如果你是讀者,你如何確定?
•
謝謝愚教授精益求精,同意,這裏不用從句了!newton用了不定式,沒有用從句,他的表達對嗎?
-beautifulwind-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/10/2011 postreply
23:20:54
•
我看錯了,newton也用了單句,沒用從句。
-beautifulwind-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/10/2011 postreply
23:25:37
•
TA好象漏翻了一句。
-EnLearner-
♀
(795 bytes)
()
08/10/2011 postreply
23:30:35
•
我看了原文,原文用的從句。 the consumption of which...文青大師說對了!
-beautifulwind-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/10/2011 postreply
23:40:14
•
是從句。假教授隻能說:因為這裏指代fuel比較明顯,所以不嚴謹也就不嚴謹了。金耳朵說對了!
-非文學青年-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/10/2011 postreply
23:43:06
•
Why?
-EnLearner-
♀
(175 bytes)
()
08/10/2011 postreply
23:47:45
•
恩,我的理解是such as... 也是修飾noun1的, 和which從句並列。
-非文學青年-
♀
(74 bytes)
()
08/11/2011 postreply
00:10:41
•
Thanks. Now it makes more sense to me.
-EnLearner-
♀
(184 bytes)
()
08/11/2011 postreply
07:23:58
•
應該是指代immediately proceeding的名詞。在這裏用從句不嚴謹。
-非文學青年-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/10/2011 postreply
23:21:06
•
Thank you, Prof. Wen.
-EnLearner-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/10/2011 postreply
23:31:17
WENXUECITY.COM does not represent or guarantee the truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any of communications posted by other users.
Copyright ©1998-2025 wenxuecity.com All rights reserved. Privacy Statement & Terms of Use & User Privacy Protection Policy