相當左傾的《聖路易斯郵迅報》都發表社論,在批評麥律師夫婦的同時反對檢察官蓋特勒這樣做。郵迅報認為在一個天天發生惡性謀殺的城市,檢察官不去起訴罪犯卻利用公共資源去起訴一個完全不可能贏的案例,除了政治秀沒有別的解釋。可以讀讀他們是怎麽說蓋特勒的:“She is once again pursuing a no-win situation that only promises to further drain city coffers and add to the city’s already considerable embarrassment.”
"左派聲稱這是對言論自由的暴力侵犯". This is completely fallacious. Physical invasion of private property is no freedom of expression. One has no right to express on the premise of someone else's properties.
nightrider 發表評論於
It is time to hear the voice of normal ordinary people who will NOT tolerate invasion of their rightful private properties. You are lucky to have such a neighbour with a zeal to protect private properties. America is lucky to have the McCloskey's. We need tens of millions more of the McCloskey's!
st-watcher 發表評論於
"借這個機會,讓他幫你向總統轉達你的衷情。也附帶轉達文學城廣大網友的愛戴".
+1
st-watcher 發表評論於
They 起訴 him, but in California (Harris state), no 起訴 if if the stolen value is less than $950!
相當左傾的《聖路易斯郵迅報》都發表社論,在批評麥律師夫婦的同時反對檢察官蓋特勒這樣做。郵迅報認為在一個天天發生惡性謀殺的城市,檢察官不去起訴罪犯卻利用公共資源去起訴一個完全不可能贏的案例,除了政治秀沒有別的解釋。可以讀讀他們是怎麽說蓋特勒的:“She is once again pursuing a no-win situation that only promises to further drain city coffers and add to the city’s already considerable embarrassment.”