want something done, they just do it!
- stevefricker, Warsash, 27/12/2012 3:15
英國網友“蘇珊”：我不相信中國技術和工藝水準能讓他們的火車能以正常速度行駛。
I wouldn't trust Chinese technology and workmanship to get on one of their trains going at normal speed!
- SUSAN , OLDHAM, 27/12/2012 10:00
美國網友“Sam Bell ”：希望它能比中國人賣給我們的劣質工具好用。
I hope it works better than those crummy tools they sell to this country。
- Sam Bell ， 1 day 3 hrs ago
英國網友“Pacificus”：時速300公裏不是高速，真空電磁軌道運輸的時速可達6437公裏，建設費用更低，使用更少能源，需要更少土地。為什麽這種更高級的技術被忽視，而采用浪費、緩慢、昂貴的工業時代技術？究竟是怎麽回事？
300 km/h isn't high-speed. Evacuated Tube Transport is capable of 4000 mph, is much cheaper to build, uses less energy, and requires less land for construction. Why is the superior capsule-pipeline technology being ignored for wasteful, slow, expensive Industrial Revolution-esque technology such as this new rail system? What the hell is going on?
- Pacificus, Peterborough, 27/12/2012 5:51
英國網友“just a girl”：我夏天坐高鐵從上海去北京，沒有給我留下什麽深刻印象，“最長的”應該是高鐵旅程結束後等候出租車的隊列。
Last summer I went from Shanghai to Beiging by this train. Wasn't impressed much. The longest was the queue for taxi after the trip。
- just a girl, overtherainbow, 27/12/2012 16:25
