這算不算勞動剝削?美國有什麽樣的法律管這樣的事?

兩個 independent contractors A and B 給政府部門服務,A billed US goverment for B's service. Between A and B, there is no any signed contract. Meanwhile B is using A's office and personel.

B should get a credit for his service which was collected under A's name, right?

If A does not want to give B any credit, 算不算A剝削B's勞動?what can B do? What kind of labor law A violates? In what name should B sue A?



所有跟帖: 

回複:這算不算勞動剝削?美國有什麽樣的法律管這樣的事? -why-why- 給 why-why 發送悄悄話 why-why 的博客首頁 (408 bytes) () 10/27/2006 postreply 17:11:02

回複:回複:這算不算勞動剝削?美國有什麽樣的法律管這樣的事? -whywhy???- 給 whywhy??? 發送悄悄話 (322 bytes) () 10/27/2006 postreply 17:19:44

A is not the employer of B. -whywhy???- 給 whywhy??? 發送悄悄話 (123 bytes) () 10/27/2006 postreply 17:31:07

回複:A is not the employer of B. -whywhy???- 給 whywhy??? 發送悄悄話 (151 bytes) () 10/27/2006 postreply 17:35:01

回複:回複:回複:這算不算勞動剝削?美國有什麽樣的法律管這樣的事 -why-why- 給 why-why 發送悄悄話 why-why 的博客首頁 (750 bytes) () 10/27/2006 postreply 17:38:09

回複:回複:回複:回複:這算不算勞動剝削?美國有什麽樣的法律管這 -whywhy???- 給 whywhy??? 發送悄悄話 (449 bytes) () 10/27/2006 postreply 18:52:32

回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:這算不算勞動剝削?美國有什麽樣的法 -why-why- 給 why-why 發送悄悄話 why-why 的博客首頁 (254 bytes) () 10/28/2006 postreply 12:30:56

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!