該書有個影子或代筆作者Joan O’C. Hamilton，她說““Oh gosh,” Harris’ ghostwriter told The Post over the phone shortly after the allegations were published. I haven’t seen anything,” she added. “I’m afraid I can’t talk to you right now, though, I’m in the middle of something. Let me go try to figure that out.”
打假專家Stefan Weber這樣解釋：““Kamala Harris fabricated a source reference, inventing a nonexistent page number. The self-promotional content from Goodwill Industries was copied verbatim without citing the source (Goodwill Industries was her ‘primary partner’ on in [sic] the ‘Back on Track’ program),” Weber wrote.
“In many other instances, even when a source was cited with a footnote, the text was directly copied and pasted without using quotation marks. Quotation marks would have been the most transparent and honest approach, also in non-academic books. Further signs of dishonesty may be evident when sources were copied but specific details were altered, such as replacing a Subway store owner with a sandwich shop clerk (p. 124) or highlighting Southeast Asia in the context of the US gang problem (p. 184).”
西岸-影 發表評論於 2024-10-15 08:41:09
====================================
Allen Lichrmam 還說喬·拜登能贏,，為什麽biden被替換.
北美小鎮 發表評論於
毛毛可真愛造謠。看一下wiki就知道民主黨員Allen Lichrmam錯誤的預測了2016年的選舉結果，他聲稱希拉裏會獲勝。這家夥還是個騙子，他明明錯了，還厚著臉皮說自己對了。這是Wiki說的：Using the system, Lichtman has correctly predicted the popular vote outcomes of each presidential election from 1984 to 2012. Though Lichtman claims he called the 2016 election correctly based on the 13 keys, his 2016 book and paper stated that the keys only referred to the popular vote, which Donald Trump lost.
該書有個影子或代筆作者Joan O’C. Hamilton，她說““Oh gosh,” Harris’ ghostwriter told The Post over the phone shortly after the allegations were published. I haven’t seen anything,” she added. “I’m afraid I can’t talk to you right now, though, I’m in the middle of something. Let me go try to figure that out.”
打假專家Stefan Weber這樣解釋：““Kamala Harris fabricated a source reference, inventing a nonexistent page number. The self-promotional content from Goodwill Industries was copied verbatim without citing the source (Goodwill Industries was her ‘primary partner’ on in [sic] the ‘Back on Track’ program),” Weber wrote.
“In many other instances, even when a source was cited with a footnote, the text was directly copied and pasted without using quotation marks. Quotation marks would have been the most transparent and honest approach, also in non-academic books. Further signs of dishonesty may be evident when sources were copied but specific details were altered, such as replacing a Subway store owner with a sandwich shop clerk (p. 124) or highlighting Southeast Asia in the context of the US gang problem (p. 184).”
