馮德萊恩辭職 引起軒然大波

布魯塞爾主席令人震驚的辭職：歐盟權力中心陷入危機

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1_ES_tpM_E

2025年9月13日 烏爾蘇拉·馮德萊恩的驚人辭職在歐洲引起軒然大波。隨著歐盟委員會主席的卸任，歐盟麵臨著前所未有的政治動蕩、街頭抗議以及成員國之間日益加深的分歧。

馮德萊恩卸任背後的政治壓力和陰謀, 能源、移民和歐盟主權基金的衝突, 德、法、意、匈四國之間日益加劇的緊張關係。這一曆史性時刻的經濟和全球後果？歐洲正處於改革還是解體的邊緣？觀看視頻，了解這場撼動歐盟核心的危機。

烏爾蘇拉·馮德萊恩的時代正處於十字路口。歐盟委員會主席，歐洲最具權勢的女性之一， 正在準備辭職，但沒有人能夠確切地說出究竟是哪些力量將她推向了這一步。是政治壓力，還是她內部的陰謀，又或者僅僅是歐洲大陸分裂的負擔？有一件事是肯定的：歐洲正處於動蕩之中。謠言、權力遊戲和不確定性籠罩著布魯塞爾權力機構的每個角落。

據《政治報》報道，歐盟總部內部已進入緊急狀態。邦德利昂的意外離職使歐盟陷入了嚴重的體製危機。在外交政策、能源供應、預算問題和戰略聯盟等方麵的不同觀點正在浮出水麵。歐洲理事會內部出現分歧，成員國正在努力重新界定政治路線。

據《Lefiguro》報道，各國元首和政府首腦們既惱怒又困惑。辭職原因至今仍不明朗。在權力的走廊裏，一些泄露出來的消息比任何官方聲明都更有說服力。據說，在喬治亞·馬洛尼和維克托·奧爾班率領的意大利和匈牙利代表團示威性退場後，烏爾蘇拉·範德萊昂在一次激烈的會議上失聲痛哭。官方永遠不會證實這一消息，但在政治上，感知就是現實。

這一謠言像野火一樣蔓延，象征著歐盟不僅分裂，而且瀕臨政治崩潰。布魯塞爾的局勢早已震動。

2025年8月22日，歐盟委員會不得不否認範德萊昂被排除在與唐納德·特朗普和其他國家元首的會晤之外的謠言。她的發言人否認了這一說法，但不信任感早已埋下。在這種緊張的氣氛下，圍繞新的預算規則和計劃中的歐盟主權基金展開了戲劇性的一幕。乍一看，這是一個雄心勃勃的計劃，共同舉債資助綠色項目和國防工業。但對意大利和匈牙利來說，這項基金卻是一種挑釁。羅馬必須處理15萬份額外的庇護申請，而布達佩斯則被要求要麽接收5萬名移民，要麽支付數十億美元的罰款。

一項能源團結機製迫使匈牙利以限定價格向歐洲電網供應天然氣。這是對奧爾班能源政策的直接攻擊。對馬洛尼和奧爾班來說，這不僅僅是談判策略，而是對中央集權議程的根本性拒絕。他們的示威性罷工是與布魯塞爾衝突的高潮。班東德裏翁的情緒反應，無論是沮喪的淚水還是崩潰的跡象，都象征著聯邦主義夢想與嚴酷的國家利益現實碰撞的危機。

這標誌著歐盟委員會主席不得不意識到，她不再是領導者，而是親眼目睹其權威的崩潰。
與此同時，街頭抗議活動爆發。就在布魯塞爾辯論仍在繼續之際，德國、法國和波蘭的農民封鎖了高速公路。他們抗議歐盟委員會推動的綠色協議要求、氮排放限製、耕地義務以及烏克蘭免稅糧食措施。因此，羅馬和布達佩斯政府的反抗，是一場更廣泛的民眾運動的一部分，這場運動已經在巴伐利亞的田野和西歐的港口顯現出來。法德軸心也出現了裂痕。

8月28日，在巴黎舉行的一次會議揭示了柏林與巴黎之間日益加深的隔閡。
德國因經濟衰退和工業生產停滯而變得虛弱，無力承擔領導角色。

總理弗裏德裏希·梅裏茨談到了妥協的必要性，但柏林軟弱無力，無法穩定分裂的歐洲。
在法國，危機進一步加深。總理弗朗索瓦·貝魯宣布對法國進行不信任投票，原因是布魯塞爾強製推行了一項440億歐元的緊縮計劃，旨在將法國的預算赤字控製在歐盟3%的門檻以下。

馬賽街頭爆發的抗議活動，反對主要打擊底層民眾的緊縮措施，使緊張局勢更加凸顯。馬卡龍總統為削減開支辯護，但同時又將軍事預算提高了65億歐元。這傳遞了一個矛盾的信息。

八月最後一周發生的事件, 描繪了一幅歐洲大陸政治的圖景不穩定。不信任投票、街頭抗議以及來自各國首都的相互矛盾的聲明，都表明聯盟比以往任何時候都更加分裂。範德裏翁的權威，因為從一開始就站不住腳，而最終土崩瓦解。2019年，她並非由民選直接上任，而是默克爾和馬克龍之間妥協的結果。由於沒有直接授權，她的權力依賴於國家元首和政府首腦的善意，而這些人，恰恰是現在正在拋棄她的人。

此外，還有她過去的醜聞和風波。她擔任德國國防部長期間，曾爆出顧問醜聞，數百萬美元被花在外部顧問身上，而聯邦的坦克、艦船和飛機卻狀況糟糕。這種管理不善的名聲一直伴隨著她，一直延續到布魯塞爾。

然後是“費茲門”醜聞。 350億歐元疫苗協議談判中被禁止發送短信，加劇了人們對範德利昂淩駕於規則之上的懷疑。歐洲檢察官正在進行的調查強化了這種印象。與此同時，成員國的政策加劇了緊張局勢。喬治奧·馬洛尼表示要停止與布魯塞爾的對抗，而佩德羅·桑切斯則呼籲團結，這是對意大利單打獨鬥路線的微妙批評。在中歐和東歐，許多國家暗中認為，曾經對他們進行法治教育的歐盟委員會現在正麵臨反叛。

8月26日的民意調查顯示，人們對歐盟機構的信任度顯著下降，尤其是在南歐和中歐。但為什麽範德利昂偏偏在此時辭職呢？

據《明鏡周刊》報道，機密文件顯示，網絡安全和能源資源方麵的戰略合同是在沒有成員國監督的情況下閉門談判的。分析人士將此解讀為前所未有的透明度危機的信號。更具爆炸性的是，《金融時報》報道稱，範德萊昂在未與成員國協商的情況下，批準了與科技公司達成的數十億美元的數據管理和人工智能交易。

歐洲議員指責她進行秘密外交，加劇了內部緊張局勢，並最終導致她辭職。

路透社於2025年7月10日報道，在她離任前不久，她曾與國際金融機構就網絡安全和國防技術私人基金舉行秘密會談。一些人懷疑她正計劃在全球強勢回歸。

《你的活躍》雜誌於2025年7月12日報道了她與一個美國財團的秘密會談，可能是為了在一個國際人工智能和數字安全組織中謀得一個職位。範德萊昂究竟是要離開歐洲舞台，還是正在計劃在全球崛起？從經濟角度來看，她的辭職可能帶來毀滅性的後果。

據彭博社報道，歐元暴跌，政府債券承壓。如果沒有明確的繼任計劃，一段動蕩時期即將到來。在布魯塞爾，一場圍繞其繼任者的權力鬥爭爆發。一些國家支持技術官僚，另一些國家則支持歐盟的政治轉型。如果沒有達成共識，2027年至2030年每年約150億歐元的關鍵投資項目可能會受到威脅。

“歐洲觀察”等活動人士聲稱，範德·利昂已經收到了國際組織高層職位的邀請。在許多國家，主權主義政黨正在獲得支持，因為他們呼籲國家獨立，在危機中找到了肥沃的土壤。

對許多人來說，她的辭職象征著歐盟中央集權模式的失敗。歐洲正處於曆史性的十字路口：改革還是解體。

烏爾蘇拉·範德雷利昂的突然辭職，為歐洲大陸的未來開啟了一個決定性的轉折點。

人們對此有何看法？這一步是否不可避免？她的人生軌跡又將走向何方？答案尚無定論，但有一點是明確的。歐洲的曆史正處於自歐盟成立以來最具戲劇性的篇章之一。未來幾個月將見證改革是否可行，或者政治聯盟是否麵臨深刻的裂痕。

Shock Resignation in Brussels: EU Power Center in Crisis 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1_ES_tpM_E

2025年9月13日 The shock resignation of Ursula von der Leyen has sent ripples across Europe. As the President of the European Commission steps down, the EU faces unprecedented political instability, protests in the streets, and a deepening divide among member states.

The political pressures and intrigues behind von der Leyen’s departure
Clashes over energy, migration, and the EU Sovereignty Fund
The growing tensions between Germany, France, Italy, and Hungary
Economic and global consequences of this historic momentm,Is Europe on the verge of reform or disintegration? Watch to understand the crisis shaking the heart of the European Union.

The era of Ursula Vanderelion stands at
a crossroads. The president of the
European Commission, one of the most
powerful women in Europe, is preparing
her resignation, and no one can say for
sure which forces pushed her to this
step. Was it political pressure,
intrigues from within her own ranks, or
simply the burden of a fractured
continent?
One thing is certain, Europe is in
turmoil. Rumors, power games, and
uncertainty overshadow every corner of
the Brussels power apparatus.
According to Politico, a state of
emergency reigns in the circles of the
EU headquarters. Bondelion's unexpected
departure plunges the European Union
into a deep institutional crisis.
Diverging views on foreign policy,
energy supply, budget issues, and
strategic alliances are now coming to
the surface. The European Council is
divided and the member states are
struggling to redefine the political
line. As Lefiguro reports, heads of
state and government are irritated and
perplexed. The reasons for the
resignation remain mysterious. In the
corridors of power, images are leaking
out that speak louder than any official
statement. Ursula Vanderlayion is said
to have broken into tears during a
heated meeting after the delegations of
Italy and Hungary led by Georgia Maloney
and Victor Orban demonstratively walked
out.
Officially, this will never be
confirmed, but in politics, perception
is reality. The rumor spread like
wildfire and symbolized an EU not only
divided, but on the verge of a political
breakdown.
The ground in Brussels had already been
shaking. On August 22nd, 2025, the
commission had to deny rumors that
Vander Lion had been excluded from a
meeting with Donald Trump and other
heads of state. Her spokesperson
rejected this, but the mistrust had
already been sown. In this tense
climate, the drama unfolded around new
budget rules and the planned EU
sovereignty fund. At first glance, an
ambitious plan, joint debt to finance
green projects and the defense industry.
But for Italy and Hungary, this fund was
a provocation. Rome was to process
150,000 additional asylum applications
while Budapest was required either to
take in 50,000 migrants or pay billions
in penalties. An energy solidarity
mechanism forced Hungary to supply gas
into the European grid at a capped
price. A direct attack on Orban's energy
policy. For Maloney and Orban, this was
not mere negotiation tactics, but a
fundamental rejection of the centralist
agenda. Their demonstrative walkout was
the climax of the collision with
Brussels.
Bandonderion's emotional reaction,
whether tears of frustration or a sign
of breakdown, symbolizes the crisis of a
federalist dream colliding with the
harsh reality of national interests.
It marked the moment when the commission
president had to realize that she was no
longer leading, but witnessing the
collapse of her authority.
At the same time, protests flared on the
streets. While debates continued in
Brussels, farmers in Germany, France,
and Poland blocked highways. They
protested against Green Deal
requirements, nitrogen limits, fow land
obligations, and duty-free Ukrainian
grain measures pushed forward by the
commission. The rebellion of the
governments in Rome and Budapest was
thus part of a broader popular movement
already visible in Bavaria's fields and
Western Europe's ports. The FrancoGerman
axis also showed cracks. On August 28th,
a meeting in Paris revealed the growing
distance between Berlin and Paris.
Germany, weakened by economic downturn
and stagnating industrial production,
could not take on a leadership role.
Chancellor Friedrich Merittz spoke of
the need for compromise, but Berlin was
too weak to stabilize a divided Europe.
In France, the crisis deepened. Prime
Minister Francois Beeru announced a vote
of no confidence triggered by a Brussels
imposed austerity plan of 44 billion
euros intended to bring France's budget
deficit below the EU's 3% threshold.
Street protests in Marseilles against
the austerity measures which mainly hit
the lower classes made the tensions
visible. President Macarron defended the
cuts but at the same time raised the
military budget by 6.5 billion. A
contradictory message.
The events of the last week of August
painted a picture of a continent in
political instability. Votes of no
confidence, street protests, and
contradictory statements from the
capitals revealed a union more divided
than ever. Vanderion's authority
crumbled because it had stood on fragile
ground from the beginning. In 2019, she
was not directly elected by the people,
but was the result of a compromise
between Merkel and Macron.
Without a direct mandate, her power
depended on the goodwill of the heads of
state and government, precisely those
who are now abandoning her. Added to
this were old scandals and affairs. Her
time as German defense minister was
marked by consultant scandals in which
millions were spent on external advisers
while tanks, ships, and aircraft of the
Bundes were in a deplorable state. This
reputation of mismanagement followed her
to Brussels.
Then came the Faizgate scandal. banished
text messages from negotiations over a
35 billion euro vaccine deal fueled
suspicion that Vanderion was above the
rules. The ongoing investigation by the
European public prosecutor reinforced
this impression. Meanwhile, member state
policies escalated tensions. Georgio
Maloney spoke of a stop against Brussels
while Pedro Sanchez called for
solidarity, a subtle criticism of
Italy's solo path.
In central and eastern Europe, many
countries secretly saw that the
commission, which had lectured them on
rule of law, was now facing a rebellion.
Polls from August 26th showed a
significant decline in trust in EU
institutions, especially in southern and
central Europe. But why did Vander Lion
resign precisely now? According to
Spiegel, confidential documents reveal
that strategic contracts in cyber
security and energy resources were
negotiated behind closed doors doors
without member state oversight. Analysts
interpret this as a signal of an
unprecedented transparency crisis. Even
more explosive, Financial Times reported
that Vander Lion approved multi-billion
deals with tech corporations on data
management and AI without consulting
member states.
European parliamentarians accused her of
secret diplomacy that exacerbated
internal tensions and ultimately
triggered her resignation.
Reuters reported on July 10th, 2025 that
shortly before her departure, she held
secret talks with international
financial institutions about a private
fund for cyber security and defense
technologies. Some suspect she is
planning a spectacular global comeback.
Your active reported on July 12th, 2025
about discrete meetings with a US
consortium, possibly for a position in
an international organization for AI and
digital security. Is Vander Lion leaving
the European stage or is she planning a
global rise to power? Economically, her
resignation could have devastating
consequences. According to Bloomberg,
the euro plunged and government bonds
came under pressure.
Without a clear succession plan, a phase
of instability looms. In Brussels, a
power struggle erupted over her
successor. Some states favor a
technocrat, others, a political
reorientation of the EU.
Without consensus, key investment
projects from 2027 to 2030, amounting to
around 15 billion e annually, could be
jeopardized. Activists such as Europe
Watch claim that Vander Lion has already
received offers for top positions in
international organizations. In many
countries, sovereigntist parties are
gaining support as their call for
national independence falls on fertile
ground in the crisis. For many, her
resignation symbolizes the failure of
the centralist EU model. Europe stands
at a historic crossroads, reform or
disintegration. The shock resignation of
Ursula Vanderelion opens a decisive
junction for the continent's future.
What do people think? Was this step
inevitable? And where will her path lead
now? The answers remain uncertain, but
one thing is clear. Europe's history is
in one of its most dramatic chapters
since the founding of the Union. The
coming months will show whether reforms
are possible or whether the political
union faces a deep rupture.