回複:回複:回複:回複:這算不算勞動剝削?美國有什麽樣的法律管這

來源: whywhy??? 2006-10-27 18:52:32 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (449 bytes)
I have a friend who is a physician (B) and shares an office with another physician (A). Both physicians are independent, no one is the employee of the other.

They can both charge medicare for most their services they rended. However for one service, only A can bill medicare, B can not directly. Now A billed medicare for B's service. B should get credit for his service even though A collected money for B's service.

Is that clear?

所有跟帖: 

回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:這算不算勞動剝削?美國有什麽樣的法 -why-why- 給 why-why 發送悄悄話 why-why 的博客首頁 (254 bytes) () 10/28/2006 postreply 12:30:56

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”