回複Happyfeet2011的評論:
Let's look at this way: Citi had every reason to go down the tube, given how his predecessor overextended. Pandit might not be a big money maker, but he was a good stabilizer and held the bank together during the storm. Fuld was a big money maker and everyone thought he was smart, but see what happened. You're too young to know what's like to run a bank.
weston 發表評論於
回複shamrock100的評論:
That'd be a future write-up, on some of the well known gurus. Thx
Are you kidding? The #1 on the list is already a joke. Go read the news how he was kicked out of Citi after the board realized all he can do is bullshiting and cheat away Citi's money.
Why some Chinese are so addicted to kissing Indian asses, even by inventing fake stories?
"把一個幾乎沒revenue的公司吹到了45bil市價的高峰.最後又回到原點.". Can he be called 佼佼者? It is evident that he is a cheater, liar and ......... Most of the indian are like him.
