回複：community property

original deed showed the wife was unmarried even she was married at the time, then she sold as unmarried woman again. Her hu*****and didn't know anything.

The buyer is her relative and knew the fact she was married. the whole family is cheating.

how positive the judge will revoke the contract price and use current price? the fact is that the buyer is not innocent.

Thank you for your help. APT

 

 

所有跟帖： 

• 聽起來是fraud -亞利桑那陽光- ♀ (19 bytes) () 11/24/2012 postreply 01:34:41

• 您所提供的這個資料有可能會讓問題相當的麻煩 -單身老貓- ♂ (1316 bytes) () 11/24/2012 postreply 09:35:40

• 回複：澄清一下 -wondering2006- ♀ (1020 bytes) () 11/24/2012 postreply 10:43:51

• 回複：澄清一下 -wondering2006- ♀ (251 bytes) () 11/24/2012 postreply 10:49:38

• 很抱歉,老貓的回應"冤枉"了您的兄弟,不便之處請見諒. -單身老貓- ♂ (189 bytes) () 11/24/2012 postreply 12:56:11

• 沒關係。隻想知道是否應按現價估，否則誰都可作違法的事。 -wondering2006- ♀ (29 bytes) () 11/24/2012 postreply 13:42:00

• 回複：回複：community property -apt- ♂ (642 bytes) () 11/25/2012 postreply 19:39:10

• 回複：回複：回複：community property -wondering2006- ♀ (593 bytes) () 11/25/2012 postreply 23:38:54

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：community property -apt- ♂ (88 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 10:24:44

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：回複：community property -wondering2006- ♀ (211 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 13:54:02

• 一個問題 -單身老貓- ♂ (36 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 12:18:02

• 回複：3 years ago -wondering2006- ♀ (209 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 13:51:18

• 回複：回複：3 years ago -單身老貓- ♂ (901 bytes) () 11/27/2012 postreply 08:29:49