回複：這算不算勞動剝削？美國有什麽樣的法律管這樣的事？

I am pretty sure that you have withheld information on the relationship/agreement b/w A and B. If the situation is as you said, B serviced the gov. agency, gov. agency still owe B's fee. B should go after the gov. agency because they paid the wrong person, and let gov. agency to go after A.

There is no claim between A and B unless, of course, there are something else you did not say in your post.

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：回複：這算不算勞動剝削？美國有什麽樣的法律管這樣的事？ -whywhy???- ♂ (322 bytes) () 10/27/2006 postreply 17:19:44

• A is not the employer of B. -whywhy???- ♂ (123 bytes) () 10/27/2006 postreply 17:31:07

• 回複：A is not the employer of B. -whywhy???- ♂ (151 bytes) () 10/27/2006 postreply 17:35:01

• 回複：回複：回複：這算不算勞動剝削？美國有什麽樣的法律管這樣的事 -why-why- ♀ (750 bytes) () 10/27/2006 postreply 17:38:09

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：這算不算勞動剝削？美國有什麽樣的法律管這 -whywhy???- ♂ (449 bytes) () 10/27/2006 postreply 18:52:32

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：回複：這算不算勞動剝削？美國有什麽樣的法 -why-why- ♀ (254 bytes) () 10/28/2006 postreply 12:30:56