Agree but, I have a question.

Personally I don't need much. But how about the people you still care about: young kids, old parents... when they need something?

Love, sure you could give. Whether get that back or not, make it seperate because you/we are already willing to give.

Fair and justice, what can you do about it? If you are not powerful enough to make some positive difference, what's the meaning of life? So, are you in, or are you out?

所有跟帖： 

• Our kids would definitely have a better life even we pass 0 to t -naive2- ♀ (94 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:18:10

• 無法肯定我們的孩子一定比我們幸福。 -mom2013- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:24:04

• 同樣的困惑：無法肯定我們的孩子一定比我們幸福。 -螺絲螺帽- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:26:39

• 兩點不容置疑 -美西遊子- ♀ (134 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 12:31:10

• 即使那樣，也於物質關係不大。 -Naive2- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:28:50

• 這也正是我的問題：家庭院責任和社會責任限製了個人的精神上的自由，lz一定是powerful enough -08明前茶- ♀ (28 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:20:14

• 自由是相對的。沒有責任和限製，何來自由？有的話，也常常是懶散和自我陶醉。 -HappyWed- ♀ (53 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:31:31

• mm的相對論很好呀。非常辯證呀。 -zj071- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:34:16

• 回複：mm的相對論很好呀。非常辯證呀。 -08明前茶- ♀ (42 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:39:34

• 這兩天沒來這裏。剛剛看到。謝謝了。我差不多下個星期過戶了。 -zj071- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:41:56

• 嗬嗬，我講的是精神上的自由，你講的是行動上的自由 -08明前茶- ♀ (67 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:52:07

• 嗬嗬，精神上，每個人都是自由的。 -HappyWed- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:55:06

• 哈哈。我們膚淺。凡人。 -zj071- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:56:41

• 這是個哲學問題 -WQPY- ♂ (934 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 12:40:02

• Agree! -08明前茶- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 12:43:31