個人資料
正文

中國進入一個新時代

(2022-10-28 03:56:22) 下一個

中國的一個時代結束了

洪源遠  

44年前,鄧小平開啟了“改革開放”時代,將中國從一個閉關自守的貧困國家變成了一個新興的全球大國。
國家主席習近平已在上周正式結束了那個時代。他在北京召開的中國共產黨全國代表大會上成為擁有絕對權威的人,製定了圍繞自己所癡迷的控製和安全運作的國家計劃,盡管這意味著損害經濟。
中國的前景發生了巨大變化。
鄧小平讓中國取得驚人經濟成就的戰略有兩個主要組成部分。第一個是中共內部的集體領導安排。鄧小平拒絕了西方式的民主,但中國在毛澤東時期經曆的幾十年動蕩讓鄧小平明白了一人統治的危險。他和中共把一定程度的製約與平衡引入了政治的最高層,包括領導人的任期限製。第二個組成部分是一心一意地抓經濟增長,鄧小平提出了“發展才是硬道理”的著名說法。中國各地的官員們一頭紮進不惜一切代價促經濟增長的工作中去,這給中國帶來了繁榮,不過也帶來了腐敗、不平等和大規模工業汙染等問題。
習近平上周在北京拆除了這些基礎。他確保了自己繼續擔任至高無上領導人的第三個任期(如果不是終身的話),並將中共領導層全部換成了自己的親信,同時將國家安全置於追求經濟增長之上。
10月16日,在中共二十大開幕式上作報告時,習近平提到“安全”的次數顯著高於“經濟”,打破了以前的做法。他甚至明確地宣布:“國家安全是民族複興的根基,社會穩定是國家強盛的前提。”
在共產黨中國的政治中,措辭的微小變化可能預示著意識形態和政策的重大轉變。如果說人們對習近平的意圖還有任何疑慮的話,他發誓中國將堅持新冠清零政策“不動搖”則徹底打消了這些疑慮。習近平政府應對新冠大流行的做法名義上是公共衛生政策,實際上是中共設計出來的最強大的安全工具,對誰能進入中國、誰能去哪裏進行限製,並通過公民和來訪者必須在他們智能手機上安裝的跟蹤軟件進行加強。
對長期以來習慣了鄧小平的經濟發展至上觀的觀察家們來說,習近平的政策選擇似乎令人難以置信。控製新冠疫情的政策激怒了民眾破壞了中國經濟、削弱了國內消費、擾亂了製造業和物流,令外國和本土投資者望而卻步
為什麽這位幾十年來最有權勢的中國領導人如此癡迷於國家安全和國內控製,以至於要犧牲經濟呢?答案是中國麵臨的一係列國內外挑戰,其中一些因習近平本人的政策選擇而變得更糟。
政治上,他可能擔心“背後挨刀”,因為在長達十年的反腐敗運動中,他樹敵太多,包括潛在政治對手在內的數千名官員在這場運動中受到懲罰,而且,出於自我保護的本能,他正在加大打擊力度。
經濟上,他麵臨著積壓已久的危機,中國經濟正在急劇放緩房地產行業進入了崩潰狀態,年輕人失業率創下新高。這些問題都因新冠清零和習近平的“共同富裕”運動進一步加劇,“共同富裕”政策旨在縮小不平等,解決大型科技企業和其他民營部門壟斷問題,在去年突然引發了對這些企業的全麵監管打擊,讓投資者感到震驚。股市反應強烈:中國許多最具創新力公司的市值在幾個月裏累計暴跌了逾1萬億美元
在外交政策方麵,習近平展示出要挑戰美國主導地位的野心。特朗普政府應對新冠疫情的雜亂無章,讓習近平炫耀“東升西降”。但他的大奏凱歌有點為時過早。中國在經濟、軍事或科技實力上遠不能與美國匹敵。雖然美國的民主正處於危機之中,但仍是一個真正強大的超級大國,也是一個有自我批評和自我更新能力的自由國家。習近平指責西方試圖遏製中國,但他傲慢和咄咄逼人的做法助長了中國威脅論。
可以肯定的是,習近平並不打算完全放棄資本主義在中國取得的成功,正是這種成功使它的經濟更有活力,帶來了國際上的尊重和影響力。習近平也有值得讚揚的地方,他在著手解決前任們掩蓋起來的嚴重問題,尤其是腐敗和經濟不平等。考慮到中國的人口和經濟規模,習近平對一個在全球舞台上受尊重的強大中國的願景是合理的。
但解決中國存在的大量問題需要采取謹慎的措施,而習近平似乎並不願意這麽做。解決中國經濟放緩的問題,需要從放寬新冠疫情限製做起,也需要從海外進口更有效的疫苗,而他的政府一直不批準進口。雖然這些做法不是靈丹妙藥,但它們是必要的第一步,將大大減輕中國人民的心理負擔,也將讓投資者放心,他的領導班子還沒有完全失去理智。
習近平已讓中國陷入了一種惡性循環:一個傲慢和專製的領導人不對社會負責,他的顧問們也對他聽之任之,使他做出了糟糕的政策選擇,增加了他麵臨的問題,加劇了他對出亂子的恐懼,導致他采取更多的壓製做法。
他強調安全而不是經濟活力的決定將產生全球性的後果。中國是世界第二大經濟體,也是幾十個國家的最大貿易夥伴。中國經濟的長時間放緩將增加全球經濟衰退的風險,使許多國家遭受痛苦。從長遠來看,隨著中國競爭力下降,全球供應鏈向其他新興經濟體轉移的速度加快,可能會出現新贏家。但如果中國向內轉,它將失去很多。為了彌補國內的限製性環境,中國的科技企業已在向海外擴張
鄧小平及其繼任者領導下的中國資本主義大革命已成為曆史。習近平執政的前十年也已成為曆史,在那段時間裏,至少還有來自溫和派的非親信官員對他權力的最低限度製衡。毛澤東時代的中國以及蘇聯都已證明,專製獨裁並不能使國家變得繁榮富強。專製獨裁隻會帶來貧困和虛假的安全感。習近平可能會在未來幾年裏重新汲取這些教訓。

洪源遠(@yuenyuenang)是政治經濟學家,著有《中國的鍍金時代》(China’s Gilded Age)和《中國如何跳出貧困陷阱》。

翻譯:紐約時報中文網

點擊查看本文英文版。

An Era Just Ended in China

By Yuen Yuen Ang; Oct. 26, 2022
 
Ms. Ang is the author of “China’s Gilded Age.”
Forty-four years ago, Deng Xiaoping kicked off the period of “reform and opening up” that transformed China from a poor, autarkic nation into an emerging global power.

President Xi Jinping officially ended that era last week. He emerged from the Chinese Communist Party’s congress in Beijing with unchallenged authority and plans for China that revolve around his obsession with control and security — even if that means harming the economy.

It’s a momentous change in outlook.

Deng Xiaoping’s strategy for China’s spectacular economic achievements had two main components. The first was a collective leadership arrangement within the Communist Party. Deng rejected Western-style democracy, but China’s tumultuous decades under Mao Zedong had taught him that one-man rule is dangerous. He and the party introduced partial checks and balances into politics at the highest level, including term limits. The second component was a single-minded pursuit of economic growth that, Deng famously declared, would be China’s “hard principle.” Officials throughout China dove headlong into promoting growth at all costs — bringing prosperity but also corruption, inequality and heavy industrial pollution.

Last week in Beijing, Mr. Xi dismantled those foundations. He ensured that he would remain paramount leader of China for a third term — if not for life — and packed the party’s leadership with loyalists while heavily prioritizing national security over the pursuit of economic growth.

 

In his speech to the party congress at the Great Hall of the People on Oct. 16, he mentioned “security” significantly more often than “economy,” a major break with precedent. He went further, declaring unambiguously, “National security is the bedrock of national rejuvenation, and social stability is a prerequisite for building a strong and prosperous China.”

In Chinese politics, small changes in wording can herald big shifts in ideology and policy. If there were any remaining doubts about Mr. Xi’s intentions, he dispelled them by vowing that China would stick to its zero-Covid policy, “without wavering.” His government’s approach to the pandemic, a public health policy in name, is in reality the most powerful security tool devised by the Communist Party, restricting access to the country and controlling who can go where, underpinned by tracking apps that citizens and visitors must have on their smartphones.

For observers long accustomed to Deng’s growth-first ethos, Mr. Xi’s policy choice is mind-boggling. The Covid controls are angering citizenscrippling China’s economy, decimating domestic consumption, disrupting manufacturing and logistics, and repelling foreign and local investors alike.

Why is the most powerful Chinese leader in decades so obsessed with security and domestic control that he would sacrifice the economy? The answer lies in an array of domestic and foreign challenges, some worsened by Mr. Xi’s own policy choices.

Politically, he probably fears the proverbial knife in the back after making enemies through a decade-long anti-corruption campaign in which thousands of officials — possibly including potential political rivals — were punished and is doubling down on repression out of his instinct for self-preservation.

 

On the economic front, he faces smoldering crises, including an economy that is slowing sharply, a property sector meltdown and record-breaking youth unemployment. These problems have been exacerbated by the Covid controls and by Mr. Xi’s “common prosperity” campaign — a strategy for narrowing inequality and addressing monopolistic behavior by big tech firms and other private companies, which was punctuated by an abrupt and sweeping regulatory crackdown last year that has alarmed investors. The market backlash was intense: Within months, more than a trillion dollars in value at many of China’s most innovative companies evaporated.

On foreign policy, Mr. Xi has projected an ambition to challenge American primacy. The Trump administration’s chaotic handling of the pandemic prompted Mr. Xi to boast that “the East is rising and the West is declining.” But his triumphalism was premature. China is far from an even match with the United States in economic, military or technological power. And while American democracy is in crisis, the United States remains strong, a true superpower and a free country able to criticize and renew itself. Mr. Xi criticizes the West for seeking to contain China, but his hubris and aggressive approach helped bring about this threat.

To be sure, Mr. Xi does not intend to completely abandon the capitalist success that rejuvenated China and brought global respect and influence. And to his credit, he has confronted serious problems that his predecessors swept under the rug, particularly corruption and economic inequality. His vision of a powerful China, respected on the global stage, is warranted given his country’s size and economic clout.

But addressing China’s myriad problems will require measured steps that Mr. Xi seems disinclined to take. Putting out fires in China’s economy must begin with relaxing Covid restrictions and importing more effective vaccines, something that his government has prevented. These won’t be miracle cures, but they are necessary first steps that will go a long way toward alleviating stress on China’s people and reassuring investors that his leadership team has not lost all sense.

Mr. Xi has plunged China into a vicious cycle: A hubristic and authoritarian leader, unaccountable to society and unchallenged even by his own advisers, makes poor policy choices, which add to his problems, exacerbating his fears of a revolt and leading to more repression.

The consequences of his decision to emphasize security over economic vibrancy will be global. China is the world’s second-largest economy and the biggest trading partner of dozens of countries. A prolonged economic slowdown in China will increase the risk of a global recession, with many countries sharing the pain. In the long run, there may be winners as China’s waning competitiveness hastens a shift in global supply chains to other emerging economies. But if China turns inward, it will lose. Chinese tech companies are already expanding overseas to compensate for a restrictive home environment.

China’s great capitalist revolution under Deng and his successors is now history. So is Mr. Xi’s first 10 years in office, when there was at least a minimal layer of checks on his power from moderate, non-loyalist officials. China under Mao and the former Soviet Union proved that absolute dictatorships fail miserably at making nations prosperous and strong. They bring only impoverishment and false security. Mr. Xi is likely to relearn those lessons in the coming years.

 

Yuen Yuen Ang (@yuenyuenang) is a political economist and the author of “China’s Gilded Age” and “How China Escaped the Poverty Trap.”

[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (0)
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.