華爾街日報讀者揭露熱比亞文章自相矛盾

華爾街日報讀者揭露熱比亞文章自相矛盾

熱比亞在華爾街日報上發表文章顛倒黑白指責中國。但是從讀者評論看，大部分人
完全站在反對她的那邊。比如

Luther King 寫到，這是他看到的最大膽的謊言，一邊聲稱400維族人被殺，另一邊
又說漢族人要報複。Luther King問到，如果是維族人被殺，漢族人還要報複什麽呢？


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124698273174806523.html#mod%3Darticle-outset-
box%26articleTabs%3Dcomments

The darest lie I have ever seen. How could WSJ accept this article? It has no ground of standing at all. See those figures it is using:
Uighur sources within East Turkestan say that 400 Uighurs in Urumqi have died...
Most of the morale calls were based on this fact, that is Uighurs were the victims; but then at the very last, it says more Han Chinese are looking into revenge. OK, for what? If Uighurs were killed more than 400, what kind of revenge those Han are looking for? Revenge for killing more? Ridiculous logic.