Car accident, wait online

I was involved in a car accident last year. We (me and four other authorized co-drivers) rented a car from Hertz. It was raining very hard and the car lost control when I drive the car. Five of us were injured and sent to the hospital. There was no other car involved. The rented car was totally damaged. We lost conscious temporarily (about ten minutes) and had light head concussions and some bruise (no any hard injuries such as bone broken). The next day (after overnight observation), we were released from the emergency care.

One of the passengers sued me for more 250K. We purchased all the rental insurance, including car lost and damage, personal injury ($250 for ambulance, $ 2,500for medical expense), and liabilities up to $1,000K

The worst thing is that Hertz Company, my first liability provider, rejected to pay the liability. The Hertz Company explained the rental liability is for the third party liability and the authorized drivers were not covered by this policy. However, my own car insurance (second liability provider) can only provide up to $50K for PIP, which can not cover the claim if Hertz Company, my first liability provider, rejected to pay the liability. My own car insurance company is ready to pay the $50K PIP for me, and want to settle the case (Allocate the whole $50K among four passengers, and all the passengers agreed not to sue me and my car insurance company anymore). However, one of the passengers, who sued me $250K, rejected this settlement. I’d like to ask several questions, please help.

1) Hertz Company rejected to pay the liability. Should the Hertz Company legally be liable to pay the liability?
2) The lawyer designed by my own car insurance company said Hertz Company should pay. Shall I sue the Hertz Company if Hertz Company rejected to pay the liability?
3) If I need to sue the Hertz Company, shall I use the lawyer designed by my own car insurance company or I need to hire other lawyers?
4) Will the lawyer designed by my own car insurance company really protect me and finally get me out of the trouble?
5) What shall I do if finally what is available for me is the only $50K (I did not have any money)?

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：Car accident, wait online -law111- ♀ (844 bytes) () 03/14/2004 postreply 15:44:10

• 你除了請lawyer以外還有其他主意嗎？不如不回答。 -網絡偵探- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2004 postreply 16:01:31

• 回複：回複：Car accident, wait online -fdsfsfs- ♀ (340 bytes) () 03/14/2004 postreply 22:12:23

• 我的朋友有過類似的事故， -據我所知，- ♀ (57 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 08:36:46

• 回複：我的朋友有過類似的事故， -defendent- ♀ (55 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 12:29:45

• 回複：回複：我的朋友有過類似的事故， -defendent- ♀ (84 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 12:31:45

• 不會吧，為了這個去離婚！？ -據我所知，- ♀ (152 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 13:18:03

• 回複：不會吧，為了這個去離婚！？ -defendent- ♀ (505 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 13:55:08

• 回複：回複：不會吧，為了這個去離婚！？ -據我所知，- ♀ (378 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 14:11:27

• 回複：回複：回複：不會吧，為了這個去離婚！？ -defendent- ♀ (219 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 14:31:48

• 回複：回複：不會吧，為了這個去離婚！？ -law111- ♀ (507 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 16:24:12

• 回複：回複：回複：不會吧，為了這個去離婚！？ -defendent- ♀ (188 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 16:52:42

• 回複：回複：回複：Car accident, wait online -law111- ♀ (927 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 10:20:04

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：Car accident, wait online -defendent- ♀ (748 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 11:56:57

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：回複：Car accident, wait online -law111- ♀ (395 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 12:41:17

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：回複：回複：Car accident, wait online -defendent- ♀ (117 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 14:02:16

• find a competent lawyer -law111- ♀ (879 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 14:20:43

• 有一點不明白 -提個問題~- ♀ (174 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 14:29:00

• 回複：有一點不明白 -defendent- ♀ (790 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 15:09:50

• 回複：find a competent lawyer -defendent- ♀ (510 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 14:50:52

• 回複：回複：find a competent lawyer -law111- ♀ (437 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 16:01:52

• 回複：回複：回複：find a competent lawyer -defendent- ♀ (480 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 16:17:46

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：find a competent lawyer -law111- ♀ (468 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 16:28:38

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：回複：find a competent lawyer -defendent- ♀ (247 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 16:46:49

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：回複：回複：find a competent lawyer -law111- ♀ (197 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 16:55:22

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：回複：回複：回複：find a competent lawye -Igot.Thks- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 20:24:14

• 你的保險公司會處理，沒事。 -建民- ♀ (34 bytes) () 03/14/2004 postreply 18:50:20

• 建民的諧音賤民，不是我說的，看網上都這麽說 -強烈建議改名！- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 08:43:03

• 卑賤者最聰明，高貴者最愚蠢，也好。 -建民- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 18:20:02

• 為什麽那一個passenger想sue你那麽多錢？ -~NotLawyer- ♀ (89 bytes) () 03/14/2004 postreply 20:35:00

• 回複：為什麽那一個passenger想sue你那麽多錢？ -fsdfdasd- ♀ (895 bytes) () 03/14/2004 postreply 21:50:37

• give the case to your insuranc -建民- ♀ (289 bytes) () 03/14/2004 postreply 22:49:21

• 建民的諧音賤民，不是我說的，看網上都這麽說 -強烈建議改名！- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 08:43:49

• 卑賤者最聰明，高貴者最愚蠢。也好 -建民- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 18:18:55

• 回複：give the case to your insuranc -defendend- ♀ (78 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 12:14:04

• 回複：回複：give the case to your insuranc -建民- ♀ (862 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 14:48:01

• 回複：回複：回複：give the case to your insuranc -defendent- ♀ (373 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 15:22:56

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：give the case to your insuranc -建民- ♀ (758 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 15:44:52

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：回複：give the case to your insuranc -defendent- ♀ (216 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 16:04:04

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：give the case to your insuranc -建民- ♀ (359 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 16:06:41

• lawyer打車禍官司時不是都要拿整個賠償額的 -提個問題~- ♀ (31 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 16:18:25

• 回複：lawyer打車禍官司時不是都要拿整個賠償額的 -law111- ♀ (54 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 16:35:38

• 當然最好不要啦，學點知識吧。 -提個問題~- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 16:42:50

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：回複：give the case to your insuranc -defendent- ♀ (93 bytes) () 03/15/2004 postreply 16:38:25