回複：回複：這算不算勞動剝削？美國有什麽樣的法律管這樣的事？

You are right about it. B can not collect money from goverment directly; however A can. However A can not collect from goverment from B's service. Otherwise A is fraud.

So A is fraud without B's agreement because A actually did not do all the service and both A and B are independent contractors.

所有跟帖： 

• A is not the employer of B. -whywhy???- ♂ (123 bytes) () 10/27/2006 postreply 17:31:07

• 回複：A is not the employer of B. -whywhy???- ♂ (151 bytes) () 10/27/2006 postreply 17:35:01

• 回複：回複：回複：這算不算勞動剝削？美國有什麽樣的法律管這樣的事 -why-why- ♀ (750 bytes) () 10/27/2006 postreply 17:38:09

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：這算不算勞動剝削？美國有什麽樣的法律管這 -whywhy???- ♂ (449 bytes) () 10/27/2006 postreply 18:52:32

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：回複：這算不算勞動剝削？美國有什麽樣的法 -why-why- ♀ (254 bytes) () 10/28/2006 postreply 12:30:56